Expedition Leader Dr. Agnew on Coast to Coast AM

Hollow Earth Expedition: Brooks Agnew Pt.1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M70JhlnRmpM...feature=related

Hollow Earth Expedition: Brooks Agnew Pt.2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HVbQ-KpVI8...feature=related

Hollow Earth Expedition: Brooks Agnew Pt.3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACr-_9wYQiM...feature=related


The remainder of this post has been removed.

From the Forums Term's and Conditions of use:

1b. Recruitment: Do not recruit site visitors in to joining other web sites or forums, request participation in surveys, petitions, contests, protests, political campaigns, fund raisers or money making schemes.

Thanks in advance,

Tiggs
[Forum Mod Team]

Top Secret: Our Earth Is Hollow!


Our Earth is hollow. The two major entrances are at North/South poles. There is an inner surface that is home to very advanced races that don't want our planet destroyed. Most of them are benevolent. The center of gravity is in the crust which is roughly 800 miles thick. There are oceans mountains and lush vegetation where mammoths and sabre tooth tigers still live, yet they are far more technologically advanced. In the center of the Earth is a Sun. It emits just enough radiation for the inner-surface to sustain mild temperatures.

In the 40's Us Navy Admiral Richard Evelyn Byrd went in both poles. There is an purported diary of Admiral Byrd's in wich he writes about his flying into the north pole and being greeted by the inner-Earth peoples. They wanted him to give a message to the surface dwellers, a sort of warning that if we dont stop using nuclear weapons (Japan), that we may destroy "our" planet.

It's my belief that we will make formal contact with intra-terrestrials, before extra-terrestrials. In fact there is an expedition planned to the north pole which i will provide some links to in my next post. I have included some links here as well for those who are interested.

Wish you all well on your journey.
The Truth inevitably always prevails.

waykupp





Inside the Hollow Earth (Pt.1 of 12)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIRdDA_EDfM...feature=related



http://www.ourhollowearth.com/
http://www.hollowplanets.com/
http://www.tlonh.com/
http://www.hollow-earth.org/
http://www.hollowplanets.com/
http://hollowplanet.blogspot.com/
http://www.diannerobbins.com/
http://www.thehollowearthinsider.com/news/index.php

errrrr...

The 10 lost tribes of israel? O.o

I do not mean to be rude,but do you really believe this.And let me tell you something in the entire history there has only about 20 nuclear weapons plus 2 hydrogen weapons by America and the former Soviet-Union used.

And another thing there is no sun in the center of our planet,only a radioactive core of molten heavy elements that generate the heat besides if there was a cavity then the whole arctic plateau would cave in on itself because of gravitational pressure and the mass of the ice.

Stuff like this gets a lot of flack on the net.

At last someone with some sense!!!!!!!!!! This hollow earth theory is crap. Some one would have explored it .
Then would have exploited it. Sorry there is no PROOF of this. Only theory and crappy theory at best.

this guy is freaking right! * packs up gears and leaves thread *

And so are some heads.

Are you serious? Is this some sort of joke? Who would spend 20,000$ on a *cough* fake *cough* expedition when they could just open aa text book and see for themselves that the earth is SOLID.

And they have inhabitants inside them too, oh and now a sun!

I enjoyed the idea that earth could be hollow
If at first was assumed was flat, why can't it be round AND hollow!

im sure there are nice big areas underground, but mammoths, tigers, undiscovered advanced peeps, SUN. Wow. Ouch, hard to get behind that one. Maybe they interact with the intelligent Plasma down there and ask the balls for light.

Would be cool tho... hehehe

Puts on horned Viking helmet and begins to sing:

"Spam, spam, spam, spam..."

Rolling of floor laughing.

And just where is the centre of this crust?

What is the Farthest any one has ever gone underground?

