aquatus1
Jul 30 2004, 05:38 PM
Would that be the section that begins with this statement?
| QUOTE |
| The purpose is NOT to prove that psionics is real. These videos/pictures are not here to say "see? told you!". Everyone knows that videos and pictures can be faked - please do not go around saying how you think something was faked, there are literally hundreds of ways to fake the files below. |
If you don't want to prove it, then you don't want to prove it. Nothing can be done. But understand this. The days of proclaiming that you have abilities above and beyond were left in the sandbox. If you want to make a statement in a public forum, you go right ahead, but do not expect others to nod politely if what you are saying lacks credibility. If you have a belief that Psi works, more power to you. If you demand that psi be considered factual, yet refuse to back up your statement, then stand by, debate is imminent.
I am familiar with Psipog.net. Frankly, I have greater respect for them than I do for some of the members in this board, for no other reason than they at least understand the scientific method, and attempt to use that in their search for the paranatural. They also make no claims to have proof, because they understand that what they have is not what science accepts as imperical and objective evidence. I still don't agree with what they are saying, but I have no arguments with their credibility.
aquatus1
Jul 30 2004, 05:47 PM
Nate,
Researching things on-line isn't going to get you too far. The internet is good for abstracts and general direction, but not for true study. What you need to do is search for the universities with paranatural research departments, and see if they have a link to their thesis archives. Chances are that they will not (few universities, and none come to mind, have their studies open to public access). What you will need to do is get the reference number of the study you are looking for and contact the university, or if it available as a research item with your public library, ask them for help. They will be able to get you the specific study you request. There might be a charge, anywhere from $10 to $50.
The reason for all this is basically to winnow out the casual seeker. Universities do not like to waste their graduate student's time with frivolous requests, so they make sure that only people familiar with the research process are able to request their studies. Also, be advised that the studies will consist of formulas, statistics, and imperical data. It won't be in a narrative format, as it is on the internet and in most books. This is data crunching at the academic level.
Anakim
Jul 30 2004, 07:14 PM
Aquatus-
Im a little confused with the problem that you and others have with people who claim to have special abillities. Is it the fact that they are making these claims or is it that they dont want to prove it when asked to?
-Just curious
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 07:19 PM
Both.
It's dumb to make such a clam, and it's dumb to make such a claim without backing it up at all.
I found a Genie yesterday. I rubbed the lamp, out popped a Genie, and granted me three wishes.
Anakim, you HAVE to believe me and this story. Otherwise, you'll be a hypocrite, believing one outrageous claim but not another.
Anakim
Jul 30 2004, 07:24 PM
But there is a very big difference in your example and whats going on. Noone is telling you that you have to belive in what you are reading and noone expects you to.
Do you understand were im coming from or no?
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 07:27 PM
It's been posted that it exists, and we are saying it doesn't.
If you don't want to back up the fact that it exists, don't post that it does. Quite simple really.
Anakim
Jul 30 2004, 07:28 PM
why not? This is a public forum with a section on psychic phenomena.
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 07:31 PM
Yes, this is a public forum.
And as such, we have the right to share our view of such things in any forums publicly posted. Our view is such, your view is such. You post your view, you back it up. We post our view, we back it up. Therefore people reading the public forum is entitled to 2 different opinions, both the person posting that these things exist with no proof, and the person posting these things don't exist, asking for proof. That way people reading can make up their own minds as of the subject.
So is the nature of PUBLIC forums.
As i said, don't like it, post in a non-public forum. Simple.
gonzowalker
Jul 30 2004, 07:34 PM
| QUOTE (BurnSide @ Jul 30 2004, 08:27 PM) |
It's been posted that it exists, and we are saying it doesn't.
If you don't want to back up the fact that it exists, don't post that it does. Quite simple really. |
I think what burnside is trying to say is "sh*t or get off the pot".
