Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: chicks and dudes
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Spirituality vs Skepticism
MoonBaby
There are those that think that there really is not that much of a difference in the biological composition of men and women, and they are essentially the same. What makes them different is the way they are treated as infants and children. Girls are more likely to be held as soon as they start to cry, was the biggest difference as far as how infants are treated. They said that this may be some instinct bred into human nature to make the boys "toughen up". There was more but I'll have to go through my notes to find it later.

Anyways, what I want to know, is what's ya'lls opinion on why dudes and chicks are different? Do you think it's mainly because of how they are treated or is it mostly because of biological factors?

Kind of off the subject, but, boys you need to get your butts in gear in school. If things keep going the way they are, by 2068 the last male will graduate with his bachelor's degree and there will be no more guys in college. I'm a chick but I personally don't want to see this country ran by a bunch of females. Dear lord I would cry. crying.gif
Chauncy
QUOTE
Anyways, what I want to know, is what's ya'lls opinion on why dudes and chicks are different? Do you think it's mainly because of how they are treated or is it mostly because of biological factors?


The first thing that comes to my mind is estrogen.....hormones, hormones, hormones, are the differences between da boyz and da girlz.

Not saying females are slaves to their hormones, they are no more slaves then men are to their hormones.

Hormones, indeed the levels of, stipulate a great deal about a person's personality.

Here's a nifty little article by a female DR. that addresses the issue of hormones.

QUOTE
One stereotyped view of women portrays us all as creatures at the mercy of our hormones. 'Balls (or should it be ovaries?) to that!' I say. Our hormones undoubtedly have a huge influence on our lives, but there is no reason why we have to become slaves to them. The more we understand how hormones can affect the female body, mind and emotions the better able we will be to minimise their negative effects and enhance their positive ones.
Venomshocker
Hmmm, yea Id say the main difference between boys an girls, is biological.

And Like Chauncy said, its mainly hormonal differences.

QUOTE
I'm a chick but I personally don't want to see this country ran by a bunch of females. Dear lord I would cry.


Good call Moonbaby. thumbsup.gif
Falco Rex
Let's not rule out upbringing either. Moonbaby had a point in her opening post. A girl crying has a problem that needs solving. A boy doing the same needs to learn to deal with it..
Not that every child is raised this way of course, but the general roles of gender haven't changed all that much when you consider how long humans have been around..
The difference between externalizing and internalizing emotions plays a big part on a childs' psyche as they develop..
MoonBaby
QUOTE
Let's not rule out upbringing either


There was a documentary we watchd in class on PBS about this subject. On this show there was a couple who tried to raise their boy and their girl (who were about the same age) exactly the same and tried to not push masculine or feminine traits on either child. They would buy new toys for the children and lay them out on the table and let the children choose their own toys. The little girl would always go for the dolls and "girly" toys and the little boy always went for the "boyish" toys. They said that one time their son actually went for a Barbie doll and they were so happy. Then he went outside and started using it like a gun. That made them sad. crying.gif

Also, a study was done with random children that were put in a room together; girls only and boys only. There were both girl toys and boy toy in the room. Almost every girl and boy went for their specific genders toys. The girls were more concerned with working together and role playing, or whatnot. The boys, however, were more rowdy and played "war" and wrestling and more whatnot. Boys will be boys and girls will be girls type thing.
Kismit
There are huge diferences in the sexes, thank goodness . Mostly, I believe they are physical . Males tend to be bigger and stronger than women in general , they also think on a completely different level . Men tend to be practicle were as woman appear to think emotionally .

Having said that the levels of male and female thinking in any individual alter dramaticly . I for one tend to think with a fairly masculine brain , that's not to say I'm butch . But if it needs building, I can build it . Never was a doll girl , never was a tonka truck girl, but I could spend hours constructing shelter .

Ofcourse when it comes to female leadership , my mother allways said , if woman ran the world, war would be illegal .
It sounds good to me .
joc
QUOTE
I'm a chick but I personally don't want to see this country ran by a bunch of females. Dear lord I would cry. crying.gif


This country is already run by a bunch of females.........they are called...




