Abstract: The following article 'Cosmic Powerhouse of Einstein and Grand Unified Theory', reveals Einstein's most famous scientific equation, E = mc2, and explicates the inner puzzles of Einstein's state of mind. Particularly, it focuses on Einstein's postulations connected with his own theory, 'cosmological constant'. Even though Einstein was very near to the immeasurable scientific ocean of relativity, he created a block to further discovery and understanding with his assumptions of a 'static universe' connected with the 'cosmological constant', hindering the science of cosmology from proving wonders after wonders like E = mc2. This article explores the human limitations of the static way of thinking and reveals the perpetual scientific need of grand unification of the particle motion and the science of the cosmos. The article then progresses toward the practicability of the grand unification of quantum mechanics and the space-time Truth of cosmology, ending with the declaration 'Wave/particle Duality vs. Wave-particle Integrity' as a soul searching lamp of 'Grand Unification'.

(Note: This article is an extract from the ninth chapter of my forthcoming book, Nucleus of the Absolute.)


Cosmic Powerhouse of Einstein and Grand Unified Theory


How EINSTEIN Arrived at E = MC2?

In 1905, Einstein published his argument, including his conclusion that E=MC2, in a three-page paper entitled "Does The Inertia Of A Body Depend On It's Energy Content?" The paper had no footnotes and not one single reference to support it.

The scientific establishment went absolutely bonkers.

"Who does this Einstein think he is? How dare he contradict the fundamental principles of Newtonian physics? Where is his scientific evidence? What are his credentials for making such an assertion? This is preposterous....we can't allow people just to say things like this without proof! How dare he...this idea should be given no credence at all!"

What was Einstein's response? How did he deal with all the negative criticism coming his way? His response was simple and direct. Basically, he told the scientific community...

Check it out--you'll see that it's true!

As it turned out, Einstein was right. Twenty years later, when the technology became available to put Einstein's assumption to a rigorous scientific test, his theory was validated. Eventually, the whole world had to agree that Einstein's original "hunch" was correct. The truth (at least as far as we know it today) eventually won out, although it took a long, long time before it was fully embraced.

Was the inclusion of the cosmological constant Einstein's "biggest blunder"?

When Einstein introduced the cosmological constant in his theory of general relativity he did so because he was guided by the paradigm of the day that the universe was static (i.e. neither contracting nor expanding.) The cosmological constant provided a way of balancing the gravitational contraction caused by matter. It was latter discovered by Edwin Hubble that other galaxies appear to be receding away from us, that the universe was actually expanding. When Einstein heard and fully appreciated these observations, he declared that the inclusion of the cosmological constant was his "biggest blunder."

Einstein's mistake was not a mathematical one but rather a philosophical one made many times over the history of thought. Einstein held too strongly to the belief that the universe was static and thus was unable to appreciate the power of his theory's predictions of a dynamic universe. His error serves as a lesson to all thinkers, that we should never close our minds to new possibilities, even if the thought of the day is that they are impossible. Imagine how history would have been changed had Copernicus refused to accept his belief that the sun was actually the centre of the solar system, or had Columbus thought he would have fallen off the edge of the Earth. It is hard to know where the next paradigm shift will come from!


After powerful exploration of the most famous scientific equation E= mc2, Einstein’s mind started oscillating between two extremes: nature’s spectacular theory of relativity; and, his own uncertain conclusion associated with the static universe. In General Relativity, Einstein assumed that space-time becomes curved in response to the effects of matter and this curvature in turn affects the behaviour of matter. But Einstein assumed the behaviour pattern of space-time curvature in the surroundings of every matter by subtracting the super spinning motion.

Nevertheless, when we subtract super spinning motion, naturally we will give importance to the illusory assumptions of the mind and will travel apart from the zone of Truth. First, we must know that from minute sub-atomic particles to vast cosmos, everything is spinning and every spinning motion must generate curvature in space-time.

After Edwin Hubble’s discovery, though Einstein then rejected his own theory of static universe, his theory had not completely vanished from his unconscious mind. The vacuum created by the rejected theory had unknowingly taken root in Einstein’s mental cabinet, thwarting his journey to master the relative principles of the infinite universe.

Space-time curvature is a natural outcome of the super spinning motion where the surrounding atmosphere of every particle and object will also spin along with the spinning velocity of the particular object or particle; the earth is not exceptional from this universal phenomenon. Only when we consider that the universe is flat, static or stationary will an illusory picture be generated in our retina where the false assumptions of the mind will dominate the reality and move apart from the natural truth of the cosmos.

