synge
May 21 2004, 03:57 PM
Do you think Manson really did it?
Did he kill all those people himself?
or did he use/was told to use people to kill people for him with mind control?
what do you think?
i seriously don't think he could have done all those murders.
chico del nacho
May 21 2004, 04:07 PM
he got his commune members to do most of them. he did one or two, if i remember correctly. go to
the crime library to find out for sure.
Seraphina
May 21 2004, 04:30 PM
Long story short: Manson is an evil, warped individual, who is currently heading towards a death that he very richly deserves. Trying to rationalise what he did (if..."rationalise" is really what the idea of mind control does

) is pointless....people like him simply don't think on the same level as normal human beings, and there's no way we can possibly understand what was going through his head that made him do it.
Was he under some kind of mind controlling influence? No....he was just a twisted peice of human garbage that I'd like to see done away with sooner rather than later.
stillcrazy
May 21 2004, 04:55 PM
It is commonly believed that he used a form of behavior alteration, and in a sense this would be considered mind control. But what he did was not that different from Jim Jones, Applegate, or other cults that kill or commit suicide. Manson, learned early how to manipulate others, and he used this on his 'followers' Many believed he was the son of god, just as many believed Jim Jones, David Koresch, and a whole list of others, that they were the new prophet.
Manson is a person who used drugs and other enticements to get his followers, and others to do his bidding for a twisted scheme to take over the country.
synge
May 21 2004, 06:08 PM
reading your comments makes me change my opinion
saucy
May 21 2004, 06:19 PM
I think he's a sick, sick man who needs to be in a hospital, not prison. I have differing opinions about his sentence though. I heard somewhere that he didn't kill anyone and that he just made other people do it. Should someone who just tells someone else to do it be sentenced to life in prison or death? I really don't know. David Koresh, he had sex with 12-year-old girls and thought he was Jesus. he didn't really kill anyone until the ATF and FBI came around. I believe he should've been arrested for the sexual assault and when they came for him, he gave everyone guns and told them to shoot to kill. The government was wrong too with that because they threw gas and stuff into the compound where there were children and that. It was too sad. Manson, he's a sick puppy, but never killed anyone so he should've been placed in a hospital.
Chauncy
May 21 2004, 06:20 PM
| QUOTE |
| Was he under some kind of mind controlling influence? No....he was just a twisted peice of human garbage that I'd like to see done away with sooner rather than later. |
Exactly!!!
Mind control.....no!!.......taking advantage of the impressionable....yes!!!
You can start a cult easily, all you need is a charismatic leader that appears to have all the answers, a sense of community, and people who are less then educated who are searching for something in life and who will fall easily to any type of twisted in group morality.
Manson got to his followers at a point when they were weakest and captilized on that weakness, used his evil charisma to pull them out of the gutter, to only owe him a lifetime of debt for his support.
It was no act of genius and definetly didn't concern any powers other than ego!!
BurnSide
May 22 2004, 02:36 AM
the guy has cut a swastica into his forehead with a blunt knife, and you're questioning where he killed people or not?
saucy
May 22 2004, 03:34 AM
I'm not defending Manson, but if I were to carve a swastika into my head and tell a group of people to go into a house and kill other people, does that make me guilty of murder? Should I spend life in prison for that? I didn't kill anyone. Yes, I'm crazy, but I didn't kill anyone.
Falco Rex
May 22 2004, 03:37 AM
There's some evidence that Manson did take part in the Sharon Tate murder. And he isn't crazy at all, everything he did was to make people think he was. What he is ,is a master manipulater...
Chauncy
May 22 2004, 04:16 AM
I saw bits and pieces of Manson's parole hearing, he purposely messes it up every time. Probably because he knows he's never getting out, but also I think he has become attached to the prison he is afraid of today's society.
Imagen if he did get out though, there would be all kinds of wackos ready to do his bidding.....the same type of people that would wear Manson's image on T-shirts and stuff.....I think thats horrible.......not saying those people would kill, alot wear those shirts to express the opposite of what society holds true,a little rebellion is cool, but endorsing a sicko is entirely different!
