Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Jodhpur Radiation
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Ancient Mysteries & Alternative History
Pages: 1, 2
SphericalMiracle
The origins of the oldest (organized) religion are most important; enough to automatically render suspect any tales in/of subsequent religions (as I see it). Here's blog entry of 6/29:

Strange how I just became of aware of this recently; and strangely in tandem with my reading Salman Rushdie's MIDNIGHT'S CHILDREN (set in and largely about India): There's a 3-square-miles area of HIGHLY radioactive ash 10 miles west of Jodhpur, Rajasthan. It appears to verify the ancient Mahabharata; a forerunner of Vedic (Hindu) scripture. (Oldest is the Rig Veda). Here's the relevant (alleged?) quote:

"A single projectile charged with all the power in the Universe...An incandescent column of smoke and flame as bright as 10,000 suns, rose in all its splendor...it was an unknown weapon, an iron thunderbolt, a gigantic messenger of death which reduced to ashes an entire race.

"The corpses were so burned as to be unrecognizable. Their hair and nails fell out, pottery broke without any apparent cause, and the birds turned white.

"After a few hours, all foodstuffs were infected. To escape from this fire, the soldiers threw themselves into the river."

The account purportedly or apparently describes the genocide/extinction of the Vrishni and Andakha "races."

The implication of this unprecedented find (if true) is astronomically bigger than virtually everyone (globally) is aware of now: We have, for the first time ever, hard evidence to verify a significant component of truth (of a staggeringly powerfully unexplained event) in an ancient writing of an organized religion! Of course it makes most sense that the oldest religion would most qualify... THERE ARE SIMILAR ENOUGH VEDIC ACCOUNTS OF ATOMIC DEVASTATION! Even if the Mahabharata has been or will be (convincingly) debunked, the radiation evidence still applies to Hindus; therefore humanity.

[That's not putting Hinduism as we know it on a pedestal. The godawfully oppressive caste system (that's supposed to be illegal) and other horrors like female infanticide can safely prevent any notions of Gandhi-like "godliness" having major influence among Hindu Indians... Any scientific breakthrough the magnitude of formally Contacting a nonhuman intelligence (at least eventually) will far transcend any organized/named religion].

The obvious 2, entirely scientific/normal possibilities of the Jodhpur find are: time travel (by someone decidedly evil/amoral in this case) from our nuclear age to their time or, even more incredibly (to me), a similarly-evolved civilization as ours (that apparently existed alongside primitive people) of which, somehow, there is almost ZERO evidence (at least as yet) of its existence!

Could I possibly be making a fool of myself? Is this too good to be true? If the radiation is as it appears, and it doesn't bolster the overall anti-nuclear position, I don't know what else would. (end entry)

Per discussion on another site, need to correct that the Mahabharata wasn't a forerunner of the Vedas, but was written when specifically atomic destruction was inconceivable. Here's a good web reference:

http://www.geocities.com/lavlesh/More_Abou..._city_found.htm

And my blog:

http://lightworth.blogspot.com/

(Might be out and about here and there; this being the 4th in the US. Checking back as often as possible. Cheers).
The Sandman
When ever i read some stuff containing the laughable "gorkha and his flying chariot"..i feel like laughing!!
The website you have referred - LAVLESH...does the same mistake of quoting the gorkha stuff.

The "Gorkha and his flying chariot" is a internet hoax and any website quoting the same along with other claims is, in my opinion, not worthy of the read as the information is false.

It is Erich Von Daniken and Graham Hancock who have popularised the myht of ancient cities being found in india where nuclear wars have been fought...!!

questionmark
QUOTE (Da Verminator @ Jul 5 2008, 11:26 AM) *
When ever i read some stuff containing the laughable "gorkha and his flying chariot"..i feel like laughing!!
The website you have referred - LAVLESH...does the same mistake of quoting the gorkha stuff.

The "Gorkha and his flying chariot" is a internet hoax and any website quoting the same along with other claims is, in my opinion, not worthy of the read as the information is false.

It is Erich Von Daniken and Graham Hancock who have popularised the myht of ancient cities being found in india where nuclear wars have been fought...!!


Spoiler! I was sitting back ready for a hearty laugh at the development of this thread!
SphericalMiracle
OK, then can someone explain the very high level of radiation (in 3 square miles) itself? The only conceivable mundane explanation I can think of is if it was an underground nuclear test site, but no one would be stupid enough to start a housing project anywhere near such a site. CAN WE ASSUME INDIA AS WE KNOW IT HAS NEVER SEEN AN ABOVE GROUND NUKE EXPLOSION?! How could there be ANY kind of nuclear tests that close to a city? It seems obvious to me that the (extreme) radiation isn't a naturally-occurring phenomenon... I wish I could remember the TV documentary I saw a few or several years ago that showed an ancient (enough) stone carving (somewhere in India) of a VERY apparent mushroom cloud.
PersonFromPorlock
What makes you think there is a high radiation area? There are any number of websites announcing fantasy as Truth - is there some Indian government website that says "yep, hot as hell, here're the readings and here's the location?"

