whoa182
Jan 8 2005, 08:54 AM
I dont know how many research or keep up with emerging technologies on this forums. I also do not know how many are aware that we are at the verge of a Biotechnology revoloution and what this could mean.
We do have the ability to Extend life of simple tissues, cells etc... But we also have the ability to block genes in Mice to enable them to have a Life Span of around the equiv to 200 Human Years. Scientists think within the next 5-10 years Aging in Mice.
So slowing down Aging in less Complicated animals is poosible and not science fiction. Ultimatly I believe and so many scientists in fields such as biotech and nanotech believe that slowing down or stopping aging is inevitble in humans.
Now to make some things clear. Im being totally serious on this topic, its not such a far fetched idea anymore. We have the enabling technologies and they are moving forward quite well.
Im not saying that you will live on longer and you're family dies around you, that will not be the case, Since they will have access to these enhancments just as much as you, Of course at first they will be for the more wealthy and new technologies always are. But eventually they will come down in price as demand grows.
Not only might we be able to make us live longer, we may be able to geneticly engineer ourselfs in many ways. whether it be intelligence, muscle strength, better eyes, better hearing... Possibilities could be endless...
But while we are in this technology revoloution, Nanotech will be picking up and maturing, Enabling us to have far more capabilities.
the possibility of Nano-red blook cells. Using 10% of these mixed with normal red blood cells will enable you to hold you're breath for upto 4-5 hours. You could run a few hundred meters without breathing.
Also more far off in the future, millions of nanobots that go around the blood stream and fight off diseases, viruses and fix genetic faults. This is still the most extreme capability. But ermeging technologies are showing that it may indeed be possible.
Whether most like it or not. By the end of the 21st century we will have changed drasticly. Far more than any of century. Post-humans could be common, possibly an even more divide between wealthy and poor countries. But by then other technologies could help thos countries far more than today.
We KNOW its possible to engineer ourselves. Yes it is not a full understood yet. but we are rapidly advances. Every 10 years there is a paradigm shift, Technology advancements Double every 10 years. So all the advances took 10 years will take 5 years then 2.5 years ...
the model ray kurzweil has put forward, at todays rate of progress we will see 100 years of technological progress in within 25 years. and at todays rate of progress we will see 25.000 years worth of technological advancement in the 21st century.
these are TRUE trends of technology and this is what they show. SO they are not up in the air predictions, they are predictions with plenty of research behind them
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4003063.stmCheck out that article on human life span may reach 1000 years and beyond. And the first human to reach 1000 could be 60 already.
Other models have showed that the human life span s increasing 3 months every year. By 2010 these are expected to reach. 1.5 years every year. So basicly the human life span may increase faster than you can age.
you think you are going to retire around the age of 60?
welll most of you. But Im confident and so are many far more educated people that human life span will increase through the technologies we are advancing in today.
If 1 were to get an enhancment, showed it off... Their friends like it, They get it done and trend will continue. Especially if it becomes cheaper
Murphys Law
Jan 8 2005, 09:27 AM
Living forever is not all its cracked up to be!
Alien_child
Jan 8 2005, 09:41 AM
i would not like to live for ever, it would take the spark out of living. how bored would you be when you have traveled the world a hundred times over, read all the books, wached every show, listened to every song had 500 birthdays and 500 christmases the only interesting thing left to do would be to die and to wait and see what happens next
whoa182
Jan 8 2005, 09:50 AM
think 100 years ago. Could they do all the stuff we do today? the majority, if not all would of thought that just communicating how we are now would be total science fiction. Especially with playing games against people that are 5000 miles across the world. They would of called you a crack pot.
The world has changed A LOT!.
Life isnt going to be the same in the future as it is today. We have plenty left to explore yet. Space, the UNIVERSE is just one of them.
How do you know we will be watching TV shows in 50 years? We might just take part in the movies ourself with A.I , Virtual reality.
Im sorry you have a bad life

and have no interests in life. Shame
Murphys Law
Jan 8 2005, 09:57 AM
Im sorry you have a bad life
and have no interests in life. ShameI dont think that is the issue, what about living evey moment like its your last. How do you do that if you live for ever?
Mad Manfred
Jan 8 2005, 10:15 AM
I'd love it.
Truly immortal.
Imagine what you could accomplish...
whoa182
Jan 8 2005, 10:24 AM
Im sorry but Im not satisfied with an average life of 80+ years. Its just not long enough. There is too much to see in this world, not to mention space.
