http://www.infowars.com/?p=2156
Lee Rogers
Rogue Government
May 15, 2008
The technological enslavement system is now being implemented on a grand scale by the architects of the global scientific dictatorship. Aviation News reported recently that the TSA will be installing 200 body scanners in airports around the United States. http://www.aviationnews.net/?do=headline&news_ID=154717 The body scanners are reminiscent out of something you’d see in the science fiction film Total Recall. The difference between the body scanners in Total Recall and the body scanners being deployed in real life is that the body scanners in Total Recall are actually less intrusive. The real life body scanners are a complete invasion of privacy and actually reveal a person’s naked body when they go through the scanners. In addition to the deployment of body scanners, there have been reports indicating that face scanning technology is now going to be used to prevent underage smoking and drinking. These are just some of the technological horrors that are being deployed and their purpose is not to keep people safe from terrorists. Instead, this technology is meant to enslave the people of the world in an Orwellian technocratic control grid.

Other technological horrors that are being developed to enslave the people of the world include face scanners to combat underage drinkers and smokers. The BBC and other media outlets have reported on a plan to use face scanning technology to stop underage smoking in Japan as well as a plan to use similar technology to stop underage drinking in the United Kingdom. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7395910.stm

The following is taken from a Daily Mail report on the face scanning technology being deployed by a supermarket chain to stop underage drinking. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...in_page_id=1770
Underage drinkers who attempt to buy alcohol may be thwarted by the technology that police use to identify suspected criminals.
A supermarket chain is introducing face recognition cameras to prevent staff mistakenly selling cigarettes and alcohol to under-18s.
The biometric technology is being piloted by Budgens at one of its London branches.
If successful, it could be rolled out across the country to create a database of youngsters who try to buy alcohol.
Critics, however, say the storage of this data could infringe civil liberties.

Other recently reported measures being employed by governments and private companies include an Internet provider’s plan to eavesdrop on customer’s web surfing activity, a high flying sky spy guard for the 2010 World Cup, cameras to catch cars in bus lanes in New York City, airport styled scanner devices in the streets of the UK, airport styled checkpoints in Chinese subways and many others of which there are too many to mention. Regardless of the excuse for these initiatives, it is clear that there is a real pattern of technology being used not to preserve liberty but to ensure a tyrannical enslavement grid.
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/05/air-force-mater.html
http://allafrica.com/stories/200805130002.html
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2008/0...ance_camer.html
http://www.thisislondonhttp://blog.wired.c...eets/article.do
As crazy as all that is, the Air Force has even gone public with their intention to have control over every single computer in the world as part of their quest to achieve wholesale domination in the information war. https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&...amp;au=&ck=

There is no doubt that the technological enslavement system is here and it is growing increasingly out of control. Would free societies have face scanning cameras to catch underage drinkers and smokers? Would free societies have virtual strip searches at airports as part of an initiative to fight an imaginary terrorist organization? Would free societies be doing any of these things that are covered in this article? The answer is no. Even if you believe in the war on terror fraud, ask yourself why there are all of these initiatives from both governments and private companies to destroy the very things that this war on terror is supposedly meant to protect and preserve.

What's wrong with using it to stop underage smoking and drinking?

The storage of this data could infringe civil liberties.

Would free societies have face scanning cameras to catch underage drinkers and smokers?

Even if you believe in the war on terror fraud, ask yourself why there are all of these initiatives from both governments and private companies to destroy the very things that this war on terror is

supposedly meant to protect and preserve.

What's wrong with this is the fact it is just a short step before they go and start implanting chips under the skin to keep track of our every move.What's to stop them from sending utlity companies into your home under the pretext of repairs and having them install secret cameras and bugging devices in your home. Suppose you make a derogitory comment about the president or some racial group or whatever in your home. Then the next thing that happens is you get a summons to appear in court.There you are told by the thought police that you will be fined or sent to jail for your remarks.
They use your own words against you.You don't even know how they found out what you said.All originality of thought or spirit will be wiped out.
Watch Farenheit 451,the movie,or 1984 with Richard Burton and John Hurt,or read The Trial,by Franz Kaftka
or George'Orwell's 1984 the book on which the movie is based.They were predicting a future in which we are stripped of all freedom and put into little niches and forced to do what Big Brother wants you to do.Have'nt you ever heard the saying,Big Brother is Watching You?It comes from Orwell's 1984.Don't you recall the either Pepsi or Dr.Pepper commericals were people were sitting in from of this giant screen,everyone dressed alike,watching this screen,when suddenly the peepsi images pop up and people start to wake up and I think dance?The point they were trying to make is
to break out of the mold,be different.

Aww, look. Anti-intellectualism gets a 21st Century update /and/ meets good old CT paranoia: "Scary new things are scary and new 2.0". It's like being afraid the Good Times Virus has become transferable to humans. How cute.

--Jaylemurph

I agree with that bit, actually. Like, Wow, it's bad for you. Is it up to the state to say that you mustn't do something because it's bad for you? i don't think it is.

Big Government doesn't care what YOU think..

In America you can go to jail now for 6 months if your child doesn't finish graduating the GED program.

Man jailed when daughter fails to get diploma http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iXYQiNL...dnyYuQD90KNG4G0

Taking new-born baby's blood to store in databases as part as Homeland Security is criminal.

ooooohhhh... but the government does this because it loves you..

Well, it's not exactly like the sources you cite are the AP... Fortunately, as long as there's someone paranoid enough to believe a thing, there's someone cunning enough to print something for him. After all, if it's on teh Internets, it must be true, right?

--Jaylemurph

What's wrong with ALL the sources?

That very few of them actually report your scare-mongering?

(Yes, yes. I know. All the news outlets you happen not to like are censored and cowed by the Nebulous Meanies. Oddly enough, it's only the news sources you happen to like that /really/ report the truth...)

--Jaylemurph

In other words, its only the news outlets that spend an inordinate amount of time talking about Britney Spear's panties (or lack of) and OJ Simpson that can be trusted to inform the public.

double post

I'm not sure quite how you extrapolated /that/. I wasn't advocating any particular news medium. I was just pointing out an odd peculiarity in acid's citation.

--Jaylemurph

do what you want to do.. i really don't care..

While the rest of you who obey and bend over to corporate media I'll continue to find my sources wherever I so choose.

it makes no difference to me what you believe..

At least it's not all from Youtube.

incidentally, this link http://www.thisislondonhttp://blog.wired.c...eets/article.do comes up 'not found'. You seem to have run two links into one.