(According to Wikipedia:
"The Kola Superdeep Borehole (KSDB) was the result of a scientific drilling project of the former USSR. The project attempted to drill as deep as possible into the Earth's crust. Drilling began on May 24, 1970 on the Kola Peninsula, using an "Uralmash-4E" and later an "Uralmash-15000" drilling device. A number of boreholes were drilled by branching from a central hole. The deepest, SG-3, was completed in 1989, creating a hole 12,262 metres (7.6 mi) deep, the deepest hole ever made by humans...")


So if wiki is right, the deepest we have gone is about 8 miles. Now I'm not saying i have proof the Earth is hollow, it's just my opinion, but if we've only gone down 8 miles then where is the proof what you are taught in your textbook is true. Because you don't hear about the hollow Earth on the news, makes it untrue? Most of what you are taught in your schools is intended to keep you in a limited state of consciousness, or in other words keep you dumb.

If you are intelligent, you will research a theory thoroughly before criticizing it.

waykupp

If you are intelligent you will look for evidence that supports a theory before believing in it. What actual evidence do you have to support your belief (and by actual evidence I don't mean hearsay and rumours about entries in a diary that may or may not even have existed)?

Waspie,

In my last post I claimed I have no proof of my theory. Simply stated before "criticizing" anything, do your research.

I don't rely too much on outside information, meaning what I hear see or read. I rely more on my inside information, or my intuition.

waykupp






Stellar wrote:
And just where is the centre of this crust?

According to the theory, the crust is 800 miles thick. So the center of gravity would be at 400 miles.

It is not even a theory. It lacks any evidence what so ever, ***SNIP*** promoting it.

snipped part was not aimed at poster but at website writers and radio presenters that promote such nonsense.

Why do you insist that others do the research then when you are, by your own admission, doing nothing of the sort.

Belief is a wonderful thing, but in the real world, it is absolutely no substitute for evidence. How do you expect to be taken seriously with this attitude? You do understand the concept of burden of proof don't you? That means that the person putting forward the theory (in this case you) has the responsibility of providing the evidence NOT those opposing the theory.

Sorry waykupp, it is you that needs to do the research if you don't want people criticising your belief.

Insane on the face of it.

If the Earth is hollow, the center of gravity would still be at the center of the Earth.

400 miles down in an 800 mile crust would just be the halfway point to the inner edge of the crust and would be meaningless in terms of the center of gravity, the moment of inertia, or any other physical aspect of the system.

Harte

Man o Man.Looks like I have missed one hell of a discussion.

I'm not sure that coming to a forum, opening the 3,726th thread on exactly the same topic, harassing those with the unfortunate bad taste to disagree with your admittedly un-researched theories, and insulting the moderators is the surest sign of intelligence. I could be wrong, though.

--Jaylemurph

Is this the same theory that was around thirty years ago? Hollow Earth, Neanderthal moved inside, developed an advanced civilization and monitors us from flying saucers? That one?

I believe it was discredited when it was pointed out that it didn't explain dragons.

Waspie,

It's just a theory. Don't let it get to you.

Waspie wrote:
"Why do you insist that others do the research then when you are, by your own admission, doing nothing of the sort."

I never made such admission. Trust me, I do plenty research, how else could I find this theory?

I have presented my theory, and it's my wish to refrain from arguments. I now bid you all farewell and good luck on your journey to Creator Source.

waykupp


For those interested:

The following info is from: http://www.ourhollowearth.com/ExpeditionUpdate.htm
I suggest you read this from the link above as it provides diagrams. The following is an excerpt about a quarter way down the page.

"I have been getting some interesting questions from these media people. For example, Daniel Ott asked me if the earth has a molten core. I told him there is no scientific evidence whatsoever for a molten core. On the contrary, every time there is a large earthquake, the earth rings like a bell. A bell is hollow. The earth could not ring like a bell if it were full of molten lava. The molten lava would absorb all the vibrations.

