Hi! This is my first post(obviously), and i wanted to know if you guys had any chupacabra pics that AREN'T FAKE. I like seeing them, but i don't know where to look. Give me some tips. Thanks.

There are no pics that aren't fake, as you can't take a pic of a fake creature. Take some pics of a dragon then come back to me

I guess every picture I see of a chupacabra is fake... You can't ask about a real picture about something that doesn't exist...

I don't know if anyone has seen this one, although it is obviously a fake!

^^ reminds me of Pain from FFX...the Aeon thing...

Oh yeah... Anima! It really does! Just that anima is huge and... not dead...

hahah ya it does look like anima....lol...i always thought it was werid that anima use to wear a of locket virgin mary (or someone that looks like her) around its neck...lol....

but ya...no pic i have seen of chupacabra tend to be real...all fake

Lol! Anima! I thought it looked familiar! I never noticed the necklace though. I'll have to check that out.

if somebody had taken a real photograph of a Chupacabra, you would have heard about it on the news.

hey i wanted 2 say that if u go 2 earthfiles.com there is a few pics there of the chupacabra and explanations of the pics. these r of the teeth, claws, the side of the face where it was shot with barely ne blood, and part of the ear that broke of just minutes after bein shot in the right eye with a rifle. these r real pics.
[attachmentid=11421][attachmentid=11420][attachmentid=11419][attachmentid=11418][attachmentid=11412][attachmentid=11422][attachmentid=11423]

There is no chupacabra, and as such, no pictures of one. As Janiel said.

I don't think chupacabras exist. I just think they are some sort of an unknown spiecy. <- I dunno how to spell it lol. OR it could be a bloodsucking wolf. Wow.... -.-b

all chupacabra pics are fake. either it's somethig made up or it's a dead dog with mange.

Here's a pic I drew of one, what I think they look like...

That's old news, and it was nothing more in the end than a dying diseased dog.
People want anything to be a chupacabra these days, they even say that giant squid are chupas.
It's awful sad. They DO. NOT. EXIST.

well i found this one and is most likely fake



nice pic dd

Not fake, just the corpse of some feline. That's what they look like they shrivel up and get roasted in the sun for several days.

My cat is sitting right beside me, maybe I could take a picture of her saying it's El Chupacabra!

Just a thought. Has anyone ever thought that if everyone just came to the conclusion that something didn't exist just because there was no proof of it we would still be living in caves? As far as I am concerned, just because we haven't found something to be true yet does not mean that it isn't. Science has proven that more than anything else.

hmm.. Why is it that BurnSide thinks hes rite all the time .. in NEARLY every thread i come across with him in it .. he never seems to suggest .. but throws down his comments as if theyre facts... Thing Is .. No One really knows if the chupacabra exists .. there have been soo many unique cattle and animal mutilations with no trce of the one that was held responsible. Its like aliens .. soo many things to support there existence without physical evidence...

There was another phase before where cattles was getting mutated and stuff, they called it el vampir....err i can't remember lol but that turned out to be Alligators :S that were brought over there by some ppl, just goes to show it doesn't need to be some new creature.

But i am split in the arguement about it bein real.

oh yeah and i always thought it was a picture of seymours mother around animas neck...well anima is seymours mum so yeah :S

kinda looks like Nemisis from Resident Evil 3 (or resident evil apoc, whatever your going for (movie/game)

Perhaps there really is a "chupacabra" but it is already a known animal? Everyone seems to be hooked on it having it to be a new animal or nothing at all.

Pinowawa1, Burnside uses logic ,something you must be missing. We require some proof not conjecture. Grow up.

resi evil apoc is based on resident evil nemesis ? i never knew that, i've played the games but not seen the films.

And yeah Burnside always seems to make sense to me, and open to new theories and what not

I seen hat pic on many sites saying it's a Chupacabra to. But to me it looks like some kind of small dog/cat. But it's cool.

There's suppos to be a Chupa in this pic looks like one of those snow birds to me! Well anyway heres the link. Could not post because it's of big of a pic.

Link

dont see the chuppy

can't chuppy actually be a wierd cult of sicko's who like killing goats?

i can't see it either :S

Yeah I could not see anything in that pic. But here's one and it been posted here before, but I juz brining it back up again.

Oh really!?, take a look at this, proof that Chupas are real

well thats proof if ever i saw it...

As an investigator/researcher/documentarian of the Chupacabras creature, let me say that there's substantial evidence in favor of the creatures existence, the start of which can be seen in my free view online Real Player documentary "Chupacabras! The Legend Begins" at my Internet Television Station ITS-DMS.COM .

thats just a pic of a cat that was modified....whoever posted this is blonde...ITS A CAT!!!

if this was a dying diseased dog then it would have started decaying by now...it is still unaffected and decay free.... also there have been more then one siting of this animal...in other words it has been shot 2 by 2 diff ppl...this is in fact not a common coincidence that it has been sited all along the south coast and also has been photographed and looks the same...since when do giant squids walk on land, kill animals, suck the blood out of them, then get back in the water without dying??? since...well...NEVER!! its impossible to think that this animal is a sea creature when evidence points towards the animal pictured above...it is in fact a chupacabra...ne one who seems to be oblivious to the fact that the animal was examined by many scientists and proven unidentified...give me solid factual proof that it is a dying diseased dog and maybe just maybe i will believe u...but i'm not guaranteeing ne thing...don't criticize other ppls beliefs.

no one knows if any of these types of creatures exist or if they dont, until someone gets solid proof. so, actually, everybody only has their opinion, no one can say they are made up or real.

I agree that some people believe chupacabra to be anything,which is stupid.But,i wouldn't say that real chupy's don't exist,just that most of the theories are stupid and fake.I believe these 2 pics to be of the most realistic appearance of a chupy if they do exist...

