This documentary wouldn't also be called 'Conspiracy Of Silence' would it? I've already downloading what I thought was a banned documentary about 911 with turned out to be COS and I don't want to make the same mistake again.
Honestly...what has 911 got to do with a conspiracy involving child sex trafficing? Wasn't it also before 911. They even had Michael Moore as the artist. Well I'm done ranting now.

Never heard of that one...i have heard the crackpot crap about trafficking and abuse, most of it is just rumors that took off.

Yea the name is confusng.

It goes by the name of George Bush Sexpose(Banned Documentory).wmv but is really called Conspiracy of Silence which is a banned documentory that was to be aired on TV untill the goverment ordered it not to be. I wonder why

The 1 hour documentory is solid proof of Larry King trafficing young boys to various "parties" where the powerfull and goverment met, even upto the president.

It is absolute solid proof that the goverment abuse children sexually and physically.

First satanic occult ritualism, now child abusing.

Wake up guys, this is real.

I'm going to say this, your rather naive...and incredibly far from the truth.

[quote=Blood Angel,Dec 12 2004, 02:57 AM]
[quote]
I'm going to say this, your rather naive...and incredibly far from the truth.
[right][snapback]399145[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]

Av u seen the doc yourself?

I do not need to, the only thing is your trying to convince someone who already knows it all. I have noticed the way you try and make things "aware" and you have done a rubbish job at it. Its neither mine nor your place to make people aware, they have to do that themselves. This is why i do not post much on the forum, because i no longer feel the need to convince anyone of anything. Granted i will join in a debate from here and there, or help people with tidbits - but you'll notice i never give the full picture. d3v i can honestly say your hitting deadends. The reason david icke and his lot haven't been silenced - is because they are so far from the truth, let them babble. And quite honestly, you make people such as myself look like loonies.

It doesn't sound like simply rumors to me. They say they were persuaded not to go foward with the case and some were even arrested for plagarism. There's also mention of hours of video testimony from two separate people that provides more evidence but the court wouldn't allow it to be used. Investigaters had to go down there to see the evidence.
What I don't get it why it was called 'George Bush Sexpose'. It doesn't even mention him. It mentions no members of the governmnet even.
BA, do you have proof that this is just rumors? Are you denying the whole thing or just government involvment?

And if it is true what does this mean? That somehow enslaving children and abusing them are helping bringing about a one world order? NO, its either:
A: If its true, then the people involved are disturbed individuals that need to be dealth with by the law.
B: Who do YOU think starts rumors? Whilst your concentrating on this, whats happening in other places. Whilst your wasting time with Icke and his reptiles, something else somewhere is going on that your missing.

Well maybe you should watch it so you can explain to us why it's fake. It sound kind of narrow minded to state one thing when someone presents some information to you, not find out the information and say that it's because you know more than them.
Could you at least state why it's all rumors?

See my previous post, then explain to me what this has to do with the NWO.

BA, this 1 hour doc is solid proof throught.

There is no argument here.

Watch the doc you'll see for yourself.

Why have u got that sig when you are against truth spreading?

Give it to meh instead.



Nothing

No, it means that some people enjoy to enslave and abuse children because they get pleasureout of it. I guess it could also be used as some kind of mind control. If they traumatise them enough maybe they will be emotionless killers. I think the main objective hear though would be to just have fun.

Ok so it could be used as a form of distraction. It is very likely that it is. It could also be really happening and is used as a form of distraction, like me and some other people thought the Iraqi abuse photos could be for. I still don't see how it's fake. You seem to be like most other people here. You say one thing and offer no real evidence. You almost completely avoided my question and assumed that I thought it had something to do with the NWO.

I was hoping you could tell me that as you seem to be fond of bringing them up into discussions that have not a lot to do with them. Please stop making assumptions and start reading what I actually type.

I never said i was against truth spreading, i merely said it was not our place to make people aware.
My sig picture is not in relation to child abuse.



Bingo, this is a matter for the civil police. However your about to learn a important lesson in the business. Whilst you are watching this, ending up at the end frustrated, annoyed even angry, your probably wondering "why haven't the media seen this?". Its not because of control of media, (because believe it or not their are *some* pubilications that aren't tainted) you have to trust me when i say: You will never find anything this juciy outside of the media - ever. It simply will not be allowed, whilst your wasting your time with this, what else is going on in the world? You need to differentiate between disinformation, and time wasting with the real deal. The internet is not the only source of information.