There really aren't many ways to prove your claims to us, but you could use them to help people, or become a super-villain. All you need is a mask, some spandex, and a cool nick-name.
We'll believe you when you start making the front page of all the papers.
Anakim
Jul 30 2004, 07:36 PM
The problem is you attack whether a person is posting a personal point of view or just ask questions on a point of view. It makes no sence.
Ex. If I posted that last night i lifted my car with tk but posted no proof of the event would i be wrong in posting it here?
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 07:38 PM
Yes.
That would be lying. I do not give liars the time of day, and the only thing i've seen, in my personal opinion, is lies from the people boasting such claims.
Mr. Gonzo, you need a banner. Oh, and you're completely on the mark.
Anakim
Jul 30 2004, 07:44 PM
Gonzo-
you make it sound like we are debating wether its real or not. We arent even trying to change your beliefs let alone debate the subject. Yet still there is so much hostility coming from Burnside and people like him and only because we choose not to prove an ability that we can care less whether others belive in or not. Does that make kuch sence to you?
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 07:48 PM
[edit] decided it was a pointless post.
Anakim
Jul 30 2004, 07:49 PM
Lol! Burnside you sound like some kind of avenging angel of the forum. Is it realy that seriouse to you? Do our claims realy mean that much to a skeptic such as your self? Its funny how random posts by a bunch of people you dont know can get so far underneath your skin.
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 07:52 PM
I guess you're right about that Anakim.
I think we shall depart here, my point has been made, and there are others that want to make points.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
One thing:
Yeah, i showed alot of hostility, but that doesn't mean i have judged you or anyone claiming these abilities or whatever as bad, wrong, negative in anyway. From your other posts, you're chill. I just wont believe in the impossible so lightly.
Anakim
Jul 30 2004, 07:53 PM
I agree! No hard feelings!
gonzowalker
Jul 30 2004, 08:06 PM
| QUOTE (Anakim @ Jul 30 2004, 08:44 PM) |
Gonzo- you make it sound like we are debating wether its real or not. We arent even trying to change your beliefs let alone debate the subject. Yet still there is so much hostility coming from Burnside and people like him and only because we choose not to prove an ability that we can care less whether others belive in or not. Does that make kuch sence to you? |
Then what are we debating?
Hell, personally I believe in most psychic phenomenon. I'm not even calling you a liar, but why would you tell someone that you have certain abilities if you refuse to prove it? Several times I've seen Indian Steve make it rain by just spitting on a turtle, so I'm not a complete skeptic.
It's like when you go to a bar and are trying to pick up some little honey that is sitting in the corner. You can brag about how good you are in the sac all night long, but you better be able to back it up if she takes you up on the offer.
Hey, I claim to have seen Bigfoot twice and most people don't believe me. If I could prove it I would, but I can't control when Mr. Foot comes out of the woods. All I have are some pictures of foot prints that I took when I was 12 or 13.
To answer your question though....I guess It just doesn't make sense to me.
Anakim
Jul 30 2004, 08:19 PM
I see your point but we're not making claims we are discussing things that we can do or things that have happened to us, with others who have had similar experiences or whom ever wishes to listen. Thats it!
spectral
Jul 30 2004, 09:18 PM
Unfortunately extraordinary claims do require extraordinary evidence, so if people do make such claims they have to accept some hardline questions and skepticism. However I will say that for every blind believer in all things paranormal there is the arch skeptic who, despite declaiming a desire to find proof, has so invested in traditional scientific/materialistic world veiws that no amount of proof or evidence would ever suffice.
It seems the hardliners from both sides of this polarity are so emotionally bound to one particular outlook that any genuine investigation is doomed to be hijacked by one or the other. Psi and related areas have been scientifically investigated and despite claims that no proof has ever been found this statement is slightly disingenious as plenty of evidence suggestive of it's possibility has, for those who cry that we need absolute proof then I nod to the theory of relativity or the theory of evolution, neither are proof either just theories, backed up by observable evidence, yet they are generally accepted by the mainstream while psi research that falls into the same category is rejected outright, this is the kind of bias that afflicts such research from the outset no wonder it never gains ground. Randi's reputation has been continually plagued by concerns and claims that he tried to willfully influence results, this has compromised his credibility and therefore his claims cannot be accepted as proof of anything.
