Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Pyramids
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Ancient Mysteries & Alternative History
Light_B_4_Dawn
[attachmentid=8023]I am reading a book called The Complete Book of Spells, Ceremonies, and Magik, and in it states that the pyramid at Giza, aka the Cheops Pyramid,stands ten miles west of Cairo over-looking the Nile Valley from a height of 130 feet. Shaped like a four-sided triangle, the pyramid is symbolic of the four elements of the ancients. It is over 450 feet tall and is composed of over 2,600,000 blocks of granite and limestone weighing from 2 to 70 tons each. It is however a mystery how the Egyptians were able to transport these heavy blocks and place them in such perfect symmetry that the joints are never more than 1/50 of an inch wide.
It is believed to contain more masonry- (the art of buliding with brick and cement)
than all the cathedrals and churches built in England.
In recent times many expirements have been conducted within pyramids built on the same principles at Giza, with some interesting results. There are reports that cats have been mummified, and dull blades becoming sharp again after being placed in the King's chamber. Read this all and see what you think.


Sorry if the attachment isn't rotated to your likeing.
firefemme1202
I actually was reading up on this one site that talks about many of the same thing...that the ancient architects used cement so to speak. But the number of blocks were actually recalculated...

QUOTE
* According to Socrates G. Taseos,  the actual number of stones used to build the Great Pyramid is only 590,712. In his book Back in Time 3104 B.C. to the Great Pyramid- Egyptians Broke Their Backs to Build It- How the Great Pyramid Was Really Built he presents results of his computer calculations. The following is derived from the book mentioned above.

The base measurements of the Great Pyramid are: north - 755.43 ft; south -
756.08 ft; east - 755.88 ft; west - 755.77 ft. These dimensions show no two
sides are identical; however, the distance between the longest and shortest
side is only 7.8 inches.
Each side is oriented almost exactly with the four Cardinal points. The
following being the estimated errors: north side 2'28" south of west; south
side 1'57" south of west; east side 5'30" west of north; and west side 2'30"
west of north.
The four corners were almost perfect right angles: north-east 90degrees 3'
2"; north-west 89 degrees 59'58"; south-east 89 deg 56'27"; and south-west
90 deg 0'33".
When completed, it rose to a height of 481.4 ft., the top 31 feet of which
are now missing. It's four sides incline at an angle of about 51deg. 51 min.
with the ground. At its base, it covers an area of about 13.1 acres. It was
built in 201 stepped tiers, which are visible because the casing stones have
been removed. It rises to the height of a modern 40-story building.



They also broke it down into the time scale this building should take place...

QUOTE
The average number of blocks that have to be placed each day equals (590,712blocks)/(20years x 364.25 days) = 81 blocks per day.  If 10 crews of 300 men work on each of the four sides of the pyramid, then the totals of 40 crews and 12,000 men will be needed. Each of the crews will be responsible to place 81/40 = 2 blocks per day.

The workload passes through three phases of decreasing difficulty, which are
determined by the weights of the heaviest blocks:
Steps 1 through 21 (60.59 to 27.24 tons)
Steps 22 through 136 (17.66 to 6.44 tons)
Steps 127 through 201 (3.05 to 2.63 tons)

As the weight of the blocks decrease, Step to Step, the sizes of the drag
crews will decrease. However, when this happens, the number of blocks needed
to be dragged each day can be reduced because one large block can be dragged
and cut into several smaller blocks that are needed.

As the pyramid rises there is less space for the crews to work in and fewer
block to be placed. In other words, the number of workers that will be
needed depends on three factors of: weight of blocks, number of blocks to be
placed, and the working space available.


And also, if you truly look at the Great Pyramid (this shot was taken aeriallly and there are still no answers as to why the pyramid is like this) the 4 sides are concave...so it has 8 "sides." The degree that the concavity occurs is only one half to one degree.
user posted image

Source

This site above talks about a lot of the other world mysteries and fantastic megalithic structures...it explains a great deal and brings new questions and new "coincidences" to light.
Pete Vanderzwet
The movement of large stones was not confined to Egypt in ancient times. The Romans moved the so-called Trilithon, weighing 800 tons, from the quarry to the Temple of Jupiter at Baalbek (in eastern Lebanon) in the first century AD. Another stone weighing 1,200 tons, the Hajar el Hibla ("Stone of the Pregnant Woman"), was never separated from its base and lays abandoned. Though the Romans left no record of their methods, it is obvious that the Egyptians did not have a monopoly on any "secret" technique of moving large stones.

Egypt is no more mysterious than any other civilization.
Art Vandelay
Egypt had help.


We don't know this because of the burning of the "Library of Alexandria".

So who could say what we don't and do know dealing with knowledge of ancient civilaziations?

We will never truly know anything about our begginings because of this.... mellow.gif
gryphon_2005
QUOTE(Art Vandelay @ Nov 12 2004, 08:56 PM)
Egypt had help.


We don't know this because of the burning of the "Library of Alexandria".

So who could say what we don't and do know dealing with knowledge of ancient civilaziations?

We will never truly know anything about our begginings because of this.... mellow.gif
[right][snapback]354257[/snapback][/right]


//////////////////////
Art - Extending my hand here as we seemed to have gotten off to an unsettled start yesterday! We pursue different paths for the SAME GOALS - but HOW we approach matters little. What we BOTH share here is as important as our ability to even POST here.
The tragic burning (TWICE in history) of that library (Alexandria) and many others in zealous rage (or to warm the Kalif's fires or Roman Bathtubs) - caused a black smudge to cover much of history. The destruction of much of the Mayan Glyphs by the Spanish snuffed out any flicker of hope or understanding about those Great people.. We have but mere crumbs to place any hope of knowing the FULL STORY of anything. No matter our own beliefs or backgrounds -- discussion (here especially) is VALUED and to be treasured by those who DO NOT want our own records destroyed by those quick to cover our own tracks.
I am aggravated by the motivations of Political Correctness (albeit no matter how good intentioned) - and much of our OWN American History is under the pen and censorships of the "revisionists" -- and future generations will only end up with the very crumbs of what was once a Great Civilization (my own words of course) -- America.

I respect your occupation in the Archeological field - and yes there are many things I have yet to learn. But I am ALWAYS striving to learn. My own experiences, not-with-standing - my frustrations are ONLY in the obstacles I run into when my questions become too uncomfortable. For yesterday it was a blatant reminder - BUT ... I really didn't have my MORNING COFFEE when I posted some of those !!!

Keep up the good workl!!! thumbsup.gif
From the Gryphon's Lair
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.