200 years ago, 100 years ago, 50 years ago. Many of the stuff we take for granted today was Beyond what anybody thought we would have back then. We have what they would of thought of as " SCIENCE FICTION "
now I cant imagin how much the world is going to change in the next 50 years, never mind 100. Id sure like to be there/here.
I cant believe how much life has changed in the past 10 years. nevermind at the moment. Im talking, debating, playing games with people across the whole planet!!!!. Now that I thought I would never do, i never even imagined it to even wonder if its possible lol.
I just hope we dont end up a war or a epidemic disease out-break
now diseases can travel around the world in a day. in hours. This is a major problem. Before they used to take weeks. mabey years. With our greater transport system, comes with the likely event of a out-break one day
but apart from that, I dont understand the fact that people think we are going to live the same kind of lives as today. its very short sighted
Mad Manfred
Jan 8 2005, 10:30 AM
The world hasn't changed much over the last 10 years. 20 years, yes, but not 10. Things are still the same pretty much.
Alien_child
Jan 8 2005, 12:03 PM
QUOTE
now diseases can travel around the world in a day. in hours. This is a major problem. Before they used to take weeks. mabey years.
no diseases or virus can travel round the world in hours nor days , nor weeks, its more like months or years... u should get your facs right i think
Alien_child
Jan 8 2005, 12:15 PM
when you think about it in detail lots of things have happened over ten yrs in fact. think of all the new discoveries we have made and changes in out technology like pcs like how anchient would they seem to us to day. you would be playing games like pacman not high detail games like doom 3 and the sims 2. as far as i know heaps of things have changed, in the larger time scale such as the universe forming and stuff 10yrs isnt a miniscule amount of time but to humans its not. 10 yrs ago the 2 towers were still here, dvd players didnt even exist, se asia was still a paradise. lots of things have changed you just gotta think back that far to remember what it was really like.
what will happen when people arn't dying any more but babies are still being born. the world would become so overcrowded, and poluted. there would be famine and freash water would be such a scarecity that nations will be fighting over it, do you really want to see that happen. no longer will the birds sing, the forrests will vanish, the beaches will turn in to poluted dumps. there will be no wild life , there just isnt any room left for animals any more. the only peace and tranqiulity you will ever get is the day u die. you will be 1000 yrs old and telling your ancestors what it was like when you were young and how freash the air was. you could go to a beach and swim, to a forrest and go camping, go to a lake and fish and there were such things as birds that used to sing songs every morning and afternoon.
you can have your never ending life and all the polution and the overcrowded earth Whoa182 but i prefer my life 10 to 1 .... every begining has an end
Mad Manfred
Jan 8 2005, 12:31 PM
QUOTE(Alien_child @ Jan 8 2005, 11:03 PM)
QUOTE
now diseases can travel around the world in a day. in hours. This is a major problem. Before they used to take weeks. mabey years.
no diseases or virus can travel round the world in hours nor days , nor weeks, its more like months or years... u should get your facs right i think
[right][snapback]441743[/snapback][/right]
Eh, maybe you should get your facts straight. With air travel airbourne virus' can spread over continents within days.
QUOTE(Alien_child @ Jan 8 2005, 11:15 PM)
when u think about it in detail lots of things have happened over ten yrs in fact. think of all the new discoveries we have made and changes in out technology like pcs like how achient would they seem to us 2day. u would be playing games like pacman not high detail games like doom 3 and the sims 2. as far as i know heaps of things have changed, in the larger time scale such as the universe forming and stuff 10yrs isnt a miniscule amount of time but to humans its not. 10 yrs ago the 2 towers were still here, dvd players didnt even exist, se asia was still a paradise. lots of things have changed u just gotta think back that far to remember what it was really like.
[right][snapback]441750[/snapback][/right]
DVD's were around 10 years ago. They just weren't commonly known or distributed.
And the WTC incident was hardly significant on a global scale as the Tsunami in South East Asia was so please don't compare the two.
Alien_child
Jan 8 2005, 12:41 PM
name a airbourne virus' that has infected to world in days bet u cant
whoa182
Jan 8 2005, 12:48 PM
Officials in Hong Kong, the center of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) scare, said on Tuesday nine tourists caught the virus on a flight to Beijing from another passenger, a man from mainland China.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/03/25/mystery.flu/Scientists will really worry when someone that already has human flu, also catches H5N1. Then, the two may combine, emerging as a new strain with the virulence of the chicken flu and the transmissibility of human flu.
