Here is the ultimate test for x-ray vision.

I have created a photoshop file with two layers in it. The bottom layer contains two words: A food, and an animal.

It also containes a number.

It also contains a picture.

The top layer is solid red. I saved the file in a way so that the layer data isn't destroyed. Thsi image below will appear as a solid red block. However, it contains data for the above information hidden behind it.



[attachmentid=10176]




I will give PPAN, or any of you, a chance to try and see what is behind the image. After the guesses are in, I will post what was actually behind the image.

PPAN, I purposely set up this image so it actually does capture the image behind it. I didn't use a camera. I used a graphics program. Give it your best shot.

How many digits are in the number?

Banana, Monkey.


168

And a picture of a fish.

How many digits are in the number?

Intresting...
Time for true colours to show.....

There are three digits to the number. that is the last hint I am going to give. And yes whiskers, it is time for true colors to show. This is the ultimate test.

I wasn't the one who said that.

What the hey, I'll try the crazy test.



Hot dog

dog.... or, er, cat. I dunno, one of the two.



325

a tree

I'm gonna give it a try. Just for kicks.

Food? Macaroni and cheese, or some sort of pasta. Noodles, spaghetti, something like that.

Animal? Leopard. Something with a spotted pattern.

Number? 369

Picture? Um... black and white...a wedding photo, maybe?

Good guesses people. Keep them coming.

I can't wait until PPAN comes on here tomorrow and gives it a try. I will give her as much time as she needs to see through the image. If she can get a single right answer, I will give her a ton of credit. What do you say, PPAN? This a a REAL test here! It is a layered graphic image that contains the picture data behind the red color data. If you can see through this image and see the data hidden behind the color, you truely do have x-ray vision.

*shakes her magic 8 ball*

Will Insight and PPAN ever get along?

NOT YET

Pfft, some answer...

*shakes again*

NOT AT THIS TIME.

It figures.

I give it go - for fun

ok hmmm....

food: Pizza
animal: Ant

number: 829
picture: lake

lets see how i go

*chuckles* I can get along with anyone really. but if one of my friends started lying to me, I'd have a pretty hard time with that.

I don't have x-ray vision but I'm gunna give it a go too!

A food: Potatoes

An animal: Giraffe

A number: 272

A picture: A phone

Lol, I'm soo wrong.

Sorry, Insight, nice try, but this is not a test for x-ray vision. This is a test commonly used simply to determine if a person is psychic or not. Similar tests can be seen here: http://www.gotpsi.org/bi/gotpsi.htm

I suspect that to test a person for x-ray vision, you need to be with them in person, since x-ray vision is the ability to see through tangible, solid objects, not virtual ones.

You are correct sir/mame? OH wait a sec...

Wait didn't PPAN say her X-ray vision started while watching TV? or does that not count since it would be tangible, solid objects as seen through a virtual
medium?

Sorry, Insight, nice try, but this is not a test for x-ray vision.

I am not testing xray vision in general, I am testing PPAN's x-ray vision.

PPAN speciffically said she can see through objects on TV.

This is a test commonly used simply to determine if a person is psychic or not.

Perhaps on that site it is. However, this is a different csituation. PPAN said that the reason she failed her first test was because a camera can't see what is behind an object (even though she states she can see through objects on TV. I know this is totally illogical, but when I confronted her on it, she still claimed to believe in x-ray vision.) So what I have done is crated a data image which contains two layers. A red one, and one with words, a number, and a picture.


I suspect that to test a person for x-ray vision, you need to be with them in person, since x-ray vision is the ability to see through tangible, solid objects, not virtual ones.

Okay then, YOU go tell that to PPAN. She still claims that the first time she discovered her x-ray vision was when she bagan to see through objects on TV. You go tell her that x-ray vision is only on tangible objects, and not cirtual ones, okay? And we will all see how she reacts.


In any case, PPAN, if you can see through objects on TV which were captured by some sort of magic video camera that can see through objects while a regular camera cannot (your own words), then you will also be able to see through my above posted image. if you get a single answer right, I will stop bugging you forever. I promise.

"IF" anyone had X-Ray vision they wouldnt need to know how many digits

*cracks knuckles* *starts flexing* *massages temples*

Where's my photoshop program?!?!? j/p


here's my shot:

Food: corn meal
Animal: horse
Number: 101
Picture: is it a picture of E.T.???