.........wives! tongue.gif
Kira
Kismit posted
QUOTE
I for one tend to think with a fairly masculine brain , that's not to say I'm butch . But if it needs building, I can build it . Never was a doll girl , never was a tonka truck girl, but I could spend hours constructing shelter .


*Grin* good to see someone esle thinks like that... I can't sew etc. But I can cook( most of the best Chefs are male)
and I can see both sides of the arguement when it comes to men and women. tongue.gif


joc Posted on Jun 18 2004, 08:36 AM
QUOTE
This country is already run by a bunch of females.........they are called............wives! 



ROFLMAO at least we see you are under control then joc thumbsup.gif
joc
QUOTE
ROFLMAO at least we see you are under control then joc  thumbsup.gif


While it is true that Man is the 'Head of the H ousehold'..........

Woman is The Neck.....

......and the neck turns the head anyway it wants to........ laugh.gif
tigger
there was also a study done on both males and females who were unsure about their sex (felt they were a woman trapped in a male body and vice-versa)
it showed a scan of a (normal) female brain and male brain, and the differences were remarkable. but the (*abnormal* scan) males who felt that they were supposed to be born female, had brain scan very similar to a female brain.

it definitely has a lot to do with hormonal factors, which other than the x or y chromosome, makes us what we are today, be it male or female, and somewhat to a lesser extent is environmental.. (dont know if you remember the story about english parents who werent happy with having a boy child, so they had his penis removed and treated him like a girl, but he still knew something was amiss, and didnt feel like a girl at all)

i dont think its necessarily gender specific the way ppl act, could be natural selection or a mutation in the gene that leads ppl. you could ask the same about the way a dog, cat or even monkey acts.... you get 'butch' females who know the ins and outs of machinery and tools, and then you get males who seem very femine
The Nameless One
Chicks rule. But they don't need to rule the world, I need to rule the world and all the chicks can serve me at will. wub.gif devil.gif wub.gif
moe eubleck
Moe is lesbian housewife trapped in a mans body. This we know. We cook, we clean and we change diapers. We go shopping and buy wholesome vegetables Moe makes his kids eat brocolli !! Moe pushes a stroller around the mall !!
Mrs. Moe is currently gone untill next friday. She has gone far far away for temporary active duty. She is groovy. She wears combat boots.
Now Moe is left all alone with 3 kids. but this is only practice for what is in store. Soon Moe will be alone for six months out of every year in 2 month cycles. crying.gif sad.gif huh.gif

Monkeys I giggle.
biological beaver
Kira
QUOTE
The Nameless One Posted on Jun 18 2004, 09:16 AM
  Chicks rule. But they don't need to rule the world, I need to rule the world and all the chicks can serve me at will.   


Nameless with an attitude like it's a wonder you haven't been slapped a few times... tongue.gif thumbsup.gif
The Nameless One
QUOTE (Celti @ Jun 18 2004, 09:22 AM)
QUOTE
The Nameless One Posted on Jun 18 2004, 09:16 AM
  Chicks rule. But they don't need to rule the world, I need to rule the world and all the chicks can serve me at will.    


Nameless with an attitude like it's a wonder you haven't been slapped a few times... tongue.gif thumbsup.gif

Only a couple times grin2.gif I deserved it, still do deserve it.

But Im hungry like the cat.gif wait thats a cat I thought that was always a wolf. Anyyo Im hungry got to eat catch ya later gator.

TNO with the mad flow, making rhymes while playing supernintendo, bad boy got to treat ya just like Ice cream, got feel ya till I hear ya scream, Im your dream and your my nightmare, but Im so damn cool that I just don't care. cool.gif

Night celti Night everyone. cool.gif
MoonBaby
QUOTE (The Nameless One @ Jun 18 2004, 09:16 AM)
Chicks rule. But they don't need to rule the world, I need to rule the world and all the chicks can serve me at will. wub.gif  devil.gif  wub.gif

Actually, I need to rule the world, I oficially decided. bounce.gif I won't say what I would do if I ruled cuz I'd probably get in trouble but, I will say we would all be burning English muffins and beating someones dog, and the world would be a happy place where all would giggle and laugh.
schadeaux
QUOTE (MoonBaby @ Jun 18 2004, 07:31 AM)
I will say we would all be burning English muffins and beating someones dog, and the world would be a happy place where all would giggle and laugh.