Maybe those Manson T-shirts are less the fashion anarchy and more bad taste......I dunno.........could never figure those T-shirts out......some-one explain for me
NirmalaMaya
May 22 2004, 04:40 AM
I agree that he was a master manipulator and probably highly intelligent.
He cut a swastika into his head..that doesnt mean he is a killer.
Even suggesting that because he cut a swazi into his head..he is a killer is silly and ignorant.
stillcrazy
May 22 2004, 08:14 AM
While it was never proven that Manson killed anyone, there is still a pending murder charge against him in the death of Short Shea, a ranch hand, and some time movie extra, at the ranch where the Manson cult was staying. Manson and Shorty went into the desert and only Manson returned. With a bloody sword. However, because Shorty's body was never found, (At that time. See below) Manson was not prosecuted with the crime.
The swastika, was a X that he carved into his forehead during his trial, his followers that were not under arrest, did the same. He later changed it to a swastika towards the end of the trial. Again, his followers did likewise.
Under California Law, he did not need to be present or have committed a murder in order to be charged with the crime. If he instructed or in any way conspired with the others, he is just as guilty.
I doubt that Manson could ever survive on the outside of prison. Up until his arrest in 68, he had already spent two-thirds of his life in correctional facilities. Plus some wacko would feel that he is doing everyone a service by taking Manson out of this life.
| QUOTE |
Steve "Clem" Grogan Convicted and jailed for his part in the murder of Spahn ranch hand, Donald "Shorty" Shea, although Shea’s body was never found. In 1979, Grogan agreed to tell authorities the location of the body in exchange for parole. Shea's remains were found and Grogan was paroled in 1986. His present whereabouts are unknown. |
I had to correct the above statement, as it seems that Shorty's body was found, or at least what they believe was Shorty. However, according to Parole hearing documents on Steve Grogan, asked if Manson was present at the killing, his reply was, " He had the cutlass the whole time, you make of it what you want"
It still seems that there is a murder charge against Manson that is the states ace in the hole. If Manson is ever released, he will immediatly be charged with Shea's murder to prevent him from returning to the streets. (There is no statute of limitations for murder in California.)
Kismit
May 22 2004, 10:07 AM
I actually did a book report on the Manson murder case files in high school . All I can say is he was and is a very sick individual .
There is nothing the man did not do during his time as a free man, and society is a better place while he is behind bars .
Chauncy
May 22 2004, 04:17 PM
| QUOTE |
| There is nothing the man did not do during his time as a free man, and society is a better place while he is behind bars . |
So what about these T-shirts people wear with the Manson image......I still haven't figured out what thats all about.
I'd post a pic here for elucidation, as I'm in the habit of doing, but further endorsement of this nut job would be contradictory to what I hold true!
synge
May 23 2004, 03:52 AM
| QUOTE (Chauncy @ May 22 2004, 11:17 AM) |
| QUOTE | | There is nothing the man did not do during his time as a free man, and society is a better place while he is behind bars . |
So what about these T-shirts people wear with the Manson image......I still haven't figured out what thats all about.
I'd post a pic here for elucidation, as I'm in the habit of doing, but further endorsement of this nut job would be contradictory to what I hold true!
|
I know a few people that are big fans of Manson, and they were those t-shirts.
I really think it's to show their view of society, and maybe they support him or something.
Maybe they feel he was wrongly accused/prosectuted.
Kismit
May 23 2004, 08:33 AM
I have no Idea what these T.Shirts are that you mention Chauncy . All I can tell you is that my book report was done on the case file notes made by the senior policeman in charge of the murder investigations .
Maybe Charles never wielded a knife or forced , manipulated or convinced his followers to cut the baby from Sharon Tate's stomach or to kill any other guests and people in the house or to then follow the Murders by killing Mr and Mr's Labianca the next night or forced another member of the Manson familly to comit oral sex on an 11 year old boy whilst holding another at knife point .
