Amalgamut
Apr 30 2005, 04:18 PM
QUOTE(dunderhead @ Apr 30 2005, 04:13 AM)
Makes sense to me...? These alien greys can supposedly read your mind...Yeh!
But to do this they must have a focal point? Now if you have no vision of whats in front of you and are staring straight into a beam of light the chain of communication is cut of..
[right][snapback]598467[/snapback][/right]
Yeah, you are right.
Amalgamut
Apr 30 2005, 04:41 PM
QUOTE(Netwolf111 @ Apr 30 2005, 03:52 AM)
I'm not taking any side for the moment. But if it is a real "interview" (read here interrogation) I feel bad for him/her/it/whatever.
For those looking for an other location to view the video
here is an other site[right][snapback]598464[/snapback][/right]
Hey thanks.
I noticed that the original video is 2 minutes and 55 seconds.
Does anyone know where
that video is to download? (The ones I have seen are only 52 seconds.)
Thanks for any info.
dunderhead
Apr 30 2005, 05:11 PM
QUOTE(Amalgamut @ Apr 30 2005, 04:18 PM)
QUOTE(dunderhead @ Apr 30 2005, 04:13 AM)
Makes sense to me...? These alien greys can supposedly read your mind...Yeh!
But to do this they must have a focal point? Now if you have no vision of whats in front of you and are staring straight into a beam of light the chain of communication is cut of..
[right][snapback]598467[/snapback][/right]
Yeah, you are right.
[right][snapback]598727[/snapback][/right]
Thanks Amal, whether this video clip is authentic or not is very questionable...?
but the main question is agenda...??? They are here but what for...?
Amalgamut
Apr 30 2005, 05:17 PM
QUOTE(dunderhead @ Apr 30 2005, 11:11 AM)
Thanks Amal, whether this video clip is authentic or not is very questionable...?
but the main question is agenda...??? They are here but what for...?
[right][snapback]598772[/snapback][/right]
I'm not completly sure.
But for some reason I have
always had an uneasy feeling that their agend for humans isn't good.
dunderhead
Apr 30 2005, 06:22 PM
QUOTE(Amalgamut @ Apr 30 2005, 05:17 PM)
QUOTE(dunderhead @ Apr 30 2005, 11:11 AM)
Thanks Amal, whether this video clip is authentic or not is very questionable...?
but the main question is agenda...??? They are here but what for...?
[right][snapback]598772[/snapback][/right]
I'm not completly sure.
But for some reason I have
always had an uneasy feeling that their agend for humans isn't good.
[right][snapback]598777[/snapback][/right]
Friend we are in agreement here? There is a hidden agenda...There is no doubt..!
fallingalien
Apr 30 2005, 10:53 PM
a guy said his friend hacked a longer video of it, there was 2 aliens, read about it
here!!!!!
chinnyboo
May 1 2005, 03:47 AM
QUOTE(fallingalien @ Apr 30 2005, 10:53 PM)
a guy said his friend hacked a longer video of it, there was 2 aliens, read about it
here!!!!![right][snapback]599201[/snapback][/right]
Someone please add more info, because above highlighted link concludes with said 'guy' being a big fake. Was he? Did he stop posting becasue he got bored? Or becasue he actually did have a 3 hour long alien tape nicked from the government. Don't think so, but any more?
p.s. this has been one damned good thread
Falco Rex
May 1 2005, 11:07 AM
Mark47..So if it doesn't look authentic it implies it is authentic? That's specious logic at best, I think..One thing that escapes most people who haven't been in the military is that you don't get to do things your own way..And the more important the situation, the more rules and regulations you must adhere to. I would think that examining an extraterrestrial would count as at least slightly important, don't you?
And the military doesn't have to coordinate uniforms, as they are all standard issue..But if you were making a movie and had a limited budget, you might only be able to get a hold one complete set of scrubs. You might have to make do the best you could for the other "Doctor"...I think you see where I'm going, here..