You might also want to consider the fact that only fifty years later, most of the ground-level nuclear test sites in Nevada aren't very radioactive at all.
SphericalMiracle
Well, any GOVERNMENT website isn't going to state anything that goes against conventional thinking. They're very plainly not in the business of major revelations... I don't know, I suppose it COULD be a hoax/lie. Sorry I can't afford to go to Jodhpur to verify that there was, in fact, an attempt at building a housing project next to the radiated area several years ago.
crystal sage
cool.gif http://www.s8int.com/atomic2.html

http://www.s8int.com/atomic1.html

http://www.unsolvedmysteries.com/usm251013.html


http://s8int.com/phile/atomic5.html

this study has been going on for decades...

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=A...5b1d211fb0b7eaa

but the now blame the radioactivity on nuclears spills as it now appears to be a nuclear waste dumping ground... but how long ago where these nuclear power stations.. waste first put there? Are they just further contaminating these areas to cover up these anomolies?


Note how other ancient areas of great note.. of interesting ancient anomolies have been destroyed ..or reworked by organizations ok'd by governments to contaminate,destroy ancient sites... look at the Urals.. Iraq ...


wink2.gif I will have to dig them up again... or start a new thread on this!!!!


questionmark
QUOTE (SphericalMiracle @ Jul 5 2008, 05:10 PM) *
OK, then can someone explain the very high level of radiation (in 3 square miles) itself? The only conceivable mundane explanation I can think of is if it was an underground nuclear test site, but no one would be stupid enough to start a housing project anywhere near such a site. CAN WE ASSUME INDIA AS WE KNOW IT HAS NEVER SEEN AN ABOVE GROUND NUKE EXPLOSION?! How could there be ANY kind of nuclear tests that close to a city? It seems obvious to me that the (extreme) radiation isn't a naturally-occurring phenomenon... I wish I could remember the TV documentary I saw a few or several years ago that showed an ancient (enough) stone carving (somewhere in India) of a VERY apparent mushroom cloud.


Right...what do you call high radiation?

SphericalMiracle
QUOTE (questionmark @ Jul 5 2008, 10:58 AM) *
Right...what do you call high radiation?


High enough that the Indian government has cordoned off the area in question west of Jodhpur.

Thank you, crystal sage, for those links! I can see I've barely scratched the surface of the (very apparent) ancient nuclear war scenario. (Will be out running errands for awhile. Checking back later).
questionmark
QUOTE (SphericalMiracle @ Jul 5 2008, 07:17 PM) *
High enough that the Indian government has cordoned off the area in question west of Jodhpur.

Thank you, crystal sage, for those links! I can see I've barely scratched the surface of the (very apparent) ancient nuclear war scenario. (Will be out running errands for awhile. Checking back later).


Right, why can't I find anything about the cordoning in the Times of India archives?

Or is it an invisible cordon?

Or do you mean that cordoning off when Elizabeth Hurley had her wedding there?

Nucular
QUOTE (SphericalMiracle @ Jul 5 2008, 03:34 PM) *
Well, any GOVERNMENT website isn't going to state anything that goes against conventional thinking.

Yeah, they're all in on it, or something.

I just find it odd that a Google search brings up very little by way of actual sources - just lots of people on sites like Geocities reasserting the same unsubstantiated information.

An ancient nuclear war would be an amazing finding. An unexplained 3 mile area of dangerous levels of radiation in a highly populated area would in itself be an amazing finding. If this is true, there are scientists all over it. Where are the papers?

SM, do you have any primary sources at all you could point us to to read up more on this?
Nucular
QUOTE (SphericalMiracle @ Jul 5 2008, 03:10 PM) *
I wish I could remember the TV documentary I saw a few or several years ago that showed an ancient (enough) stone carving (somewhere in India) of a VERY apparent mushroom cloud.

Mushroom cloud? Or mushroom?
louie
QUOTE (Da Verminator @ Jul 5 2008, 12:26 PM) *
When ever i read some stuff containing the laughable "gorkha and his flying chariot"..i feel like laughing!!
The website you have referred - LAVLESH...does the same mistake of quoting the gorkha stuff.

The "Gorkha and his flying chariot" is a internet hoax and any website quoting the same along with other claims is, in my opinion, not worthy of the read as the information is false.

It is Erich Von Daniken and Graham Hancock who have popularised the myht of ancient cities being found in india where nuclear wars have been fought...!!

I watched the tv series they made in India of the maharabaha, an it was a tv repsentation of the book an in it all the wars etc were fought on flying chariots with bombs exploding thrown from hands, so where did they get that idea from, the book was written many centuries ago.
questionmark
Well, guys, I have some news... evidently there is no...nor ever was ... an archaeological excavation ten miles west of Jodhpur.

After not finding anything in the archives I decided to have a look on satellite images ...nothing there.