Uncle Meat
Jul 30 2004, 10:48 PM
i dont understand why fluffybunny and burnside have to be so negative and close-minded. this site is unexplained mysteries so dont bring the rest of us down who enjoy this stuff. (by the way i dont have psychic powers but im interested in tapping into them)
what if people like you dont belive in a cure for cancer with the same passion you dont believe in psychic abilities??? open up your mind a little and explore. your close-mind is only generating negative energy. but if your happy in your own safe little world, thats fine.
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 10:53 PM
I took myself out of this after explaining myself fully so please don't drag me into it again. It is not me or fluffy or any of us who are close-minded, we have said MANY MANY MANY times we would believe if ONE shed of prove was presented to us. As it is, it has not been proven. Therefore, there is nothing to believe.
Your arguement is a little silly, there is no cure for cancer, one does not currently exist and therefore there is nothing to believe in. Once cancer is cured and a treatment created, it will then exist undeniably.
Lastly, Unexplained-Mysteries is NOT for people to claim that they have super powers, it's about mysteries that cannot be explained. We skeptics are doing alot more for Unexplained-Mysteries than people who claim us false. We look to science to EXPLAIN these mysteries, we don't close ourselves off and choose to simply blindly believe in things with no proof, or without giving proof.
End rant.
tameer
Jul 30 2004, 11:08 PM
| QUOTE |
| We look to science to EXPLAIN these mysteries |
yeah well like i said before: science can't explain everything!
And either can you!!!!
i said before, if you wanted proof you could bring your ass'es to psipog.net or telekinesis.mine.nu theres all the proof there. but unfortunely like i predicted you STILL wont believe!
so then you tell us, how the hell do you think we can prove it to you, if we wanted to make you guys shut up..? huh? im not saying we will? i'm asking how the hell do you want us or any telekinetic or telpathic or whatever, to prove it to you? Since you wont officaly believe in video's, pictures, etc, what do you want us to do?
Find out where you live? go to your house and then be like
"watch me now, im going to roll this pencil"!!!!!
HAHahA COME ON! thats pathetic, start having faith, wisdom, and belifs, that lead to the inner mind. Stop being so damn close minded- and negitive about everthing!
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 11:10 PM
And the point of point out that quote was what exactly?
It's better than saying 'i believe it because i feel it's real'.
tameer
Jul 30 2004, 11:18 PM
hahahaha
you still didint answer my question::::::::
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 11:23 PM
That question wasn't there when i posted. It was just a quote.
I'll read it over. Hold up.
tameer
Jul 30 2004, 11:24 PM
haha
BurnSide
Jul 30 2004, 11:26 PM
We've posted our opinions on those sites. They do not give any scientific proof whatsoever, and psipog.net admits to not having any scientific proof. Read aquatus post, it pretty much covered it.
tameer
Jul 30 2004, 11:27 PM
correct. but then how do you expect us to prove it?
aquatus1
Jul 30 2004, 11:32 PM
| QUOTE (Anakim @ Jul 30 2004, 08:14 PM) |
Aquatus- Im a little confused with the problem that you and others have with people who claim to have special abillities. Is it the fact that they are making these claims or is it that they dont want to prove it when asked to? -Just curious |
That is an excellent question which deserves an honest answer. For me at least, and I certainly will not presume to speak for others, it comes down to pride.
How so? What does pride have to do with it? Let me explain.