When our mind is not entirely convinced about the mythological root that exists behind Ptolemy and the theory of ‘static universe’, often we will become slave to our mind’s meaningless assumptions. In this context, naturally ‘known’ will become dominant in our mind and prevent our mental organisms from mastering some of the simple Truths of nature. Instead of witnessing the effects of the super spinning motion, we will witness an illusory curvature in every space-time. If one observes the reality, without any preoccupied mental illusions, then one will realize the universal phenomenon of the spinning atmospheres that has originated from the super spinning motion of the particular particle and object, extending from stars to atoms.

The day when science realizes this natural phenomenon of the cosmos the world will witness the axiomatic leap in every field of humanity and will become capable of decoding the underlying secret that governs the universe. Otherwise, science will continue to be paralysed within the zone of illusions and consequent assumptions of the mind where only self-projected discovery can continue, not invention.

If Einstein could have freed himself from his assumptions of the ‘static universe’ and the meaningless postulation of gravity, then he could have proven wonders after wonders like E = mc2 in the science of cosmology.

Einstein’s greatest blunder is not the theory of cosmological constant, but trying to relate the scientific ocean of relativity with the illusions and assumptions of the static universe and the law of gravity.

Einstein’s theory, associated with cosmological relativity, was a newborn baby for Einstein himself where he represented a moving character in the beginning. Slowly, he become slave to the static character and used the word ‘constant’ and ‘static’ instead of using the word ‘dynamic’. Here, Einstein deviated from the immeasurable scientific ocean of relativity and seized himself in the static clutches of the finite mind.

Everything in this universe is in a moving and spinning state; there is no static point for any object or particle.

In every moving state there will be contraction and expansion, but static behaviour pattern is impossible for both matter and mind since everything represents super spinning motion. If something is above becoming static, the invisible internal motion of that particular object or particle (the weak force) will come out and explode, crossing the threshold of chaos. Finally, this will make every exploded object and particle spin and move inside the magnetic boundary of the particular. This natural phenomenon exists everywhere from the minute sub-atomic particle to vast cosmos.

Every form of contracting state represents chaotic behaviour pattern in the first phase. In the meantime, it is the contracting state and its highly volatile behaviour pattern of chaos that explores the way to the particular particle, object or mind resulting in an expanding state necessary to maintain equilibrium between the particular and the universal energy levels.

‘Universe is Dynamic, not static’ is misunderstood to mean that the universe is expanding or will expand forever. There is a myth that Hubble’s universe is expanding; Hubble discovered that particular individual entities within the universe are expanding, not the whole universe. If any individual entity is expanding or contracting, we cannot come to a conclusion that the universe is expanding or contracting as a whole.

The universe is not a separate entity to expand or contract. Every individual entity in the universe will contract or expand based on the need of the particular space-time, but it does not mean that universe will go on expanding or contracting.

Universe is a living and moving unit within space-time as a whole, not in particular. It is filled with different entities such as the magnetospheres of the sub-atomic particles, atoms, matters, natural satellites, planets, stellar systems, galaxies, cluster of galaxies, super clusters, etc.

When all entities in the universe are in active spinning motion, a static universe is impossible. This applies not only for the universe, but even to human mind where the static behaviour pattern is impossible. There will be motion whether negative or positive, order or disorder, contraction or expansion, destruction or construction, attachment or detachment. Even time cannot exist without motion.

If the mind or matter is immobilized or becomes static, there will be destruction; yet every destruction results in construction. Thus, destruction and construction, order and disorder, contraction and expansion, attachment and detachment are momentary and appropriate. The everlasting Truth is that everything is dynamic and in motion, not static.

In other words, there will be destruction only to the individual consciousness, matter and systems (stellar families, galaxies, clusters of galaxies, super clusters), not to the collective unconsciousness or the universe. As human beings, we are tuned with the individual consciousness; in every perceived destruction, disorder, contraction or detachment, the wonders of resulting construction are not visible or perceptible for us.

The Grand Unified Truth

In the entire universe, ‘Super Spinning Motion’ is the underlying source for the existence of all forms of macroscopic and microscopic objects and particles. The grand unified forces of nature are omnipresent, but not omnipotent; the omnipotent force is the ‘super spinning motion’. What we see as the fundamental force today has also originated from the Super spinning: the law Eternal.