Food: Orange
Animal: Elephant
Number: 268
Picture: a tree

Either way, Insight, this is not a fair "definitive x-ray vision test". Any person who came to this site and took this test and TRULY has x-ray vision would not pass this particular test using that ability. It may have been created for PPAN, but it is directed at the masses, which is just a little confusing. That's all I'm getting at.
As far as PPAN goes, if she really "sees through" things on tv, somebody needs to explain to her that that is NOT x-ray vision. This does not prove that she does not have x-ray vision, however, since she also claims to see through things in real life. So for real objects, she is either using x-ray vision, OR just clairvoyance or some other psychic gift. With the television and computer, however, x-ray vision is not even a possibility.

Yes well, hi all, i am new to the forums and such and well, i saw this thread and decided it was time i introduced myself, i spent a lil time confering with my sense and here are my answers.

Food: Some sort of pig based food, i am going for roast pork
Animal: Giraffe
Number: 453
Picture: a king dancing

Well thats what i saw neway (lets hope one of em is at least half right).

While you guys are all guessing numbers superior to 1, I'm guessing Insight might just be laughing at you guys cuz his number might be inferior to 1

Oh yes, It could be a negative number...

*applauds Guffy*

Its perfectly fair. She said she did something like this before, so we're asking her to do it again to prove it.

Its perfectly fair. She said she did something like this before, so we're asking her to do it again to prove it.

Yep. That's exactly it.

And ya'll are supposed to be the voices of reason? Whatever. Hey Insight, is God the one who put you on this holy mission to prove that PPAN is behaving childishly? Get a clue, dude, she's 13 - ie a child. Before you cast anymore stones at her, why don't you prove to us that your conversations with God are true?

And what is that supposed to mean? Think about it... people come here crying "So what about my age! It doesnt matter that I'm 13! I should be treated like the rest of you!" and then when they are... people come here telling them to leave the person alone cuz they're 13.

Sometimes the only standard around here is the double standard..

how did we do insight?

The way I see it, PPAN has set herself up so that there can't be any valid test on the internet. She would need something tangible to work with, and of course you can't get that on the internet. Thus, preventing the exposure as a fraud, but also preventing her abilities to be proven.

The only mistake she made was the claim that she could see through objects on TV, and then later saying that the camera couldn't capture what was on the paper. Now she is really stuck.

... I doubt if PPAN will be arriving soon, she was last here on the 28th.

Maybe I am wrong but I thought PPAN said she wasn't 13 so that goes right out the window and yes its a fair test based on PPAN posts and it was directed toward her NOT masses

Hmm, isn't this an impossible test? The computer doesn't display pixels that are not visble until other pixels are removed, so there may be the numbers and such in the file but since it can't be displayed there is absolutely no way using x-ray vision you could see behind the red, since the monitor only displays the red. The only power one could use to find out is to somehow be able to detect and read programming and code. Looks like this is a flawed test.

Scroll through previous post or start from beginning its a very good test based on claims of person being tested

she said she could see throug objects on the tv... does the tv display what's underneath it? no.

Explain. I am not sure who you are talking about, and who is PPAN?

PPAN is short for phychicpowersarenice, a girl who claimed in one of her first topics that she had x-ray vision.

And she claimed that she found out by doing a something similar to this test, but it was on the TV. Either way, it changes nothing. If she's capable of doing it on a TV, she's capable of doing it on the pc.

LOL! That is one of the most hilarious claims I have ever heard! It's a mistake to claim to have things you don't, let alone attempt to prove that you do! I will butt out now and let her take the test, can't wait to see the results.

lol, this is getting more fun to watch every day ^^;;

Hey Insight, is God the one who put you on this holy mission to prove that PPAN is behaving childishly?

Nope. It's my own doing. I hate letting liers get away with lying.

Get a clue, dude, she's 13 - ie a child.

I'll tell you what, YOU go tell her that. She how she reacts.

Before you cast anymore stones at her,

That reference refers to sin, not being naive. Being naive is not a sin when you are a child persay. Your reference to me casting stones is a faulty one. If I was judging her by saying she was sinning, THAT would be me casting stones. All I am trying to do is prove she is delluded to herself, and anyone else who comes here who is new.

why don't you prove to us that your conversations with God are true?

How would you have me do that? Tell God to go visit you? I doubt he'd respond to a human's command. If you want God to make himself real to you, you have to open your heart to him. The only thing that God cannot do is give his love to someone who doesn't want it.


The way I see it, PPAN has set herself up so that there can't be any valid test on the internet.

I know. Except she hasn't been playing the game long enough to know how to properly do it. She didn't think she would encounter resistance like this, and she let her emotions betray her. She has been progressively trying to get out of having to prove herself via the internet. But she has made a fatal mistake that has allowed me to formulate a test that abides by her very own posts. To back out of this test would to fully go against her word. She has three options. Option one: Leave here and never come back, and peddle her wares somewhere else. Option three: Take the test and either succeed or fail. Option three: try to go back on her words to avoid taking the test, completely nullifying her credibility.