You don't like doggies?
crying.gif
MoonBaby
I love doggies. wub.gif wub.gif Ever watch OCC?
Falco Rex
I don't mind burning and laughing but I refuse to beat a dog. I may have to take over pre-emptively to prevent such a world from coming to be. All animal abusers will then wear their own intestines around their necks..
..And Falco will giggle and laugh.

Unless you were using slang I'm not familiar with. Then it's cool.. thumbsup.gif
MoonBaby
QUOTE (Falco Rex @ Jun 18 2004, 03:37 PM)
I don't mind burning and laughing but I refuse to beat a dog. I may have to take over pre-emptively to prevent such a world from coming to be. All animal abusers will then wear their own intestines around their necks..
..And Falco will giggle and laugh.

Unless you were using slang I'm not familiar with. Then it's cool.. thumbsup.gif

It is slang. I love puppies and I agree with you. All animal abusers should have their eyeballs popped out of their skulls and be thrown in a room with spiders and lots of creepy crawly things that are disgusting and scary. And after that, they should be hung upside down from the ceiling and have every single nail ripped from their body. And I'm not joking either. I hate people that abuse animals. mad.gif
Chauncy
Tigger said
QUOTE
you get 'butch' females who know the ins and outs of machinery and tools, and then you get males who seem very femine


There is a large scale of femine and masculin.

This scale has alot of gray areas. At one end of the scale lets put a man and on the other you have woman.

Now in between these two extremes you have feminine males, butch women, gay men, gay women. You also have gender confusion, where people feel they are a different sex on the inside then on the outside. Hermaphidites would fit in here as well.

It seems that in the womb hormonal activity or the lack there of will render a person anywhere on this scale. I believe this has a lot more to do with nature than nurture.
odinsgrl
QUOTE
I'm a chick but I personally don't want to see this country ran by a bunch of females. Dear lord I would cry. 



Why?

No offense to any guys out there, but I feel men have had thier chance at "ruling the world", and personally I think they've made a pretty big mess of things. I'm not saying that women could do any better, but hey, give us a chance, and we might.

This is not a comdemnation, Moonbaby, I'd really like to know.
Fenris
QUOTE (odinsgrl @ Jun 18 2004, 05:30 PM)
No offense to any guys out there, but I feel men have had thier chance at "ruling the world", and personally I think they've made a pretty big mess of things. I'm not saying that women could do any better, but hey, give us a chance, and we might.

Well the only woman Prime Minister the UK ever had was the singlemost destructive thing to happen to British politics!

However, it isn't about wether they are male or female, but rather how good a politician they are and that isn't effected by gender even though some people act as if it does.
MoonBaby
QUOTE (odinsgrl @ Jun 18 2004, 05:30 PM)
QUOTE
I'm a chick but I personally don't want to see this country ran by a bunch of females. Dear lord I would cry. 



Why?

No offense to any guys out there, but I feel men have had thier chance at "ruling the world", and personally I think they've made a pretty big mess of things. I'm not saying that women could do any better, but hey, give us a chance, and we might.

This is not a comdemnation, Moonbaby, I'd really like to know.

No offence taken. grin2.gif

I'm not talking about the world, if I said that, I apologize. Those statistics were for the U.S., and that's what I am referring to. I think men have had their fair share also. It's time for there to be a balance in power. I don't think that either gender should be the ruling power. Men are too domineering and women are too emotional. There needs to be emotion mixed in there with "control", and there needs to be logic mixed with emotion. But at the rate we're going, our country is going to be ran by emotion and that is a very scary thought. But... somebody will come along to fix that if it happens, someone always does.
Chauncy
Whats the difference between if men "run" the world or women "run" the world?

I would very much like for both of us to maintain 'our' world.

Lets rid of these divisions, they do nothing but hinder our understanding of everything!!

This world, our future, our past, our endeavers are exactly that................OURS!