The repulsive force of the spinning atmosphere originated from the super spinning motion of the particular particle, object, planet, star, stellar system, galaxy, cluster of galaxies and super clusters should generate spiral motion similar to super strings since it is an result of the super spinning motion.

Quantum scientists identified the spiral motion similar to super strings that exist in the surroundings of every particle and named it ‘wave/particle duality’. Meanwhile, the science of cosmology identified the same duality and named it ‘space-time curvature'. The perception of ‘wave/particle duality’ and ‘space-time curvature’ explores the basic behaviour patterns that exist within the environment of every moving and spinning particle and system. In turn, this exposes their possible magnetic boundaries extending from stars to atoms and termed ‘magnetosphere’.

Therefore, there is no probability for a ‘super string theory’ to unify the quantum mechanics and the science of the cosmos as one integrated unit. Quantum science has identified the ‘curvature’ in the space-time surroundings of every particle and unknowingly unified it with the science of cosmology by developing a method to calculate the ‘wave-particle duality’. Now, there is a need to develop a model to analyse the space-time behaviour patterns of spinning particles and systems in order to unify the science of cosmology and the ground-breaking innovations of quantum mechanics as one integrated unit.

Wave/particle Duality vs. Wave-particle Integrity

When the science of cosmology and quantum mechanics subtracts the super spinning quality of the particle from the particular particle motion, it seems like wave/particle duality or space-time curvature. When we realizes that super spinning is the underlying source of every particle motion, then we will easily understand that waves or space-time curvatures are the natural outcome of super spinning. In every particle motion, waves or curvature must exist and should move along with the particle since it is the result of the super spinning motion of the particular particle. When a particle changes its position in connection with its spinning and moving velocity, there will be a background effect of waves or curvatures where sometimes we cannot see individual particles, but we can see their waves.

This background effect of waves (where a particle is absent) will generate confusion in our minds only when we subtract the underlying source (super spinning) from the particle motion.

Waves and space-time curvature are natural characteristics of super spinning that exists and moves along with the particle. After realizing this universal phenomenon of nature that exists from the minute sub-atomic particle to vast cosmos, we cannot term this infinite activity as wave/particle duality because it is not duality; it is integrity. Hereafter, it is the duty of quantum mechanics to observe the science of wave/particle duality as wave-particle integrity; the duality exists only within our minds and not within nature. Sri Krishna says, “All things static and dynamic, conscious and unconscious arise from the interaction of entity and its nature”.

what I only understand is just all is in motion...
we just have to wait for the universe to evolve as long as it will.

Hi Chandrakanth, welcome to UM.

Your book sounds interesting - may I ask when it is to be published, and by whom?

I think the main question that leaps out, to me at least, is, what are your qualifications in physics?

Although I think demanding qualifications from people gets very tiresome, in many ways physics is a special case, since the equations and 'heavy maths' of it all is really the only way to introduce new ideas in physics.

Your book has the look of a popular physics book (one devoid of such equations) which is great as far as communication of ideas to the lay public is concerned, but I like to think the heavy work has been done before that communication takes place, if you see what I mean.

And of course, challenging the ideas of Einstein, whilst a perfectly legitimate pursuit, is also commonly the pastime of unqualified headline-grabbers as well as real scientists.

I also wonder whether you could give us a taste of some of your arguments, as well as your conclusions?

Dear Nucular,

Thanks to your kind comment and concern. Please note that I am very pleased to forward the manuscript of NUCLEUS OF THE ABSOLUTE for your kind perusal. But I need you email ID to send the script.

Long ago, science has authoritatively declared that everything in the universe is made up of sub-atomic particles, but since childhood I was thinking that if the world is really made up of sub-atomic particles then everything what we see as fundamental force today must also be applicable at sub-atomic, atomic, stellar and cosmic levels. Otherwise, it cannot become fundamental as per the law Eternal. Today, what I am presented in the book is nature's revealed theory connected with the very functioning of human mind, nature and its connectivity with the science of the cosmos.

At the completion of the above process, nature gifted me a friend Swami Sai Sambat. After reading my manuscript, he suggested to complete ‘The Grand Unified Theory’. His interaction and scientific inputs helped me in the process. He provided me the book, ‘Beyond Einstein’ (by Michio Kaku along with Jennifer Thompson), which assisted me to evaluate and understand the current state of science. In the length and breadth of this process, there have been innumerable minds that have interacted and supported this unusual journey.

