Some may be aware that the 10,000 year rule for human civilization is inaccurate. In fact, it dates well beyond that. North Carolina, for example has remains dated to 50,000 years ago. Mexico and Brazil go much further back.
Why is the scientific community hiding the truth of early human civilization, like Atlantis and MU.
Full Version: Human Civilization 350,000 years ago
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Ancient Mysteries & Alternative History
Atlantis because noone really knew if it exsisted.. and what is MU, i might of missed something... as far as human civilization goes 50,000 years ago is a longgggggg time wow thats like before the begining of evolution hahaha... i wonder how they communicated and what they used for tools!!! very interesting topic Aztec!!! and welcome to the forum!!! =0)
before the beginning of evo? your joking, right?
evo began 4000 million years ago (approx)
evo began 4000 million years ago (approx)
So what is meant by "350,000 years ago"
QUOTE(LucidElement @ May 26 2005, 12:24 PM)
Atlantis because noone really knew if it exsisted.. and what is MU, i might of missed something... as far as human civilization goes 50,000 years ago is a longgggggg time wow thats like before the begining of evolution hahaha... i wonder how they communicated and what they used for tools!!! very interesting topic Aztec!!! and welcome to the forum!!! =0)
[right][snapback]641074[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]641074[/snapback][/right]
Mu is just like Atlantis. Fiction.
[SIZE=1]Some may be aware that the 10,000 year rule for human civilization is inaccurate. In fact, it dates well beyond that. North Carolina, for example has remains dated to 50,000 years ago. Mexico and Brazil go much further back.
where did you get this info from, aztec?
where did you get this info from, aztec?
haha, i didnt mean to say about evolution 350k years ago.. but can someone give me like a few sentence of what MU is? im not sure though what is meant by 350k though!! sorry =0(
Mu, as well as a few others, is another name for Lemuria. It was kind of like Atlantis on in the Pacific. Try this link http://www.crystalinks.com/lemuria.html
Thats soo interesting, thank you for the link.. so their saying that Easter Island may be part of Lemuri, hell it might even be part of Atlantis, but that seems like a stretch for me i must say... but that picture of that huge stone carving under water they say came from a peice or is a peice of Lemuria?
I think that underwater photo is at Yonaguni, Japan and they think that area was once part of MU. Heres a good site about Yonaguni http://www.morien-institute.org/yonaguni.html
Mu was invented by a chap called James Churchward in the 19th century. As soon as anyone starts referring to Mu you know they're talking twaddle......
If "evolution" started 350,000 years ago we would still be organisms.
btw Lemuria was also invented in the 19th century - the name was coined by a geologist as a name for a hypothetical landbridge connecting Madagascar with SE Asia - postulated to explain similarities in animal and plant types. This was, of course, in days before we knew that continents move....
QUOTE(Essan @ May 27 2005, 12:59 PM)
Mu was invented by a chap called James Churchward in the 19th century. As soon as anyone starts referring to Mu you know they're talking twaddle......
[right][snapback]643501[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]643501[/snapback][/right]
you should change your addy from "essan" to "1sanevoicecryingoutinthewilderness"
I'm thinking of changing mine to
"onemorementionoflemuriamuoratlantisandimgonnakillsomeone"
QUOTE(Aztec Warrior @ May 26 2005, 02:16 AM)
Some may be aware that the 10,000 year rule for human civilization is inaccurate. In fact, it dates well beyond that. North Carolina, for example has remains dated to 50,000 years ago. Mexico and Brazil go much further back.
Why is the scientific community hiding the truth of early human civilization, like Atlantis and MU.
[right][snapback]641066[/snapback][/right]
Why is the scientific community hiding the truth of early human civilization, like Atlantis and MU.
[right][snapback]641066[/snapback][/right]
in fact your entire post is inaccurate not the civilisation dates
http://archeonet.nl/index.php?itemid=4228
as you can see from the link the 50,000 bce date is not representative of civilisation.
it represents the species homo sapiens sapiens being on the north american continent and using stone tools
Stone tools mean civilisation now ?
did someone move the goalposts while i was offline
i don't think so
QUOTE(marduk @ May 27 2005, 01:35 PM)
QUOTE(Essan @ May 27 2005, 12:59 PM)
Mu was invented by a chap called James Churchward in the 19th century. As soon as anyone starts referring to Mu you know they're talking twaddle......