The shadow zone is THE evidence for a hollow coreIn fact, whenever there is a large enough earthquake to ring the earth like a bell, there appears on the opposite side of the earth a shadow zone, where no or very few seismic waves arrive. This happens because the seismic waves from the earthquake cannot pass through the hollow interior of the planet. The shadow zone is THE evidence for a hollow interior.

Also, Prof. Marcelo Martorelli, our expedition recruiter in South America, was kind enough to put his movie short in English for us. You can find it on my New Items page, or by clicking here:

www.erks.org/expedition9.zip (Archivo mpg)
www.erks.org/expedition2.wmv (Media player)


Our advertising apparently has struck a cord in the professional establishment. We have received several emails from professors, engineers and scientists asserting that we are a bunch of Morons, Hollow Heads, Stupid, and some other epithets I won't mention. Of course, what they lack in proof of their side of the debate is made up in throwing out hideous name calling in an effort to intimidate us. They have NO proof that the earth is not hollow and name calling is their only recourse when they have no evidence of their FALSE solid/liquid interior earth theory.

Gravity and Our Hollow Earth

One question brought up by these brain washed (and well paid) Learned Heads is how does a hollow earth account for gravity. They claim that the earth would not have enough matter in it to produce the gravity we experience on its surface.

Establishment science teaches that everywhere inside a hollow planet there would be ZERO gravity. If there were any interior earth inhabitants, they would be floating around in zero gravity.

Inevitably, questions such as these arise when considering the hollow earth theory. Questions arise, such as, how could there exist a hole in the Arctic Ocean that leads to a hollow in the earth? Wouldn't all the ocean water drain down such a big hole and empty the Arctic Ocean? Wouldn't any inner earth inhabitants that supposedly live on the inner surface "fall" into the Inner Sun?

So, if you may have had any such questions, I will attempt to describe how gravity can work in a hollow earth.
Our Earth is Hollow with Polar Openings and a Central Sun

First of all, could enough matter exist in a hollow earth to provide us the surface gravity acceleration we observe on the outside of the earth?

I originally thought that perhaps there may have been a miscalculation in the gravitation constant which scientists have used to determine the strength of gravity exerted by a certain measured amount of matter. On first thought, also, it would seem that if the earth were hollow, that it would have less matter. After an extensive review of the theory behind the gravitation constant, I was unable to find any error in it and it's use in determining the acceleration of gravity exerted by mass.

So I decided to apply the Newtonian gravity to a hollow earth to see if it could contain the mass calculated to exist in the earth. According to the Inner Earth Guide in ETIDORPHA, the earth has an earth shell thickness of 800 miles. So one half the total volume of the earth is contained in its shell. Since the Inner Sun is relatively small, and is most likely a hollow crystal itself, most of the earth's mass would be located in the earth's shell. I have calculated that 99.99% of the earth's mass is located in the earth's shell. The Density of Shell = Mass of Earth/Volume of Shell, so the density of the shell would be:
5.978541732 x 10^27 gms/5.342261531 x 10^26 cc

= 11.19 gm/cc

As you can see, Newtonian physics would require an average shell density almost as dense as lead (11.3). And since surface rocks are 2.7, then the interior of the shell would have to be greater than the average density.

The interior density using the Newtonian mass of the earth requires than the interior of the shell would have a density of 2 * 11.19 - 2.7 = 19.68, which is denser than gold (19.3). Platinum is 21.4, so an inner shell density of 19.68 is not beyond the realm of possibility. In fact, if the earth is hollow as we maintain, the inner shell would necessarily need to be of a greater density to give the hollow planet enough strength to keep its hollow shape.

So we can say that a shell density of 11.19 gm/cc could be in the realm of possibility. After all, the earth DOES ring like a bell after a rather large earthquake. A bell is hollow and is made of metal, just as a hollow earth may be. So amazingly, we find that Newtonian gravity IS consistent with a hollow earth. A hollow earth COULD feasibly contain all the earth's estimated mass and thus be able to exert the surface acceleration of gravity we observe on the earth's outer surface.