I am a scholar and an advocate of the scientific method. As a scholar, I have spent hours in academics not simply learning the basics of how we understand the natural world to work, but also how to investigate it in an objective and non-biased way. There have been times when I have sat in a classroom and stared at literally 5 whiteboards full, from top to bottom, of derivations of proofs and formulas. There is no faith involved here; there is no belief system at work. Everything that I have learned, I have learned not because an authority figure has told me, but because I myself have worked through the equations and studies and derived the equation myself.
So, what is the basis of this knowledge? What is it that gives it an authority so grand that to some science borders on near mystical? The basis is scientific methodology. This is a method of analysis, the modus operandi of research, a standardized path and requirements through which everything and anything that wishes to be acknowledged as science must meet and and justify. It is not easy, and it takes years of work and dedication. When you have met them, however, when your work has been reviewed, verified, and finally, accepted; that is when you have earned the honor of being titled the highest form of a scientific authority, that is when you are a Theory.
And yet...there are those who would demand the respect of science, yet refuse to follow the requirements to meet its demands. There are those who honestly believe their research should be taken into consideration through the sheer power of their devotion. Why is this so wrong?
It is wrong because the scientific method is a system that has been refined and that has proven its worth through over five hundred years of science. The belief system of research existed for millenia, and has never come close to the amount of knowledge that has been gathered in the mere fraction of time that scientific methodology has held sway.
So, in answer to your question(and I apologize, I should have warned you of my tendency to lecture at length): the problem that I have is not with those who believe in the paranatural, but rather with those who claim that it is a fact. Facts are the purvue of science, and when one uses a scientific term, one must be prepared to back it up scientifically. Science revolves around imperical evidence, not subjective evidence. Science has a credibility because it works through a problem so exhaustively, it strips away all the variables so throughly, that the final answer can be taken almost as true, even though, scientifically, it will never be so.
There would never be a happier time in my life then when scientific evidence of the paranatural is discovered. But the account must be credible. It must meet the rigorous demands of science. It must meet the prerequisites of scientific methodology. And if a teenager twirling a piece of paper around a pin suddenly decides that his work is worthy of the title of science, then perhaps you might understand the frustration of someone who has spent hours analyzing data and come up with nothing.
tameer
Jul 30 2004, 11:42 PM
well... perhaps we have accomplished spinning the psi wheel, rolling pencils, etc... but there would only be one problem to that, science cant explain how that works, and how that can happen.... meaning we cant either.. But ideas, theories, Ways, these are all subjectives to finding a clue on how it all works in its own ways. So yes, people can be sitting in frustration for hours on analyzing the data of how it is all supposed to be. As for parapsychologists thats what they do. And still they come up with nothing, even though all of the proof is right in front of them. They can get any telekinetic infront of the world to levitate a chair. but thats still not proof. proof to scientists, is simply understanding how it all works... and yet that cant be defined. So as in a way, skeptics like such. have the right to question me, and others on this forum. And i totally understand that.
But its importent to know that 40 years ago, if you happen to have lived back then and told some of the people that "did you know that in forty years medicine will change the world! meaning: doctors will be able to make people unconsciencs! Doctors will be able to transplant breasts, and nose jobs... and will have cures for diseases they dont have for cures now!" and things like that, people there will crack up at you right in front of your face! they will think your crazy! "hey, did you know in forty years new communication will have technology such as cell phones!"
"There programming television will have color! yes color i tell you!" People will be like "what are you crazy!" But take a look, 40 years past and what do we have? exactly what those people have said and told. Its just the same thing! Maybe in the future we will discover machines that exactly tell us how our brain-left and right- function. That way parapsychologists will be confused no more! because that very system will tell you how the psychic inside of us works!
Im sure 40 years ago nobody knew how they eat, drink, breath, smell, see! all of these things! 40 years ago People saw in the eyes of western science! Anything that didint fit there point of view in that world they either said it was a fake-or-fraud. They never happend to believe any thing they thought was not real... were they afraid? or was it because they simply didint want to... either way, they were wrong...