[right][snapback]643501[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]643501[/snapback][/right]
you should change your addy from "essan" to "1sanevoicecryingoutinthewilderness"
I'm thinking of changing mine to
"onemorementionoflemuriamuoratlantisandimgonnakillsomeone"
[right][snapback]643620[/snapback][/right]
LOL!
QUOTE(Essan @ May 27 2005, 03:52 PM)
QUOTE(marduk @ May 27 2005, 01:35 PM)
QUOTE(Essan @ May 27 2005, 12:59 PM)
Mu was invented by a chap called James Churchward in the 19th century. As soon as anyone starts referring to Mu you know they're talking twaddle......
[right][snapback]643501[/snapback][/right]
[right][snapback]643501[/snapback][/right]
you should change your addy from "essan" to "1sanevoicecryingoutinthewilderness"
I'm thinking of changing mine to
"onemorementionoflemuriamuoratlantisandimgonnakillsomeone"
[right][snapback]643620[/snapback][/right]
LOL!
[right][snapback]643723[/snapback][/right]
yeah you know when you hear on the news about some guy going crazy in the archaeological department of my local bookstore that i've been in there browsing and someones asked me if theres any books about Mu
KILLKILLKILLKILL
its getting like that NOW
QUOTE(marduk @ May 27 2005, 01:39 PM)
QUOTE(Aztec Warrior @ May 26 2005, 02:16 AM)
Some may be aware that the 10,000 year rule for human civilization is inaccurate. In fact, it dates well beyond that. North Carolina, for example has remains dated to 50,000 years ago. Mexico and Brazil go much further back.
Why is the scientific community hiding the truth of early human civilization, like Atlantis and MU.
[right][snapback]641066[/snapback][/right]
Why is the scientific community hiding the truth of early human civilization, like Atlantis and MU.
[right][snapback]641066[/snapback][/right]
in fact your entire post is inaccurate not the civilisation dates
http://archeonet.nl/index.php?itemid=4228
as you can see from the link the 50,000 bce date is not representative of civilisation.
it represents the species homo sapiens sapiens being on the north american continent and using stone tools
Stone tools mean civilisation now ?
did someone move the goalposts while i was offline
i don't think so
[right][snapback]643624[/snapback][/right]
I'm glad at least one person knows the difference between civilisation and existence.
Where did the 350,000-years-ago date come from?
At any rate, archaeology hides a lot of discoveries because it goes against orthodox beliefs and we can't have that. Egyptology is especially censored.
QUOTE(Potholer @ May 28 2005, 09:52 AM)
QUOTE(marduk @ May 27 2005, 01:39 PM)
QUOTE(Aztec Warrior @ May 26 2005, 02:16 AM)
Some may be aware that the 10,000 year rule for human civilization is inaccurate. In fact, it dates well beyond that. North Carolina, for example has remains dated to 50,000 years ago. Mexico and Brazil go much further back.
Why is the scientific community hiding the truth of early human civilization, like Atlantis and MU.
[right][snapback]641066[/snapback][/right]
Why is the scientific community hiding the truth of early human civilization, like Atlantis and MU.
[right][snapback]641066[/snapback][/right]
in fact your entire post is inaccurate not the civilisation dates
http://archeonet.nl/index.php?itemid=4228
as you can see from the link the 50,000 bce date is not representative of civilisation.
it represents the species homo sapiens sapiens being on the north american continent and using stone tools
Stone tools mean civilisation now ?
did someone move the goalposts while i was offline
i don't think so
[right][snapback]643624[/snapback][/right]
I'm glad at least one person knows the difference between civilisation and existence.
Where did the 350,000-years-ago date come from?
At any rate, archaeology hides a lot of discoveries because it goes against orthodox beliefs and we can't have that. Egyptology is especially censored.
[right][snapback]644979[/snapback][/right]
the first (allegedly) major civilisation in mexico were the olmecs.
they had a population of about 350,000,
there was no civilisations that far back unless they were populated by either homo erectus or aliens
and lets face it
either one is extremely unlikely (and thats an understatement)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.