Australasia's 'Neo-Dinosaurs'
You're walking along an isolated old track in the outback. Insects buzz and birds chirp, the sun is shining and untamed nature takes pride in its beauty. Yet, you are uneasy. What was that sound? Probably just some feral cat snarling at a snake, you tell yourself. But just as you start to walk again, ther eit is, that deep, throaty growl. Your eyes dart all about the place. You jump when you snzp a twig beneath your feet. This is getting ridiculous. There's nothing to be afraid of out here in Oz. Nothing man-eating out here.
WHAM! You're struck from behind and a monstrous face emerges, hissing at you. Thinking fast you grab a fallen branch and whack the creature with it. It falls off your back, and you run. From behind you, you hear it scream, a primal screech from some hideous prehistoric abomination. The cry echoes from the distance till at last you find civilization.
Strangely enough, John Matthews swears this is a true story and that he was attacked by none other than a dinosaur in the australian desert.
He first contacted me about a month after I opened my 'Burrunjor' thread, which chronicled sightings of a tyrannosaurus-like beastie stomping around in the outback. I was, and still am, naturally skeptical of his story, but despite having little but his word that he is being honest, I have no reason to be certain he is lying. Apart, of course from the fact that dinosaurs are dead. Long dead.
I'm not the first to be interested in these modern Australian dinosaurs though, not by a long shot. Mr.Rex Gilroy, the self proclaimed father of cryptozoology in Australia originally bought many Burrunjor sightings to light and presented his 'Neo-Dinosaur' theory in his book Out of the Dreamtime. His theory states that dinosaurs evolved in Australia, and due to its isolation from the rest of the world, the Pacific has managed to evolve a few stranded dinosaur species long after their extinction in the rest of the world.
Although I question Gilroys credence (And, on occasion, sanity!) it is a good-enough theory, with a few holes that a bit of imagination can fix. But whatever caused these Neo-dinosaurs to arise in the Pacific does not matter, the beasts themselves are many, varied, weird and wonderful.
Australia holds almost a monopoly on the Pacifics dinosaur population, laying claim to Burrunjor, Kulta, Gaurange, the Meheme and many more, but it is almost beat by that real-life lost world, Papa New Guinea, home to the ridiculously unbelievable 'Row' (Obviously a hoax), a living tyrannosaurus, a sauropod, a ceratopsian, and a Carnotaurus-like animal. Other dinosaurs are scattered across the islands, with even Hawaii having an elusive little brontosaurus. But what of my beloved New Zealand? Do we not earn a dinosaur?
Despite occasional sea monster sightings, even less requent moa sightings and a few rarities in-between (A giant Kangaroo reported from the Bay of Sounds, and two Jackal-like creatures which apparentally resembled a platypus!) New Zealand lacks the virtual gold mine of dinosaurs other Pacific countries do.
So when I discovered the tiny newspaper article "'Monster' emerges in Canterbury" I was overjoyed.
The article described a local tramper, Edward (Eddy) Longs, claims to have been disturbed by a growling animal outsid his tramping hut late at night. Upon going outside to check what it was he slashed by the animals front claws (Suffering only very minor wounds), so he locked the door and could barely sleep till he could not hear its growls anymore.
I eMailed Eddy about the incident, although he was reluctant to stay in contact due to being laughed at by his peers for the story, and he gave me a more full description: A green, scaly animal on two legs, with an extremely long tail. Sadly, he did not get a good veiw of the beasts head.
Intrigued I contacted the Department of Conservation, also by eMail, asking for a list of sightings which matched that description. There were 32! Thirty Two! THIRTY TWO! A full 32 sightings had been slowly collected from trampers, hikers, even their own scientests had seen the beast! Most reports had come from earlier days, and others had been poorly noted.
But by far the most fascinating was this report:
"After some time, he discovered the smell was that of a slightly rotted corpse, suspended three metres above the ground in the thick vines. Climbing up a rata trunk he was interested by the carcasses unusual appearence. He believed it to be a human sized, two footed lizard of a strikingly saurian nature. Due to the smell and the creatures heaviness, he tore off the head of the animal, the skull of which is to be sent to the Wellington museum for study."
Then what on earth happened to the skull?! This report was from 1960, and must have been acknowledged to be fact by the DoC, otherwise they wouldn't have noted it! So what happened to the skull? The DoC was sorry to say they could not help me find the skull as it had been shipped to Wellington on a ship which struck rocks, and almost sunk just outside the harbour, losing most of its cargo in the process.
In short, prehaps the greatest discovery in the field of biology ever made was lost forever.
Even so, I do not give up hope on this mystery beastie, who I suspect might be a large lizard of a hitherto undescribed kind. It has been exciting unravelling this little homegrown mystery, and I hope you will join me in the search to uncover the truth! (Or the BS, whichever it turns out to be
- UDS
