Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Truth About 911
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
frenat
QUOTE(Sunofone @ Aug 28 2005, 09:31 AM)
QUOTE(frenat @ Aug 28 2005, 07:27 AM)
  No they couldn't have been 100% positive that the radar returns they were receiving were the plane that turned off it's transponder.

thank you

QUOTE(frenat @ Aug 28 2005, 07:27 AM)
But how many others would they have without a correlated IFF return?  Not many.  How many of those would have been traveling over 350 knots?  None.
[right][snapback]814194[/snapback][/right]

doubtful conjecture


QUOTE(frenat @ Aug 28 2005, 07:27 AM)
Fairly easy to ID then.

ludicrous without visual confirmation it would only be a guess--is it standard operating procedure to assume? all the witness testimony,evidence of demo cutting charges in plain sight and an un-natural collapse within its own footprint(110 stories bud) and the deviation from SOP and your not worried?
[right][snapback]814246[/snapback][/right]


The computer would have been tracking it and had symbology assigned before the IFF was turned off. It would have continued to track by radar long after it was turned off. The only planes without IFF transponders are small private planes as you must have one to enter Class B airspace. Thus the only radar only returns travelling over 350 knots would be the airliner that had its transponder turned off.

However you are missing the point. The pilot said "If you listened to her carefully only an experienced pilot probably would have known that what she was saying was scripted,” but any student pilot would know what he is saying is false. It is required for the FAA written test to know something as basic as only altitude is encoded in Mode C of the transponder. For him to be wrong about so basic a thing lends doubt to him being a pilot at all.
robbo1331
QUOTE(Sunofone @ Aug 26 2005, 11:44 PM)
video
[right][snapback]811519[/snapback][/right]


OK seen the clip of wtc 7 collapsing i admit it does LOOK like a controlled demolition but if it is where are the explosions, i mean you can hear it collapse but no explosions, now your not going to tell me they've invented silent explosives are you.
~TheArtOfContact~
I have a question, I'm just wondering about something. Is it really a good idea to put up the "Freedom Tower" in the place where the towers fell?? Isn't it just asking for the terrorists to attack all over again in the same spot??

This question kind of haunted me for a while now.
Redneck
QUOTE(PFlack @ Aug 31 2005, 10:25 AM)
I have a question, I'm just wondering about something. Is it really a good idea to put up the "Freedom Tower" in the place where the towers fell?? Isn't it just asking for the terrorists to attack all over again in the same spot??

This question kind of haunted me for a while now.
[right][snapback]819398[/snapback][/right]


If we let terrorists cow us into submission, they win. You can't live your life in fear of what statistically is a very small threat. I think they should put up the biggest building in the world right there, as a big F-you to al Qaeda.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.