QUOTE (MasterPo @ Aug 29 2008, 03:47 PM)

Glad you brought that up.
If this is an example of "middle class" then consider this:
In 20 years at a mere 4% annual inflation that same family of 4 with an income of $25k will need to have an income of approx $55,000 to be at the same adjusted level.
To put it another way: At 4% inflation someone 2o years from now making $25,000 will be the same as a person making approx $11,400 today.
Will $25,000 still be considered "middle class" then?

Making $25,000 in your book is middle class, then that explains why a family of four making $50,00-$75,000 are considered rich by you liberals.

I don't know which state you live in, but in the San Francisco Bay Area you can't even make rent payments with that income. Obama will tax you further because you are RiCH.
QUOTE (sqlserver @ Aug 29 2008, 08:29 PM)

Even though the numbers are staring you right in the face...
The application *may* be broken. The image from above(also available at the link below) is just as important.
Perhaps if you've CLICKED THE LINK on how they calculate your savings, you'd get to this Washington post link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...8060900950.htmlSo, tell me, does the Washington Post just spread "Bogus Propaganda"? How about you send a letter to the editor about that?
Perhaps it is time you got over your little fantasy that Obama's going to raise taxes and start facing reality.
Cheers,
SQLserver
I reviewed your chart and your link and two things are quite clear...Obama is the candidate raising taxes. Where and how does he lower ANYONE'S taxes?
You did get one thing straight about Obama tax plan, it
"*may* be broken". Not only will he raise personal income taxes, but also capital gains and business taxes across the board. Not since George MacGovern, have so many tax increases be considered. You need to look a lot closer at the specifics of his proposal, which granted are hard to dig up. I will, however if time permits endeavor to find them for you.
QUOTE (IrishAidan @ Aug 29 2008, 10:56 PM)

Ya know, it's really annoying how shortsighted people are. For one, I think most anyone with a brain would be happy to pay the same taxes we had under Clinton if we had the Clinton economy. And I don't want to hear any of that "Technology Boom, Newt Gingrich" Republican BS; it's easily debunk-able. The bottom line is that Republicans give massive tax cuts to the rich and allow big corporations to ship jobs overseas. What the hell do you think? That because McCain plans on cutting the rich's taxes they will decide to keep jobs here? NO! They'll ship job overseas where they don't have to pay $14 an hour and make double the money.
Wake up. Republicans are no good for anyone but the wealthy.
Obama plans on cutting taxes for corporations who decide to keep jobs here. He isn't going to reward them for shipping jobs overseas like McCain. Obama will also make sure to invest in alternative energy, and those jobs cannot be shipped overseas. McCain wants to drill and invest a little -- period. And drilling isn't going to do a damn thing. Go read and learn about how long it takes for newly drilled oil to be ready for cars. It will do NOTHING but hurt the environment.
Republicans have screwed this country enough. It's time the rich, who've had it easy for 8 years, bend over.
Show me where EXACTLY and which corporations he will cut taxes for. NOT GOING TO HAPPEN AND NOT SPECIFICALLY STATED ANYWHERE.
In addition, you clearly know nothing about the cycle of oil well drilling. Just the mention of increased drilling and the lifting of the executive ban on off-shore drilling brought down the spot price of crude nearly 30%. I realize your not old enough to understand economics, since the brightest thing you have stated is 'McCain Sucks."