QUOTE(Dancing_Dumplings @ Nov 19 2004, 05:29 PM)
QUOTE(Frosty @ Nov 19 2004, 06:13 PM)
I am now convinced more than ever that the 757 did hit the Pentagon.
[right][snapback]363925[/snapback][/right]
whys that? im not sayin what i think about it, cause honestly i dont know.
[right][snapback]363938[/snapback][/right]
If this was the video that everyone I hear that has been taughting as proof of a missile strike or non-plane strike, than this is a very weak argument. I could make a better video than this. Talk about great editing. Notice how they don't bother to show the photos of the plane's turbine engine that survived, which belongs to a 757, nor do they say the size of the hole which is roughly 15 ft wide 12 ft tall in the E-ring, big hole! Nor do they mention the fact the plane never left radar till it struck the building.
"It sounded like a missile." Wow, guess what, tomahawk missiles use turbine engines as well as numerous other missiles that are the only logical explanation as to what type of missile 'could' cause this amount of destruction! Whoopty Freaking Doo!
Notice the area around the hole and the destruction. It appears as if that's where the wings hit the plane, and as far as I know, missiles do not have wings.
As far as the video and the 757 being unable to fit in with what the cameras caught, take into account that objects tend to become smaller in view as distance from them is increased.
"Light poles and trees were in the way". Yeah, you think a light pole or a tree is going to stop an 80 ton vehicle traveling 470 mph?