And I think there might be a phantom fourth option, in which she fails the test, and tries to explain her way out of it. Now, she is naive enough to be able to explain to herself why she failed, and allow herself to continue believing her own lies, however, she has trapped herself by her own words, and the test I have set up adheres exactly to what she claimed her ability to be.

....what if she succeeds though? *laughs*

She would need something tangible to work with, and of course you can't get that on the internet.

Yet, she openly stated, that the first time she realized she had x-ray vision was when she saw through objects on TV.

Thus, preventing the exposure as a fraud, but also preventing her abilities to be proven.

Such is the primitive plan of any would-be internet prodigy. I wrote the book on these sorts of tricks, so I can easily see through them, as I am sure many of you also can.

The only mistake she made was the claim that she could see through objects on TV,

She's made more mistakes than that. But I won't spring all of this on her unles she fails the test and still tries to deny her way out of it. Which she will. She is too far gone in her fantasy world to admit defeat. She doesn't realize the incredibly huge amount of respect she would gain with me if she simply admitted she was wrong.


My father told me it takes a real man (or woman) to admit when he or she is wrong.

and then later saying that the camera couldn't capture what was on the paper. Now she is really stuck.

I'm glad you are one of the people who can see that. She has the choice now: avoid taking the test, and loose even more credibility and respect. Or, take the test, and if she fails, admit she was wrong about her claims. That would be the bigger thing to do.

... I doubt if PPAN will be arriving soon, she was last here on the 28th.

Only time will tell.

Maybe I am wrong but I thought PPAN said she wasn't 13

If she did, I sure can't find the post. I wouldn't put lying about her age past her though. She's starting to get desperate for anyone to believe her.

Hmm, isn't this an impossible test?

Ask PPAN. She was the one who said she could see through objects on TV. Now, we all know a video camera cannot capture what is behind an image, yet, still she claims she can see said image.

The computer doesn't display pixels that are not visble until other pixels are removed, so there may be the numbers and such in the file but since it can't be displayed there is absolutely no way using x-ray vision you could see behind the red, since the monitor only displays the red.

And that is EXACTLY the same way a video camera and television displays a picture. But PPAN said that she can STILL see through them on TV. Here is her chance to back up her claim.

The only power one could use to find out is to somehow be able to detect and read programming and code. Looks like this is a flawed test. cat.gif

If you are saying this is a flawed test, then you also imply PPAN's claims are fully flawed, because this test is in perfect conjuction with her exact posts and claims.

This test is was designed to cater exactly to PPAN's speciffic claims, and no one elses. If you read her back posts, you will see this is technically fully within her range of said ability.

And she claimed that she found out by doing a something similar to this test, but it was on the TV. Either way, it changes nothing. If she's capable of doing it on a TV, she's capable of doing it on the pc.

Exactly! They are the exact same technology. If she can see through objects on TV, then she can see through objects on the computer. I'm quite interested if she actually can!


Well PPAN, the world is watching. The next move is yours.

Jeeze Insight, you scared the poor girl off! Even if she WERE telling the truth, I doubt she would take the test for fear of making a mistake.

You've intimidated the hell out of her, I don't think she will be taking the test. If you wanted her to take it, maybe you could have encouraged her a little instead of beating her up with doubt?

She hasn't been on for a while, she probably got scared off.

Or, you know, maybe she got, oh I don't know, a LIFE outside these forums?

Hint hint?

Jeeze Insight, you scared the poor girl off! Even if she WERE telling the truth, I doubt she would take the test for fear of making a mistake.

Oh no, you discovered my plan.

You've intimidated the hell out of her, I don't think she will be taking the test. If you wanted her to take it, maybe you could have encouraged her a little instead of beating her up with doubt?

That's not how the "true" test works. I think you know what I mean.

She hasn't been on for a while, she probably got scared off.

No, she probably signed up under a different user name, and will be peddling her claims in another form. Personally, I wlecome that. I'd love to be able to see if I could see through that disguise.

Or, you know, maybe she got, oh I don't know, a LIFE outside these forums?

I severely doubt it. Her psionic abilities were the pride of her life. They can't exist without the internet and other internet people to validate them.

Hint hint?


*laughs* HEY!!! *laughs again*

OK, I think this thread only exists to make fun of another member

If PPAN wants to take this "test" I'm sure she can pm her guess to you insight