QUOTE
It's a lung diesiese said to be cause by the inhalation of silica dust.
Have I made your day yet?
?
QUOTE
I bring science into this because science has to do with everything in the world. Science IS everything in the world. I think I learned that in third grade.
Well, I wouldn't say science is everything, but as a method of evaluating the likelyhood of a possibility, I have found it to be without peer.
The thing to remember, however, is that science is done a certain way. There are specific points that have to be covered in the pursuit of it in order to avoid falling into the trap of subjectivity. Take, for instance, vampires.
The first step in a scientific investigation is to verify the phenomena. What are we talking about? The modern vampire, gothic, brooding, intelligent, blood-thristy, and endowed with supernatural abilities? Does such a thing exist?
In science, one does not begin with a result and look for evidence to support it. Rather, one must provide a logical path from the evidence to the result. Ergo, one cannot assume that the modern vampire exists, and then look for physical ailments, reports, or studies that confirm this. Science is about proving first and confirming after. One cannot confirm without first proving.
All the evidence concerning their properties can be objectively and imperically traced to sources created after the legend began and for the purposes of entertainment. The evidence leads us logically to the conclusion that, since these properties did not exist prior to their appearance in the books and movies, then the most likely explanation is that the properties were created for the books and movies.
Occam's Razor rules in science. The simplest explanation is usually the correct one. If there is no reason to consider the vampire to be real, then one does not assume it is real and attempt to prove it.