QUOTE (Kerkido @ May 10 2008, 10:17 PM)

Exactly!
What's the harm in believing something that
may be a possibility?
It's called exercising an open mind

We're all smart when it comes to dead obvious fake stuff, cos I'm sure not all of us forward chain emails for free products from business, based on the claim they're able to trace each person we send an email to

The harm comes when obviously fake material is presented, which is debunked with supporting material that explains why the original material is fake, and then people continue to say..."well, it could still be real...". Denying reality in the face of pretty good proof is harmful. It is one thing when the debunking is questionable, when there is still doubt, of course people can say that they are reserving judgement for a later date when they have more info to go on, that is a sound logical answer. When you have something that is cut and dry though, and people dont let it go, there is something wrong there.
There are plenty of unknowns in the world, there are a lot of unknown mysteries that havent been completely explained. There are some people that are completely so anti-anything paranormal, that they will never accept any evidence regardless of how reasonable it might be, they will dismiss out of hand without consideration as it does not fit in their narrow frame of how the world works. The polar opposite is the person that sees alien aircraft in everty 737 with blinking landing lights that flies overhead or thinks that every dust mote that reflects in a pictures flash is a demon. We have both kinds of people here and we deal with them regularly. Those people are never going to change. never. One side is going to continue to be haunted every few days with a new fantastic story, and the other side is going to dismiss every new claim they see within minutes of it being posted; obviously not even taking the time to actually study it.
An open mind is a good thing, but we want to keep it from falling out and rolling about on the dusty floor. Being somewhere in between the polar ends is a good idea. The "thinking cap" is a good idea. We want to make sure that we give consideration to claims, but not blindly believe. This case is a good example. The video in question has made the rounds for a while. It was debunked some time ago as a viral marketing video for a retirement/insurance fund of some sort. The company that made the video makes another video explaining the development of the initial video which is presented here, which makes perfect sense.
After the video that explains the development of the initial "time travel" video is presented, from the company that developed it, people still question whether the time travel video is a real time travel video.
I go back to my crop circle example. When you have time lapse video of college students creating an intricate crop circle that had been claimed unbuildable by human beings, only to have those same people watch the time lapse video of the crop circle being built, with the students explaining how they did it, then going on to deny the reality of the fact that the crop circle was faked, there is harm in that.
Sometimes the truth is the truth, even when it goes against what we think is possible; that cuts both ways. I have had to eat crow a couple of times...
So while there are many unknowns out there, this unknown, in fact...is known. Can we time travel? That is open to debate...Is this particular video a time travel video? that debate is closed, it is a viral commercial. We have seen proof supporting that. To think otherwise is I believe not a good perspective to have in my own opinion. That is just my opinion though.