The result - a deadly pandemic which in the age of easy international travel could spread around the globe in weeks
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4092709.stm
Alien_child
Jan 8 2005, 12:50 PM
the sars scare firstly took months to infect the amount of people it did and didnt infect the world
whoa182
Jan 8 2005, 12:55 PM
Yes but it HAS the potential to Travel across the WORLD very quickly. It only requires 1 human to carry it on a flight, land in an aiport. Other people get infected as they go to travel to other countries and so on, So its more possible than ever before to travel around the world very fast.
Alien_child
Jan 8 2005, 12:58 PM
yeah very fast eg months or weeks not hours or days
whoa182
Jan 8 2005, 01:04 PM
QUOTE
what will happen when people arn't dying any more but babies are still being born. the world would become so overcrowded, and poluted. there would be famine and freash water would be such a scarecity that nations will be fighting over it, do you really want to see that happen. no longer will the birds sing, the forrests will vanish, the beaches will turn in to poluted dumps. there will be no wild life , there just isnt any room left for animals any more. the only peace and tranqiulity you will ever get is the day u die. you will be 1000 yrs old and telling your ancestors what it was like when you were young and how freash the air was. you could go to a beach and swim, to a forrest and go camping, go to a lake and fish and there were such things as birds that used to sing songs every morning and afternoon.
you can have your never ending life and all the polution and the overcrowded earth Whoa182 but i prefer my life 10 to 1 .... every begining has an end
You should take a train trip around you're country. You will find there is still plenty of space to fill. On nearly every big country there is plenty of space between cities.
Who said we will be breathing oxygen is the next 1000 years? we might drink it. Hey, we might not need it by that time.
Also nanotech has very promising concepts of Cleaning the air and envionment.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,55024,00.html" NEW YORK -- For scientists who study it, nanotechnology is considered a clean technology, perhaps even the key to solving some current environmental ills.
The National Science Foundation has been cutting its timetable for the release of nanotech-fueled products from five or 10 years to two or three years, said Mihail Roco, NSF's senior adviser on nanotechnology.
Nanotechnology will so thoroughly affect the way science addresses medicine, food, electronics and the environment, that within a decade or so, Roco envisions a $1 trillion yearly market in products that carry nano-components, including all computer chips, half of pharmaceuticals and half of chemical catalysts"
To many people living on earth. Who said we wont colonize another planet, Mars and other planets we havnt found yet in the next 1000 years?
Alien_child
Jan 8 2005, 01:17 PM
In Australia there maybe lots of open space but there isnt enough water because australia is 3/4 desert der. in 1000 yrs we are still going to be breathing air and drinking water because evelution in a very slow process it doesnt happen over night nor in 1000yrs as u might like it 2. if people are not dying then our earth will die it can not suport the mass numbers of humans and our wastes.
whoa182
Jan 8 2005, 01:24 PM
Evolotion is mostly in our hands now. nature done a good job on us. but we take over from here. genetic engineering.
Water? I agree with you, a VERY BIG PROBLEM!, you know the world is going to require Double the amount of energy the world produces today.
These people agree with you to, only they have a nice soloution.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,128...tw=wn_tophead_5Water Filters Rely on NanotechAMSTERDAM -- A slow, methodical transformation of the $400-billion-a-year water-management industry is currently in progress, and nanotechnology appears to be leading the way.
Water covers more than 70 percent of the Earth, but only 1 percent can be consumed without processing, filtering or melting polar ice caps. That supply appears to be dwindling as the global population grows and industry and agriculture require more and more water.
secret to the nano-enhanced water-management devices, as with all nanotechnology, lies at the atomic level. The chemical properties of basic elements tend to be different and easier to manipulate at the molecular level. This gives companies working at this scale -- one billionth of a meter -- greater control over the material, making it stronger, lighter, more conductive, hydrophilic or hydrophobic (water-loving and water-hating, respectively).
You can read the rest from that link I put on here at the top to see the whole idea
The Drake
Jan 8 2005, 01:26 PM
Immortality would be awesome but only if the people you love and care about are immortal to. And your pets

Yet it would not be that fun if you think about all the things you love disappear and you don't know anything of the new generation.
Novo
Jan 8 2005, 02:57 PM
Longer time to fight for the revolution. I could live longer, and spread more seeds of dissent. Possibly figure out a way to hack into the nanotech things from the net, disable all of the militarys weapons.
