cos_mic_kid
May 2 2004, 04:43 PM
We all take cavemen drawings on cave walls for granted. But have we all seemed to somehow neglect to notice that they never drew the men with any beards. I could be wrong but do not think so.
I have a theory that they were perhaps the survivors from the destroyed Atlantis. So maybe they had the technology / knowlegde to shave.
If they were evolving primates is it possible that they had a strong sense of self identity? Doubtful.
Or were these beings hybrids?
Also does anyone have any information on how the egyptians shaved, as their carvings depict neat and tidy goatees.
Thx.
chico del nacho
May 2 2004, 04:52 PM
maybe they didn't think it was that important. or maybe they found it too hard to draw. either way, i don't see what the big scandal about it is
aquatus1
May 2 2004, 05:32 PM
No beards? They didn't have faces either, or hair. Drawing accurately, like any other artform, took a long time to evolve beyond its primitive roots.
NightMoon
May 2 2004, 09:32 PM
That's odd, I never noticed that before
AztecInca
May 3 2004, 09:37 AM
It was their ART...... they can draw themselves anyway they like, but maybe they just didn`t draw them because their pictures were never super detailed and putting on a beard wouldn`t be right

their way of drawing.lol..............who knows????
Angelfish
May 3 2004, 09:51 AM
Mabbe they didn't have ne hair. Like the V'ornn(sp?) from that one series by that one dude who's name I can't remember.
those were good books, i hafta read them again
Pendekar Timur
May 3 2004, 11:16 AM
| QUOTE (NightMoon @ May 3 2004, 06:32 AM) |
That's odd, I never noticed that before  |
..me too..
i think they drawed a young boy hunting..(what ever)
and they didnt drawed old man hunting..

p/s-well,that is just my opinion..
STIX
May 3 2004, 03:36 PM
omg, I saw one and the person had no nose, mabye back then our noses werent as developed and didnt stick out from our face...and now we are more evolved....doesnt that sound ridiculous?
vimjams
May 3 2004, 03:50 PM
Cos_mic_kid
I think you are making a serious and fundamental point that nobody has noticed or considered before.
Vimjams
Kellalor
May 3 2004, 03:52 PM
Some races of people have very little body hair. *shrug*
Pendekar Timur
May 3 2004, 04:02 PM
| QUOTE |
| Some races of people have very little body hair. *shrug* |
STIX
May 3 2004, 06:03 PM

if you look on the bottom right you can see figures, they are usually void of detail because of the method they used at the time, but they dont have beards...but do you expect them to have beards?
secondhand
May 4 2004, 12:56 PM
Why wouldn't they shave? They were anatomically almost identical to us and a newly knapped flint is comparable to a razor-blade in cutting ability. I think you're assuming that they wouldn't have thought how to shave because they were in some way "thick", but then someone had to invent it.
man_in_mudboots
May 4 2004, 02:01 PM
come on now, they didnt even have fingers most of the time. little more than stick figures.
GunnerCDM
May 4 2004, 02:53 PM
cave paintings were made to tell storys correct? i don't think beards were really an important element and it was just like let's do this quick and simple so that we can remember maybe? and also they wern't that advanced art detail probally wasn't a big deal but then again who knows...
Ozmeister
May 5 2004, 11:58 AM
snuffypuffer
May 5 2004, 04:13 PM
A beard on a stick figure would look a little strange now wouldn't it?

Seriously, cave paintings are highly stylized works, they don't seem to actually represent individual people. They usually have more religious connotations, tied to the success of the hunt and what not. Native American and Australian petroglyphs also have this stick figure form.
stillcrazy
May 5 2004, 05:18 PM
I don't know about anywhere else, But in the southwest of the U.S. very few of the native americans can grow beards. While some can, it is a general genetic fact that certain tribes such as the Navajo do not have facial hair. Since these good folks are decendents of early man, at least here in he U.S. it would stand to reason that they would have the same traits as their forebearers.
Just a thought.
man_in_mudboots
May 6 2004, 11:49 PM
the people that would have been paintinf the cave pictures were VERY hairy. the native amreicans were, of course, decended from the siberian nomads, who dont have much facial hair, like alot of eastern orientals.
Joe013
May 9 2004, 01:53 AM
And even if they didn't have a real good reason for not drawing facial hair, how can you jump from that to Atlantis? It's a good point, yet it needs more proof for you to just go right into how the Atlantians did it. That's just kind of...looking for evidence that doesn't exist....good point though. More connections are needed for me though.
dezavala
May 11 2004, 02:32 PM
I thought it was an interesting observation.
Pendekar Timur
May 11 2004, 03:04 PM
as you can see,
some ancient script from South East Asia..

1-
Link to Borneo Cave2-
Cave Painting-SOURCEp/s-the 2nd link's cave painting-represented to what? A Giant Cockroach..??
Fluffybunny
May 11 2004, 04:05 PM
I don't think that beards would show up in cave paintings as they are just a step up from stick figures.
I don't see any eyes in the cave drawings either, but supposition leads me to believe that they were there...
snuffypuffer
May 11 2004, 05:29 PM
They don't even have faces, much less beards or eyes, by that evidence you could argue that cavemen were really malnourished, and blind.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.