Second, where would the center of gravity be located in a hollow earth and what do empirical experiments indicate in regards to this? In other words, would the water of the Arctic Ocean drain down into a polar opening and would inner earth inhabitants be drawn into the central sun?

These are interesting questions, and the answers may surprise you.

In a hollow earth with a central sun, there exists two centers of gravity. One in the central sun, and the other is actually a sphere located between the inner and outer surfaces of the shell, closer to the inner surface than the other, as reported by the Inner Earth Guide in ETIDORPHA, who said it is located at a 700 mile depth in the 800 mile thick shell. The fact that earthquakes occur no deeper than 450 miles indicates that beyond that point, the shell density increases causing the central sphere of gravity to be located closer to the inner surface than the outer.

The center of gravity in the inner sun has very little if any effect on us because the inner sun is so small, estimated to be about 600 miles in diameter. I have estimated that 99.99% of the earth's total mass is located in the earth's 800 mile thick shell. So gravity of the shell is what affects us the most by far.

The central sphere of gravity located in the shell is supported by a couple of experiments I have located.

The first experiment was carried out in the early 1900's, as reported in Scientific American.

In a solid earth, the center of gravity would be located in the center of the earth. So the experiment was to measure the distance apart that two plumb bobs suspended a mile into the earth would be closer at the bottom than the top, which if the earth were solid, the plumb bobs would be closer at the bottom than at the top because the plumb lines would be expected to point to the center of the earth.

What they found was exactly the opposite. The plumb bobs were measured at the bottom of the mine shafts and found to be farther apart at the bottom of the mine shaft than at the top. In fact, they were exactly the distance farther apart at the bottom than at the top that would be expected if the center of gravity were 4000 miles out in space! The experimenters were unable to explain this so they just wiped the whole thing from their minds.

Some hollow earth theorists took this as evidence that we are living on the inside of a hollow planet.

Obviously, this is not the case. We are living on the outside of a hollow planet. We routinely send satellites into orbit about the earth and to other planets. We obviously are living on the outside surface of the planet. Pictures of the earth taken by our satellites show our earth to appear as a ball as observed from the outside of it.

So what does this experiment mean? What it means is that the center of gravity is NOT in the center of the earth -- at least for us living on the outer surface of the planet. Another thing this experiment indicates is that gravity is not what we all thought it was, assumed to be an attraction of matter. What it does indicate is that gravity is something else.

My study indicates that gravity consists of a flow of an etheric gas that fills the universe into the nucleus of all atoms. It appears that all atoms are hollow, with an electron shell and interior nuclear radiation generator. My theory of gravity requires that the particles in the nucleus of atoms concentrate the ether of space down into spinning balls of ether which become the smallest particle of matter, and are ejected by the nucleus out the south polar opening of the atom and become what we know as the electromagnetic field of the atom. These gyroscopic particles are met by incoming ether which causes the gyroscopic particles to curve around the atom towards the north pole, traveling between layers of electrons orbiting more or less at right angles to the magnetic field lines. The inflow of the ether into the nucleus also keeps the electrons in orbit about the nucleus.
Atoms are hollow with a central nuclear radiation generator that creates the magnetic field and induces the gravitational ether flow
The concentration of the ether of space down into spinning balls of matter creates a vacuum in the nucleus in the ether. The ether gas surrounding the atom, then rushes in to fill that vacuum. As it accelerates into the nucleus it exerts a pressure force on all particles of matter it passes pushing them towards the central nucleus. The effect we feel as the ether gas passes through us into the matter of the earth is the weight we feel of our bodies pressing onto the surface of the planet. This ether gas accelerates into the earth and then spreads out in all directions at the central sphere of gravity 700 miles down. The spreading out of the ether gas as it enters the earth's shell and approaches the central sphere of gravity is what caused the plumb bobs to be farther apart at the bottom of the mine shaft than at the top. The plumb bobs actually point to the SOURCE of gravity, which is the ether of space that accelerates into the earth.