Sounds good to me
sultanmuratova
Jan 9 2005, 12:58 AM
it might not be such a good thing to have people living longer, the world is already getting crowded as it is and immortality or living longer than a human normally does would only add to that.
but even without any help of science, we are already expanding our life span due to a more healthy life and better conditions, these days a lot of people live up tp 100 years or more.
saRa
Jan 9 2005, 01:10 AM
I don't think that I'd like to live longer, but maybe a better life. When I die, I don't want to come back. And what I mean is by spirit with another body. I just feel like this is my last life and I don't want to keep it going. (spirit-wise)
Kellalor
Jan 9 2005, 01:53 AM
I wouldn't mind living longer, but living forever would be boring!
I'd like to live about 600 years, and gradually grow older.
~TheBigK~
Jan 9 2005, 02:21 AM
QUOTE(The Drake @ Jan 8 2005, 05:26 AM)
Immortality would be awesome but only if the people you love and care about are immortal to. And your pets

Yet it would not be that fun if you think about all the things you love disappear and you don't know anything of the new generation.
[right][snapback]441813[/snapback][/right]
I agree with that. But I think I'd just like to live a long time and eventually grow old.
HolyDevil2053
Jan 9 2005, 02:48 AM
I voted yes-youthful...
I think it would be interesting to say the least...
whoa182
Jan 9 2005, 03:54 AM
I dont understand the people on here that say it would be boring.
If a Educated person and has much time to study stuff and learn. They would want all the time in the world to do it.
I agree with this point in the BBC article
Should we cure ageing?
Curing ageing will change society in innumerable ways. Some people are so scared of this that they think we should accept ageing as it is.
I think that is diabolical - it says we should deny people the right to life
The right to choose to live or to die is the most fundamental right there is; conversely, the duty to give others that opportunity to the best of our ability is the most fundamental duty there is.
There is no difference between saving lives and extending lives, because in both cases we are giving people the chance of more life. To say that we shouldn't cure ageing is ageism, saying that old people are unworthy of medical care."
I have the pretty much the same view as that, Atleast this way, you could choose when you want to die, mabey you can even have a choice to have a Very long sleep lol... I dont know.
There is soooo much to do, I have A LOT of interests any believe me, There is not enough time to do them all because of aging.
I still find it amazing how people say they would be bored.
Tetanus
Jan 9 2005, 04:10 AM
I'd like to have an extended life span and stay youthful, but still die... and only if everyone around me was the same way. It would be much too painful to watch your family members and loved ones grow old and die... and I'd still want to die because it'd really suck to be alive during the apocalypse.
whoa182
Jan 9 2005, 04:53 AM
This is on today. hes a Very Famous inventor and futurist that makes prediction on Real models, not looking into a crystal ball. He researches a lot, has written some books and is very much interested in Technology trends
"Ray Kurzweil will be interviewed live on CNN cable television on Sunday, January 9 sometime between 4 pm ET and 4:30 pm ET. The topic will be health and longevity. "
Try and watch it, I guess he WILL take about this subject and he might give a more clearer idea of what im trying to put forward.
he wrote his latest book called Fantastic voyage - live long enough to live forever
1 of his old big selling books was called : The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence
scooby-doo
Jan 9 2005, 06:03 AM
"There are stories throughout the world of people searching for the "Fountain of Youth." It is said that Pizarro desperately searched in vain for this rejuvenating fountain during his expeditions to the New World. The great secret, however, is that the "Fountain of Youth" does not exist outside of us, but rather exists within us. This fountain is our own sexual energies and drinking from this fountain refers to the transmutation of the sexual energy. The alchemists of medieval times were searching for the Philosopher's Stone, which was supposed to give them eternal life. Great alchemical treatises talk about creating this Stone, but use veiled language. The first step in order to create the Philosopher's Stone is to begin working with the rough mercury. This mercury is our own sexual energies. Working with the mercury means to transmute the sexual energies. Samael Aun Weor states: "Age does not exist. It is merely a crutch that people lean heavily on. What does exist is cellular mechanics. New cells are born, to replace the old cells that die due to erroneous processes of assimilation, etc. The rate of such replacement decreases because of us wasting our energies foolishly and thus, so-called old age arrives at our doorstep."