The man is one very, very sick individual and society is a better place with him behind bars .
And the Swastica was a symbol he cut into his head to prove to other members of the familly that he still supported them , he also asked that other members cut a swastika into there own foreheads to show him that they supproted him too . This was done while he was on trial .
Lottie
May 23 2004, 01:35 PM
The sooner that man is put to death the better as far as I am concerned.
stillcrazy
May 23 2004, 04:56 PM
| QUOTE |
| And the Swastica was a symbol he cut into his head to prove to other members of the familly that he still supported them , he also asked that other members cut a swastika into there own foreheads to show him that they supproted him too . This was done while he was on trial . |
See my earlier comment on this, and on Shorty Shea.
Kismit
May 23 2004, 09:50 PM
I've said it before ... Keep up the good work Still Crazy
And allthough it is similar in cultism to Jim Jones it is a very different story alltogether. Jim Jones led his followers to commit suicide , of course the children in the flock and those that where not given a choice could be considered as muredered , But Charles only wanted to leave a mark . Make the world notice the power he wielded over his followers by killing and murdering 100% innocent bystanders . Who's only mistake was living proximity to the Manson ranch itself.
Chauncy
May 23 2004, 09:59 PM
| QUOTE |
| But Charles only wanted to leave a mark . Make the world notice the power he wielded over his followers by killing and murdering 100% innocent bystanders . Who's only mistake was living proximity to the Manson ranch itself. |
Didn't he leave clues of the murder in a specific neighbourhood to inspire reaction the murders?
As to incite Helter Skelter I believe, a revolt?
Kismit
May 23 2004, 10:20 PM
He told the other members of the familly to make it look like a ritual killing and to write something "Witchy" in blood on the doors . No doubt it was done to get a lot more notice than the average murder .
Chauncy
May 23 2004, 10:59 PM
"The killers' motive?
Manson believed that there would be a great conflict between blacks and whites, which would end with the destruction of the white race. When the White Album came out, he was certain the Beatles were sending him signals, with songs about revolution and guns.
Utilizing passages from the Bible's Book of Revelations to define himself as the Fifth Angel, the gatekeeper of hell, Manson believed he would become defacto leader when the blacks, who he felt were inferior, would not know what to do with their newfound power. By killing a group of rich white people, he hoped that black nationalists would be blamed."
http://www.terrortrap.com/helter.htmI wonder if he just told his followers this was the motive, where in fact Manson's sole desire was to gain pleasure from controling people to the point that they would kill for him. The Helter Skelter idea seems absurd, unlikely and pointless.
stillcrazy
May 24 2004, 01:06 AM
| QUOTE |
| Didn't he leave clues of the murder in a specific neighbourhood to inspire reaction the murders? |
He told the group to leave the wallet of Mrs. La Bianca in a place where it would be found by a black person. The idea was that a black would find the wallet, use the credit cards and get blamed for the murders. But Linda Kasabian, dropped the wallet behind a toilet at a gas station. The police found it after her arrest right were she said it would be.
And in the Le Bianca case, because Manson himself tied up the victims, this was enough to charge him with murder, as he took an active part in causing the deaths.
The correlation between Jones and Manson is this: Jones started back in the 50's with a church setting that basiclly denounced "Standard Christian beliefs" he was a fundamentalist Pastor. And had a congragation that was inter-racial, unheard of at that time in history, in that location of the U.S. (Indiana to be exact)
Over time, he used his skills as a Pastor, and a leader to get people to follow his teachings. Brain-washing, mind control or what ever else you want to call it, needs time to work. The person who can convince others that his argument or ideas are based in anothers already imbedded belief system, makes it so much the easier to convert. (It may be noted that the cult leader may not know the final ending when they start out. Their intent may be completely different from the ending. But they begin to see how much of an effet they have on others and keep talking steps to further their own power.) Jones control took better than twenty years befor his demise, and yes he had people kill for him. He directly ordered the murder of Congressman Leo Ryan, and four others attempting to leave Jonestown.