You almost answered your own question, what will investigating this gain? Do you see what i'm getting at? Distraction, disinformation, rumors, keep your mind on one thing - whilst something else equally important happens that HAS got something to do with the NWO.

Well it might not again much except a better understanding of this subject. You must have investigated this in order to dismiss it. If it is real, distraction or not, isn't it best to try to stop this from happening?

BA, of course its our place to spread the truth!!!!!

The internet is the tool to use and we must use it.

Why the sig like that if you dont spread the truth? im confused.

Again, i never said i don't, i just said it was not my place to, nor yours to make people aware its up to themselves.

Let me explain again about distraction, and disinformation. Tomorrow or today i want you to go out and pick up a typical newspaper. (people in britain will understand this) Look on the front page, i'm doing this right now with fridays edition of the daily mirror, it could well have been the sun as they both do the same thing. At the top "'depressed' kerry in The Priory" down the side " Did anne diamond have and affair with top tory". First ask yourself this - do you care what celebrities are up to? do you care who they are dating, or where they like to boogy? The answer will be no, but still lets open the paper. Now with the sun, how many people (esp men) skip the first page and look directly at the scanitily clad babe on page 3? The answer- ALOT. Distraction numbers one and two. People today are bombarded with images and texts referring to other peoples lives, that people will start taking notice of that rather than the real good stuff. On the second page is a article about yuschenkos poisoning, this is the real important stuff. But not many people will notice this, why? because they skip right to the celebs to see how much toilet paper elton john is using. One perfect example of this is a few months back, the papers were awash with jordans and jodie marshs boobs. But right near the end in a very small hidden article was a story about MI5. This was a story about MI5 placing bases within towns and cities to watch citzens, as they call it "watching terrorists". How many people read this? How many know this? a few, i noticed. How many people looked at jodies cleavage? All the rest. Do you understand what i'm saying? Distraction, distraction and more distraction. People are more content to blabber about celebrities than they do about whats really important and whats really happening. We saw this with 9/11, i remember a scandal about a politician within the tory cabinet who said to use 9/11 as a smoke screen to get rid of a few home truths. We saw the Patriot act fly past without the bat of a eye. Now do you understand? Celebs are a major distraction tool, so is advertising and fashion - to keep your minds on the little things whilst the bigger ones pass you by. This video, is another distraction whether its intended or not. Whilst your investigating this, did you stop to think - what can i do about it? Nothing - the public will never here of this. No-one will stop to think about it - they will call you loony, a crackpot. Don't give them the pleasure of this. If its not being discussed by your most popular celeb forget about it ever seeing the light of day.

Just a quick comment on BAs explanation:

But is it conspiratorial or just excellent marketing strategies?

The way you word the question, is forcing me to choose between the two. I'm saying its both. It benefits them to distract you from the real things that are happening in the world, it also benefits those who use the celebs to make money. Think about this, there are probably 100s of celebrity magasines out there that run the same stories as the papers do. Agreed this is filling a market, but to be honest - ask the person next to you, do you care what the celebs are doing with their lives? Every person that i ask says "no i do not care", most are normal people, who unlike me have no idea whats going on behind closed doors, of the REAL matters. But still they spend more time on celebs than they do with important political issues, and other world issues.

So you're saying that we should ignore claims like this because while we're worrying about it the NWO is becoming more and more of a reality? We should focus more on the actions that contribute to it like restricting rights, the use of the hegelian principle and concentration camps?

*Gives a round of applause.* Bingo.

So what subjects do you think are distraction and which do you think we should be aware of?

Well the NWO should be the main agenda we pay most attention to becuase thats the real threat to our freedoms and basic rights and if people reamin ignorant, we WILL be virtually enslaved by this new system.

Do u guys even know whats in Patriot Act I, nevermind PA II

Gather round, sit down and make yourself comftable. Lets first look at the first part of your question.

What subjects are distraction?