Even though it may sound like an extraordinary claim to the average individual, physical death does not have to take place. The idea that physical death must occur is an erroneous concept. We currently have defective mechanical and unconscious processes occurring within the body, and it is these erroneous processes that are responsible for the aging process. The people of Lemuria lived for thousands of years. The people of Atlantis lived for centuries. There are accounts of various Masters who are said to have lived for tens of thousands, and even millions of years, with the same physical body. There are a set of exercises within the Gnostic teachings called the Tibetan Rites of Rejuvenation. These exercises have as one of their purposes the rejuvenation of the physical body. A person of seventy years can, if correctly practicing these exercises, transform himself into someone who is thirty or forty years old. Through transmutation and prayer, a person practicing these rites can ask for rejuvenation, the healing of an organ, general good health, increased intelligence or memory, the healing of an illness or disease, etc.
Samael Aun Weor tells the story of an old English army colonel regaining his youth:
"While in India at the age of 70 years, an English colonel learned that a lamasery (monastery of lamas) existed in Tibet where people could rejuvenate. He invited a friend he had, to come along. His friend was young and obviously did not want to listen to him because he may have thought that since he was young, there was no reason to seek a place to rejuvenate. On the day of the old man's departure, his young friend, as is to be supposed, laughed a great deal to see this poor 70-year-old man, with his cane, bald head, a few white hairs, very old, traveling towards the Himalayas in search of youth. His young friend thought: How funny, this old man has already lived his life and wants to live it again. And, of course, he saw the old man leave and the only reaction in him was laughter. The interesting thing of it all is that after about four months, the Colonel's young friend received a letter from the old man in which he said that he was already on the track of that lamasery called "The Fountain Of Youth", and this information, of course, caused the friend laughter and that is how matters remained. The truth is that four years later, something which was no longer a laughing matter occurred. Someone knocked at the young man's door.
The young man went, opened the door and said,
"At your service, what can I do for you?"
The visitor, who appeared to be a man of about 35 or 40 years answered,
"I am Colonel so and so."
"Ah..."said the young man, "You are the son of the Colonel who left for the Himalayas?"
"No," he answered, "I am the Colonel himself."
"But how is that possible if I know the Colonel, he is my friend and he is an old man and you are not old..."
"I repeat, I am the Colonel who wrote you a letter four months after my departure informing you that I had found the way to the Lamasery."
The visitor showed the young man his documents and obviously, the latter was astounded. Interestingly, while in the Himalayas, the Colonel saw many youths with whom he made friends at the lamasery known as "The Fountain of Youth". There was not a single old man there; everybody was young. He was the only old person; all the others were persons between 35 and 40 years. But later, after he became a very good friend of many, he discovered that all of them were older than 100 years old. In other words, all of them were older than he was, but none of them showed signs of old age. Of course, the Colonel was astonished; he committed himself to the discipline of the lamasery and succeeded in reconquering his youth."
To conclude, transmuting the sexual energies is the key to healing and rejuvenating the body and remaining free from illness and disease. Of course, psychological work on oneself is indeed necessary to combat illness. Since the hidden causes of disease are psychological in nature and created by the ego, the threat of illness will always remain as long as the ego is not completely disintegrated. Transmutation gives us large quantities of energy to work with in our daily lives and in our exercises. By working with transmutation we are opening the door to new possibilities, to the awakening of consciousness, and ultimately to self-realization."
girty1600
Jan 9 2005, 06:21 AM
QUOTE(whoa182 @ Jan 8 2005, 11:53 PM)
This is on today. hes a Very Famous inventor and futurist that makes prediction on Real models, not looking into a crystal ball. He researches a lot, has written some books and is very much interested in Technology trends
"Ray Kurzweil will be interviewed live on CNN cable television on Sunday, January 9 sometime between 4 pm ET and 4:30 pm ET. The topic will be health and longevity. "
Try and watch it, I guess he WILL take about this subject and he might give a more clearer idea of what im trying to put forward.
he wrote his latest book called Fantastic voyage - live long enough to live forever
1 of his old big selling books was called : The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence
[right][snapback]442663[/snapback][/right]
What you are forgetting is that humans are emotional. Given the opportunity to live forever, most people will say no after thinking it over. No one wants to see all their friends, family and culture come to pass before their very eyes. No matter how scientific we allow ourselves to be, we can't change the fact that we are human.
