hyuugaNeji
Nov 27 2004, 07:21 AM
to prove nessie(other lake monsters exists)=shoot it(see if it makes noise)
big foot=shoot it (in the leg or someplace not to kill it)
giant anocanda=120 ppl go int the jungle and form a wide line and scower the place
and while doing this get it all on film and make copies (cuz they tend to keep these things hidden from us)
scipherel
Nov 27 2004, 08:08 AM
I WILL IF I COULD ! but there's no need to shoot it. Just bring video camera.
Welcome to the jungle !
aliwigan
Nov 27 2004, 12:43 PM
They should install cameras deep all over the jungle ! And do this for a month and see what photo's come up with..?
aquatus1
Nov 27 2004, 01:12 PM
Good luck. Zoology is one of the strictest fields in which to claim new finds. You pretty much have to bring in a specimen. Don't worry about it being alive; if you get the chance, take it.
Incidentally, 120 people could walk under or over an anaconda and not even see it in the jungle.
Clobhair-cean
Nov 27 2004, 05:06 PM
It's even harder... if you get one dead or alive, the wiseguy science community will say that it is some kind of deformed known animal... So you should minimum get a family of bigfoots/nessies/snakes...
There is a reason why these creatures are not found, if they exist:
Newsie: Loch Ness is HUGE !!! It's long and thin, plus you could sink the Eiffel Tower in it... The water is almost black, so almost nothing can be seen that's under the surface... Bigfoot/Yeti: The areas they live in are also enormous... There are some pert of Nepal, with only nomad yak herders as inhabitants that haven't even got proper maps made of. It's just huge mountains covered with dense forests. No-one goes there and no-one lives there... The snake is mostly the same...
If you see one, you should shoot/capture one(shoot and kill on sight is the best option, because a wounded one could still get away...), but you could spend a lifetime in Nepal without seeing a even tiger,which is known to live there.
Wooddevil
Nov 28 2004, 01:58 PM
Why kill or wound to prove their existence? This is why us humans are so feared. If we showed half as much compassion to our wildlife, maybe they wouldn't be so elusive, eh?
Clobhair-cean
Nov 28 2004, 04:18 PM
It is sad, but unless you put the creature right in front of the nose of all the science community, it will not believe it. The only way to do it, is to capture or kill a specimen... Capturing one is harder than killing it and without wounding the creature it is nearly impossible...(Plus, even if you have captured/killed the specimen, there is a huge chance of failing. read the 'Little Prince')
aquatus1
Nov 28 2004, 04:56 PM
Hate to break it to you, Wooddevil, but wildlife is elusive because it fears other wildlife, not because of us. We are just one of many, many different animals looking to make lunch out of them.
Wooddevil
Nov 28 2004, 05:17 PM
QUOTE(aquatus1 @ Nov 28 2004, 04:56 PM)
Hate to break it to you, Wooddevil, but wildlife is elusive because it fears other wildlife, not because of us. We are just one of many, many different animals looking to make lunch out of them.
[right][snapback]375872[/snapback][/right]
It's a dog eat dog world.
DarkSide
Nov 28 2004, 05:55 PM
I'd like to add to the Giant Anaconda, Normal Anacondas can swim and climb rees, so I wouldn't be surprised if the Giant Anacond could do the same thing, If it exists
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.