Lately many people have been wanting pics of different cryptos,so i am gonna do a series of threads with most of the pics i have,of many cryptos,so nobody has to repeatedly post them over and over...

Feel free to discuss any of the following pics in any of my threads...

Info - Said to be an unknown ape,or a a surviving caveman.

And the second part of em...

Btw,if anyone has some that i have not posted,and any that are not obviously fake,then feel free to post them...

The ones that are in the distance are more probable to be for real.

Yea,but some are cropped,were already that way when i got em.

OK here are a few pics that have yet to be posted!

First off I see u have one shot of the Skunk Ape Vince Doerr supposedly took while out on a call to a fire. Here is the other sequince to those shots!

First shot!


Second shot!


And third shot is the shot you've posted!

Canadian Rottweiller!

Just to clear this up the second last pic in your first post is NOT a real bigfoot it is not even a fake one.

The women who took the pic claims it was a bf at the time, but upon later examination the object was still there it turned out to be none only than our old tree stump in full glory..

double post sryy all!

So lets make some use of it.

Here the infamous Luxemburgh Bigfoot! Suit?

And one of the 5 best for me the freeman footage!




The elusive 'Whitey'!

Bigfoot running away?

'Curious Bigfoot' peeking in on women reading in car!

He/she's looking at you!



And dont forget the redwoods 'playboy' incident!




And this may not be bf related , but had some very harsh discussion on the bff(bogfoot forum). Maybe some of you here will shed some new info and great thoughts as to what this may be?

And for now last but not least!!!

The beautiful patty in her full glory.

I see Cr already posted one of her back, so here are 2 of her face and upper torso.

These are really well enhanced and really bring out some of her best features..

And sorry there is no 'BABY' being carried on the breast!

everyone of these pictures is on another thread in this very forum

Now they are all in one thread!

Actually she never claimed it to be a fake,some say it is a stump yes,but many say it isn't.And that "report" by the woman who took it was probably just a theory of some guy.

Exactly.These are reference threads.

It is amazing in the age of Digital photography and digital video no one can get a good quality picture or moving image... too far away or blurred, I would love to be sponsored to try and get conclusive evidence on bigfoot and the others.

Here you go CR! Here is the link to where the women claims it is nothing more than a tree stump.


Tree Stump

Wow, are you sasquatches #1 fan?

I heard on the internet somewhere people have seen sasquatches on the praries! But at the time I was freaked out.

If you had a gun, and you saw sasquatch, would you shoot?

many of the pics seem to be nothing more then tricks of light

I wouldn't want to shoot, however I don't really know. If I did I Know I wouldn't shoot to kill.

It depends: How desperatley have I been seeking my truth all my life, and would I be willing to throw my chance away then?

This one I always loved!


You should be able to spot the so called bf in this pic!

This one has really been grilled over on the bff and so far the best expalnation of what it may be is a 'ROOT BALL'?


Your thoughts on this pic!

If its that thing in the left, we don't get a good view, so it could be anything. But it's shape and size isn't consistent with the bigfoot myth, so my verdict is no.

Those are actually called skunk apes,which are smaller sasquatches...

It's four legged.Looks like a thin bear.

I thought skunk apes lived in Florida, not Alberta

Locations are always patchy with cryptoids, except marine ones, They seem to stay round about the same place.

Is it me, or does it look like it may have a tail..

Yes exactly what I was thinking!

If this a real animal were are looking at it is definately on all fours(bf allegedly go on all fours to retreat faster), it has a tail(never heard of bf having a tail), and it is atleast the same size(if not a little bigger) than the women laying on the rock.

Awesome question and I got a truthful answer. Usually when sightings or encouners occur, their least expected. And when least expectations occur, you aren't usually walking around with a camera. But say the people who are just so coincidentally walking around with a camera (or tourists who wait all day at Loch Ness with camcorders and pictures ready), their nerves are stimulating. They either see the unearthly cryptid and get scared to move, or are in shock and totally forget that they have a camera on them, or by the time they get ready to take a picture, the cryptid is gone. As for the people who wait at Loch Ness, if something just happens to pop up out of the water, their scared to get their camcorder ready, in a shock and want to see it with their own eyes, nervous and excited at the same time, or just forget that they have a camera or recorder on them. So the pictures of Bigfoot that are beauitfully clear are most likely hoax because it was as if it were expected. The pictures that are far away and hard to see are the ones that have more of a chance of being real though of course hoaxes are always made and could be purposely shaked to create a false image.



Unfortunately, I would have to shoot it. Not tending to kill it, but as to reffering for information and to find out what it really is. Being honest -



That animal on the left could be a monkey/baboon/baby bear/ for all we know due to the lack of the quality of whats being focused on.



Agree -

I'm not sure what the hairy-looking thing on the left is, but that creature on the rocks looks delicious!

lol!

Behave.

Oh, haha. I wasn't sure what he was talking about for a second, lol -

Me neither, I had to re-read it.

Lol, but getting back to topic on this thread - since it lacks quality and what is being focused on, basically it could be anything.

Alright, im not going to say that i dont believe in Bigfoot but, why hasnt there been Hair , Skeletons, or poop left of Bigfoot. im just pointing out something. Dont get Hyped up.

If there was then we would have more proof.

I once asked that question and really never got a straight answer out of that nor don't really even know the answer myself.

Most of them are so indistinct, who knows if the are real or not.

Check this site out:
http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/~bz050/HomePage.bht.html

I hope its real.

I don't know, if it were real I think we would of already found out by now.

This one turned out 2 be a tree stump

Thats ironic coming from you Brit

yes it is
lol normaly it is me gettin told it is fake not today lol

Ah ha Maybe we will indoctrinate you into the UM skeptics club after all.. Those who wish to believe but have not had the proof yet