They were wrong when it came to all of that technology stuff! They were wrong when it came to all of that medicine stuff! And i know that they are also and will be wrong about all of this "paranatural" stuff as you guys call it!
many of you are'nt used to seeing stuff that isint normal... i explained alot about that in my website: my telekinesis website: freewebs.com/tameer
under the (people vs. psychics section) if your very much into the eyes of the western world then i recomend you check it out!
.......*sigh*.......
aquatus1
Jul 31 2004, 12:22 AM
This was a bit over a decade ago, when I was an avid believer and vocal defender of the paranatural realm. The psi-wheel was no challenge to me. I could make that baby spin, stop, and even flip completely off the head of the pin on demand. I was all set to be the one who brough the field of paranormal study the respectability it deserved.
So I went to my physics professor and made my pitch. A self-study program, dedicated to the investigation of several different phenomena of paranatural nature. When he asked who my test subject would be, I proudly declared "Myself." At his raised eyebrow, I explained my powers.
He looked at me quietly for a little while. Then he spoke.
"You got your ID card on you?"
A little confused, I handed it over, he took it and stared intently at my picture. I watched, a little uncomfortably.
With a flip of his wrists, he sent the card spinning in mid-air. My ID card, which only seconds before had been secured in my pocket, was now hovering as it spun around itself, about six inches below both his hands. I watched in amazement as he guided the card through the air with the merest motion of his hand, first waving it around his right hand, then sending it flying to his left hand, all the while never touching, never getting within six inches of the hovering card. He even sat quietly as he sent the card a full 180 degrees around his back, only to catch it as it passed around to his front again. He handed it back to me.
"That was incredible." I couldn't think of any other way to describe it. I was in awe. Here I was all happy because I could spin a little piece of paper, and this guy was turning my ID card into a remote control UFO.
"That...was science." He replied simply. He then sat me down and explained exatcly how I was to go about setting up an experiment.
It was all about stripping away the variables. I made a list of all the possible causes that could be responsible for moving the paper: Air, heat, vibrations, sunlight, anything that i could think of. Slowly, I designed tests for all of them. I created a wind barrier by placing my psi wheel in a plastic plate with a small sheet of water, so that when I placed a large tumbler over it, the edge was submerged. The water also acted as a heat sink, removing another variable. I also did the tests in a darkened room. I even went as far as placing everything one a four inch foam pad that I secured.
Slowly but surely, all the variables were stripped away. And slowly, but surely, the wheel stopped turning, till finally, when I had a psiwheel that was shielded from the wind, heat, sunlight, and vibrations, would turn at all. Not from me, anyway. It still occasionally turned, but the duplicate that I had as a control turned as well, without the benifit of my focus on it.
I repeated tests such as these all summer. I learned more and more about methodology and research, as well as statistics and numbers, and finally realized, as I re-read all my original books and sources, that the science behind them was lacking. Things that i had ferverently believed in before now had glaring inconsistencies that I had never been aware of. Slowly, I realized that I had been deceiving myself all those years, searching for something that was greater than anyone else had, convinced that there had to be something more to this mundane world than what I saw.
And there is. And it is science. 11 dimensions. Infinite universes. Worlds within worlds within worlds. I still miss believing in the paranatural. If someone was able to spin the psiwheel after having eliminated the variables and set a control, then I would feel my interest rekindled. But, after ten years of searching, I have seen nothing more than the same claim cropping up time and time again. One gets discouraged. I still have hope that proof will be found. But I will forever be a skeptic.
And if anyone comes to me and claims they have power to spin a wheel, I will simply smile, and ask for their ID card. It is, after all, science.
PsiSeeker
Jul 31 2004, 03:06 AM
Would this Randi guy find someway to prove that you're a fake even if you tell him that he can choose whatever place he wants to, whatever time and perform Telekinesis infront of him, lets say levitate a rock, and try to make you out as some cheap skate???