Mark47
May 1 2005, 01:40 PM
so you are saying is that if it was authentic that they would all have matching scrubs? If you know this, and the military know this then why didnt they think of that? I think most people would make that a priority especially if they are going to go to all the trouble of making a "puppet". If you look at any Sci fi movie where they have "puppets", they always make them blink as a means to make them look authentic.
fallingalien
May 1 2005, 02:08 PM
I don't think they would worry about getting sick because they been having aliens there. i WONDER WHAT IT MEANS when he said he had to go into another capsule? the link I gave also tells you why the room was dark. I wanna find that video now!
Falco Rex
May 1 2005, 06:09 PM
I don't know why they wouldn't think of it, but of all the responses on this thread so far nobody else noticed this discrepancy but myself; and some posters here are extremely intelligent indeed..
Yet they slipped that very small detail right through..This is the kind of thing most hoaxers rely on. Focusing so hard on one aspect, that you miss the rest of the picture. As to why it doesn't blink, well; if you were to construct a realistic alien puppet you could make it move quite easily, but to make it blink requires mechanics. It's much harder than manipulating wires; which would be invisible anyway in the darkened room..
And yes, Fallingalien; they would worry about disease..Even human POWs' have to be put in quarantined environments and examined in most circumstances. An alien would call for even more care to be taken..
Amalgamut
May 1 2005, 08:09 PM
I don't know why I feel this way...
But Im almost certain aliens don't blink.
I have never heard of any story of them blinking their eyes.
It's like I am almost certain they don't, but I'm not sure why. (wierd feeling.)
Walken
May 1 2005, 08:26 PM
Thats because when an aliens probing you, you don't generally pay much attention to how often it blinks
TaintedDoughnuts
May 1 2005, 09:05 PM
QUOTE(Walken @ May 1 2005, 12:26 PM)
Thats because when an aliens probing you, you don't generally pay much attention to how often it blinks
[right][snapback]600195[/snapback][/right]
what are the chances that a bieng from another planet is able to breathe the same air as us? even if it breathes oxygen, it still might not be able to breathe the nitrogen and other trace elements in the air. and the whole blinking thing, insects dont blink, but theyre real, and birds dont blink... right?
Amalgamut
May 1 2005, 09:25 PM
QUOTE(TaintedDoughnuts @ May 1 2005, 03:05 PM)
what are the chances that a bieng from another planet is able to breathe the same air as us? even if it breathes oxygen, it still might not be able to breathe the nitrogen and other trace elements in the air. and the whole blinking thing, insects dont blink, but theyre real, and birds dont blink... right?
[right][snapback]600241[/snapback][/right]
I think birds blink, but I don't think all insects do.
I agree with the oxygen thing, I mean, what are the odds of them being able to maintain their life functions without some type of space suit.
I know the conditions of Earth are favorable to humans, and millions of other species, but still.
cAvEmAndrEw
May 2 2005, 12:23 AM
QUOTE(Walken @ Apr 30 2005, 11:05 AM)
Well the footage claims to come from inside Area 51, although variations of the tale now include a prison in Cuba and the white house itself
All video footage ever to show the interior of Area 51 has been a hoax, to my knowledge. I'm yet to see a peice that convinced me. It makes you wonder how these films get out, doesn't it? Especially since the infamous break in footage clearly showed a soldier destroying the camera being used to film.
[right][snapback]598634[/snapback][/right]
I kinda liked the aspect of the camera getting smashed my the soldier. Reminds me of the ghost stories where everyone gets killed. Then how did the story get out if everyone got killed? Who told it?
If the camera got smashed and the soldier saw it...
did he just hand it back to the guy and tell him to have a nice day?
Mark47
May 2 2005, 02:42 AM
surgeons wear masks to stop the patient from getting infected. The story says that the footage was stolen while the person was transferring it, so that it was official footage that was stolen, it wasnt taken in secret.