Manson though, had a leg up on Jones and others like him, he took street kids, mostly teenagers when he found them/they found him, who were already outcast from society. Most were runaways or had other family troubles and were unwanted at home. Thus Charlie, became they're Family. It's a lot easier to convert a person to your way of thinking if they already have a reason to want to be converted.
I think most of those spouting manson's ideal have no clue what he was really all about. They think it was an anti-establishment movement, it really wasn't. It was a racially motivated idea, that if truth be known, would have never happened.
Universal Absurdity
May 24 2004, 02:14 AM
i think the man is guilty of everything he was charged for
he deserves to rot in jail, or suffer the death penalty
just my opinion
Kismit
May 24 2004, 04:16 AM
I understand the similarities in the Cases of Charles Manson and The Rev. Jim Jones . However I believe them personally to be two very different case studies .
Charles Mansons cult was a hopeless loss which really never took off . Why, because Charles was a deranged lunatic before he started his cult and Jim Jones grew into his well after his cult had begun .
The Jones town massacres, the killing of the reporters that went to visit Jones town and the alledged abuse that took place amongst the flock where symptoms of a paranoid dellusionist who didn't discover the full extent of his paranoia untill the 1960's . Most cases of mistreatement where not recorded untill after Jones town itself was settled .
Before this The Reverend had been known as a good man devoted to god . He even held a $3,000 a year job with the Indianapolis City's human rights commision , because of his stand against racism . It is my opinion that Jim Jones was corrupted by power where as Charles Manson only had a taste for it and would have been corupt with out it .
stillcrazy
May 24 2004, 04:48 AM
Kismit, I agree whole-heartedly with what your stating, The one common thread between the two is that they took what people wanted to see, or believe, and made themselves into that personification. Manson was the guru of the down trodden teen, abandoned by society and family. Jones was the speaker of all races and the poor, the promise of God revealed. This is what their followers wanted, and this is what they got. Where it breaks down, is when the leader becomes a god to his followers. In a sense, it's a blind faith. And it dosn't just apply to a religious cult, but can play on peoples fears. As I am sure any of the Mods here can attest, there are those who have a blind faith in politics, religion and whorshiping 57 chevy hubcaps. Jones built his cult over time, using social and mental tricks, Manson had a fast track because his groupies were, for the most part, already into drugs and disenfranchised with society. But the tactics were the same, base your belief on what your followers believe, and quietly, over time add to them. Use music, scripture, attacks, fear, sex, drugs, love, hate, and whatever else fits the doctrine to show that you have an inside track to the all knowing. This is nothing new. Other cases: Hitler, Koresch, Heaven's gate, and on and on.
Kismit
May 24 2004, 04:55 AM
Let us not forget Stalin ..

| QUOTE (StillCrazy) |
| This is what their followers wanted, and this is what they got. Where it breaks down, is when the leader becomes a god to his followers |
I agree particularly so in the Jones case where the followers were, in my opinion the creators of a false Idol . They wanted to believe and The good reverend was more than happy to give them something to believe in .
Chauncy
May 24 2004, 05:05 AM
| QUOTE |
| It is my opinion that Jim Jones was corrupted by power where as Charles Manson only had a taste for it and would have been corupt with out it . |
I can see totally how you arrived at your conclusions in regards to Jim Jones and Manson.
However I can also see, that maybe Jim Jones is nothing more then a perfected version of Manson. Where as Manson had the potential and the desire to wreak as much death and destruction as Jones but was simply not as effective at his craft.