PsiSeeker
Jul 31 2004, 03:23 AM

If so many people have been claming to be capable of a certain decree of power wouldn't some scientist get interested eventually and try to prove them right.
So far all i have been able to figure out is that scientists who don't believe are the only ones who have been trying to do the proving, i'm damn sure that some expert qualified person would want to get really involved in this subject and do their best to find out about it.
Falco Rex
Jul 31 2004, 03:42 AM
Firstly the last I heard about it was that Randi has completely removed himself from the testing process, so people couldn't use him as an excuse for failure.
You would tell them what you can do and how and his testing panel would work something out with you to remove all variables that might be trickery. It's a completely scientific process and still none have passed muster.
Although many of those tested have cried foul and whined intensely about their failure to pass; upon further investigations they've all been proven frauds. Either deliberately or through self delusion..
As to your second post. It doesn't matter if the scientists doing testing on psychic abilities believe in them or don't. The scientific method exists to weed out personal beliefs from the experiment at hand. If the studies so far have shown up inconclusive or false that should tell you something..
PsiSeeker
Jul 31 2004, 03:46 AM
Why don't the experts have a television show or write a book to make people shut the fact that they can do stuff. Surely they would have been extremely annoyed at how many paople have shown up only top be proved or prove themselves wrong.
PsiSeeker
Jul 31 2004, 03:51 AM

Can anyone explain the clasic psi ball away. If so let me no.
Falco Rex
Jul 31 2004, 03:52 AM
People do try. But few want to hear it. Even I have to admit that it's much more fun to believe in wondrous abilities; but sadly the evidence given so far doesn't seem to support it..
Besides that; despite what you hear; many scientists have a genuine interest in these kinds of things, and actually want to investigate them. So why discourage potential test subjects. If they're false, the data will show it. And up to this point it has..
PsiSeeker
Jul 31 2004, 03:58 AM
If the evidence so far proves wrong how come people are experiencing all the side effects of making a psi ball. Read the Psi ball guide and see what i mean
Falco Rex
Jul 31 2004, 04:00 AM
As for Psi-Balls. Do you know the term, Psychosomatic? I can make my hands feel all tingly right now by concentrating on them and convincing myself I've formed an energy ball. Does that mean there's actually something there?
Unless it actually does something physical it's safe to assume what you have may well be nothing more than a physical sensation induced by your mind..
The same way hypochondriacs feel phantom pains and illnesses..
snuffypuffer
Jul 31 2004, 04:44 AM
Sounds like nothing more than a vivid imagination. When I was a little Snuffs, I imagined there were little green men who'd come into my room every night, and I could kill them by blinking my eyes really fast. Where they really there? Of course not, but my imagination was so overactive that I convinced myself that they were real. This is what these psi-balls remind me of.
Xenojjin
Jul 31 2004, 04:47 AM
mainly why its good to try psi with a partner .
Talon
Jul 31 2004, 12:04 PM
| QUOTE |
| Sounds like nothing more than a vivid imagination. |
lol
Janiel
Jul 31 2004, 01:19 PM
i'd like to see some kind of proof(i.e. your teachers report, or other such documents), like the title says "Prove it!"
till then im just gonna sit here

and hold my breath
BurnSide
Jul 31 2004, 01:53 PM
Janiel, don't hold your breath mate, it's hard to prove something that doesn't exist, as has been demostrated here.
Falco Rex
Jul 31 2004, 02:09 PM
Jan?...Jan!?...I think he passed out! Get some cold water, quick!
tameer
Jul 31 2004, 04:03 PM
okay well then it seems as if nobody understood anything in my recent post. Even though thats the most i could possibly have cared for trying to put you guys to your senses. as it may seem, psi esp all of such do not exist, then one day it will be you guys who will know the truth of psychic phenomenon. Because i already do.
aquatus1
Jul 31 2004, 04:26 PM
And you may well be right. But we are not talking about technological predictions here. Claiming that our technological progress is an indicator of our imminent discovery of paranatural phenomena is a disastrous turn of logic. Why not the imminent discovery of the Greek pantheon of Gods instead? Why should it be paranatural phenomena?