As those images are copyrighted, I made one from Google Earth consistent with the Russian image I have.... and all you find is fields and irrigation channels:

Click to view attachment

Pax Unum
I’m trying to find some objective information about this extraordinary claim, all I can find is the claim being made by the Archeologist ‘Francis Taylor’, yet I can’t find any information about an Archeologist named Francis Taylor, could anyone post the credentials for this ‘expert’?... just wondering
questionmark
QUOTE (Pax Unum @ Jul 5 2008, 09:39 PM) *
I’m trying to find some objective information about this extraordinary claim, all I can find is the claim being made by the Archeologist ‘Francis Taylor’, yet I can’t find any information about an Archeologist named Francis Taylor, could anyone post the credentials for this ‘expert’?... just wondering


The only accredited Francis Taylor I can come up with is an American museum director ... who died in 1957.

ED:

After looking a little more I found:

Francis Taylor, Accountant, amateur archaeologist, Trustee for CBA

SphericalMiracle
I'm not sure if there were any actual excavations near Jodhpur; just a radioactive area (assuming it's true). The excavations (that I've come across so far) were at Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro; where a lot of people apparently died instant, unexpected deaths.
questionmark
QUOTE (SphericalMiracle @ Jul 5 2008, 10:01 PM) *
I'm not sure if there were any actual excavations near Jodhpur; just a radioactive area (assuming it's true). The excavations (that I've come across so far) were at Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro; where a lot of people apparently died instant, unexpected deaths.


... and they are also cordoned off?

SphericalMiracle
QUOTE (questionmark @ Jul 5 2008, 02:05 PM) *
... and they are also cordoned off?


Unfortunately there's no info on either of the links crystal sage provided. I know as much about this as basically anyone, but perhaps the Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro sites were discovered in or around '72, when the DU (depleted uranium) "natural nuclear reactor" mines were discovered (per the first link).
questionmark
QUOTE (SphericalMiracle @ Jul 6 2008, 12:10 AM) *
Unfortunately there's no info on either of the links crystal sage provided. I know as much about this as basically anyone, but perhaps the Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro site was discovered in or around '72, when the DU (depleted uranium) "natural nuclear reactor" mines were discovered (per the first link).


Well, no, Harappa was discovered in the late 50s and mostly excavated by the end of the 60s and Mohenjo-Daro in 1922.

And as far as Jodhpur...the only thing mined there is Gypsum. Not very radioactive...as far as I recall
cormac mac airt
Wasn't much of this shown to be inaccurate in a previous thread: Atlantis obviously they blew it up

Or has some current evidence come to light?

cormac
questionmark
QUOTE (cormac mac airt @ Jul 6 2008, 01:42 AM) *
Wasn't much of this shown to be inaccurate in a previous thread: Atlantis obviously they blew it up

Or has some current evidence come to light?

cormac


nah, mostly the same stuff.... in a different bag and different ribbon.

SphericalMiracle
Just as speculation, is it possible the Jodhpur site, in addition to being ground zero of a blast, was a toxic dump of bodies and other hot things? Could such a landfill possibly have made the site more hot? Ashes to ashes? Or was it just one bigger-than-usual (it seems) blast? It makes sense that survivors would want to centralize the dead and ruined... And could that have been from whence the Hindu cremation ritual came? Just thoughts.
Pax Unum
QUOTE (questionmark @ Jul 5 2008, 01:51 PM) *
The only accredited Francis Taylor I can come up with is an American museum director ... who died in 1957.

ED:

After looking a little more I found:

Francis Taylor, Accountant, amateur archaeologist, Trustee for CBA

Thanks questionmark, I only found links to this article and the 'Atlantis obviously they blew it up' article, what search engine did you use?...

so this theory is either the work of a museum director or an amateur archaeologist, explains much...
questionmark
QUOTE (Pax Unum @ Jul 6 2008, 02:17 AM) *
Thanks questionmark, I only found links to this article and the 'Atlantis obviously they blew it up' article, what search engine did you use?...

so this theory is either the work of a museum director or an amateur archaeologist, explains much...


I used google. But see, it is worse: The Museum director evidently has no publication credits and the amateur specializes in Roman buildings in Britain, the only deviation I could find is that he once moderated a slide show about Petra. So, neither could have been the quoted archaeologist.

I am starting to suspect that the quote is as good as a three dollar note.



Pax Unum
QUOTE (questionmark @ Jul 5 2008, 06:24 PM) *
I used google. But see, it is worse: The Museum director evidently has no publication credits and the amateur specializes in Roman buildings in Britain, the only deviation I could find is that he once moderated a slide show about Petra. So, neither could have been the quoted archaeologist.

I am starting to suspect that the quote is as good as a three dollar note.

I agree, this story is eerily similar to Erich von Däniken’s Dropa Stone fantasy, the expert’s involved don’t exist and there are no artifacts, basically nothing to back up the claim except the story itself...
crystal sage
Scientists find uranium in Ladakh
QUOTE
http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070827/nation.htm#6

“Geochemical analysis of the separated zircon grains showed exceptionally high concentration of both uranium (0.31-5.36 per cent) and thorium (0.76-1.43 per cent),” Upadhyay said. He added that the study is preliminary and “detailed work is in progress”.

