Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Conspiracy of the Liberal education system
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
Whom_God_Loves
Harvard Hates The White Race?
By Paul Craig Roberts

Is the multicultural campaign really about diversity? Or is it about stamping out Western civilization and the “white race” itself?

College students will tell you that a university education today is a guilt trip for whites. The purpose is to prevent whites from appreciating and absorbing their own culture and to make it difficult for whites to resist the unreasonable demands (quotas, reparations, etc.) from “people of color.”

To the questions, “who am I, what am I,” the white university graduate answers: “a racist, sexist, homophobic oppressor.”

Neither parents, trustees, alumni, nor the public are aware of the anti-white propaganda that masquerades as education. When someone who is aware tells them, they think the person is exaggerating in order to make a point.

Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at Harvard’s W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is the founder of a journal, Race Traitor, which has as its motto, “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.”

The journal’s purpose is “to abolish the white race.”

At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological genocide for whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination is part of the program. A statement by the editors on the web site says that the new abolitionists

“do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.”

Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. He writes:

“The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” Thus does he put whites on notice. If they oppose their abolition, they are “white supremacists.”

According to Dr. Ignatiev,

“The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.”

“Make no mistake about it,” he says,

“we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

What “social construct” will be left? A black one? An Hispanic one? Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish?

The Washington Times reports that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If Jewish intellectuals and Israeli political leaders can be believed, Jews have a cultural and racial consciousness. Israel is the Jewish homeland, and Israelis seem determined to keep it that way. Can anyone imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding a magazine devoted to abolishing the Jewish race?

Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites in their homelands should be abolished.

Where did he get this view? His only education was at Harvard where he received two graduate degrees.

Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [ignatiev@fas.harvard.edu] is showcased in the current issue of Harvard Magazine. Getting rid of whiteness is not controversial at Harvard, because it is the business of American universities.

A white skin, you see, is a mark of privilege. It is not the privilege of being admitted to Harvard even though you don’t meet the entrance requirements. It is not the privilege of being hired independently of ability because of government enforced racial quotas. It is not the privilege of being able to sue whites and “white companies” if blacks are not proportionately represented in the work force. It is not the privilege of being able to call whites every name in the book and sue if a white replies in kind.

The privilege of being white is that whites can secretly believe they are superior and, as long as they don’t mention it, be loyal to the white race.

“The white race is like a private club,” says Dr. Ignatiev.

I am sure Dr. Ignatiev is well-informed, but I see no signs of this white loyalty. Most of the multiculturalists and radical feminists are white. Whites disadvantaged whites by imposing racial quotas. Despite widespread opposition to quotas, neither “white” political party will act to stop unconstitutional quotas, which have made a mockery of equality under law. Whites are inundated by massive non-white immigration, and neither “white” political party will act to restrain immigration. To the contrary, both parties pander to the immigrants.

But Dr. Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty and must go. The communists said it was a guilty class that had to go.

If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, be apprised that today genocide has a home in the educational system.

Paul Craig Roberts is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of "The Tyranny of Good Intentions: How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice"
Joe013
this thread is pointless to post on. whether what you say is true or not, this thread will quickly disintegrate into a racial issue and be locked.

thank you and good day
Whom_God_Loves
I read it somewhere else and found it interesting, is this not a consiracy afterall?
just because you may diagree with it doesn't make it false.
Heartattackman
Acutally, I think this is an interesting thread. This kind of thing is happening all over the world. Not to such extreme degrees, but hey, it's freedom of speech in effect, and what can anyone do about it? Reverse it though, and it is considered hate speech. It really does seem like a conspiracy. I think it's a scandal that Dr. Ignatiev gets to keep his degree from Harvard. I think it's a scandal for Harvard to even keep it's association with him. IMHO, this makes Harvard a trashy university.
Joe013
QUOTE(Whom_God_Loves @ Nov 28 2004, 03:41 PM)
I read it somewhere else and found it interesting, is this not a consiracy afterall?
just because you may diagree with it doesn't make it false.
[right][snapback]376025[/snapback][/right]


who said i disagreed with it? i'd be more than willing to post...i fully agree with him...i just have a feeling that eventually this would turn into a racial issue and end up getting locked.


nowhere in my post did i state that i disagreed.
Whom_God_Loves
Yeah it's unfortunate people get too sensitive to talk about controversial issues.

One that comes to mind, and a seemingly harmless situation at that, was what happened to Rush Limbaugh after making a comment about the media's desire to market an African-American Quarter Back(McNabb)

Then Rush was fired from his job at ESPN and basicly blacklisted from the mainstream media. I do feel there is a double standard in american society, and I will most likely be sssshhhhhushed for saying so disgust.gif
Joe013
ok.


i've tried to hold back.
but i'm going to comment on this issue.

i'm not racist, nor do i have any like/love for racists. this comment is going to be posted on completely true facts. (dont want a racial thing to start)

i beleive that Whom_God_Loves is correct. there is a double standard in america. i just heard a while back that american eagle or abercrombie and fitch or one of those stores just got sued for not having enough models that were minorities.

yet if you go into a minority based store (fines, etc.) you never see a white model?



cough
double standard
cough

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.