I've finally got my debit card working and I thought I'd buy some stuff so Idecided to buy the RealUFOs e-book. I downloaded it straight from thier site through an e-mail. I had a little trouble at first and accidentally got another e-book called 'Jesus Is Not God'.
Anyway, I found out how to download it and I found some interesting stuff. There is one video of a plasma like, disc shaped UFO that sends out a beam of concentrated red light. I think this is the best UFO video I've seen. Even if it's fake it's the best fake I've seen before.
What does anyone here think of this or any of the other stuff in the e-book?
I also found pictures of the "humanoid faces" in the UFO. I don't believe this though as I can find better pictures in my bathroom blinds.
There still is some interesting stuff there. It might have been a bit expensive for what I got for the money but I got a good video of that rare plasma UFO which I didn't even know existed.

You've always gotta ask yourself, "if one part of the book or video or movie or documentary is totally discrediting (like the faces in the UFO u said), then the rest of it can not be taken seriously."

Why? Just because some guy went a bit crazy interpreting it, doesn't mean that it's BS. The author didn't shoot it, it was shot in the 70s I think. He said that he didn't have any access to the technology needed to produce the video. Sollog, the author has nothing to do with the UFO so I don't think it should be ignored because of one wierd person.

Couldn't get anything off that!!

Are you sure? Try opening one of the files. If anyone wants a copy I could try and send it to them by MSN.

the link worked! and thanks for the vids!

i like the shuttle videos

those tepoztlan vids are soo fake tho, and they have billy meier vids? also that wtc ufo that is a fake too...

the "close encounter" video does look interesting, but along side of these other proven fake videos, i cant take it seriously, unfortunately

are there any stories with the vids???

How is the tepoztlan video fake? I thought that it would be very hard to fake. Is there an article or anything that you can post?
I heard the close encounter was faked. It's hard to believe that a UFO would fly that close over someone yet they are still filming it. Plus they show no signs of shock or distress.
There are pdf files that analyse some of the videos. They're with the video files.

altho i have proof of the meiers and the wtc footage being fake, i am using my own judgemnt on the tepoztlan being fake...


first reason, everything is so still... not that i know if a ufo would move around or anything, but it just looks too still to be real...

the beam looks fake, when you pause the screen you can see crocked lines in the beam, like if you drew a diagonal line in mspiant or something, and the beam is looks exactly the same each time it comes down...

altho the ufo stays still for the most part, there is a bit of a wobble to it at times, and it looks like if i was to film a light on my desk, and then accidently hit the desk and made the lamp wobble a bit

okay found this....

http://www.rense.com/general6/hoax.htm

Well I don't know much about it but if you're willing to spend a lot of time on the Internet then I think it was filmed in New York by amateurs. I'll probably look for it if I have time.

what do I use to open a .rm file?

thanks man

close encounter is fake, what was he filming before the ufo showed up? why was it jerky at first as if he was running if the position in which the camera was stayed the same?why didnt he turn around and film more of it?