The discovery that gravity consists of a flow of ether gas has lead to the discovery of gravity control, popularly called anti-gravity. With electrostatic forces using specially shaped capacitors, gravity control has been achieved and is what flying saucers use for propulsion and control. Our government has succeeded in using high powered radar beams to knock some flying saucers out of the sky and have been able to back engineer their gravity control technology. The alien saucers actually are not extraterrestrial, but come from inner earth, where exists a civilization a couple of thousand years more advanced than we are. Their study of the inner sun led them to the discovery of gravity control.

A ice-hole gravity experiment in Greenland reported in the February 27, 1989 Physical Review Letters journal discovered that the acceleration of gravity decreases faster than if the center of gravity were in the center of the earth, which would be the case if the earth is instead hollow.

Acceleration of gravity decreases faster than if it were in the center of the earth A gravity meter lowered toward the central sphere of gravity located in the shell of a hollow earth would require a much more rapid decrease in the acceleration of gravity (red in the chart - actual measurement) than the much more gradual decrease in acceleration (purple in chart - calculated) that would be required to reach zero acceleration in the 4,000 miles to the center of a liquid-solid earth.

It could be, also, that the earth's inner sun has a reverse gravity flow together with its solar wind and electromagnetic radiation which allows it to repel the inner surface and helps to keep the inner sun centrally suspended in the hollow. This may also contribute to a healthy inner surface gravity as reported by those explorers who have been there -- that the the inner earth inhabitants have their feet planted just as firmly on the inner surface as we do on the outer. They certainly are not floating around in zero gravity as the science books say would be the case in a hollow planet. Gravity ether flowing into the inner surface towards the central sphere of gravity in the shell also would help to provide an inner surface gravity, although it is suspected to be less than our outer surface gravity.

I have also recalculated the densities of all the planets, and if they are hollow with shell thicknesses about 10% of their diameter, they would all have solid surfaces, except Saturn. It would have to have a thicker shell to have a solid surface. Even the sun I have calculated would have a solid surface at a density of 2.9. It is known that the surface of the sun is cooler than it's atmosphere. My study indicates that the sun is a hollow crystal ball. Solar radiation generating cells were discovered by Skylab to be stationary, indicating it has a solid surface. Gravity ether flowing into the sun is converted by these solar magnetic cells into electromagnetic radiation and solar wind particles.

The sun in X-ray & ultraviolet shows permanent coronal holes at its poles The sun has an electromagnetic field caused by the rotation of its crystal shell about its inner sun. If the sun were a gaseous planet, it could not produce an electromagnetic field. From an article in the Scientific American comes this significant confession: "In 1934, Thomas G. Cowling of the University of Leeds in England proved that single, symmetrical fluid flows cannot generate magnetic fields...Astronomers cannot explain the galaxies or solar magnetic fields." (Mystery of the Missing Dynamo, Scientific American, p. 24, January 1995)

Because astronomers believe stars are gaseous and planets have liquid interiors they cannot explain the observed magnetic fields in suns or planets. Scientists today teach that the sun and stars are composed entirely of gases. But Skylab photography revealed that the nuclear reactions on the sun emanate from permanent stationary "nuclear cells." Such permanency strongly indicates that the surface of the sun is solid, not liquid nor gaseous. In fact, the surface of the sun is relatively quite cool compared to its upper atmosphere. If the sun has a shell that is perhaps 10% of the planet's diameter, I have calculated that it's shell would be solid having a density of 2.86 gm/cc, which is a little denser than glass. As such, the sun could easily be a giant crystal globe! In fact, Skylab discovered that the sun has permanent coronal holes at its poles taken in X-ray and ultra violet images that could indicate it has polar openings also.

