QUOTE (Jennie 1 @ May 15 2008, 03:01 AM)

Thanks for part of the glow!!! I feel bad taking it though, since I started not to tell you about it.

Bah, you deserve it! You could not wrestle with your honesty

QUOTE (Jennie 1 @ May 15 2008, 03:01 AM)

Personally, I think that it is possible that Biff exists. There are just too many sightings, IMO, for all of them to be mistaken identity or hallucinations, but I could be wrong. I used to think that people were just seeing bears standing on their back legs. Then on a camping trip, I saw a bear standing on his back legs clawing a tree. There was no mistake, I immediately knew what it was.
So now, I'm a little more open minded about it.
I spend a lot of time in the woods around here, yet I've never seen the bones of a deer or a raccoon either, and I know they are plentiful in this area, I've seen them alive hundreds of times, but never dead. (I did find a dead alligator once)
So I'm not all that surprised that Biff's bones have never been found.
You are right it is definitely an interesting subject.
Please keep us posted on your adventure!!!!!! I've been to Blackwater Park, but not to Coon Hill cemetery, I might have to check it out!

Actually, I am the opposite, I kind of wish I had not lost my innocence with regards to the creature sometimes (ROFL, no Incorrigible1, I did not have a visit with Patty as you once romantically described LOL). I grew up on a farm in the Oz outback and hunted plenty. Mostly Roo's and Pigs, and I saw many different carcasses. Especially when you have a predator problem. We used to get these evil Shepard-Dingo crosses that were as mean as could be. Come to think of it, I lived on a property that was 3,300 hectares. A big place, and when we lost a sheep, even several K from the house block, from the carcass my stepfather could determine the predator, and it's trail. Within a week we would generally have the culprit captured. Waterholes and banks are another very hot spot for the dead. Steep banks can prove to be too much of a challenge for thirsty locals. No bones in one small area could be explained, but I find a global situation a real big pill to swallow. The studies in the Pacific NorthWest (Patty's alleged stomping ground) are numerous and extensive. Did you know the snails and slugs of the Pacific NorthWest have even been studied and catalogued? There also appears to be no noticable impact on any animal population leading to the assumption of a larger predator from that area. I just think it incredible that such a detailed search of the area could be carried out with no trace of an 800 pound 8 foot primate. Globally, the creature is reported in many countries, yet not one has a shred of proof after 40 years of named exposure. Every PNW theory s contradicted by the global situation as well. That with the total abscence of such a creature from the fossil record is just too many problems for the creature to exist.
What keeps an open mind for me is the eyewitness reports. Some from very valid sources. The one thing that bothers me is the common denominator - man. Man is prone to human error and therefore is fallible, whereas physical evidence (bones, stool remains from meals, habitat etc.) is not, and does not seem to exist. One can only assume the only fallible element must be in question?
Either that or we have an 800 pound primate making us look rather silly! We have primates as a precedent on the planet, so the possibility to me cannot be entirely ruled out, but I do not believe the odd's are in Biff's favour.
Having said that, I hope to be wrong. I'd like for Biff to exist. It sure would put a great deal of wonder back into my life and make me re-evaluate a great deal. It would make one hopeful that other amazing sights from the macro world are yet to be encountered in the animal kingdom. Primatology would need a new chapter. It would be a most marvellous discovery.
Likewise, I do hope that young fellows expedition turns out well. It would be a real treat for a member to come forward with some new compelling evidence!