Remember the single pic of this?This is much more detailed.What is it?

Wow. Never seen those yet. Well, i only seen one. You are a strong beliver in Chupacabras, arent you?

I'm a strong believer that's a babboon of sorts. Or a mixed breed of dog with alot of fur.
Either way, it looks very different from all the other Chupa pics, showing once again that Chupacabra is nothing more than a blanket term for an unidentifable animal of sorts.

It's been a dog, a deer, a squid, a cat, a toy, a branch, a squirrel, all sorts of things. You'd think if it actually existed it would have one form not several.

hmm...looks kinda like a puppet or something....like an ALF doll.

It looks like a small dog... Dosen't the blood look a little too dark?

Not if it had been there for a few days.

Probably a dog or an escaped monkey, like a baboon, but almost surely not a chupacabras! That's the "De Ridder critter" isn't it?

Yes I am.I like to believe in lot's of different unknown creatures.I do not need proof to believe in something.

Tell me why you don't believe this a Chupacabra.Is it because it kind of resembles a baboon?Or that you just don't believe in Chupacabras?

I dont see any legs resembling a monkey nor do I see a monkey tail... but I would like to know where these pictures were taken...

I'll get back to you on that...

Baboons do not have tails (or are they really short? )

YEah I have seen these pics before looks like a chow chow dog.

notice how it's dead next to a road...its just some dog cat or whatever thats been ran over

Could have been a Chupacabra that was hit by a vehicle...

yes it could be but if it was dont you scienctist's would be looking at it

and no the blood does'nt look too dark

It looks like it might have a split hoof, ruling out a dog or a baboon. Maybe a young buffalo? Or a long haired goat (if there is such a thing). Why didn't the photographer take a close up of it's head? I wouldn't care much to touch road kill, but if I was going to go to the extreme and claim it as a chupa, I'd want to show the world it's gnarled head!!!

If i was going to claim it was a chupa i'd call in scientists and biologists who would obviously pay ALOT of money to claim the new species whcih was previously denied of existing.

As am i

yes i agree burnside...if there was a discoery the whole world would know about it

I find the fact that people need no proof to believe in things very ignorant. If there is no factual proof that something exists, then it doesn't exist until it is proven.

then i am god you must believe me

I have noticed that people that report bodies and other weird things,get dissapointed because scientists take so long that by the time they get there the body is gone or has been eaten by other things.This creature could have been dead for days,before the guy found it.Blood goes to a dark red/black color over a bit of time,like about a day or two.If you look at the "feet"they are not from a dog or baboon,they are a hooved/2 toes. This might not be all over the world,because lot's of people don't care about this kind of thing.Plus,the scientists didn't get to study it.This could even be a government conspiracy.Which means they took it away after it was found.They do this quite often with mysteries like this.

Exactly. And i'm the king of mars.

Alright... Not sure if anyone posted this, but, some biologists dug up the remains of that naked dog in Elmerdorf, TX and they are doing tests on it. Here is a link to the story and the news cast:

Chupa?

By the way, the picture and the story don't match. The picture is that of the hyena-tiger-cat-fox w/mange creature from Maryland.

Never seen those before. Whatever it is I don't think that is a chupa.

For starters,don't ever mock or insult me burnside.Everyone has there own opinion.Your not the boss of everyone.I am NOT ignorant!!!There are 3 kinds of people,1.people that don't believe in mysteries,2.people like you that need proof that something exists,3.people like me that don't need proof to believe(even though I would like to see proof).Once more,don't ever insult me again,or say that my opinion is wrong.

That was on this site itself for auite awhile. It turned out to be a fox with a disease i believe.

I didn't say you were wrong, nor did i insult you personally.
I said it was my opinion that people who will believe anything with no reason to believe are ignorant. Sorry, but if you believe without proof, well, that is the definition of ignornace.