According to him, uranium-bearing magmatic rocks are located all along Kohistan, Ladakh and southern Tibet (from east to west). “However, contents of uranium may differ from place to place,” he said.

Officials of the atomic minerals division under the Department of Atomic Energy did not reply to questions about the significance of this new find or whether the Ladakh uranium could augment India’s reserves. — IANS


India has enough indigenous uranium to last 50 years'
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2007/0...41102980300.htm

Measurements of Natural Radioactivity in Some Water and Soil Samples of Punjab State, India
http://ibe.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/5/357?ck=nck
Indoor radon concentration in the rural dwellings of Chhattisgarh state (India)
http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/...act/119/1-4/434

Radon measurements have been carried out in groundwater of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab states, India. Radon concentration values in potable water show a wide range of variation from source to source and from place to place. Generally, radon concentration values in thermal springs groundwater have been found to be higher than the values from other sources.
http://www.rsc.org/publishing/journals/EM/...sp?doi=b209096c

Measurement of alpha radioactive air pollutants in fly ash brick dwellings
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=A...2f640fe0ebd3ded
rolleyes.gif
Cheap Flights from Uranium City to India

http://www.farecompare.com/flights/Uranium...itycountry.html

QUOTE
http://www.thestar.com/News/Ontario/article/249912

blink.gif
linked-image

"The best place to go looking for new ore is in an old mine," says Zbiegniew Wytrwal, 61. He moved to Uranium City when he was nine years old, and became a geologist at Eldorado, the biggest mine there, through the boom. He left in 1980, just before uranium began its freefall into economic oblivion. Twenty-seven years later, much to his own shock, he's come full circle. "It was a dead industry," he says. "I never thought it would come back."

Uranium City, in the far northeast corner of Saskatchewan and connected by road in winter across frozen lakes, began as a tented outpost in 1950. Just a few years later, bathed in uranium's glow, it was a thriving hub of 5,000, complete with hotels, department stores, a dance hall, a curling rink and a movie theatre. In 1959, even Prince Philip dropped by. Just a few kilometres away from the Uranium City hub, the mine towns of Eldorado and Gunnar counted another 2,000 and 1,200 people, respectively. By the early '80s, though, anti-nuclear sentiment was gaining momentum. Even with détente looming, a near-disaster at Three Mile Island in 1979 coupled with a public weary of their cold war anxieties was cooling the prospects of a nuclear-powered future.

"There was a time when people from Uranium City were real pariahs," says Jim Kermeen, a geologist at Eldorado in the '60s. "You'd tell them you were from here, and they'd take a step back."




huh.gif the coal in India has......
QUOTE
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1050328/asp/...ory_4506823.asp

discovered that thorium levels in the flyash from Kolaghat are about five times the average level in the crust. In a report published in the Current Science, the researchers say the average level of gamma radiation above the ash ponds is about 150 nanoGrey per hour. Grey is a unit of radioactive emmision.

The geophysicists have also cautioned that the uranium trapped in the ash ponds may be washed into the groundwater. Given the high dose of 150 nanoGrey per hour from the ash ponds, the disposal of the flyash may result in a ?radiation hazard? to the population living close to the ponds. ?Prolonged exposure to the high-dose rates may lead to the risk of lung or bone cancer,? Sengupta and Mandal said in their paper classified as a ?Research Communication? in the Current Science. Sengupta, who was earlier at the Physical Research Laboratory in Ahmedabad, has nearly 15 years? experience studying radioactivity in the environment. His study has also shown that flyash bricks from KTPS had higher levels of radioactivity than ordinary bricks. So those who live in houses made of flyash bricks will be continuously exposed to radioactivity emanating from the walls from all sides.
The Sandman
QUOTE (crystal sage @ Jul 6 2008, 01:29 PM) *
Scientists find uranium in Ladakh


India has enough indigenous uranium to last 50 years'
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2007/0...41102980300.htm

Measurements of Natural Radioactivity in Some Water and Soil Samples of Punjab State, India
http://ibe.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/12/5/357?ck=nck
Indoor radon concentration in the rural dwellings of Chhattisgarh state (India)
http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/...act/119/1-4/434

Radon measurements have been carried out in groundwater of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab states, India. Radon concentration values in potable water show a wide range of variation from source to source and from place to place. Generally, radon concentration values in thermal springs groundwater have been found to be higher than the values from other sources.
http://www.rsc.org/publishing/journals/EM/...sp?doi=b209096c

Measurement of alpha radioactive air pollutants in fly ash brick dwellings
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=A...2f640fe0ebd3ded
rolleyes.gif
Cheap Flights from Uranium City to India

http://www.farecompare.com/flights/Uranium...itycountry.html





huh.gif the coal in India has......



so? what does that have to do with the OP's idea of ancient nuclear war in india? nothing!!
In Kerala, in India(the state i am originally from) there is a place called chavara which beach sands with high radiation levels.
So, as per the OP's thinking ..any where where there is high radiation...was a ancient nuclear war occured???
A BIG NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
questionmark
Just to add something here:

