QUOTE (Harte @ May 9 2008, 03:58 PM)

Here ya go:
QUOTE
The allegations of the child sex ring made national news on June 29, 1989 when the front page of the Washington Times bore the headline Homosexual Prostitution Inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bush.[1] The Washington Times article by journalists Paul M. Rodriguez and George Archibald alleged that key officials of the Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush administrations were connected to an elaborate Washington, D.C male prostitution ring, and reported that two of these prostitutes even entered the White House late at night. The allegations included, among other things, "abduction and use of minors for sexual perversion."
In July, 1990, a county grand jury in Nebraska's Douglas County concluded that the charges were a "carefully crafted hoax", although they failed to identify the perpetrators of said hoax.[2] Various conspiracy theories regarding a coverup of the original allegations persist to the present day.
Source:
WikiAlthough your own link says basically the same thing.
Are you kidding? That's your way of debunking it? Watch the video. You obviously did not do that. If you did, you would hear from the people involved in the case talking about anonymous phone calls they received in regards to the case and how they were told not to pursue it.
What you just posted above in absolutely no way whatsoever debunks the pedophilia claim I made and the governments involvement in it. I can't believe that you are even trying to pass off what you posted above as debunking anything.
Read about how the case was handled instead of just saying to yourself oh, looky here,
"a county grand jury in Nebraska's Douglas County concluded that the charges were a "carefully crafted hoax". Why don't you look into how and why it was declared as such.
And oh, by the way, despite claiming it was hoax, they then said the kids were molested, but that they were lying about the people they identified as molesting them. That makes a lot of sense.
And ask yourself another thing - why would children even know the names of the people they accused to begin with? What exactly was their motavation for bringing about this hoax, as you wish to believe it is.
If you want to learn about something, you should investigate it yourself. Not simply post a sentence that makes you feel comfortable with the situation and then act as if the case is debunked. That's absurd.
I take it you believe O.J. Simpson didn't kill his wife and her friend either?
Anyways, you don't seem very interested in knowing the details of the case and are content in being ignorant about the situation.
QUOTE
Note that it was a Grand Jury that found these allegations to be a hoax. Grand Juries have broad powers and are very difficult to tamper with.
Making a claim of jury tampering is sour grapes from people that wish (for some unfathomable reason) that the government could be involved in pedophilia, although that allegation never even appears in the Franklin case anyway, so why would you say it?
It isn't "sour grapes", what it shows is how ignorant you are about what actually happened.
If you ever decide to watch the Conspiracy of Silence video, and/or take the time to read through the links I provided to you, then maybe you will actually be able to discuss what happened with some real knowledge in regards to the the Franklin Case and how it pertains to pedophilia and the governments involvement in it.
Certain people were killed to be kept quiet. One child was thrown in jail for refusing to change her claims about what was done to her. Others trying to prosecute the case had anonymous phone calls made to them saying they better not try and go forth with the case.
Then there is the fact that certain evidence was kept out of the case. Not to mention the fact they tried to make all the children withdraw their testimonies and scared the hell out of them if they refused to do so.
It is clear you haven't taken any time to look into what really happened.