My study of gravity indicates that our earth as well as all planets are actually hollow. The sun and the supposedly gaseous planets all have strong magnetic fields. They could not have magnetic fields if they are completely gaseous, or if the planets have liquid interiors. This indicates that they have solid shells that rotate at different speeds than their inner suns. By recalculating the planets and sun's masses assuming that the greatest portion of their mass is in the shell, all would have solid surfaces -- thus making it possible that these planets can generate the magnetic fields they have been observed to have.

All the outer planets were found by the Voyager spacecraft to emit more energy than they receive from the sun. Radiation is emitted from their polar openings from their inner suns to light up auroras over their poles just like our inner sun does here on earth.

So how does gravity work in a polar opening? The answer is that since by far the greatest portion of the earth's mass is located in its shell, then that is where gravity accelerates towards. Therefore, as one advances through the polar opening, the water and the ship is not accelerated towards the center of the earth, but towards the central sphere of gravity located in its shell. As such the water of the ocean adheres to the side of the polar opening, just as the earth's oceans adhere to the sides of its outer surface. More than likely, however, one would weigh less at the neck of the polar opening than further outside of it because of the mass of the earth that would at that point be directly above one's head. Admiral Byrd was amazed when he flew through the south polar opening and saw what appeared to be a continent hanging in the sky above his head. As Olaf Jansen sailed through the north polar opening in 1829, he saw the sun reflecting off the ocean on the opposite side of the polar opening and said it appeared to be a very bright star he could see for several days as they were sailing through an open sea after they passed the ice. He did not know what star it was or what caused it, but was surprised to see a star in the bright sunlight of day. Of course, it was not a star, but the sun being reflected off the surface of the ocean on the opposite side of the opening as they sailed through it. Olaf reported it being quite warm as they passed through the polar opening. The sun was circling high up in the sky and then almost down to the horizon as they passed through the opening. At noon, the sun was observed to be directly overhead as if they were at the equator. This could only happen if they were actually passing through a quite large polar opening, where at one point on the curvature into the interior, our outer sun would shine down directly from above.

We will observe this when we go on our expedition to the inner earth. We will use the ship's radar to bounce radio waves off the opposite side of the opening and so determine the exact shape and size of the north polar opening. Once on the interior, we will also use the radar to determine the distance to the inner sun and the opposite side of the hollow, and thus confirm the thickness of the earth's shell. We will take a weight scale with us and use it to determine the gravity difference going through the polar opening and on the earth's interior as compared to the outside surface of the planet. We will document all of this and our scientific observations will shatter the inner earth sciences taught in our schools today. These professors and scientists who call us Morons and Hollow Heads and claim to know so much about our earth's interior will have to eat their own words.

We believe this expedition will be the greatest expedition in all of history. The truths we will return with will be earth shattering to establishment science. It will all be documented in color, theater format for all the world to witness.

On December 23, 2004, I was on the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM Radio Show with George Noory. See my Coast to Coast AM interview with George Noory Thursday, December 23, 2004.

Also, on November 30, 2004, I did an interview with a Journalist from Greece, Ioannis Moutsos, with the ALTER Channel, regarding the Hollow Earth theory and our upcoming expedition, Voyage to Our Hollow Earth Expedition Cruise. He had some interesting questions to ask. His first question was:

Hello Jaylemurph.

According to me,you are actually 100% correct.To me this is the lowest you can go on the intelligence totem pole.For a man who insults moderators and because of crap un-researched theories on something that has a 100% possibility not to exist,I have no good tastes for.

NeoGeneis, this is constitutes a personal attack. Will posters please attack the ideas ant not those that hold them. That is one of the more basic rules of this site.


Whilst I disagree with waykupp 100% I see more insults being thrown his way than are coming from him. Personally I do not feel insulted by him, nor do I see any insult aimed at any other moderator. When a moderator joins in a discussion his/her point of view is allowed to be questioned just as is that of any other member. It is only when we do our jobs as moderators that disagreements should be taken to PM.

As the OP has chosen to close his account there's little reason to keep this thread running.