Natural elevated radioactivity happens everywhere, as one can see from this radioactivity map of the US:

linked-image

blue is lowest
SphericalMiracle
QUOTE (Da Verminator @ Jul 6 2008, 05:33 AM) *
so? what does that have to do with the OP's idea of ancient nuclear war in india? nothing!!
In Kerala, in India(the state i am originally from) there is a place called chavara which beach sands with high radiation levels.
So, as per the OP's thinking ..any where where there is high radiation...was a ancient nuclear war occured???
A BIG NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH


I'm referring to decidedly ABNORMALLY high radiation and other evidence of sudden mass murder by a very powerful weapon. And I believe crystal sage is pointing out that natural radioactivity is abundant enough that more technologically-advanced people/beings could have made use of it sometime before recorded history. Obviously no one knows for sure... Looks like the key is to get enough clarity on the area near Jodhpur. How can that happen? Are there any Indians or Pakistanis who read this site's forums who live close enough to investigate (if not from the city itself)? Assuming it really exists, the objective is to determine whether or not the radioactive ash can be reasonably determined as naturally-occurring.
questionmark
QUOTE (SphericalMiracle @ Jul 6 2008, 04:33 PM) *
I'm referring to decidedly ABNORMALLY high radiation


... is everything that ranges above the medium radioactivity level, and is found naturally there where lack of water or precipitation does not wash it out.

The Sandman
Dude Spherical...I am from India.
I have heard a lot of such stories. But all of these originate in hoaxes by erich von daniken and graham hancock and Francis Taylor.
If any ancient city is excavated or found in india, it would be the business of The Archaeological Survey of India. Their website nor any of the mainstream newspapers have ever hinted at such a story.

You can check up ASI's website at ASI
SphericalMiracle
QUOTE (Da Verminator @ Jul 6 2008, 09:11 AM) *
You can check up ASI's website at ASI


I couldn't find anything on that site on this subject. I searched "Harappa excavation" and got diddley on the first 2 results. Please be more specific. The objective regarding Jodhpur stands. Or someone please direct me to a convincingly debunking link.
crystal sage
QUOTE (questionmark @ Jul 6 2008, 10:49 PM) *
Just to add something here:

Natural elevated radioactivity happens everywhere, as one can see from this radioactivity map of the US:

linked-image

blue is lowest



Nuclear test sites in the US...

http://www.atomicarchive.com/Almanac/Testsite.shtml

http://maps.google.com.au/maps?q=map%20of%...sa=N&tab=il

Add to that sites where there was significant uranium leaks


http://www.scidacreview.org/0801/html/subsurface.html

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html...753C1A96E948260

linked-image
http://pro-resources.net/nuclear-power-plant.html



Natural???
questionmark
QUOTE (crystal sage @ Jul 6 2008, 10:21 PM) *


Which does not explain it. Because there where there is lots of precipitation there is no elevated radiation.

and, btw, why does the same phenomena happen in Europe... there never were any nuclear testing in either Spain, Greece and so on:
linked-image
crystal sage
QUOTE (questionmark @ Jul 7 2008, 05:25 AM) *
Which does not explain it. Because there where there is lots of precipitation there is no elevated radiation.

and, btw, why does the same phenomena happen in Europe... there never were any nuclear testing in either Spain, Greece and so on:
linked-image

but they have nuclear power stations...

http://www.nea.fr/html/general/profiles/spain.html
linked-image

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf85.html
Fuel cycle facilities

Operation of the Saelices el Chico (Salamanca) uranium mine ended in 2000, though minor output continued to 2002 from decommissioning. The 1600 tonnes used in Spain each year is imported. ENUSA has a 10% stake in mining in Niger.



I am sure that will show up in the readings of radiation on the maps
cormac mac airt
QUOTE (crystal sage @ Jul 6 2008, 03:33 PM) *
but they have nuclear power stations...

http://www.nea.fr/html/general/profiles/spain.html
linked-image

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf85.html
Fuel cycle facilities

Operation of the Saelices el Chico (Salamanca) uranium mine ended in 2000, though minor output continued to 2002 from decommissioning. The 1600 tonnes used in Spain each year is imported. ENUSA has a 10% stake in mining in Niger.



I am sure that will show up in the readings of radiation on the maps


Nuclear power plants, past or present, are only a small portion of the hits on a radioactivity map, the rest would be natural occurances. Naturally occuring sources of radiation do not equate to a nuclear war in ancient times. There is a whole infrastructure that goes along with the production and use of nuclear power. Where is the ancient infrastructure for all of that?

cormac


crystal sage
QUOTE (cormac mac airt @ Jul 7 2008, 07:33 AM)
Nuclear power plants, past or present, are only a small portion of the hits on a radioactivity map, the rest would be natural occurances. Naturally occuring sources of radiation do not equate to a nuclear war in ancient times. There is a whole infrastructure that goes along with the production and use of nuclear power. Where is the ancient infrastructure for all of that?

cormac



no.gif
or to where uranium was washed by precipitation to new areas.
QUOTE
http://cpluhna.nau.edu/Change/uranium.htm

Runoff of rainwater from tailings piles also contributes to the contamination of surface water. In 1984, a summer flash flood in Hack Canyon washed four tons of high-grade uranium ore into Kanab Creek and on to the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. In many communities, abandoned open pit uranium mines serve as stock tanks and swimming holes.