Devices already exists that allow us to study the human mind, the decades old fallacy that we only use 10% of the mind has never been true, and with today's technology, neurology can answer almost any question on the working of the mind you would care to ask.
Again, subjective opinion will never be considered evidence. Evidence which you presented as proof positive was claimed by the presenters themselves not to be considered proof at all. You want to proclaim the "Truth" of your word? Go right ahead. But don't expect others not to point out the incredible lapses of logic in your arguments. It is all about credibility, and you have shown nothing that would lead a person to believe you are an authority in this matter.
spectral
Jul 31 2004, 05:32 PM
HHmmm, but is a cynical little cabal, ready to pounce on anyone who doesn't speak the party mantra any better than hysterical fourteen year olds proclaiming outrageous psychic talents. I don't think either side serves the purposes of a forum to discuss things weird and paranormal. The a priori dismissal I've read several times here that such things don't exist proves each case is already prejudged as worthless and not to be taken seriously but something has not been proven is not the same as something can't be proven because it doesn't exist. That's not a true sense of enquiry scientific or otherwise. My experience on other boards and some of the so called skeptics there is that they came to veiw such places as no better than some on line Bedlam where they could come and make fun of the fools and idiots. Fine if you create your own sight for the purpose, dissapointing if you need to hijack another and create a culture of inhibition. I hope that doesn't happen here because within a short time no ones going to bother posting anything of interest and you can all sit around congratulating yourselves on banishing the darkness of superstition, within another month you'll be bored titless.
On the other side of the coin people who make claims of being able to astral project or induce OOBEs to order really do have to put their money where there mouth is when challenged and not become petulant or defensive when proof is asked for, you're only setting yourself up for a fall, having said that anyone who wishes to try is welcome to visit here and tell me three items that are sitting on my shelf unit in the lounge. For myself the one OOBE that has intrigued me so far is from the poster who experienced them spontaneously in childhood and has been unable to replicate them since, from reading the post it obviously had a profound effect on them and even if examined and speculated on retrospectively is far more of an improvement on the can/cant back and forth arguments.
Falco Rex
Jul 31 2004, 05:43 PM
On the contrary, I hardly think I'm sinister or ready to pounce. I have a genuine curiosity about all this, but so far any serious inquiry into it has yielded nothing but anger, arm-waving, and outright refusal to answer..
I don't think asking for at least a willingness to try and show proof is so much. Until we've heard from someone who's willing to discuss these matters rationally, what can we do besides butt heads constantly?
spectral
Jul 31 2004, 06:13 PM
| QUOTE (Falco Rex @ Jul 31 2004, 06:43 PM) |
On the contrary, I hardly think I'm sinister or ready to pounce. I have a genuine curiosity about all this, but so far any serious inquiry into it has yielded nothing but anger, arm-waving, and outright refusal to answer.. I don't think asking for at least a willingness to try and show proof is so much. Until we've heard from someone who's willing to discuss these matters rationally, what can we do besides butt heads constantly? |
But are you asking about proof for a specific claim, ie 'hey I astral project whenever I want' in which case the understandable response 'well go on and prove it, what am I wearing right now' is perfectly acceptable but should that demand apply to any discussion of paranormal related subjects. If someone brings up a topic about ghosts, ufos etc would you automatically dismiss the conversation because they haven't been proven to exist/can't exist or are you willing to speculate on the subject anyway. After all speculation is what leads to new ideas and breakthroughs. It's when skepticism turns into blind adherence to a specific set of beliefs that it becomes useless to enquiry.
Do we accept only proof, even if only to speculate further or should evidence either anecdotal or empirical, soft and hard be taken into account also. Despite claims to the contrary there is evidence about that, at the very least, tentatively suggest something is going on.