Apart from what i have already listed, such as celebs and advertising. Distractions come in many forms, terrorism is a big distraction. What catches big news other than another "threat thwarted by security services"? The governments make huge announcements of of thwarted attacks, yet no-one stops to question the credibility. This sort of thing should not be dwelled on, sure read it, but don't commit huge amounts of time on it. All it does is glorify the government, in its apparent sucesses. War is equally a big distraction, right now iraq is still raging (and in my opinion, has not achieved the total victory that bush has claimed). Iraq has been in the papers everyday, yet what your missing is how much companies like haliburton are benefiting from the deaths of your troops, iraqs civilians and aid workers (this will be discussed in a bit hold on). Reports of hostage taking, should also be avoided (no offence to the hostages that have been killed, or indeed the grief that their families are suffering). This time of year, its christmas thats the distraction. Too much focused on spending your hard earned cash, bombardments of festive advertisement. Do you know who won the taiwan election? (don't look it up, answer truthfully). Other times its reality TV shows, like "I'm a no-hoper pratt get me out of here"and the aptly named "Big Brother", which all serve to fuel distraction celeb gossip.

What you should be aware of?

This is rather easy, although not as obvious as it may seem. Its the terrorist iniatives, like "MI5 building bases in cities and towns to watch citzens", and "ID cards". Don't concern yourself with the thwarted efforts, concern yourself that which takes away more freedom. I know i have already mentioned the patriot act, but this is a prime example. It was passed 359 yay to 75 noe votes, congress was NOT allowed to read it till after it was passed. Things like the civil contingencies bill (which i call the UK patriot act), reshuffling of security services. Look for contridictions in terrorist attack reports, if a attack happens look to see who benefits. Iraq, who is benefiting? Haliburton is making billions of dollars reconstructing iraq, after the coalitions forces demolished it, a few million spent blowing up a few towns, billions earned from rebuilding. Subjects like fraud allegations should be investigated in their fullest (trust me when i say, this is the main way those that are trying to setup the NWO, use to smear people), everytime a senior official or politician is smeared across the papers for something or other, don't investigate what they have done - instead investgate what they did to earn a smearing. You see the illuminati/NWO puppeteers are not satanists, they do not use occult rituals to get their ways (although their are links with occultism, this doesn't nessacarily mean they are satanists. Occultism, holds alot of power, one simple way of denying the little man from huge power is to use major religion to call it evil. Occultism is far from evil.), they use knowledge. Scientia es potentia - Knowledge is power, leverage is what they use to get their way (theres also a underlining message i'm trying to get through to you here, but goes off topic). Example (a purely hypothetical situation to get my point across, any relation to any presidents living or dead is purely coincidential): Step into their shoes, you know say a president that harbors secret homosexual tendencies. This man is a devout christian, and such a relevation would surely destroy him, should it become known to the public. You use black mail to get you what you want, with him as your puppet and a figurehead for your shadow government, you pass say a law that would allow you to barge into anyones home at midnight, kidnap their family and send them to eygpt for torture and interrogation. However, lets say this president is a smart cookie and knows what you are up to, and digs his heels in. He is foolish to think that he has any real power just because he heads a country. He does something stupid, like going against the bill/law once its gone through. You retaliate, and reveal to the world his secret, the man is destroyed and forever hated - his very word now is useless no-one will ever believe a word he says. Where have we seen examples of this? Nixon - watergate, Clinton - lewinsky, to name a two famous ones. In extreme examples, assasaination. Kennedy made huge mistakes in office, he tried to make the public aware - but he payed the ultimate price. What did he do to hurt the NWO in the making? Disapproved Operation Northwood, released proper united states dollars instead of federal reserve dollars (so that america would no longer be indebted to those that control the reserve), stopped funding for important projects like Majestic Twleve, weapons programs have been stopped, nuclear advancement has been stemmed by him. But don't stop with just your own country, look at world news in particular. Example: Ukrainian elections, something like the poisoning of a opposition leader, rigged elections, intimidation are all signs of something that would be used in the future. One thing that by passed everyone in the run up to war, was a very important political assasaination: Dr David Kelly, if he was still alive, the coalition would never have gone into iraq. But no-one seems concerned with his death, even though all the suspiscion that surrounded it. This is what you need to look into, even the smallest thing is important. Look into large gains from companies you know are in the back pocket of administrations. How are they gaining the money? Who is losing out? Once you begin reading between the lines of every news story you get a bigger picture. I have got to a stage now, where i know the NWO is real, but the hard part is convincing people. Its taken me alot to get this far, every scrap of evidence is important. However presenting it is a different matter, if it took me 3 years to fully understand the background and workings of the NWO, how am i to present three years of work to prove the world? This is where you come in, and everyone else who is reading this. You want the proof? Find it for yourselves, dont give up its out there trust me. You can spend your whole life here shoving "solid proof" in peoples faces, it won't make any difference, unless they see it from the beginning from your perspective, the proof your trying to present will be nothing but toilet paper to them. With each person that actively looks, i have made a small victory. To skeptics i say this: Its better to know about a subject whether its real or not, than to be caught with your pants down.