Mark47
May 2 2005, 03:11 AM
suppose that they originated from a planet like our own and millions of years ago or maybe even less, and were originally much the same as us. That planet became uninhabitable so they had to move. the only place they could find was somewhere that had much lower gravity, therefore the same would happen to astronauts, they grow taller and so would become comparatively thinner by growing up instead of out, and so their arms and fingers would become elongated as a result. less gravity also means less stress on muscles, therefore they would lose a great deal of muscle mass while the head still having a bone structure that is segmented would become larger. As there was little sun, if any, their pupils would become dilated and over time less tolerant to light which is why the room was darkened as they cant tolerate strong light. The dark eyes we see may in fact be a shield of some kind, to protect them from our sunlight as they also wear an outfit of very thin body hugging material, so the entire being is probably wearing some high tech space suit that looks like skin. They have scaly skin but so do we, only theirs is much larger because of the low gravity. They may in fact live in space as they don't have the technology to terra farm. If they lived on a space station then they would have all artificial light and artificial gravity, or maybe their suits are something to do with the need for gravity, so that rather than wear gravity boots, they wear a gravity suit to hold them in place, so there is zero gravity on their bodies therefore changing their appearance dramatically, especially when conceived and born in space. They no longer eat food as we know it but take some form of artificial nutrient, so that there stomachs have disappeared. The jerky movements therefore is because they are not used to our gravity, so to move they have to build up and release energy, like you would do when inder water.
Because we are so much like them they use us as guinea pigs because there is something wrong with them they need to fix. So they visit here and pick up people and do things to them and then watch the results over generations. They perhaps implant women to see how the children turn out, or else harvest eggs, but basically they are using our DNA as a means to help them fix whatever problem they have encountered. Perhaps they have become inbred, and need fresh DNA from an outside source?
TaintedDoughnuts
May 2 2005, 04:27 AM
QUOTE(Mark47 @ May 1 2005, 07:11 PM)
suppose that they originated from a planet like our own and millions of years ago or maybe even less, and were originally much the same as us. That planet became uninhabitable so they had to move. the only place they could find was somewhere that had much lower gravity, therefore the same would happen to astronauts, they grow taller and so would become comparatively thinner by growing up instead of out, and so their arms and fingers would become elongated as a result. less gravity also means less stress on muscles, therefore they would lose a great deal of muscle mass while the head still having a bone structure that is segmented would become larger. As there was little sun, if any, their pupils would become dilated and over time less tolerant to light which is why the room was darkened as they cant tolerate strong light. The dark eyes we see may in fact be a shield of some kind, to protect them from our sunlight as they also wear an outfit of very thin body hugging material, so the entire being is probably wearing some high tech space suit that looks like skin. They have scaly skin but so do we, only theirs is much larger because of the low gravity. They may in fact live in space as they don't have the technology to terra farm. If they lived on a space station then they would have all artificial light and artificial gravity, or maybe their suits are something to do with the need for gravity, so that rather than wear gravity boots, they wear a gravity suit to hold them in place, so there is zero gravity on their bodies therefore changing their appearance dramatically, especially when conceived and born in space. They no longer eat food as we know it but take some form of artificial nutrient, so that there stomachs have disappeared. The jerky movements therefore is because they are not used to our gravity, so to move they have to build up and release energy, like you would do when inder water.
Because we are so much like them they use us as guinea pigs because there is something wrong with them they need to fix. So they visit here and pick up people and do things to them and then watch the results over generations. They perhaps implant women to see how the children turn out, or else harvest eggs, but basically they are using our DNA as a means to help them fix whatever problem they have encountered. Perhaps they have become inbred, and need fresh DNA from an outside source?
[right][snapback]600610[/snapback][/right]
that was very good mark
too bad i cant really agree with it since i dont believe in evolution... otherwise, i wouldve supported you 100%
Mark47
May 3 2005, 03:18 AM
The sound of silence, its strange no one has taken the opportunity to say how wrong my theory is, apart from the totally irational "evolution".
Walken
May 3 2005, 12:37 PM
Oh I agree.
Alien abductees have describes aextra terrestrials movements of jumpy, like a computer graphic, jumping fowards and backwards.