But hey, as the old saying goes, ignorance is bliss right? So believe what you will, i'll stick to the truth.

canadian you cant take critisism can you

Yeah, BurnSide, it was a fox with mange, but some in Maryland say there are two of them, and the other is something weird. However, that picture is not the crytpobeast that goes with the story. The webmaster needs to get his or her head out of their bum and post the correct pic, .

haha fair enough aquaryus. Thanks, i did not know there were actually 2 stories.

Yeah, that blood is real, if it's a real animal.. I'd guess it being a dog too.. but it's possible someone just threw their hoax where some other sort of animal had recently been killed, ne?

Was I talking to you?NO.All that I said was that everyone has there own opinion.

You see,everyone has different descriptions of what happened in this pic,which means that we can't know for sure that it's real or fake unless someone proves it.

Maybe they have looked into it... You can't tell either way (whether they have or not looked at it) from those pictures.

Now Canadian you are being ignorant. By not respecting people comments and lashing out at everyone and anyone who makes a reply.

Your a right though, everyone has the right to his/hers on opinion. But you are starting to get mad at burnside because his opinion is that this picture isn't a chupa and is a dog or some other creature.

Also Burnside I told my friend about this conversation, he believe in your side but he says you are also being prejudice because Canadianmay not have now that these pictures are fake. Also though I believe he should look more carefully because you and I ahve tried explaning to him to look through the galleries for these pictures, and also look for topics already on this subject.

Let's see here, buncha reasons I suppose-

1. It does closely resemble a baboon or a dog, I think.

2. I don't believe in the chupabras.

3. Even though almost all chupacabras stories describe a somewhat different animal, it's usually a more reptilian, scaly, short haired or human like animal. The critter doesn't really remind me of any chupacabras story I've heard.

4. From what I remember about the critter's story, it was supposed to have been found in a place within the U.S. borders that is beyond the range of chupacabras sightings.

5. The first time I heard about the critter, and it was quite a while ago, there was no mention of it being a chupacabras. I know from experience that people often dig up weird dead animal pics like this and put them up on the net as chupacabras. The way this has happened with the critter seams to fit the way that happens.

Canadian,

You're going to have to learn to accept the good with the bad when you post pictures of dubious and questionable origins. As has been mentioned, many of the photos you've posted since you have been here have been discussed at length in the past, and much has been discovered since their initial appearance, mostly that the photos are misidentified, technically manipulated or deliberately hoaxed. Trust me, we haven't suffered from a lack of photographic anomolies prior to your arrival. That you don't care for others members opinions of them can't be helped, but that's little reason to become irrationally argumentative. If you won't take other members advise to search for the threads that discuss these pictures in the past, then you better be ready to suffer the consequences of your refusal to fully familiarize yourself with their true nature. In other words, laziness is not an excuse for cluelessness. Spend a bit more time researching your contributions, you won't be perceived as being so 'green'.

On a final note, let's all endevor to temper our responses so that they can't be interpreted as being unduly critical or personally insulting. Thank you for your cooperation.

Magikman

Why is everyone against me?Does anybody actually believe that the unknown creatures exist?Or am I the only one?All that I'm saying is that everyone has an opinion.I'm not being ignorant,I just like to believe in these kinds of things.They interest me.Just imagine if the pics that I'm posting are actually authentic,wouldn't that be cool if these creatures do exist?Please stop saying that these have already been discussed,because I don't know about it.I'm just trying to keep an open mind,alright guys?

But they do exist that is either a dog, a monkey, or a goat, or a cat of some kind.

Those pics are too dark to make anything out!!
Show us another and then maybe we'll believe you..

if that's a chupa, i've seen about 10 on the side of the road, in the exact same state, this past summer.

ease up canadian, (using that post name one would expect a layed back demeanor) almost all of those on this forum have open minds, and maybe, like me want to believe in these things.
but i need good solid proof, before i believe, you seem to believe right away with minimal proof, and wait for something solid to disprove your belief.
two different approaches, to believing, that's all.

....just something i am wondering as well.
are canadian and bigfootyeti the same person.
just seems to be the same tone .............

No were not the same person.

Skye Williamson on cryptozoology.com compared it to this dog..