(crikey i should have made a article about this)

Good post BA and I agree with all that you've said.

I agree with the distractions and stuff too but most of it is not made for the sole purpose of distracting the masses from the stuff that matters but i'm sure you dident mean that anyway.

I also agree the Iraq war gracing the papers everyday is a distraction and its really not informative or necassary.

sorry blood angel but it is all true and horrorfying-ive posted here about it-using an interview by A Jones where he talks with the author of the book "the franklin cover-up" which details events which took place in bohemian grove by a boy who was prostituted by larry king(not the talk show host)here is the interview and another link form the washington times confirming scandal---the link with 9/11 lies with the perpetrators
also the video conspiracy of silence can be found here
http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_child_...up/franklin.htm



***********************************************************

Alex Jones Interviews John DeCamp, Author of “The Franklin Cover-up.”

Alex Jones Show | July 21 2004
AJ:Tell us how you got into this. You didn't get into this to find all these horrors. You were basically there to go disprove it for the Senate, right?

JD: I was. I had just gotten out of the [state] Senate a year or so before when this started breaking. Let me give the story real quick. In North Omaha, Nebraska there was a credit union, an old credit union and that was run by a man named Larry King. Larry King, some of you may remember and I'm sure you'll hear about him again. Not the Larry King on TV but another one. He was officially listed in the New York Times, since you mentioned them, and a number of other state and national, mostly national publications. He was officially listed as the, quote, "Fastest-rising black star in the Republican Party.” Some of you who may be listening may have attended the 1984 or 1988 Republican National Conventions. One in Texas, I remember I was there and I was there for the one in New Orleans, then…

AJ: You're a Republican. Now let's get that out there.

JD: Yeah, I guess.

AJ: I'm the same way.

JD: It's kinda like - but anyway Larry opened both those national conventions as some of you may remember. In fact, when they refer back in old footage they always show the convention being opened. Larry opened both of them by singing the National Anthem. He's a great singer. A great whatever you call it - baritone or alto or whatever those strange things are, but anyway…

AJ: Vocalist.

JD: I knew it was one of those, but anyway Larry is the man that’s singing there and opening the convention and on a election day 1988, when George [HW] Bush, that would have been when George Bush was elected in November. The Fed's raided his little credit union there in North Omaha. It was suppose to be serving the minority community, particularly the black community and they shut her down. They said there was a lot of missing money.

Stories started floating out as always happens when some incident like that occurs and some of the stories involved missing money that was used for this and that but some of those stories were even strange. They were coming from kids all over. Young kids - 16, 14, 13 - kids telling about how they had been on Larry's private jet to this party or that party. Or that they had been at the Republican National Convention here or they had been at this political event in Washington and the stories had to do with they were there and were used as drug couriers. You know 13, 14-year old kids back then going through the airport could get through without anyone asking twice about anything. They pack them full of cocaine or whatever on little packs they'd carry on their bodies, between their legs, etc, etc. - young boys, young girls. And the kids also were telling these stranger tales that seemed bizarre at the time: that they had had sex or were involved in sex with this or that famous politician or businessman or whatever.

And I was one of the first ones who stood up and said this has got to be the most hilarious, ridiculous story I've ever heard. First of all, I knew Larry King. What the heck! I was head of banking at the time he was when he was doing his banking stuff, the head of the senate banking committee here in Nebraska. So I said, “It's absurd.” Well the stories started cropping up more and more and I said something else and I said look if I believe even one of these crazy stories I'd be the first one to stand up and demand that something be done. Then I got a letter from a kid named Paul Bonacci who was in a jail in Omaha. And he said, “Look, if you come and talk to me, I can show you that these aren’t just fake tales.”

AJ: Now later, you took his diary that went back like 5 years and had ink experts and forensics experts look at it. He had written all this stuff down.