There should be no difference of objective in the commonality sense.
Falco Rex
I don't think there'd be much difference in the world if women "ran" it, sad to say. Politics itself requires a certain mindset if you're going to be involved in it. It doesn't matter if you're male or female, you'll end up doing the same things..
Look at Hillary Clinton, Margaret Thatcher or Indira Gandhi. You'd be hard-pressed to find a difference between their politics and the traditional "Male" definition of it..
tigger
QUOTE (Chauncy @ Jun 18 2004, 04:58 PM)
Tigger said
QUOTE
you get 'butch' females who know the ins and outs of machinery and tools, and then you get males who seem very femine


There is a large scale of femine and masculin.

This scale has alot of gray areas. At one end of the scale lets put a man and on the other you have woman.

Now in between these two extremes you have feminine males, butch women, gay men, gay women. You also have gender confusion, where people feel they are a different sex on the inside then on the outside. Hermaphidites would fit in here as well.

It seems that in the womb hormonal activity or the lack there of will render a person anywhere on this scale. I believe this has a lot more to do with nature than nurture.

which is exactly what i wrote in my post

and it leads us to believe more so that being gay is a contributing genetic factor.... a recessive gene or a mutation etc.....

but on the topic of hermaphrodites..... a being containing both sex organs.... it depends on how much more of one hormone they have in their body to contribute to which gender they would be more akin too
ouijaouija
Hi, I've looked at these areas as I am studying, and this is what I think.

The fact that females do better isn't really a big deal. Males actually get more degree and higher degrees than females.

But if you look at inequality. The biggest correlation with education is class, not gender.

And though burture may be a big factor, the fact that animals have clear segregated roles shows that gender differences are also largely biologically motivated, though culture does have a alrge affect too.
Cradle of Fish
I really dont think we need "leaders" like politicians.

Those who lead by example are better leaders than a guy who half the country hates and the other half voted for because they didnt like the other guy.

Prime Ministers and Presidents are a bad idea, they have way to much power.

I think women can lead the country better than men can, because men are more violent and are more likely to invade other countries for reasons noone really comprehends.

Wasnt there that guy who commited suicide recently who was born a male but raised a girl as an experiment?

Or something..
Fenris
I think you have little clue! I cite the example of Margret Thatcher, the UK's first, only and worst ever prime minister..... you know, the one that pressured argentina into a conflict, ordered the sinking of the belgrano dispite the fact she was told it was heading OUT of the conflict zone.... etc....

Women can be just as bad as men when it comes to politics, gender makes NO diffrence in that area!
Chauncy
Tigger said
QUOTE
and it leads us to believe more so that being gay is a contributing genetic factor.... a recessive gene or a mutation etc.....

but on the topic of hermaphrodites..... a being containing both sex organs.... it depends on how much more of one hormone they have in their body to contribute to which gender they would be more akin too


Absolutely, homosexuality is an orientation people are born like that, it is pure ignorance when someone says that it is a choice.

With the hermaphrodites having both organs, doctors usually wait until they become sexually mature enough to relay what gender they are on the inside. When this is revealed then surgery usually takes place if the person so wishes.

I often speculate that Hermaphrodites might have actually been twins if there was no mutation......but thats pure speculation.
MoonBaby
Dudes, I must have only known some really big bitches in my life (as far as chicks go) because the thought of women running America by themselves scares the T-total crap out of me.
QUOTE
Males actually get more degree and higher degrees than females.

Dudes did used to be the ones that got the higher degrees, but now I believe just as many (or close to as many) chicks are getting their doctorates and whatnot.
Kismit
QUOTE
QUOTE
Males actually get more degree and higher degrees than females.

Dudes did used to be the ones that got the higher degrees, but now I believe just as many (or close to as many) chicks are getting their doctorates and whatnot.


Actually the statistics in New Zealand show that allthough females tend to do better academically for the most part , when it comes to graduating males tend to graduate with higher marks and better degrees . Of course I personally put that down to the increase in teenage pregnancies . It's only statistics and the variation in ratios of males to females at graduartion stage must have an impact .

