Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Uncoventional Flying Objects
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Extraterrestrial Life & The UFO Phenomenon
gadfly21
NASA engineers,astronauts and scientists see the UFO/(ET's)?too...read late NACA/NASA engineer Paul Hill's excellent book "Unconventional Flying Objects" for a great treatise on some of the observed physical capabilities and actual physical effects of UFO's. Why they produce plasma's around their frames? or ionizing radiation that produces plasma? High electrical or magnetic fields(?) or directional acceleration fields that dampen out air shock waves for SILENT SUPERSONIC or HYPERSONIC flights!

And they're often more in the know about their trajectories, technological aspects, performances, rates of acceleration.

Mach 25-30 isn't impressive itself...The space shuttle goes Mach 25 (~17,000 mph)...What is interesting is the incredible acceleration manuevers some of these 'craft'/objects pull off. If they are intellingently controlled then they *must* have some kind of directional acceleration control...aka "gravity" control...(ugghhh) I hate that phrase...(sooo...back to directed acceleration field... for me)...sounds so nice and scientific doesn't it? wink2.gif
Anyways if they can use something in their propulsion system/powerplant to get a directional acceleration field then
all is well and hunkydory for doing 30-100 g's acceleration!!! cuz then they can compensate without getting crushed ...unless they are invertabrea creatures?

Directional acceleration is not a new concept...Andrei Sakharov ...the Soviet equivalent of Dr. Vannevar Bush. The Soviet father of their H-bomb was investigating directional acceleration fields in the 1970's. Heck he came up with the tokamac design...His work isn't that far off from what others like Tesla, or Jean-Petit have proposed...
The Soviets censored and removed him from his National Academy of Sciences job when he went on the record publicly talking about UFO's and magnetic and gravity research in the 1970's and 1980's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Sakharov

ET's probably use something similar to this...

The truth is out there people...you just have to go and do a little digging for it...



skyeagle409
QUOTE (gadfly21 @ Jun 7 2008, 10:59 PM) *
NASA engineers,astronauts and scientists see the UFO/(ET's)?too...read late NACA/NASA engineer Paul Hill's excellent book "Unconventional Flying Objects" for a great And they're often more in the know about their trajectories, technological aspects, performances, rates of acceleration.

Mach 25-30 isn't impressive itself...The space shuttle goes Mach 25 (~17,000 mph)...What is interesting is the incredible acceleration manuevers some of these 'craft'/objects pull off. If they are intellingently controlled then they *must* have some kind of directional acceleration control...aka "gravity" control...(ugghhh) I hate that phrase...(sooo...back to directed acceleration field... for me)...sounds so nice and scientific doesn't it? wink2.gif
Anyways if they can use something in their propulsion system/powerplant to get a directional acceleration field then all is well and hunkydory for doing 30-100 g's acceleration!!!


Scientist who were observing and documenting their observations of--in their own words--"flying saucers," documented one case where the data confirmed in one of their observations, an acceleration rate of 80 G's.

The amazing thing about the scientist and engineers in those cases, was that the Head of those teams admitted that the--in his own words--flying saucers were intelligently controlled exterrestrial craft.
seax
hey gadfly21,

go to search and type in TR3B. You will find the article interesting and could explain some sightings and an explaination of extreme g maneuvers.

best regards,
seax cool.gif
bmk1245
QUOTE (gadfly21 @ Jun 7 2008, 10:59 PM) *
[...]
The Soviets censored and removed him from his National Academy of Sciences job when he went on the record publicly talking about UFO's and magnetic and gravity research in the 1970's and 1980's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Sakharov
[...]

WHAT??? I'm stunned... Sorry, but this is ridiculous original.gif
I'm just curious - where you've found such masterpiece?
gadfly21
QUOTE (skyeagle409 @ Jun 8 2008, 02:37 PM) *
Scientist who were observing and documenting their observations of--in their own words--"flying saucers," documented one case where the data confirmed in one of their observations, an acceleration rate of 80 G's.


I believe it! The late author of the forementioned book, NASA Langley Engineer Mr. Hill says he saw two spherical craft in the infamous 1952 Washington DC flyover.
He saw them near the Patomac River. He said they revolved around each other at a rate by his calculations of around 120 G's!!!!! I don't think humans had craft that could revolve at 120 G's in 1952, do you? wink2.gif







Yes Seax, I have heard of the TR3B's and also the TR3'A's. Either or both could exist. Especially the smaller version.
skyeagle409
QUOTE (gadfly21 @ Jun 9 2008, 03:14 AM) *
I believe it! The late author of the forementioned book, NASA Langley Engineer Mr. Hill says he saw two spherical craft in the infamous 1952 Washington DC flyover.
He saw them near the Patomac River. He said they revolved around each other at a rate by his calculations of around 120 G's!!!!! I don't think humans had craft that could revolve at 120 G's in 1952, do you? wink2.gif


No aircraft could even come close, yet radar was tracking the objects as they maneuvered and accelerated at such high rates.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.