QUOTE (crtbud @ Jun 16 2008, 02:11 PM)

I guess along those standards alcohol should be long gone... cigarettes shouldn't be considered even partially acceptable... and all prescription drugs should be done away with because there are so many people who abuse those. Those certainly weigh heavily against their pros. Oh and how about cars. Why should people be allowed to drive??? There are drivers who are irresponsible with cars and cause deaths EVERY DAY! Get 'em all out of here because someone could be irresponsible with them.
Lies form the basis of the legislation that originally made weed illegal in this country, and still does today. Do some research on it and you will find I'm not making that up.
The things we have are trouble enough. We don't need legal drugs and pot on top of it.
QUOTE (Incorrigible1 @ Jun 16 2008, 02:43 PM)

Fewer laws=A very good thing
Wrong. Fewer laws = more crime. A much greater then 50% of people will follow the limit of the law. Speeders do 65 mph. People will drink one and a half drinks and drive, figuring they will just make the limit. People in general do stupid stuff. Legalizing things that are illegal is not the answer. Removing those illegal things all together should be the answer.
QUOTE (III @ Jun 17 2008, 06:00 AM)

Banning drugs dosn't make them go away, it just leaves a whole bunch of dangerous criminals with a major income. It's like diggin a ditch between human communicative pathways. Treating people who need help, like dirt.
I will never understand how society think it's helping anything by punishing addictive personalities for their self destructive behaviour instead of helping them out, passing information on how to handle these substances safely. Teaching them about the sideeffects and advantages to taking these drugs. Educating doctors in treatments.
Punishment is what you do to people who wish to cause harm to others, not themselves. You push these people away, you only push them further out into self destructivity.
IMO
The same arguement can be made for guns. You can say, "It is not the drug harming the people, it is the people abusing it", all you want, but if the drug is not available the problem then does not exist at all.
QUOTE (crtbud @ Jun 17 2008, 07:20 AM)

I think it's a gateway crime because if you have to break the law to do something that's so harmless to others as well as yourself, (when used in moderation) then are you going to be more apt to break other laws?
And there is the key to the arguement. It is a statistical fact that teenagers find everything hard to do "in moderation". Taking away temptation is the easiest way to do so.
The problem is that pot is systemic. Even when my sister-in-law was sent to a Baptist Christian school with an excellent record, she fell in with the "wrong people" and was smoking again inside a week.
Pot growers are not any better people then other criminals. Growing up I went into the State Forest near my Parents house and was chased for a half hour by Pot growers who fired shots at me and my friends. They may have been trying to scare us off, but it sure seemed like they wanted to kill us.
The next thing the Pro-Pot people will want will be Pro-Ecstasy or Pro-Meth. Because, the only ones getting hurt are those using it. That logic sucks.
In the words of Mr. Mackay, "Drugs are bad. M'kay."