Downstream from most of America’s uranium mines and mills sits Lake Mead, a huge reservoir that supplies drinking and irrigation water for southern California, Las Vegas, and parts of Arizona. The 40-year-old Atlas mill tailings pile at Moab, Utah, located 750 feet from the Colorado River, covers 130 acres and leaks on average 57,000 gallons per day of contaminated fluids into the river. The radioactive isotopes that are released in the mining and milling process have very long half-lives and are slowly making their way downriver into the sediments and water of the lake. The implications of a contaminated western water system are catastrophic.

Surface water is not the only threatened resource. Seepage from tailings ponds and “direct injection” of wastes into the subsurface contribute to ground water contamination. Wells that tap into these aquifers provide much of the drinking and irrigation water for the arid Colorado Plateau. Both people and livestock are affected by drinking this water and eating plants that are irrigated with it.
questionmark
QUOTE (crystal sage @ Jul 7 2008, 12:56 AM) *
no.gif
or to where uranium was washed by precipitation to new areas.


Ok, lets not mix apples and pears here, Uranium is a naturally occurring element, and its presence does not prove anything (except that Uranium is present), the same goes for Radon.

And as you said, Uranium gets washed to new areas... which is why low precipitation regions tend to have a higher natural radiation.

To prove that there was an atomic explosion, or any other kind of fusion the presence of Cesium-137 or Strontium-90 has to be established. I fail to see that in any of the areas where there are supposed to be ancient atomic explosions. And areas where these elements are proven are not cordoned off, they are registered with the IAEA, and as such matter of public record.

crystal sage
first of all... had to share this... cool.gif Glow in the dark teeth!!! unsure.gif

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=A...8a8e52c0bdc4558



An unexpected rise in strontium-90 in US deciduous teeth in the 1990s

Strontium-90 (Sr-90) concentrations in 2089 deciduous (baby) teeth, mostly from persons living near nuclear power reactors, reveal that average levels rose 48.5% for persons born in the late 1990s compared to those born in the late 1980s. This trend represents the first sustained increase since the early 1960s, before atmospheric weapons tests were banned.


http://www.osti.gov/energycitations/produc...osti_id=4083915

Sunflowers used to cleanup nuclear waste...

http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older.../199701149.html

Much of this radioactive waste is taken up by their food chain!!!!

especially tea!!! gives a new meaning to 'green tea'

QUOTE
http://www.springerlink.com/content/v74n5j3154m872x0/

The paper presents results of measurements made on tea samples, collected during 1961–1979 period for their strontium-90 and caesium-137 content. Tea was found to contain higher concentration of these radioisotopes compared to other food-stuffs having vegetative origin. Levels in tea are compared with those in leafy vegetables from both India and Japan. Interpretation for higher concentrations in tea compared to leafy vegetables is briefly given on the basis of agro-climatic conditions. The levels are also considered from the point of view of health hazard.



Strontium-90 in milk and human bone in India.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13781869


http://hydrolab.arsusda.gov/cesium137bib.htm
no.gif w00t.gif crying.gif unsure.gif blink.gif ohmy.gif

QUOTE
http://www.sare.org/sanet-mg/archives/html...-html/0005.html

The Nuclear Connection

To irradiate beef and poultry in the U.S. on a mass scale, hundreds of
irradiation facilities would need to be built. Currently, the radiation
source for most irradiators is cobalt 60, supplied by the Canadian
company Nordion International, Inc. But the only isotope available in
sufficient quantities for large-scale irradiation is cesium 137, which
is also one of the deadliest. With a half-life of 30 years, cesium 137
remains dangerous for nearly 600 years.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initially encouraged food
irradiation as part of its Byproduct Utilization Program (BUP) created
in the 1970s to promote the commercial use of nuclear by-products. The
DOE claimed nuclear by-products “have a wide range of applications in
food technology, agriculture, energy, public health, medicine, and
industrial technology,” and wanted to “ensure full realization of the
benefits of the peaceful atom.”

At the same time, it would transfer the burden of nuclear waste from
weapons production to consumers--a fact the DOE admitted to the House
Armed Services Committee in 1983: “The utilization of these radioactive
materials simply reduces our waste handling problem... we get some of
these very hot elements like cesium and strontium out of the waste.”

Not only would this take care of the DOE’s waste problem, it would
develop the technology to reprocess spent nuclear reactor fuel in order
to recover cesium 137.




http://consumercide.com/food/nukelunch.html


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/pop_...mine/html/7.stm


http://www.newspostindia.com/report-12620
Chlorine 36 and Cesium 137 in ice-core samples from mid-latitude glacial

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=A...ac929574216169b

surveys have shown large amounts of Cesium-137 and Cobalt-60 forming radioactive ..
QUOTE
http://italy.indymedia.org/news/2006/07/1110254.php

I have an interest in diabetes and public health links to depleted uranium. There are big unexplained increases in diabetes in India, China and Jakarta since 1990. I am participating in a meeting about these issues."