...The question is, do they move this way in reality, or is it just how we perceive them? We cannot comprehend the way they really move, so we see a toned down and distorted version, much like what happens when you play a high quality game on an obselete PC?
OR do they move that way for our benefit, because we cannot comprehend or understand how they would move without our presence?
Perception, I say! All perception!
RobBelieves
May 3 2005, 05:12 PM
If the video is real, which I believe is real. Then I feel soory for the poor thing. It really s**t scaredyou try being in a room with lots of strange creature (us, to them) around you and watching you. I probually scared to death.
Walken
May 3 2005, 05:25 PM
Welcome aboard Rob, that's a very intresting take on things.
fallingalien
May 3 2005, 08:27 PM
QUOTE(EvonSD17 @ May 1 2005, 08:51 PM)
Thanks people. Just thought I'd toss out a few theories and see what other people think.
Also look at the dragon symbol in Ancient Sumeria. They are the ones who guarded the stargates to heaven, other planets, etc... It is mankinds distortion of these creatures who ascended to heaven that has caused so many problems in this world. The Roman Catholic Church just put more wood on the pyre when they helped invent the Satanic notion of evil and hell and beastie dragons anti-christs. The only Anti-christ on this planet is the church. The Cathars believed this and I guess you could call me a modern day Cathar on a mission for truth.
The only thing we should fear is fear itself.
What a bunch of goobers in red those cardinals are. The first Christian teachers were also women but people don't do the research and listen to much to what their told. While peope like me say.. no.
bloody devils they are.
hehe
[right][snapback]600493[/snapback][/right]
QUOTE(Walken @ May 3 2005, 08:37 AM)
Oh I agree.
Alien abductees have describes aextra terrestrials movements of jumpy, like a computer graphic, jumping fowards and backwards.
...The question is, do they move this way in reality, or is it just how we perceive them? We cannot comprehend the way they really move, so we see a toned down and distorted version, much like what happens when you play a high quality game on an obselete PC?
OR do they move that way for our benefit, because we cannot comprehend or understand how they would move without our presence?
Perception, I say! All perception!
[right][snapback]602503[/snapback][/right]
that makes me think like holagraph, like they aren't there but they are, like in star wars, obi wan was ther but as light. I read that they found the same thing ON A UFO, I'll find a link. but it said teh star wars machine that obi wan used they found on a UFO, you know, like you as a light.
Walken
May 3 2005, 08:34 PM
I don't think they'd be interviewing a hologram, lol.
fallingalien
May 3 2005, 09:51 PM
no, not that one but when they see them or when they are seen in UFOs
Richdog
May 3 2005, 10:20 PM
From reading this thread, and watching the video, I see that as usual the power of belief is far more powerful than that of reason.
The video does not look authentic. Look at the light shining on the aliens head, it seriously looks computer generated. The head movements, despite what people conveniently say about their mvements being jerky, look speeded up and not in synch with the time being displayed in the corner. Added to which, where is the body? What is that little green light moving in synch with it's head?
If this video were real it would be the biggest thing the world had ever seen, and the major UFO sites and UFOlogists would be making sure EVERYONE knew about it.
Sorry guys, but i'd bet a serious amount of money that it's a fake. I believe in aliens right enough, but that is asking a bit much... though obviously not for many of you.
Mark47
May 4 2005, 12:22 AM
QUOTE(Richdog @ May 4 2005, 09:20 AM)
If this video were real it would be the biggest thing the world had ever seen, and the major UFO sites and UFOlogists would be making sure EVERYONE knew about it.
Sorry guys, but i'd bet a serious amount of money that it's a fake. I believe in aliens right enough, but that is asking a bit much... though obviously not for many of you.
[right][snapback]603425[/snapback][/right]
In order for it to be the biggest thing people need to believe it, if you dont believe it then why would anyone else? That is the trouble, people dont want to believe and so they make up reasons that most of the time are rediculous, like the scientists that said that the mexican UFO footage were plasma sparks trailing a jet at 200kph, there are just so many no brainers, that no one wants to take anything seriously unless it is signed by the president the pope and stephen hawkings. Unless there is validation that people feel comfortable with then they wont accept it, so how can it be the the biggest thing?