In fact, in the book I forwarded nature’s revealed equation in connection with chaos to trap all forms of the asymmetric secret of nature. It introduces oneself to the very root of life and the cosmos and explores the eternal connectivity between ‘The Grand Unified Forces of Nature’ and ‘The Super Spinning Motion of the Universe’. It explores the origin of the Advaita Vedanta, a true masterpiece of Physics. The last chapter of the book illuminates the reader to the ‘Secret of Infinity’ that provides a new scientific equation to the world connected with the root cause of all forms of chaotic behaviour pattern of nature and human mind. With this equation the scientific world can enter the inner as well as outer space in a simple way to prognosis all forms of impending energy outburst from the minute sub-atomic particle to vast cosmos.

Note: In this process I need spiritual support from a person like you to introduce a new hypothesis to the scientific centers across the world. Please do not think that it is my journey. No, absolutely not! It is our journey!

For more details about the book please read the synopsis at Synopsis of NUCLEUS OF THE ABSOLUTE

- Message from Chandra with an unconditional spiritual compassion

Hi again Chandrakanth,

Thanks for the kind offer by pm and the above post to send me a copy of the manuscript. I would never dream of turning down such an offer, and I'm very interested in seeing your book, but I have to be clear that, having now read the synopsis you linked to, I am quite likely to disagree with some of it to a substantial degree.

If you are comfortable with critique of your ideas (I always try not to be unpleasant, and remain constructive where possible) then I have sent my email address via pm. If you choose not to send it, that's fair enough.

I am very interested to have a look though: I am always up for reading about new takes on things, and I do think that perhaps Eastern thought has something to say about some Western science. It's very generous of you to offer.

In the interests of openness, I'll also point out that as far as physics is concerned, I'm pretty much a semi-educated layman - though from the synopsis it seems that your book touches on something which is rather more 'my thing' as well, namely psychology. So I may or may not be capable of meaningful comment, but I shall certainly try my best

I like this statement because it proves that all the time there are people that know 'scientific' things about the world before (most of time) everyone else does, but they don't have the theory or 'project' validated at that moment...thus everyone refuses to believe for those x amount of years that person was right, even though later they are. I just find it hilarious

Inner Chemistry of Nature and the Philosophy of Truth

After several interactions, comments, discussions and arguments in the different blogs of philosophy, science and metaphysics I have realized two things.

1. There is a need to present the philosophy of motion through equations. It is easy to explain some of the chemistry of nature more effectively through equations.

2. There is a need to mathematically prove that how math has destroyed the beauty of science.

In the beginning philosophy and science used to move together. Philosophy used to inspire science and science used to inspire philosophy. If one refers the history, he or she will understand that most of the major scientists of the past were philosophical in nature and most of the major philosophers were scientific in nature. Aristotle is one of the examples for it.

Nevertheless, subsequently the mathematical people entered the zone of science and exploited the space between the scientific equations connected with the chemistry of nature by misinterpreting it as the math of science.

Till today, mathematical people are thinking that scientific equations are the product of math, but scientific equations represent the hidden chemistry of nature, not math.

When two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom join it will result into a water molecule (H²O=Water). This chemical activity that inherently exists in nature does not belong to math, but to chemistry.

Chemistry, Physics and Mechanics are an inseparable trinity of nature, but not math. Math emerged in human mind in connection with the day-to-day commercial need of the surrounding world, whereas, scientific equations emerged in human mind in connection to find out the invisible chemistry of nature that governs the universe.

Most of the scientists who invented wonderful devices for the betterment of humanity were mathematically weak. This is an absolute Truth of the history. But now we are trying to separate such inventive characters from the mainstream of science by using inhumane mathematical tool of scientific fundamentalism. This is the tragedy of present science.

Even though science knows that most of the scientists like Wright Brothers who invented flight, Richard Trevithick, who invented the first steam-powered vehicle etc., all emerged outside the academic system; why the present education system is not permitting such scientific people and inventions to emerge? Most of the outstanding scientists who gave wonderful devices to humanity were poor in mathematics but not in invention. They proved their stunning aptitude of innovation without depending on the dogma of mathematics. Even Werner Heisenberg did the same. When the quantum mechanics was in its peak, Heisenberg emerged with uncertainty principle and shocked, but also helped the quantum mechanics to grow in a right direction. Science has given importance to the uncertainty principle without acknowledging the philosophical and the spiritual command of Werner Heisenberg.

Scientific vision of inquiring and finding answers is the innate quality that exists in every child. All over the world, we can witness this infinite character in every child irrespective of race, creed or nationality. It is their intrinsic quality, but through parenting and the present education system we are introducing the narrow mathematical approach in every child and destroying the natural excellence of the in-built scientific quality of the child.