Jones had to have been immensely more powerful then Manson, because he was able to convince 900 or something people to take their own lives. Manson convinced his people to kill others then try and hide the fact that they did it. But I don't think he was powerful enough to have them take their own lives. And as you said , his cult didn't take off where Jones built a large congregation as a result of his charisma
This was the final scene at Jonestown.
stillcrazy
May 24 2004, 05:40 AM
Chauncy, Jones had more time with his followers than did Manson. Charlie lusted for domination of a country so to speak. Jones only lusted for the domination of his followers. The trouble is, manson never got what he wanted, there was no way it could have happened the way he dreamed about it. Jones did get what he invisioned, at the cost of 911 lives. But they still used the tactics I mentioned earlier. And it seems that other 'cults' still use these today. (I was jsut reading a forum on another board that discusses a current 'Christian cult' in California. And am seeing a lot of comparisons with Jim Jones there.
Anyway, Kismet and Chauncy, great post. Very informitive and insightful.
BTW Manson is guilty, and should never be let out.
Chauncy
May 24 2004, 05:47 AM
| QUOTE |
| BTW Manson is guilty, and should never be let out |
This is the undeniable truth regardless of his methods or the effectiveness there of!!!
stillcrazy
May 24 2004, 07:14 AM
I don't believe Charlie is mentally defective, he is a great manipulator to be sure, and that requires at least a few brain cells working together. It is well documented that he is capable of using his surroundings to his advantage, and is always watching for little things to exploit.
But the middle comment does apply. " Maybe dangerous to those around him"
What I find interesting about Manson, is that unlike Jones and Koresch, he did not start out as a 'religious cult'. That aspect evolved later after he left San Francisco. And he only used, to the best of my research, the Book of Revelations. Where as Jones and many many other religious cults us the bible in it's entirety to develop their following and teachings. But then Manson also used mind altering drugs, sex and other means to gather his flock.
Chauncy
May 24 2004, 07:44 AM
| QUOTE |
| I don't believe Charlie is mentally defective, he is a great manipulator to be sure, and that requires at least a few brain cells working together. It is well documented that he is capable of using his surroundings to his advantage, and is always watching for little things to exploit. |
I would have to say though that if you look at his goal, and then look at the manner in which he executed it (Manson) is nothing short of bumbling, where as a rational minded person with the same goal would have done it differently, so his method is that of a mental deffective.
The video clips I've seen of him confirm the idea of mental illness. Unless of course he was acting, then he would have the appearance of a mad genius, and as of yet I'm not ready to give him that classification of genius, the adjective 'mad' I'm partial to.
Kismit
May 24 2004, 10:26 AM
| QUOTE |
| The video clips I've seen of him confirm the idea of mental illness. |
I would have actually suggested a permanent drug induced semi-psychosis .
Genius he certainly wasn't, most cult leaders tend to do terribly at school and Charlie was no diferent . He may well of had a heightened social intelligence . There are so many different areas of intelligence . I scored terribly on social intelligence in an I.Q test once . Shamefull it was .
Chauncy
May 25 2004, 04:30 AM
| QUOTE |
| I would have actually suggested a permanent drug induced semi-psychosis . |
Yes this is true, and as with his followers. The combination of psychedelic drugs and the power of suggestion is an effective one....ask the U.S Army:)
| QUOTE |
| He may well of had a heightened social intelligence . There are so many different areas of intelligence |
I can understand this....he just excelled on a more abstract social level......Manson's area of intelligence could have been one comparable to a good salesman......but other influences either environmental or genetic twisted it.
ladylisa
Jul 1 2004, 10:39 AM
Charles Manson is what we would call a habitual criminal his comfort zone is behind bars.This is due to the fact that the majority of his life he was imprissoned.Charlses belief that racial wars were imminent was partially due to the fact that although he never knew his father(due to his mothers prostitution) Charles was of mixed race himself part white and part black.Charles held little regard for his loose mother and very little regard for the weak father that disgusted him.Therfore creating a subconcios hatred for mankind itself. Charlse Manson is a very depraved humanbeing who undoubtedly did have many answers or so it would seem for the lost connfussed youth of the times(as do all cult leaders) An exellent book on the subject is helter skelter it is written by the prosecutors and all of the hard evidence is spelled out in it. I am sorry if any information is wrong I last read the book 14 yrs ago although this post has given me an urge to try to locate a copy thanxs
AffinityForEvil
Jul 3 2004, 03:18 AM

Manson had people do stuff for him. He gave them drugs and such so they would do stuff for him. He did partisipate in some of the murders so they coul convict him. manson was a good guy tho.
ladylisa
Jul 3 2004, 10:05 AM
| QUOTE (Darklordxion666 @ Jul 3 2004, 02:18 PM) |
Manson had people do stuff for him. He gave them drugs and such so they would do stuff for him. He did partisipate in some of the murders so they coul convict him. manson was a good guy tho. |

How ???????????????????????
