QUOTE (SunDogDayze @ May 23 2008, 12:24 PM)

That's what I don't understand. Why are they sending you to a muslim priest? Medicine and religion should be separate, especially in the UK. You don't need a priest for a psychological problem, you need a well trained psychologist or psychiatrist.
I agree.
Hi Kais. I read your linked thread in its entirety, along with this thread, and see that you indicated you had a neurological workup before. That was a smart move on your part. IMO based solely on your posting, and perhaps reading between the lines some...I think it's possible that proper neurological protocol was not followed during your evaluation. This is quite common, and the percentages of misdiagnosis' are astounding high in the psychological/medical field.
As an example the article below. When looking for seizure activity, there are what are called standard radiologist...they are not experts in a particular field, kind of like a GP, if you well. You can go to the best neurologist specialist and possibly have standard protocols practiced in the radiology department.
Here is the article:
MRIs Done at Epilepsy Centers More Accurate Than Standard MRI
Laurie Barclay, MD
Information from Industry
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed and reported by epilepsy specialty centers are significantly more accurate than standard MRIs, according to a report in the December issue of the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. The editorialist suggests that techniques used by specialty centers should be standardized throughout the community.
"Dedicated MRI protocols as performed at epilepsy surgery centers can detect epileptogenic abnormalities with great sensitivity and specificity. However, many patients with epilepsy are investigated with standard MRI sequences by [radiologists] outside epilepsy centers ('non-experts')."
The investigators compared results of standard MRI reported by
"non-expert" radiologists, standard MRI evaluated by epilepsy "expert" radiologists, and epilepsy-specific MRI read by "expert" radiologists in 123 consecutive patients undergoing epilepsy surgery evaluation between 1996 and 1999. The gold standard for validation was postoperative histological examination. Sensitivity in detecting focal lesions was 39% for "non-expert" reports of standard MRI, 50% for "expert" reports of standard MRI, and
91% for epilepsy-specific MRI, which showed focal lesions in 85% of patients who had no focal lesions on standard MRI. Although the technical quality of standard MRI improved during the study period, accuracy of "non-expert" reporting did not.
Standard MRI interpreted by "non-experts" correctly predicted neuropathological diagnoses in only 22% of cases compared with 89% of dedicated MRI reports, and it missed the diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis in 86% and of focal epileptogenic lesions in 57%. In an accompanying editorial, J.S. Duncan, from the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery in Queen Square, London, U.K., stresses the need to improve the diagnostic accuracy of MRIs obtained at smaller units. Although improved scanning hardware is helpful, he proposes that MRI acquisition protocols for epilepsy would improve yield even more. Some protocols may be used by radiographers without extensive specialist training, while others, such as those formulated by the International League Against Epilepsy, include functional imaging.
"There is a clear need for an increased number of trained neuroradiologists to direct image acquisition and to report on MRI scans," he writes. "In the meantime, current resources could be used more efficiently by the increased use of standardized acquisition protocols and effective telereporting in the managed clinical networks of community hospitals and regional specialist centers."
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73: 612-613, 643-647
Reviewed by Gary D. Vogin, MD
Printed with permission:
Source-------------------------
I just want to note that someone can have a very strong seizure only once in their lifetime and it change their brain and personality forever. They may never find evidence of seizure activity in an EEG, but they can attempt to locate possible sclerosis (scaring) from that one time seizure by other protocols.
The thing is....often times people think of seizures as a negative experience or condition...and certainly they can be, because they can cause brain damage...but also there is an assumption that all seizure activity shows outside evidence while it's happening. This is not the case with partial seizures, which oftentimes many who have them, never remember (complex) or they may have one they do remember (simple) and it changes the personality and brain, most often permanently. I had this experience myself, and I thought it was a Kundalini/spiritual experience. I later learned there is a neurological term with nearly identical symptoms called "Kindling". I was also diagnosed with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy, after years of misdiagnosis, which again is common.
What I had experienced is termed
Interhemispheric Intrusion<.
It was a strong seizure brought on by a combination of factors, but can also be brought on by just having a very high fever, just once. Even though it was confirmed that I had a seizure and scaring, the experiences, nonetheless, had a profoundly positive effect on my life as a whole. It was the most profound experience of my life in fact, and it changed me into a better person. I started viewing the world with different eyes, a different perspective. With a combinations of factors leading up to the sudden experience, abnormal electrical activity fired in an area of my brain that is often considered to be rather submissive in nature...the right hemisphere involving the right
Hippocampus (specialized for positive expectations and cognitive style)...giving way to lots of feel good neurochemicals, as well as the left
Amygdala (positive experiences/emotions). See above link for better explanation. I just wasn't aware of my condition at the time because, I had been misdiagnosed or undiagnosed all together, 7 times by doctors.
Here is an MRI of scaring. As you can see...even an expert eye could miss this:

Kais, I feel I understand your desire to want this experience to have more "spiritual" meaning, and I completely get where you are coming from. IMO...there's nothing wrong with believing the experience was from something other than biological/neurological/environmental phenomena for you, but it is always best, imo, to make sure that you've left no stone unturned in understanding what you have experienced, especially if there is a potential for further brain damage.
Please forgive me if I've put you on the spot and or for perhaps being presumptuous, but it would appear to me, based on everything I've gleaned from your posts that perhaps you are reaching out for confirmation that this was indeed a 'spiritual' experience, and for you it certainly was, as it was for me as well. I would think that to give you peace of mind, and get that confirmation you are seeking, you might again attempt another process of elimination by seeking 'expert' medical advise, such as was suggested in the article above, and by many others here. I've had to learn the hard way to do my homework first before I see a doctor. I also interview the doctors to see if we are going to jive together, and that he/she has a genuine interest in my well-being, if you know what I mean. That's very important, and it's also important to let them know that "you" are hiring "them"...and you have the right to ask questions as to the neurological protocols they practice.
That's just my personal take on it, based on personal and professional experience...I hope this helps, and good luck on your journey in life.
Edited to add links.