We don't need a "more clearer"

idea to make us want to live forever. I suppose if I were to sacrifice my humanity for scientific purposes and shut down the will to be human then I could do it. But, I would never make that choice, immortality is not an option for me.
whoa182
Jan 9 2005, 06:26 AM
"no1 one wants to see all their friends, family and culture come to pass before their very eyes"
most/all of them will live with you in the time when it all happens. They will have the choice too.
http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2004/07/...0712_b_main.aspheres a radio show where ray kurzweil was on a few months ago. he talks about all the points you guys made in the topic and has some good idea how we will tackle them.
Ray Kurzweil is a legendary dynamo of human innovation. He's founded nine businesses in everything from speech recognition to artificial intelligence. Now Ray Kurzweil's restless mind is focused on human life.
Immortality is just around the corner, according to Kurzweil. The super-charged convergence of biology, computing, and nanotechnology, he says, is about to radically extend human life. And it may be just a matter of a couple of decades, not centuries, before the human lifespan becomes essentially unlimited-- not 100 but many centuries.
Tune in to hear techologist Ray Kurzweil talk about his how-to-achieve the unlimited human lifespan guide.PLEASEEE Take a listen, its only 32kb audio for about 30minutes.
The link is in this post, You can listen with Windows media player, real player, quicktime
it starts around 6 minutes into the audioWhen you are ill. Are you going to refuse these treatments that cure you're heart disease. basicly reversing damage to you're organs and cure you're cancer?
girty1600
Jan 9 2005, 06:28 AM
^meh......To each his own. Not me though.
Fluffybunny
Jan 9 2005, 06:33 AM
I wouldn't want to live forever.
It would be nice to be able to live a little longer as long as I could be healthy; maybe a couple of hundred years but no more.
It would be nice to be able to live long enough to have many varied careers and an incredible education, as well as the wisdom that would come with living so long. It would be very hard to want to live so long in a society like what we have today where there are so many bad things happening in the world and uncontrolled greed and ignorance seem to be gaining a stronghold like nothing that we have seen in recent times...
RaginCajun
Jan 9 2005, 06:33 AM
i would love to live for a very long time. maybe even forever. when and where can i sign up. (seriously). i can really start dreaming of my ultimate goals and plans. i would like to be maybe the only one too. i would be a history book but can talk and interact with you guys.
whoa182
Jan 9 2005, 07:18 AM
I think that If life were to stay the same as today, it would be quite boring for living for hundreds of years without change.
But thats where you need to look more to the future, Life today is far different from 50 years ago. to be honest life is quite different even from 25 years ago!. so things will always change, There will always be new discoveries.
Imagin if this model is correct. look at what it is saying.An analysis of the history of technology shows that technological change is exponential, contrary to the common-sense "intuitive linear" view. So we won't experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century -- it will be more like 20,000 years of progress (at today's rate). The "returns," such as chip speed and cost-effectiveness, also increase exponentially. There's even exponential growth in the rate of exponential growth.
the future: it's widely misunderstood. Our forebears expected the future to be pretty much like their present, which had been pretty much like their past. Although exponential trends did exist a thousand years ago, they were at that very early stage where an exponential trend is so flat that it looks like no trend at all. So their lack of expectations was largely fulfilled. Today, in accordance with the common wisdom, everyone expects continuous technological progress and the social repercussions that follow. But the future will be far more surprising than most observers realize: few have truly internalized the implications of the fact that
the rate of change itself is accelerating.for the actualy Data and graphs and more info you can see it all here
http://www.kurzweilai.net/articles/art0134.html?printable=1Mabey this will convince you. mabey not. If you scroll down you might be facinated about the type of technology we will probably see. scroll and see the sub headings
Then it will be upto you, when the time comes
Mad Manfred
Jan 9 2005, 12:50 PM
QUOTE
"no1 one wants to see all their friends, family and culture come to pass before their very eyes"
Well, I guess it's easier for people who aren't dependant on others for physical and emotional support.
Imagine what wonders you'd see in a thousand or tens of thousands of years from now. Family, friends and lovers come and go, knowledge and experience is forever.
I'd sell my little ficitious soul for the chance
Alien_child
Jan 9 2005, 03:22 PM
no matter how you put the matter, alot of people would not like to live 4 ever. yes a hell lot of things will change over 500 years perhaps everything, but when your talking about living forever your still going to be living day by day week by week and 1 year at a time. at the start of the topic you describe how nothing much has happened in the last 10yrs nor 20, years well what is the difference when u live 4 ever your not going to wake up 1 morning and 50yrs have just flew past. your days will still be 24hrs long and at 500yrs old all those 182,500 days are just going to blend in to one another and unless you have a hell awsome memory u wont be able to remember jack of the last 300yrs , so you will be living each day just like we do now, nothing will seem special. every thing we find entrancing about the future now will just seem boring to that generation and it will just seem boring to us. even in 500yrs time nothing will seem to change over a ten year period. just like nothing seems to change now.... i think thats what all u people who are chasing a never ending life forget.