Cradle of Fish
Jul 4 2004, 01:41 PM
Charlie Manson was just a person who knew how to manipulate people well.
He posed as a hippy, but its been said that he hated them, he just used them for the murders he masterminded.
| QUOTE |
| The man is one very, very sick individual and society is a better place with him behind bars . |
How do you know society is any better while he is locked away.
For all we know if he was still free he could of Overdosed on something, commited suicide, been hit by a bus, thrown in an insane asylum, or have repented some how.
And he is an old man now, if he was let out now he wouldnt be able to do anything diabolical.
And even if he is running rampant around the USA, we here in Australia dont care.
ladylisa
Jul 4 2004, 03:07 PM
| QUOTE (Cradle of Fish @ Jul 5 2004, 12:41 AM) |
And even if he is running rampant around the USA, we here in Australia dont care. |

thats a bit harsh you know johny loves bush lol but seiously some of us would care
Cradle of Fish
Jul 5 2004, 03:45 PM
Yeh some of you, but there is little reason to care.
The USA is hardly the center of the universe, even though they seem to make themselves out as it.
Sure madmen deserve to be locked up, but people rarely get what they deserve.
Kismit
Jul 6 2004, 05:19 AM
| QUOTE |
Sure madmen deserve to be locked up, but people rarely get what they deserve.
|
Now theres a good reason for letting madmen out of prison
moe eubleck
Jul 6 2004, 09:58 AM
Moe has been accused of madness. Does this mean he should be locked up ?
Kismit
Jul 6 2004, 10:35 AM
Tis a sad day when I must reply, I actually spent time thinking that over .
Kismit has a very good friend who suffers from what most people refer to as MPD but is apparently refered to as Dis-asociative disorder (SP?) She is not the kind of crazy you lock up . She is the kind of crazy you take to a party .
| QUOTE |
| i shall say it was moronic to even compare. |
Fluffybunny
Jul 6 2004, 02:25 PM
| QUOTE (Darklordxion666 @ Jul 2 2004, 08:18 PM) |
| manson was a good guy tho. |
I've never been one for one word replies in posts, but when I read this one the first thing that came to mind was:
WTF?
Do you even know who we are talking about? What he did? Did you catch on the the part about the murders or did that slip your attention? We are talking about Charles Manson, not Marilyn Manson...
odinsgrl
Jul 6 2004, 04:47 PM
Cradle of Fish
Jul 6 2004, 05:58 PM
Rockstar is one thing he is though.....
Are we still discussing Marilyn Manson?
Anyway, I dont think murderers should be set free to wreak havoc, in general its a bad idea, but if they ever do get let out, I wouldnt care, cos I dont go around angering mass murderers and making them want to come and kill me when they get out.
I think the Rapists and Kidnappers are much much more dangerous.
odinsgrl
Jul 6 2004, 06:19 PM
Um, this thread is about
Charles Manson. For those of you who, aren't really paying attention.
moe eubleck
Jul 6 2004, 07:36 PM
I have a friend named Charles
Monson. I wonder what his parents were smoking ...
The Nameless One
Jul 7 2004, 05:03 PM
| QUOTE (synge @ May 21 2004, 04:57 PM) |
Do you think Manson really did it? Did he kill all those people himself? or did he use/was told to use people to kill people for him with mind control?
what do you think?
i seriously don't think he could have done all those murders. |
Manson was sick and twisted.

I believe the correct word would be Bi-Polar..............
TNO