Seahorse
I used to think that all differences between men and women were down to nurture, and that other than the obvious sexual/anatomical differences, we were the same.

Then I met my boyfriend and realized how off the mark I was, lol. laugh.gif

I think it's most likely a combination of nature and nurture. I've also read about those studies in which girl children tend to pick "girl" toys and boy children tend to pick "boy" toys. There does seem to be an inherent tendency for girls to want to role-play and work with others while playing, and for boys to tend to play "war", etc. I read one study in which girls and boys were put together in a room, and the only toys available were little Matchbox-type cars and trucks, along with some little houses (but no dolls). The boys did their usual drive & crash into each other's cars and the houses sort of thing, whereas the girls pretended that their were people in the cars and had them talk to and interact with each other, drive "home" to one of the little houses and talk to their families, etc. Sort of the reverse of that little boy using the Barbie doll as a gun! laugh.gif

As for homosexuality and transgender/intersexed issues, I do think that homosexuality is at least partly determined by biology and genetics. What really pisses me off is this -- who CARES which it is, or if its both, either way there's just no excuse for going around gay-bashing, telling gay people they're damned to hell, and all that crap. I mean, we're each entitled to our own opinion, of course, but it's really no one's business who anyone else is having sex with, so long as they're having sex with a consenting adult(s).

Transgendered/intersexed individuals can become that way through a variety of factors, many of which do involve being exposed to incorrect levels of testosterone and other hormones in the womb. True hermaphrodites are very rare, although there are a number of syndromes which mimic it, such as androgen insensitivity syndrome (here's a link to a website on that: Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome)
There are plenty of others as well, though I'm by no means familiar with them all -- I just watch a lot of Discovery Channel and Learning Channel programs. huh.gif

Here are a couple of websites on being intersexed:
Intersex Society of North America
UK Intersex Society

That may have gone somewhat off-topic, sorry if so. I just find it a very interesting topic, although rather sad.

Oh, and as for that man who recently killed himself: he was actually not born intersexed, his condition resulted from a botched circumcision, in which they essentially cauterized his poor little penis right off! dontgetit.gif sad.gif blink.gif He had a twin brother, and as you can imagine the parents didn't have his circumcision done at that same hospital; the baby who eventually grew up to kill himself just had the extremely poor luck to have gone in first. His name was David Reimer, and he eventually grew up, became as male as possible, married, had (step)kids, and wrote a book called As Nature Made Him, about what happened to him.

His parents tried to raise him as a girl, on the advice of doctors, which was a mistake. A "doctor" called John (?) Money was involved, I don't remember if he was a medical doctor, a psychiatrist, or both, but he essentially abused those kids in order to serve his pet theory, which was that identifying as male or female was all down to how you were raised, and that kids could be trained either way.

I'll stop going on about it; here's a link for those who are interested: David Reimer
MoonBaby
QUOTE
What really pisses me off is this -- who CARES which it is, or if its both, either way there's just no excuse for going around gay-bashing, telling gay people they're damned to hell, and all that crap. I mean, we're each entitled to our own opinion, of course, but it's really no one's business who anyone else is having sex with, so long as they're having sex with a consenting adult(s).


Right on homie! grin2.gif thumbsup.gif What ticks me off even more though, is how it's "cool" and "sexy" for a girl to be bi-sexual or a lesbian, but if it's the same for a guy, that's "disgusting".

On that subject, here's a link I think is very interesting. Tell me what ya'll think.

QUOTE
his condition resulted from a botched circumcision


That's crap. If I have a son one day he will never be circumcised. Besides, most of the nerve endings that are in a male's penis are located in the foreskin. You chop that off and the little dude's not getting all of the feeling he should. Off the topic, but does anyone know why that ritual was started in the first place?