The jerky movement was accounted for, as was the poor lighting; that is called reasoning.
convert-proof
May 4 2005, 04:39 AM
can somebody provide me with a link to watch the whole thing?
Richdog
May 4 2005, 06:49 AM
QUOTE(Mark47 @ May 4 2005, 01:22 AM)
QUOTE(Richdog @ May 4 2005, 09:20 AM)
If this video were real it would be the biggest thing the world had ever seen, and the major UFO sites and UFOlogists would be making sure EVERYONE knew about it.
Sorry guys, but i'd bet a serious amount of money that it's a fake. I believe in aliens right enough, but that is asking a bit much... though obviously not for many of you.
[right][snapback]603425[/snapback][/right]
In order for it to be the biggest thing people need to believe it, if you dont believe it then why would anyone else? That is the trouble, people dont want to believe and so they make up reasons that most of the time are rediculous, like the scientists that said that the mexican UFO footage were plasma sparks trailing a jet at 200kph, there are just so many no brainers, that no one wants to take anything seriously unless it is signed by the president the pope and stephen hawkings. Unless there is validation that people feel comfortable with then they wont accept it, so how can it be the the biggest thing?
The jerky movement was accounted for, as was the poor lighting; that is called reasoning.
[right][snapback]603603[/snapback][/right]
Yes of course it was accounted for, how would you continue your belief otherwise? You're going to see what you want to see, as is everyone else desperate to believe it.
A pink elephant could have floated past the screen and people would have justified it's presence in some way, shape or form.
It just ain't credible, and all of the reasons you guys are finding for it being authentic are no more reason than to call any other good hoax authentic. "Oooh look at the uniforms it MUST be real" or "OMG I heard that aliens move all jerky like that" and "Yeah the lighting is bad of course you can't see anything other than it's head" which btw is really clear, you'd think you'd be able to see SOME part of it's body.
But hey you guys believe what you want, if it wasn't for people like you then UFO's and aliens wouldn't get as much coverage, and I guess that is a good thing.
Mark47
May 4 2005, 08:33 AM
Logical reasons were given, therefore it is you that is dealing in opinions. Your whole argument it that "it isnt what it is because we see what we want to", which is exactly what you are doing. The jerky movement was said to be a result of gravitational differences, which logicaly would be correct, if the alien was for real and has been noted on many other occasions in other descriptions. I started out thinking it was fake but on closer examination saw elements that showed otherwise, so I am hardly "wanting" it to be anything other than what it is. Whether it is or isnt real is irrelevant to me, that is the why an open mind that looks objectively will always be more likely to find the truth rather than someone only trying to prove that their point of view is correct. anyone can find evidence to support their own point of view.
Richdog
May 4 2005, 08:52 AM
Please get over yourself good sir, I have an objective, open mind... and I have used it. Please do not do the typical "you must be close-minded because you think it's fake" that most of the die-hard believers use.
On the website they say the ligts were dim because "the aliens eyes are sensetive to light" yet they are putting flashlights in its face... eh? Would they really interview an alien that needed medical attention in the dark... or would the area not be clearly lit so everything could be seen? Why the frick are they rubbing it's head?
If the alien is telepathic why are they making it look as though it is talking away?
Would they really be interviewing a member of of a species that could potentially destroy our race like a 1950's criminal?
If the alien is highly psychic couldn't it send a telepathic message to others telling what was going on?
Haven't we supposedly been in contact with these aliens for a long time, and if so wouldn't we now be PAST the stage where the government feels the need to incarcerate those caught, is it in their interests to torture and interrogate them?
Why did Viktor sell the video and not release it to the media? Why no audio whatsoever on the tape? He could have doctored it so his "friends" voices were unidentifiable, we easily have the tech nowadays.
I have read many serious UFOlogists do not believe in this tape, and if the experts who would LOVE to prove aliens exist and base their whole lives around it don't... does that not say something to you?