Mad Manfred
Jan 9 2005, 03:37 PM
I understand perfectly. I stand by my drunken statement.
whoa182
Jan 9 2005, 03:47 PM
Our brains wont be capable of living that long without being changed in many ways. Artificial neurons etc..
So our mental capabilities might of advanced by the end of the 21st century.
Alien_child
Jan 9 2005, 04:22 PM
by the way your make it out it wont be us humans living for iternity but some big pile of scientificly modified brain.
they still call them selves human, either they cant think of another name for there kind or because they wish they still were. the only thing that remotly looks human about them ne more is there eyes, thats the one thing that the scientists have no need to change. they drink oxygen because the air is so poluted from previous generations, the earth has been raped of all its natural resourses and it it remains to be is a trashed wasteland. The new humans live consantly straped to Virtual reality games, where they can play there lives out as us humans do today where u can still go 2 a beach and fish and swim with no one else is around.
we may only live for a short period of time but that what living life is all about. the risk of not being here tomoro is what drives us to live our lives to the full protential that we possibly can. when life has no end what will u live for , just to see the next big discovery that happens once every 20years perhaps or the new technology that comes out once every 5. wouldnt it just be better to build a time machine and see all these things and once u get bored move ahead a few more hundred years it would defently be a lot more exiting, then waiting for everything to happen because it wont all happen at once its going to happen gradually. 1 thing at a time .
whoa182
Jan 9 2005, 08:56 PM
We already have the ability to re-arrange atoms, The hope is within the next 10-20 years we will have the capability to build anything we want form a nano-assembler.
If this were ever to be built, world resources would be a problem AT ALL. It could grab the raw materials ( atoms ) and arrange them in the in the appropiate order to make any type of material you want, any food, water, diamonds, a house, a rocket.... It would self assemble and basicly build up infront of you on its own.
That is Nanotechnology, that is the future. Probably more far off future, but We know that a nano assembler should be and probably is Very likely to be built within the first half of this century, Most optomistic veiews are around 2020.
Its very dangerous technology, But also will reward humanity in many ways if used right.
This probably sounds really far fetched to you, But believe me... its Already happening and being developed. The first country to come with a nano assembler.
WINS the most powerful position on the planet
its that simple
Examle of what Nanotech really is
A molecular assembler is a device capable of breaking and creating the chemical bonds between atoms and molecules. Since a molecular assembler is by definition able to self-replace, the first could build a duplicate copy of itself. Those two then become four, become eight, and so on. This compounding capital base could lead to a massive and decisive force within days.
a state that makes the assembler breakthrough could rapidly create a decisive military force – if not literally overnight, then at least with unprecedented speed.
The race to build a molecular assembler, if won. will result in its worldwide nanotechnic dictatorship
So there are dangers to living in the 21st century and beyond, Forget nukes. They are nothing compared to what technology is here and is advancing so fast.
I personally want to stay alive long enough to see Space colonization become a reality across our solar system and beyond ( that I need some major extended time ) also I am extremely interested in Computers, Biotech and Nanotech. How far will humans go in the 21st century. Machine and man living together. Possibly merge.
scientists call the 21st century, The post Human era. I want to see it. I want to be in it
Alien_child
Jan 10 2005, 03:32 AM
well if you want to see Space colonization become a reality why dont u build a time machine its nearlly as far fetched as your idea of living for ever.