JD: Yeah, that was the strange thing about this kid. I wish I had been able to do that throughout life but anyway when he was a little boy, he was about 18 when I had meet him in jail, 17 or 18. And as a young kid his uncle or grandfather or somebody had taught him religiously to keep a diary where you mark things down everyday. Well, he did it and he did it in detail. So when I went and visited with him and he told me these strange tales and then you had the head of psychiatry from one of the major medical institutions in the state say, "Hey, this kid he ain't crazy. He's a multiple personality and he's probably telling the truth because multiples don't need to lie. They just switch personalities.”

Anyway, so to make a long, long bizarre story short. I found out that he was in jail because he had been one of those intimately involved in all this, and he had to be shut up real quick. I’m making that as a conclusion now – at the time I didn’t realize that. But and so they locked him up and charged him with touching another boy on the outside of his pants, a cousin or something.

AJ: Senator, talk right into your telephone for me.

JD: Anyway, they have him there and I finally agreed I would represent him and that led to a long, long tale that's got me deeply involved in researching and investigating the whole collapse of that credit union and the personalities involved. Ultimately, on the advice of my best friend, closest friend, godfather, whatever, eventually writing a book because he told me that’s what I should probably do to protect myself. And that man was a man named Bill Colby. About the time that I started writing the next book, Bill, as you know was head of the CIA and ended up floating dead in a pond somewhere. But I won't get into that right now. Anyway, so I wrote the book and as I got at the very beginning of this story and working on it, one of the things that I did do was as I say, as you say, obtain the diaries of this young boy to see just what he did say and then I had them checked.

AJ: And it wasn't just that. I mean they've got…

JD: Forensic experts and the forensics were because somebody said he could have just made this all up later. He could have made this up later. And so I wanted to make sure that this wasn't done. So we had forensic examiners said that this ink was done at a certain time and this could of only been done and on and on. Anyway, to get to the heart of the discussion…

AJ: One more point, Senator John Decamp, because I've actually seen the Discovery Channel documentary that never aired and we actually played it here locally in Austin. I was sent a copy of it. They found hundreds of videotapes in King's office. The police saw it and freaked out, hid it and never released it and for all those other children, people actually got convicted of this stuff

JD: Anyway, so there was where he claimed and I wasn't there so I don't know. The closest I've been to Bohemian Grove, he took me out and showed me where it was an indeed there is a place there. And I didn't know there was a place called Bohemian Grove. I didn't write Bohemian Grove in the book because I didn't know what it was. I just took his diary. Anyway, it clearly is where he was taken and he was taken out there for a ceremony in which they committed some pretty horrible things on another boy. And three boys and they filmed it and I just took his words and the names he wrote there. And they’re right in the book.

And by the way just to answer your next question. Yes, I put names in the book, dates and everything that I could just as they were. Why? Because I figured blow it out all straight and I said when a number of threatening calls came after the first edition came out. They said, “This is the most libelous, slanderous thing we've ever heard.” And I said, “Fine, I think I've done enough to prove it and I'm satisfied. If somebody feels that way, if somebody said these things about me I'd sue them for liable and slander.”

AJ: Here you are 10 years later and you're winning lawsuits.

JD: Well, there was one libel/slander lawsuit as a result of the book. But, that was one I filed against some group called Great Atlantic Telecast Company. Some TV network on the East Coast when they had one of the characters of the book - who also happened to be running for president at the time - go around saying, "Oh, don't believe this and don't believe this, this is a lie." And they supported him and so I sued them. Well it ended up they ended up paying me off, backing down and reaching a settlement.

AJ: Stay right there Senator. This is powerful info. It's all coming up.

[BREAK]

AJ: That’s right. Right here in Austin, Texas, every month, they are grabbing the equivalent of 5-first grade classrooms with Child Protective Services. No rights, no nothing. It's just a total takeover. And the very people doing this here locally are involved in their own forms of wickedness, which is a whole other show. This stuff is prolific. It is a cult of evil and it's more wide spread than you can probably imagine. Senator Decamp, we were talking during the break and you made the point about how this is this new world and laughed. What do you mean by this new world?

JD: Well, you just talked about some of it. You just talked about some of it. About five, six years ago on behalf of a family here that was just totally destroyed by Protective Services, I filled a class action suit against the entire system. Since it was financed by myself and I just couldn’t keep it up and they had unlimited lawyers on the other side. But I did bring out an awful, awful lot of things that are sure proof enough since then from the way they take kids. Your rights as a parent are pretty well destroyed. But I'm not going into that now we can talk about that another day.

