mr_halo
Jan 8 2005, 12:24 AM
QUOTE(Jesus_Freak @ Jan 8 2005, 12:15 AM)
looks like a rock to me...
[right][snapback]441127[/snapback][/right]
yes indeed it is...
hasn't this photo been dismissed before, i mean its been around for years...
Mr. Blonde
Jan 8 2005, 12:33 AM
It reminds me of that bogus alien that got sucked out of the ship from the inside out in Alien Ressurrection.
mr_halo
Jan 8 2005, 12:44 AM
QUOTE(Mr. Blonde @ Jan 8 2005, 12:33 AM)
It reminds me of that bogus alien that got sucked out of the ship from the inside out in Alien Ressurrection.
[right][snapback]441168[/snapback][/right]
cobra4j
Jan 8 2005, 01:29 AM
Thank you! Glad someone finally found a good copy of that picture. I have been wanting to see it for years.
What is it? Well, as I recall the whole story - this is from a special underwater camera. They put it down there for obvious reason, to get a good pic of the monster, if possible.
During the day when the film was taken something caused it to move around a lot. There was either some type of storm, or some unknown underwater disturbance. (hmmm, interesting)
In any case, here we have a picture - what is it? Some say it looks like a "monster head". I say it looks like it could be a rock, a tree, a pile of dirt, a cloud of dust, or other things. But, it could be an unknown animal.
So, I'm sorry I am not overly impressed. The head and neck shot, now that's almost enough to turn a sceptic into a believer. That looks like a pleseosaur. But, "looks like" and "is" are two different things. It could also be a tree. The "head" does not really look like it's attached. Also, in most reports about Nessie from eye witnesses, the animal is usually dark in color, brown, black, grey. This thing looks light in color, like a tree branch with no bark.
So, is there a Nessie? I want there to be. Is there a discussion in here somewhere about "Nessie, real or not?"
Devilwolf
Jan 8 2005, 02:56 AM
think about it a little cobra4j, the loch having extremely murky waters making it pretty dark beneath the surface, in order to be able to see something in a picture you would probably have to lighten it up a bit, thats why the pic is pretty light.
DamienPriest
Jan 8 2005, 06:26 AM
With all the technology there is out there... I can't believe it's taking as long as it is to get an updated expedition in Lochness. I mean, I agree... why not use motion sensors or like different kind of maping infered, nightvision, or some kind of visual effect to make the darky waters of Lochness more clear.
I hope that the expedition of 2005 brings back more clear evidence. Nothing inclusive. Nothing that disputes what it could be...
You know?
Dp
Devilwolf
Jan 8 2005, 06:32 AM
that would be excellent if they brought back proof, this will be very interesting to watch on tv when it airs