The way the guys keep walking in front of it and putting themselves between the camera and the alien.
I would LOVE for an authentic video showing an alien interview to come out... but this ain't it.
It is a decent fake, just as the alien autopsy video (that everyone believed at the time too if you remember) was. But still a fake...
Mark47
May 4 2005, 10:11 AM
Please get over yourself good sir, I have an objective, open mind... and I have used it. Please do not do the typical "you must be close-minded because you think it's fake" that most of the die-hard believers use.
No you dont have an objective open mind, I didnt say you were closed minded simply because it is your opinion that it is fake, but because you are only looking at one side and attempting to prove that, and that only, and doing so using opinions, rather than showing any error in anything I have put forward. Your idea of open minded is, "I wont believe you until you can show me something I cant deny"; that is not being open minded.
If you want to see an objective mind then I suggest you watch the Myth busters. In order for them to prove whether the Myth was real or not, they examine what would need to occur in order for it to work not just if it doesnt work.
Therefore if you were being objective, and I said that their jerky movements were caused by gravity, then you would examine the "real" effects of gravitationl change, and prove what really happend due to gravitational change, therefore invalidating my arguement Rather than do this you just use another opinion, therefore it is not objective. You havent said anything other than a load of unsubstantial opinions. They had torches, so what, docotors have torches they shine in your eyes, cause and effect dude, cause and effect.
Richdog
May 4 2005, 10:48 AM
Right, you're claiming I have a closed, unobjective mind based on one post, when you don't know me or any of my beliefs... how incredibly mature. Not. I looked at the video with no pre-conceptions and afterwards thought it was fake, nothing more, nothing less. If you can't handle that then that's your problem, but don't expect me to treat you like an adult if that's how you deal with differing opinions. My entire career in publishing requires a cool, objective opinion, and i'm used to giving it.
Listen, why do you think UFOlogists and other experts with a lifetime of experience don't believe it? Are you trying to tell me that some kid on an internet forum (i.e. you) has more experience than them or more knowledge to determine whether it is real or not?
And while we're at it, how can you say I am the one making insubstantial opinions... what the hell are yours and the other peoples who are trying to cliam this is real then?!?!?!?! Fact?!?!?!?
You're the one who has to work harder than me to claim it is real than I do to claim it is a fake.
I wish I could see a real alien vid too, but that doesn't mean i'm desperate enough to go against my instinct when it tells me something isn't real.
Of course the jerky movement and poor lighting are accounted for... I mean the guy who is
selling it told you all so... didn't he?
if you were thinking straight you would see that i'm not the one who is thinking up convenient explanations for discpepancies in the video... I am the one pointing them out...
The mind boggles...
Mark47
May 4 2005, 11:52 AM
The jerky movement was not accounted for by the person that sold the movie, so why are you making a statement based on assumptions. I accounted for the jerky movement by examining how a species would evolve over time in a zero gravity enviroment, and then once in a gravity enviroment would exhibit jerky movement, the same as a person under water. If you examine lunar videos you will see that astronauts also have jerky movements but no one has suggested that it is because they are puppets.
If the jerky movement is so obvious, then why didnt the "fakers" pick up on that when they went over it again and again to make it as authentic as possible? Isnt that what you would do?
Richdog
May 4 2005, 11:58 AM
For it to be fake it would have to be a puppet or a computer animated object... and to me it looks more like a clever puppet than anything else.
Mark47
May 4 2005, 12:00 PM
That is just an opinion, you havent said why it isnt possible to be as a result of gravity differences.
Richdog
May 4 2005, 01:15 PM
Thats because im not saying its impossible for crying out loud, but that is irrelevent. There are too many things that I see as bogus in that video for the fact that gravity may give it slightly jerky movements to make a difference to my opinion. It may just be a puppet...
Just because gravity may cause jerky movements doesn't mean that it isn't a damn puppet either. I want more conctrete reasons for why it is real than the single theory that "omg it must be real because zero-gravity makes your movements jerky." because that makes no difference in light of that it could be a puppet... you're clutching at straws...
