Stellar
Sep 6 2004, 03:49 PM
What do you think about this picture?
dunderhead
Sep 6 2004, 04:49 PM
Looks a bit fakey to me! The trees look in focus but the sky looks, well sorta all screwed up...
Is it a home job Stellar, you do this yourself ? Where abouts was it taken and by whom? I've seen a lot better than this before, whats your opinion on it?
_hAiLO_
Sep 6 2004, 05:01 PM
It looks like the picture was taken in the shade, and the sun in shining on the other side of the house, you can tell by looking at the UFO

.
I wish it was a clip from a video

.
Fluffybunny
Sep 6 2004, 06:21 PM
Oh my god, there coming!!!!!
It looks like they are headed straight for Normans house...what are the odds?
Nice picture. Where did you get it from?
FLY SPITTA
Sep 6 2004, 06:57 PM
The top of the house and tree look very clear but the object looks blurry! I DUNNO??? kinda fake 2 me but good pic!
Althalus
Sep 6 2004, 07:13 PM
I think that this picture is fake also, it looks too good to be anything but, not only that, the UFO is blurry while the rest is not.
That said, it could be attributed to the UFO being far away, if it is an auto focus camera than it would automatically focus on the nearest object/s.
Also though, if it is real, people will say it is false due to it being so good. What will it take for people to believe in them?
FLY SPITTA
Sep 6 2004, 07:19 PM
The ufo looks blurry and edited in theres something about it that you can just tell it's fake.
zygon
Sep 6 2004, 09:38 PM
depending on the camera it will have focused on the nearest object but, that photo looks pretty fake, im gonna have a look on photoshop.
well its blurred around the ufo, but so is most of the picture when you zoom in lol. but im still gonna say its a fake,
earthygirl04
Sep 6 2004, 10:06 PM
Cool pic...

But why is it that the sky looks outa wack?
Yet the UFO that is so far away is still obvious?
Panthera leo atrox
Sep 6 2004, 10:17 PM
Looks like it would be easy enough to make that with photoshop.
David_Cubero
Sep 7 2004, 01:47 AM
ROFL Fluffy!!!!It's about time they came for Norman, I think.
I believe that He's getting a little restless from "THEIR" dawdling...
Cool Pic though!!! If it's a hoax, it's was done with great attention to details. I like it, true or not!
sunspot
Sep 7 2004, 01:48 AM
QUOTE(Panthera leo atrox @ Sep 6 2004, 11:17 PM)
Looks like it would be easy enough to make that with photoshop.

[right][snapback]257119[/snapback][/right]
I think the strange texture of the sky is infact JPEG compression artefacts.
Panthera leo atrox
Sep 7 2004, 02:13 AM
I was refering to how easy it would be to put that "UFO" in the picture. I made my own version of it with photoshop, it's not too hard:
Fluffybunny
Sep 7 2004, 02:20 AM
Wow, good job panther.
Isn't it sad that in this day and age we can't even trust our own eyes? no matter what it is; video, prints, emailed picures...it doesn't matter because anyone with any talent at all can put together a hoax photo that would fool pretty much anyone nowadays...
If a gaggle of aliens from Alpha Proxima landed on my lawn tonight and I snapped pictures using my digital camera and immediately uploaded the photos no one would know if they were real or fake...
It is a wierd time to be a believer or a skeptic...
panther10758
Sep 7 2004, 02:28 AM
Short answer it looks fake
Stellar
Sep 7 2004, 02:41 AM
Shorter answer: It is fake. I made it in Lightwave only a few minutes ago. I grabbed a picture I took of the sky a few months back (it was a dark day, hense the color of the sky) and added a 3d model to the picture. I actually added some fait air desturbance behind it, i wanted to know if anyone would notice. Anyway, whats fake about it? I'm trying to get it to look as real as possible, and see how easy it truely is.
Panthera leo atrox
Sep 7 2004, 02:51 AM
Nice job

For me, I kinda sorta think photoshop, misid (ect.) whenever I see a UFO pic, knowing how easy it is to make a hoax or misidentify a normal object.
Glad everyone here didn't automatically think it was real!
2004years.einstein.
Sep 7 2004, 03:02 AM
QUOTE(Stellar @ Sep 7 2004, 04:41 AM)
Shorter answer: It is fake. I made it in Lightwave only a few minutes ago. I grabbed a picture I took of the sky a few months back (it was a dark day, hense the color of the sky) and added a 3d model to the picture. I actually added some fait air desturbance behind it, i wanted to know if anyone would notice. Anyway, whats fake about it? I'm trying to get it to look as real as possible, and see how easy it truely is.
[right][snapback]257533[/snapback][/right]

Its amazing how easy it is to fool people because before you disclosed that you faked this i was going to say that it had a possibility of being "THE REAL DEAL! " I've seen a lot of shoddier sh*t than this been touted as sure fire proof on forums i,ve been to recently, but then they were all living on another planet with greys and reptoids!

Get a load of pics like this- publish it in an overpriced book! and hype it up as "uncovering the truth that the government didn't want you to know!" and you'll make millions dude!:tu:
SORRY, JUST TRYING TO GET BACK TO REALITY HERE MAN!.
MichaelS
Sep 8 2004, 12:40 AM
There's just something about it that rings a "False Alarm" alert in my head... not sure though.
BurnSide
Sep 8 2004, 12:44 AM
I think what looks most fake about it is the terrible 60's saucer shape. If it was, i dunno, triangular or something it would probably look more real.
earthygirl04
Sep 8 2004, 02:09 AM
vimjams
Sep 8 2004, 05:40 PM
Stellar... I've just read a similar post to this in which you tried to 'trick' people into believing you had some kind of psi ability...Only then to say it wasn't 'psi' but actually (static electricity)...Is this an example of your bias toward honesty. Why don't you try growing up (?)
Vimjams
BurnSide
Sep 8 2004, 05:45 PM
Wow vimjams that was a rather dumb thing to say really.
You see, this is an example of Stellars quest for the truth. He wanted to show people how easy it would be to fake a picture, to show them that you can't believe what you see on the net. Just like with the static electricity, he wanted to show that there are ways of explaining unexplained things. He wasn't trying to 'trick' anyone.
I think it is you who needs to get out of the childish behaviour. Try doing a little growing up yourself.
Stellar
Sep 8 2004, 05:48 PM
Thanks Burnside. I only got I dont know how long cuz Im at school right now, so I'll keep this short... I find it interesting that I described an event which, if you listen to your teacher in 9th grade science class, is perfectly scientifically explainable, and not some psi ability, and they think its psi.
vimjams
Sep 8 2004, 05:48 PM
Stop reading the tabloids burnside...
vimjams
BurnSide
Sep 8 2004, 05:50 PM
Tabloids?
Never touched them. It's funny that the people giving sensible, scientific reasons to things are told to 'stop reading tabloids' whereas people saying they were abducted or have superhuman powers are deemed the norm.
Stellar, you gotta remember, most people on this site who claim such things haven't REACHED 9th grade yet.
Stellar
Sep 8 2004, 06:06 PM
Lol, thats true too.
ghostguy
Sep 8 2004, 06:23 PM
could be genuine.. could be fake... not enough to go on really
PolkaTulk
Sep 8 2004, 06:49 PM
what im going on is that one part where he said it was fake
earthygirl04
Sep 8 2004, 09:45 PM
QUOTE
ghostguy Posted Today, 01:23 PM
could be genuine.. could be fake... not enough to go on really
QUOTE
Tull Posted Today, 01:49 PM
what im going on is that one part where he said it was fake
Now that really had me ROFL!!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.