QUOTE
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context...;articleId=2057

“Map of regions within a 1000 mile radius of Baghdad and Afghanistan which have been contaminated with depleted uranium since 1991. Depleted uranium dust will be repeatedly recycled throughout this dry region, and also carried around the world. More than ten times the amount of radiation, released during atmospheric testing, has been released from depleted uranium weaponry since 1991. In 2002 the US government admitted that every person living in the US between 1957 and 1963 was internally contaminated with radiation.” (Leuren Moret)

What the US and its allies have done is set western India on to certain annihilation. Dr. Keith Baverstock, a WHO radiation expert, co-authored a report in November 2001, warning that the long-term health effects of DU would endanger Iraq’s civilian population, and that the dry climate would increase exposure from the tiny particles blowing around and be inhaled for years to come. WHO refused to publish the study, bowing to pressure from the IAEA. Dr. Baverstock released the damning report to the media in February 2004.

With extensive use of depleted uranium, the US and its allies have not only destroyed the lives of their own soldiers and civilians, but of peaceful people around the war zones who had nothing to do with their illegal wars. The question is why have the US and its allies taken this murderous step? May be 45 billion years later the survivors would ask the question and get the answer.

When one thinks of the harsh truth that a time bomb is ticking within our bodies, one wonders what the Indian media were doing all these years. It has been known that if one breathes even one molecule of DU, how and when it will destroy one’s body and mind can’t be predicted. No wonder, probably not one Indian journalist went to Afghanistan or Iraq to report the truth. Not one newspaper, not one TV channel informed the Indians of the true consequences of the Afghanistan and Gulf Wars and the utter criminality of the US government and its allies in these countries. Is there a single secular journalist, politician or bureaucrat who raised the issue of DU contamination? Not one, I guess.

Instead, the Indian governments since 1999 have been courting the US and the present government is rolling a red carpet to receive a President who is a mass murderer and whose hands will soon be soaked with innocent Indian blood. Ten American CEOs are accompanying the Prezzy, hundreds of deals will be signed, and billions will change hands.



http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-128185711.html
questionmark
QUOTE (crystal sage @ Jul 7 2008, 02:22 AM) *
first of all... had to share this... cool.gif Glow in the dark teeth!!! unsure.gif


Right, but see, if those elements would have been present before the testing of atomic weapons we would not notice an increase.

The increase in Xenon-133 and Krypton-85, for example just indicate that somewhere an atmospheric fusion has taken place, as they are gases and tend to mix with the atmosphere and after a relatively short time are uniformly mixed in it.

Besides, I am not so sure that with the half-hazard testing of both Indians and Pakistanis the nuclei stayed underground. My bet would be quite to the contrary with the increase in Strontium.
crystal sage
QUOTE (questionmark @ Jul 7 2008, 10:10 AM)
Right, but see, if those elements would have been present before the testing of atomic weapons we would not notice an increase.

The increase in Xenon-133 and Krypton-85, for example just indicate that somewhere an atmospheric fusion has taken place, as they are gases and tend to mix with the atmosphere and after a relatively short time are uniformly mixed in it.

Besides, I am not so sure that with the half-hazard testing of both Indians and Pakistanis the nuclei stayed underground. My bet would be quite to the contrary with the increase in Strontium.

unless we dig deep


look at old ice samples in the Tibetan areas..

isn't there a way of testing how old some of these samples are by the levels of decay?

or even noting how plants seem to absorb these nuclear byproducts.. then perhaps testing some ancient seeds?

DieChecker
I thought the story was not that there was a layer of radioactive ash, but that there was a layer of vitrified (Fused) stone that had been created by a enormose heat source, such as a nuclear explosion. Perhaps that is a different story?
cormac mac airt
QUOTE (questionmark @ Jul 5 2008, 05:29 AM) *
Spoiler! I was sitting back ready for a hearty laugh at the development of this thread!


I hope you still feel like laughing. After going back and looking at it in its entirety, I just want to cry.

cormac
SphericalMiracle
EUREKA! I believe I've realized the central question: What SHAPE is the radiated area in question? How CIRCULAR is it?

And how many times more radiation are we talking about at the (near) Jodhpur site than areas of naturally higher radiation?
crystal sage
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2585723/High-nat...in-Kerala-India

Kerala stands out... the area of the Red Rain...

http://www.dae.gov.in/ni/ni0602/ni0602.htm

linked-image

QUOTE
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/002200708281010.htm

National
Uranium deposits found in Ladakh, DAE cautious

New Delhi, Aug. 28 (PTI): Scientists have claimed to have found uranium deposits in the icy heights of Ladakh but the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) has adopted a cautious approach regarding the commercial importance of the find.

Geologists from the Kumaun University have found "exceptionally high concentration" of uranium and thorium in Udmaru, a small village situated on a volcanic rock formation in the Nubra-Shyok valley in northern Ladakh.