Mark47
May 4 2005, 02:01 PM
unless you cant disprove my theory you cant prove yours. If you can prove that gravity cant cause jerky movements then you have a fact, but you havent done that. What you have said is that "yes gravity can cause jerky movement, but I like my expleantion for jerky movement better".
Richdog
May 4 2005, 03:24 PM
QUOTE(Mark47 @ May 4 2005, 03:01 PM)
unless you cant disprove my theory you cant prove yours. If you can prove that gravity cant cause jerky movements then you have a fact, but you havent done that. What you have said is that "yes gravity can cause jerky movement, but I like my expleantion for jerky movement better".
Dear God... I presume you're a teen, correct? I never said that gravity could not produce jerky movements, I said that I don't doubt it could. Please read my post and try to give me at least a semi-intelligent argument.
The fact is, as I have repeated about 10 times, there is far more going against that video than is going for it... I outlined a load of reasons in my earlier post.
You have one little reason... "gravity may cause jerky movements" and this is what you're basing your entire argument on... need I say more? It is a bit feeble, lets be honest here. Your argument is in the minority by a long way.
I'm not going to continue the debate with you until you start doing better than that, outline multiple clear reasons why you think the video real, just as I did for my logic behind it being a fake.
Until then pelase don't waste my time.
Cheers.
Amalgamut
May 4 2005, 04:34 PM
QUOTE(RobBelieves @ May 3 2005, 11:12 AM)
If the video is real, which I believe is real. Then I feel soory for the poor thing. It really s**t scaredyou try being in a room with lots of strange creature (us, to them) around you and watching you. I probually scared to death.
[right][snapback]602879[/snapback][/right]
Hey, welcome to UM.
As far feeling sorry for it.......
Walken
May 4 2005, 04:38 PM
QUOTE
The video does not look authentic. Look at the light shining on the aliens head, it seriously looks computer generated. The head movements, despite what people conveniently say about their mvements being jerky, look speeded up and not in synch with the time being displayed in the corner. Added to which, where is the body? What is that little green light moving in synch with it's head?
.
It's not convenient that they say this. People telling stories of this type of movement exsisted long before computer animation itself
QUOTE
If this video were real it would be the biggest thing the world had ever seen, and the major UFO sites and UFOlogists would be making sure EVERYONE knew about it
Maybe they are, but then people say it's a fake.
I don't really beleive this footage (3/10) but keep an open mind. Yup.
fallingalien
May 4 2005, 06:20 PM
I Can prove this fake, and prove it real, it just has to whatever. ther is a longer one, they said the alien was sick and was dying. they said it had problems reading the guys minds, they had another alien come in adn take care of it. he then said this ain't good and turned teh camera off.
Richdog
May 4 2005, 06:26 PM
dunderhead
May 4 2005, 06:35 PM
I think there is a debate thread where you can go head to head on this subject..?
I suggest you both choose a non biast judge to moderate and award points..?
This is turning out to be a battle between two ego's..!
Richdog
May 4 2005, 06:37 PM
Ehhh I don't think it is, and I don't need a debate thread. I've said what I have to say, cheers.
Walken
May 4 2005, 06:39 PM
QUOTE
I think there is a debate thread where you can go head to head on this subject..?
I suggest you both choose a non biast judge to moderate and award points..?
This is turning out to be a battle between two ego's..!
How? Between who? Why?
It's a friendly discussion about a video, theres nothing egotistical about it.
dunderhead
May 4 2005, 06:52 PM
QUOTE(Walken @ May 4 2005, 06:39 PM)
How? Between who? Why?
It's a friendly discussion about a video, theres nothing egotistical about it.
[right][snapback]604773[/snapback][/right]
Well I've been reading the last couple of pages and things were starting to brew..?
maybe its just me..? In that case I do apolagize... !
The Roswell Man
May 4 2005, 06:58 PM
maybe its ur take on polite disscussion about video
Walken
May 4 2005, 06:59 PM
No need to apologise, I just didn't notice anything
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.