Falco Rex
It was started by Desert Tribesmen in the Holy Land and adopted by the Jews. It actually made a lot of sense. It was started as a hygienic measure. Anyone who's been to the beach knows that sand gets into everything..
If you live your entire life in a tent in the desert then, well...
Sand thats trapped between the foreskin and the head is a severe irritant and can lead to infection..
There isn't as much need for that nowadays, but on the whole circumcision is more sanitary than not..
Seahorse
Moonbaby,

Thanks for the "thumbs up", lol! grin2.gif It really does drive me crazy that some people believe they have the right to tell everyone who to have sex with -- and not only that, they believe that they know what God feels about the situation!! mad.gif disgusted.gif blink.gif Idiots.

QUOTE
What ticks me off even more though, is how it's "cool" and "sexy" for a girl to be bi-sexual or a lesbian, but if it's the same for a guy, that's "disgusting".

You're absolutely right. Personally, I tend to believe that everyone has at least a tiny little bit of bisexual inclination, though most people do seem to be very much more to the straight or gay end of the spectrum. I think that society -- American society, at least -- is not quite as bigoted against bisexual and/or gay women as against bisexual and/or gay men, because (1) women are, as a rule, more emotionally expressive than men anyway, tend to kiss/hug their friends hello, etc. it's just more accepted than if men do it, unfortunately; (2) men love to see two women together, lol. whistling2.gif

Thanks for posting that link, by the way. I read the article it led to, although I don't have the time at the moment to read all the other articles that that article led to, but what I read was thought-provoking.

QUOTE
That's crap. If I have a son one day he will never be circumcised. Besides, most of the nerve endings that are in a male's penis are located in the foreskin. You chop that off and the little dude's not getting all of the feeling he should. Off the topic, but does anyone know why that ritual was started in the first place?


I don't think that most of the male's nerve endings are in the foreskin; it's my understanding that some people believe that when the glans or head is exposed, which is what happens when the foreskin is removed, over time the head becomes somewhat desensitized. Myself, I'm undecided on the issue of whether or not to circumcise my boys, if I ever have any. It does seem barbaric, but on the other hand it's easier to keep the penis clean if it's been circumsized, especially when the boy hits age 10 or so and is none too fond of baths and general hygiene. I think I will probably let my husband make the decision, only because he owns one himself and has a better understanding of the impact and implications.

As for why it was started in the first place, I think it had something to do with the Jewish people wanting to maintain their religious and cultural identity, while in the midst of various other Middle Eastern peoples/tribes (the old "if your pants were any tighter I could tell your religion" bit, lol. wink2.gif ) But I may be wrong about that; maybe someone else here knows more about it. Probably so, in fact. wink2.gif
moe eubleck
QUOTE
There isn't as much need for that nowadays, but on the whole circumcision is more sanitary than not..


I read somewhere that circumcision takes away 1/3 of sensation. So sensation or sanitation ? What will it be ? Ask yourself this question when you have a newborn son.
MoonBaby
In this day and age, with there not being a whole lot of sanitation problems, I would have to choose sensation. Plus, my husband is already set on that decision.
Chauncy
QUOTE
Besides, most of the nerve endings that are in a male's penis are located in the foreskin. You chop that off and the little dude's not getting all of the feeling he should.


All of the nerve endings that count, are located in the exact head of the penis, same as a clitoris.

Now, the foreskin rubs against the head, which would logically create more sensation, more friction more sensation. This is where the fallacy comes from that the foreskin has more nerve endings or is crucial to full sensation.

Quite the opistite when you consider that the whole head of the penis is exposed to friction without the foreskin.

It's comparable to feeling the exact temperature of the water with your sock on? or off?
Falco Rex
QUOTE
Ask yourself this question when you have a newborn son


Well, I do. And we went with the circumcision. We had some long conversations with various doctors about it, and what came out of it for the most part was that the sensation thing was an often repeated myth. Just like that well-known fallacy about only using 10% of your brain.
The only drawback is the slight chance they'll botch the operation, but it's a 1 in a milion chance of that happening if not more..
Another factor for me was that my Son has a Jewish Grandmother and a half Jewish Dad(I mean me smart-asses). I'm not pushing him into any particular religion, but if he decides to practice Judaism when he gets older, I'd rather him be circumcised now than when it will be really painful for him..

..Anyway, his circumcision went fine and he's healthy and happy..
MoonBaby
You loose 35% of feeling according to my husbands doctor.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.