Burnside was being too bold,he was just stating his opinion.Everyone is entitled to their own anyway.That 'chupy dog' from texas is still unidentified,so it has not been proven to be a regular sick dog.Btw,your theory on the decomposition cycle makes sense,but it has been discussed many times,so it's very old news.

What bothers me is the utterly ridiculous descriptions of the chupacabra. IF the creature does exsist...I doubt it walks on it's hind legs, has large red eyes, vampire fangs, and porcupine quills. That's just stupid.

Whatever it is....it's going to have normal anatomy...reasonable anatomy. Animals are built with purpose. Ducks have webbed feet to swim. Deer have ears on the side of their face so that they have more peripheral vision when grazing. An animals anatomy is not random. IT LIKE THAT FOR A REASON OR IT WOULDN'T SURVIVE. I doubt that the creature survives on blood alone...it would have to eat meat. Some say it eats chickens...other say it just sucks blood. But...it would have to be really small....like a bat...to live off of just blood...or else it would have to have ALOT of blood...and we'd see more evidence of that.

Anyways...might be real....but there are no REAL pics or video of it.

You're starting something with no evidence to support it.The pics i just showed are the most common of reports,and the most realistic.You say it would have to drink a lot of blood eh?Well,it's not like a vampire bat at all.Vampirebats drink about a capfull,and the host it feeds from obviously stays alive.But when a chupy sucks blood,it kills the damn animal.The animal dies from blood loss.Check on google and see what shows up for reports,dead animals and sightings.Here is one that has been supposedly killed by a chupy...

That picture barely shows anything...just some wounds on the neck of the animal. Anyone could do that and fake it.

Like I said, if it DID drink LOTS of blood like it would have to to survive...we would see more evidence of it...and we don't.

http://www.bjacked.net/LuvToHunt/hunt/Coyo...ith%20Mange.jpg

Above is a link to a pic of a COYOTE with mange (and also a missing leg) There is enough hair on it's head so that you can tell it was a coyote...but you can see from the rest of the body how nasty and crusty it looks. It looks just like the other pics of the mangy dogs that people claim are unidentified or say that they are the chupys.

Here is what the guy said about the pic of the coyote he shot.

It is a picture of a coyote I shot Saturday with the worst case of mange that I have ever seen. Mange is a very deadly condition for canines caused when the animal is infected by mites. The animal literally scratches all of his hair off of him trying to rid himself of the mites. The animal then dies by exposure to the elements. This coyote was also missing his left front leg. Mange is spread from animal to animal by contact. It becomes very common when animals are overpopulated. It is nature’s way of controlling predators. As you will see, nature is much more cruel than hunting. We now have very few coyotes in our area due to mange the past two years. Prior to that, the population had grown very large and we used to see lots of coyotes. The good side of fewer coyotes is that it will help the gamebird population and we are already seeing a lot more fox around. Coyotes use fox as tasty treats. That is why there are so many fox in and around populated areas. The coyotes have driven them into the cities.

He was in such bad shape that he could hardly hobble towards my call. I got tired of waiting for him to get closer, so I shot him at 200 yards. If I would have missed, I could have probably easily run him down. With this storm moving in, he surely would have froze to death. I did him a favor by putting him out of his misery.

Where did you go, Rottwieler? I thought we were debating here

There is lots of evidence in favour of the chupa, scientific evidence. The evidence in favour oh im not exsisting is usually circumstancial.

I think it's just the opposite!

^ I agree.

I've read reports of where Puerto Rican authorties claim that these animal deaths that are used as proof are nothing more than wild dogs, or exotic animals...I remember when I read an article in which the director of Puerto Rico's Department of Agriculture Vetinary Services Divison, even confesed that there is nothing unusual about the killings, that it could possibly be some guy in a religous sect just trying to make fun of the Puerto Rican ppl.

[

That's old news, and it was nothing more in the end than a dying diseased dog.
People want anything to be a chupacabra these days, they even say that giant squid are chupas.
It's awful sad. They DO. NOT. EXIST.
[right][snapback]476413[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]


NOPE! Go back and find the article claiming it was a dog. The guy they interviewed never even saw the corpse except for the pics. He says in the article : "it looks like nothing more then..."

The last story I heard on the subject, from Linda Moulton Howe on http://www.earthfiles.com was that the labratory examining the DNA could not establish what sort of canine it was. As for the skin, it was not Mange nor any known skin ailment. The brittle texture of it remains a mystery.

I don't believe the animal was a Chupacabra, it doesn't fit the traditional descriptions of the beast, but I suspect this canid was some genetic experiment that escaped from a lab somewhere. There have been a lot of reports of rather disturbing mutations turning up in the Southwest.

If anyone is interested in researching the older articles, you should be able to find links to them in the archives of my site:
http://www.parabolicmirror.com

^ PM look at the link I posted with the pic of the mangey coyote. It looks just like the other two dogs found in Texas.

Just because they did SAY that someone said it was a dog or not doesn't mean the DIDN'T run tests. They may just want to keep the news to themselves since they made such a huge deal about it in the first place. It would be kind of embarrassing and not "news worthy" of them to come back and say, "OH yeah...it was a dog after all."

No,Walken is right.

Mange causes nasty "brittle" crusty skin. So that shouldn't remain a mystery. An expert should know this, so they shouldn't say that it was 'unknown'.

The presence of the sarcoptic mite causes severe itching. The dog will chew and scratch its skin constantly. This leads to the loss of large amounts of hair, especially on the legs and belly. Eventually, the skin will become thickened and will darken due to pigmentation.

From this site about Sarcoptic Mange


http://www.pethealthcare.net/html/body_can...ptic_mange.html