AJ: It's just such a horror.

JD: It’s just a whole new world we live in from I guess what I thought I grew up in here long, long time ago admittedly. I said to you it sure is a new world order, I think or something like that, and then I realized that I was using a worn out phrase that I guess some people are really trying to implement. But anyway…

AJ: Continuing, you actually have the passages in your book out of the diary …

JD: Well, I have a , I have right here the diary. Do you want me to read a little? Understand that I didn't know that the thing was Bohemian Grove back then, nor did the kid when he was writing it. All he knew was he was taken to this place. Let me just read it. It'll take three minutes. Is that okay?

AJ: Go ahead.

JD: I went in January, now this is Bonacci, this is Paul Bonacci writing this. This is directly word-for-word from his diary.

"I went in January of ‘84 on every trip. I was paid by men King knew for sex. The summer of ‘84 sometime I went to Dallas, Texas and had sex with several men King knew in a hotel. I flew on YNR airlines (by the way that’s a private airline or a private charter deal) and Cam airlines (another private charter deal) normally for King. I never had much personally to do with King only went where he told me to go.

“In or on July 26th, I went to Sacramento, CA. King flew me out on a private plane from an airfield in Omaha to Denver where we picked up Nicholas. A boy who was about 12 or 13, then we flew to Vegas to a desert strip and drove into Las Vegas to some ranch and got something. Then flew on to Sacramento. We were picked up by a white limo and taken to a hotel. I don't remember the name of it. We, meaning Nicholas and I, were driven to an area that had big, big trees. It took about an hour to get there. There was a cage with a boy in it who was not wearing anything. Nicholas and I were given these Tarzan things to put around us and some stuff like that. They told me to, (I won't use the word) blank the boy and stuff. (In other words have sex with him.) At first I said no and they held a gun to my genitals (I'll use that word) and said do it or else lose them or something like that. I began doing it to the boy and stuff. And Nicholas had anal sex and stuff. We were told to blank him and stuff and beat on him. I didn't try to hurt him.

“We were told to put our blanks in his mouth and stuff and sit on the boy’s blank and stuff and they filmed it. We did this stuff to the boy for about 30 minutes or an hour when a man came in and kicked us and stuff in the genitals. And picked us up and threw us. He grabbed the boy and started blanking him and stuff. The man was about (I'm not sure how to say this) the man was about so many inches long and the boy screamed and stuff. The man was forcing his blank into the boy all the way. The boy was bleeding from his rectum and the men tossed me and him and stuff and put the boy right next to me and grabbed a gun and blew the boy's head off. The boy's blood was all over me and I started yelling and crying and the men grabbed Nicholas and I and forced us to lie down. They put the boy on top of Nicholas who was crying and they were putting Nicholas's hands on the boy’s blank. They put the boy on top of me and did the same thing. They then forced me to blank the dead boy. (It gets pretty crude.) They put a gun to our heads to make us do it. His blood was all over us. They made us kiss the boy’s lips. (Anyway, a few other things.) Then they made me do something I don't even want to write so I won't.

“After that the men grabbed Nicholas and drug him off screaming. They put me up against a tree and put a gun to my head but fired into the air. I heard another shot from somewhere and then saw the man who killed the boy drag him like a toy. Everything including when the men put the boy in the trunk was filmed. The men took me with them and we went up in a plane. I saw the bag the boy was in. We went over a very thick brush area with a clearing in it. Over the clearing they dropped the boy. One said the men with the hoods would take care of the body for them.

“I didn't see Nicholas until that night at the hotel. He and I hugged and held each other for a long while. About 2 hours later the men or Larry King came in and told us to go take a shower since we'd had only been hosed off at some guy’s house. We took a shower together and then were told to put on the Tarzan things. And after we were cleaned up and dressed in these things we were told to put on shorts, socks and a shirt and shoes and were driven to a house where the men were at some others. They had the film and they played it. As the men watched it they passed Nicholas and I around as if we were toys…”

AJ: Stay right there. This is the New World Order – what they want to do to your kids.




full interview can be read here
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/july2...4johndecamp.htm

The Franklin Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska
by John W. Decamp

Good post and further evidence of my claims.