seeking
Jan 10 2005, 05:36 AM
i would love to be able to live up untill the end of civilization, i so want to go into space, i so want to walk on the moon, and other planets, i so want to see the cure for diseases and so want to see what kinds of technology we develop, i would love to know if light speed is ever achieved, or near light speed for that matter, i would love to see it all, i think i have a problem i hate missing out on things, i feel like ive been cheated, its not fair to me that one day i will die and miss out on whats really out there
whoa182
Jan 11 2005, 05:50 AM
Check out what this guy has to say, hes actually 1 of the brainiest guys on the planet. Elezer Yudkowsky
http://www.radio4all.net/proginfo.php?id=7610he has a really good philosophy on this whole subject , its just a Audio file, 16mb or 4mb
Tell me what you think about his views.. I totally agree with what hes saying lol and he covers nearly everything and gives some answeres to the questions asked here
tanmoychat
Jan 11 2005, 01:32 PM
QUOTE(whoa182 @ Jan 11 2005, 05:50 AM)
Check out what this guy has to say, hes actually 1 of the brainiest guys on the planet. Elezer Yudkowsky
http://www.radio4all.net/proginfo.php?id=7610he has a really good philosophy on this whole subject , its just a Audio file, 16mb or 4mb
Tell me what you think about his views.. I totally agree with what hes saying lol and he covers nearly everything and gives some answeres to the questions asked here
[right][snapback]445519[/snapback][/right]
I guess the massive tsunami in Asia proved once again that against Nature man stands nowhere. Hwoever technologically advanced we become still we will remain an atom in front of the collossal mother nature.
Till date we havent even tracked even 10% of all the near earth asteriods. According to one of the articles in Discovery Channel a very famous astronmer was reflecting the fact that for sure we know only 1% of the totoal asteriods and comets and can track their path. But we do not know anything about the remianig 99% of them ....Even with the so called advancement in science...I agree that comparing our forefathers say 1000 years ago we are far far ahead and still going string, yet one immortal fact is thet nature is Infinite. Being mere mortals we can always try to reach infinity but can never reach there.
Also just imagine that in a few yeare huge chunks of ice breaks from the the Artic and Antartic Reagions, it wont be long before another Ice age sets in...How much fuelf or energey do we have which can keep all of us alive till the end of Ice Age. Agreed that Man has always tried to fight against mother nature building houses to shelter from the storms rains sun, building transportation system to cover enormous distaces in matter of minutes, yet the fact remains that nature is really vast and unfathomable. The moment medical science finds a cure for deadly disease like TB or Pox, another one in the form of aids crop up. Studies have shown that the hepatitis viruses are adapting themselves against the vaccination. There are hundreds of other diseases which may break out any day anytime and wipe out millions and millions of people from the face of earth.
Regarding longeivity, yes averager life span of humans is increasing (discounting the many myths of tibetian fountain of youth, and our ancestors living 1000 s of years), but again with the lifespan the other by products like pollution, global warming, resource crunch are also increasing. and there will always a fight . Lets see who wins in that fight.
But certainsly science has atleast allowed us to think that we cahieve immortality. Who knows maybe we can some day...But I really doubt whether mankind can last long against the fury of Nature.
God Bless All!!!!
Alien_child
Jan 11 2005, 02:33 PM
QUOTE
it wont be long before another Ice age sets in...How much fuelf or energey do we have which can keep all of us alive till the end of Ice Age.
Us humans survived the last ice age and we were still in the stone age.... this is the 21st centery mate were not going ne where..... unless like an asteroind hits or something
tanmoychat
Jan 11 2005, 04:45 PM
QUOTE(Alien_child @ Jan 11 2005, 02:33 PM)
QUOTE
it wont be long before another Ice age sets in...How much fuelf or energey do we have which can keep all of us alive till the end of Ice Age.
Us humans survived the last ice age and we were still in the stone age.... this is the 21st centery mate were not going ne where..... unless like an asteroind hits or something
[right][snapback]445767[/snapback][/right]
Get your facts right Dude before being over-optimistic. Ice Age can result due to global warming. It has even been picturised in The Day after Tomorrow. By the way I am not quoting any movies out here. For more information go to
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0130-11.htmProbably ya humans may survive the ice age but certainly it would lead to mass wipe out and probably alien species like you may survive who will have to start culture, scientific breakthrough all over again
Alien_child
Jan 12 2005, 02:28 PM
if u noticed the day after 2moro has been greatly over exagerated with the wheather der. u watch way to many movies. so i bet u recon the care bears are real to.
whoa182
Jan 23 2005, 04:07 AM
PLAY: A Theory of Fun - A talk given by Eliezer
http://www.radio4all.net/proginfo.php?id=7610 Take a listen to this, Right click and ' Save target as ' on FTP or HTTP link on that webpage...
He explains all this in quite a good way, he explains a lot about living forever and boredem. He might make you think again about Death, Longer life may not be how you see it now
edit: ohwell, Ive just noticed I put this link down twice, But if any1 is still interested in discussing this topic, then please do lol