So it's possible they've travelled from Montana to parts of North Dakota and into Manitoba.[right][snapback]602741[/snapback][/right]

can anyone capture it off tv and post it on the net some place? Don't live in the US or Canada but would love to see it!
[right][snapback]603863[/snapback][/right]

i just saw a promo on fox 5 for it what they showed of the video is VERY bad!
(i cant really see any thing)
[right][snapback]603840[/snapback][/right]

The reason you couldn't see anything was that the promo purposely blurred the "bigfoot". They want you to tune in tomorrow.
[right][snapback]603986[/snapback][/right]

That's an interesting photo, does anybody else notice that the fur on the beast looks almost like fleece instead of hair?

To me it looks almost too groomed for an animal that is supposed to live in such a rugged environment.
[right][snapback]604811[/snapback][/right]

Was the video cleaned up any from the trailor shown on the website earlier today? Or did it look just as lousy?
[right][snapback]605779[/snapback][/right]

This photo was taken with a hidden camera at Moyie Springs, Northern Idaho. The owner of property noticed foot tracks some weeks earlier and set camera up in tree along path of tracks. This picture was taken from that camera mounted in the tree. It seems that the Bigfoot took a bite of the red fir tree bark. In the original that I have you can clearly see a piece of bark in the air. I circled the bark in the photo.

This is the only close up photo of Bigfoot that I have ever seen. Very large body and face. The original shows the face and teeth in great detail. Very large mouth and teeth. Not sure of the date. I was told a few years ago. There have been many sighting of Bigfoot in the Northern Idaho area near the Canadian border. Very rugged landscape with many mountains.

Mike M.
michaelmukk@aol.com
[right][snapback]604653[/snapback][/right]

The recent footage described in the Canadian press was obtained on April 16, 2005, near the Nelson River, 500 kilometers north of Winnipeg, Canada.
Click image above for the map showing the location of the recent footage in Manitoba, Canada.

BFRO Director Matt Moneymaker has seen a digital copy of the master tape (the master tape is 8mm analog video), in Los Angeles, at the studio for the Fox Television program "Current Affair." Here are his observations:

"The Manitoba footage is blurry for the most part. The figure is nearly 1000 feet from the camera, on the opposite bank of a wide river.

Due to the distance involved, and problems with auto-focus while in zoom, the footage ranks well below the Memorial Day footage in terms of clarity."


Exclusions:

The figure in the footage is definitely :

1) Not an illusion created by a play of light and show (i.e. not a "blobsquatch").

2) Not a bear, or any other large, known, native species.

3) Not a composit, fabricated image.

4) A dark, upright, primate figure, with arms and legs somewhat like a human, standing on a riverbank.

5) Either a human or a sasquatch, but among those two candidates it is not clearly one or the other, due to the blurriness of the footage.



Comparisons:

Side-by-side images, showing humans standing at the same place, shot from the same vantage point, might demonstrate that the Manitoba figure is substantially larger than an average human, but comparison images are not yet available.

The trees along the river bank will provide scale measurements and a height range of the figure. When the height is determined it may reduce or eliminate the potential for it being a human.

The limb lengths are not clear enough in the footage to show an obvious distinction with human limb proportions, as they do in the Patterson footage.


The Focus Problem:

The footage is clearest at the beginning, for a few seconds, before it zooms in. The further the camera zooms in, the blurrier the figure becomes. Finally it goes into the dreaded "digital zoom" mode. Digital zoom transforms the blurry figure into a blocky, blurry figure.

The focus problem is apparently caused by the camera's auto-focus mechanism being thrown off by branches in the foreground. There is also some fog behind the figure. The fog dulls the edges of background objects when the camera is on full zoom. Had there been no fog behind the figure, the auto-focus mechanism might have found more clear edges in the tree line to use while adjusting itself.

The combined segments are well over 30 seconds total. There are two segments.



Circumstances:

The man who obtained the footage, Bobby Clark, is the ferry boat operator at the river crossing north of the Cree Nation community at Norway House.

Clark had previously worked the night shift. During his night shifts he occasionally heard eerie screams in the distance. He wanted to record the unusual screams so he made it a habit of bringing his camcorder with him to work. He didn't get any sound recordings, but he continued to bring his camcorder with him to work after he changed his shift to the morning shift.

The morning shift for the ferry operator begins at 6:30 am. Often there is no traffic to ferry across the river at that hour. Clark shot the footage from the opposite bank of the river while standing on the river bank waiting for vehicles to arrive.

For those of us who have been studying authentic footage and debunking bogus footage for a long time, the full circumstances of this incident point to a credible encounter.

The footage will air on Wednesday, May 4, 2005 as one of the stories on the Fox Television program "A Current Affair."  The program may be aired on your local Fox station, or on a local independent station, so check your local listings.


Next Steps:

Comparison images will allow for measurements. Measurement data will allow for a height range to be determined. The height range will allow for calculation of a percentage of probability as to whether the figure could be human. The larger the measurements, the smaller the probability that it is human. If the figure is well over eight feet tall, the probability is close to zero (0). The location where the figure was walking (a muddy, marshy riverbank) and the movement seen in the footage, reasonably eliminates the possibility of a man on stilts.

That's an interesting photo, does anybody else notice that the fur on the beast looks almost like fleece instead of hair?

To me it looks almost too groomed for an animal that is supposed to live in such a rugged environment.
[right][snapback]604811[/snapback][/right]

Sooooo...what should a mythical creature no one has ever seen really look like fur wise?