A prelimnary study of a thick granite dyke showed that it contained abundant, small-to-medium grained euhedral, greenish coloured zircon, Rajeev Upadhyay, a geologist at the Nainital-based Kumaun University said in a communication in the latest issue of Current Science.

"Geochemical analysis of the separated zircon grains showed exceptionally high concentration of both uranium and thorium," he said.

Rock samples analysed in isotope laboratory of the University of Tuebingen in Germany have revealed uranium content to be as high as 5.36 per cent compared to around 0.1 per cent or less in ores present elsewhere in the country.

QUOTE
The Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research is enthused by the discovery of uranium at Wakhyn in Meghalaya and the permission to prospect in the Rajiv Gandhi Tiger Sanctuary

http://www.flonnet.com/fl2227/stories/20060113000206800.htm

Unless we drill in the area, we cannot prove the deposit. We have received permission to drill in a 10 sq km area [in the sanctuary]," he said.


QUOTE
http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/farooqs/notes/b8-3-4.htm

The thorium content of the minerals contained in these placers is considerably greater than the uranium content; therefore the deposits are classified primarily as thorium-­bearing placers.

Monazite is the chief source of thorium in the world. Though it is a constituent of some granites and pegmatites, such sources are not economically workable. Monazite is concentrated by weathering into economically workable deposits in beach sands in the coastal tracts of Australia, Brazil, Ceylon, Malaysia and India. India possesses the largest deposits of monazite in the world. Recent indications are that in the near future, thorium would emerge as a fission fuel of greater potential than thorium.

In India monazite is found in the coastal tracts of Cuttak and Ganjam distr@ts of Orissa where the thickness of the placer is about 30 cm with a monazite content of 2.5 percent. Minor occurrences have been noticed between Chilka Lake and Chicacole River also.

In Andhra Pradesh thick ilmenite and monazite placers are found around Vishakhapatnam and Bhimunipatnam. The beach sands of the coastal tracts of Kerala and Tamil Nadu are also very rich in monazite. They also contain ilmenite and rutile. Monazite bearing sands are best developed along the beaches of the southwest coast of India between Quilon and Kanyakumari (Lipuram, Pudur, Kovalam, Varkala and Neendakarai) and between Chowghat and Ponnani. On the east coast of India, monazite concentrations are not as good as on the western and southwestern coasts, nevertheless small deposits are found along the Vishakhapatnam and Tanjore coasts. The monazite content of placers is rarely more than 3%. It appears that the maximum concentration of U and Th in placer type deposits are about 70 and 3000 ppm of sediment respectively, and the average concentrations are probably about 2 and 60 ppm respectively. Sands on the Florida coast are reported to contain 0.09% monazite, beach sands of India average 2-5% monazite.

Elsewhere in the country black sand deposits occur in the coastal tracts of Waltair, Bimlipatnam and Narasipatnam.
R3LOAD
this would be oober cool



if it was true

=/
The Sandman
check this out

Ancient Nuclear Reactors in Africa.....hehehehe...
crystal sage


QUOTE
http://www.ocrwm.doe.gov/factsheets/doeymp0010.shtml

It came as a great surprise to most, therefore, when, in 1972, French physicist Francis Perrin declared that nature had beaten humans to the punch by creating the world’s first nuclear reactors. Indeed, he argued, nature had a two-billion-year head start.1 Fifteen natural fission reactors have been found in three different ore deposits at the Oklo mine in Gabon, West Africa. These are collectively known as the Oklo Fossil Reactors.2

And when these deep underground natural nuclear chain reactions were over, nature showed that it could effectively contain the radioactive wastes created by the reactions.

No nuclear chain reactions will ever happen in a repository for high-level nuclear wastes. But if a repository were to be built at Yucca Mountain, scientists would count on the geology of the area to contain radionuclides generated by these wastes with similar effectiveness.

sad.gif

QUOTE
http://www.geotimes.org/june08/article.htm...xtra061308.html

Time to build Yucca
Yucca Mountain
Department of Energy
Nevada's Yucca Mountain is the proposed site of a national geological repository for nuclear waste.


After 30 years and $9 billion worth of federal research, Yucca Mountain is one of the most intensely studied pieces of real estate in the world. But the Nevada landmark — the proposed site of a national geological repository for high-level nuclear waste — remains shrouded in controversy. In a new report, two experts admit that scientists cannot answer every question about the site's future security. Still, they say, it is time to move forward and build a carefully monitored facility.

"The point we're making is that there will never be closure to all the questions about Yucca Mountain, or any other site" that could host an underground nuclear repository, says Isaac Winograd, an emeritus scientist of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). But that's no excuse for inaction, argue Winograd and Eugene Roseboom, also a USGS emeritus scientist, in a paper published today in Science. "We have to live with some unknowns," Winograd says. "The real question is whether it's safer to put this waste in one isolated, monitored site or to keep it spread among 121 sites throughout the country."



questionmark
QUOTE (cormac mac airt @ Jul 7 2008, 03:37 AM) *
I hope you still feel like laughing. After going back and looking at it in its entirety, I just want to cry.

cormac


...yep...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.