I unconditionally love the scientific approach that moves with philosophy because philosophical scientists and the scientific philosophers of the history presented the famous equations associated with the chemistry of nature with the spirit of Truth and honesty.

Scientific equations help us to easily explain the philosophy of motion, but such equation does not belong to math, but to chemistry.

Remember! Absolute science is a science of never ending motion and will not rest in any harbour, may it be Newton’s harbour, Einstein’s harbour or the harbour of Quantum Mechanics. One of the highly enlightened souls of the Indian history, Basavanna once said, “There is destruction for what stands, but not for that which moves.”

It is very sad news of science that after four hundred years of observation, now, we started realizing something. The Text Book of Physics, page 338-339, The National Science Foundation of America says, “Centrifugal force was imagined by Newton to adjust planetary dynamics within gravitational law. There is no existence of any such real force in Astrodynamics.”

======

It's important to understand that while Newton was able to formulate his law of gravity in his monumental work, he was not comfortable with it because he never, in his words, "assigned the cause of this power." In all other cases, he used the phenomenon of motion to explain the origin of various forces acting on bodies, but in the case of gravity, he was unable to experimentally identify the motion that produces the force of gravity. Moreover, he refused to even offer a hypothesis as to the cause of this force on grounds that to do so was contrary to sound science.

Einstein's hypotheses are successful in explaining the effects of gravitational forces more precisely than Newton's in certain cases, but he too never 'assigned the cause of this power,' in his theories. It is said that in Einstein's equations, 'matter tells space how to curve, and space tells matter how to move,' but this new idea, completely foreign to the world of Newton, does not enable Einstein to assign the 'cause of this power' to curve space anymore than the Law of Universal Gravitation enabled Newton to assign its cause.

Einstein's theory of relativity predicts that the speed of gravity (defined as the speed at which changes in location of a mass are propagated to other masses) should be consistent with the speed of light. In 2002, the Fomalont-Kopeikin experiment produced measurements of the speed of gravity, which matched this prediction. However, this experiment has not yet been widely peer-reviewed, and is facing criticism from those who claim that Fomalont-Kopeikin did nothing more than measure the speed of light in a convoluted manner.

Scientists have theorized about the graviton for years, but have been frustrated in their attempts to find a consistent quantum theory for it.


George Bernard Shaw once inaugurated a function that was arranged in honour of Albert Einstein. Bernard Shaw began his inaugural talk by declaring something amazing. Einstein was personally very happy with the humorous declaration of Bernard Shaw. It was not only humorous but also represented a deep philosophical and scientific vision of Truth.

Bernard Shaw said, “Ptolemy invented a Universe that lasted 1,400 years. Newton, also, made a Universe, which has lasted 300 years. Einstein has made a Universe and I can’t tell you how long that will last.”

Present science has replied some of the fundamental questions of cosmology by using mathematical assumptions of Newton, which we cannot test in the lab because any object cannot and will not produce any force from the center of the object unless and until it starts spinning. But what I explained in my hypothesis that we can even test in the lab and get accurate equations from nature. There will be more scientific authenticity when we get equations from nature than human.

If we observe the energy movement of a big spinning disc or object, it repels the air molecules in the vast area, but if we take our hand or body close to the object, it pulls or attracts. This action clearly shows that because of the spinning motion, the air molecules will be tightly packed near the object and maintain pressure towards the centre of the object and acts as the binding force.

Nevertheless, after a certain boundary there will be a flexible layer that repels the air molecules in the vast area. Here, attraction or repulsion is not a product of the object or the air molecules, but an outcome of the super spinning motion.

The pressure of earth’s spinning atmosphere works quite like an under water current. Nevertheless, one cannot term this enormous drag of the spinning atmosphere as Gravitational pull. The binding force is simply the result of the spinning motion of earth, not the result of any pull from the Centre of the Earth as Newton assumed. Gravity is not what we think it is…. So far, we thought the ‘Binding Force’ to be the gravitational Force. The myth of gravity as we experience it today is the result of the binding force originated from the super spinning motion of the particular object or particle.

In the hypothesis I have explained the hidden chemistry of nature without touching the math. One can test it in any space lab by spinning any given object where they shall and will witness three fundamental forces (weak, strong and the repulsive force) and two derivative forces (electromagnetic and the balancing force).


Thank you

Chandrakanth Natekar from India