Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Nicola Tesla death ray
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Conspiracies & Secret Societies
Pages: 1, 2
RabidCat
QUOTE(Robert Moody @ Aug 8 2007, 07:21 PM) *
I had found Mr. Bearden in searches previous to my posting here. I watched videos from him and read a couple articles/websites. I'm sorry, but whether the science he claims exists or whether he is a poor business man, I have no idea. Unfortunately, it is difficult for me to accept his scientific claims considering the "free energy" claim is older than dirt. Coupled with conspiracy theories, I'm simply not interested.

I admit, he seems more together than this guy though.
Links please. Please do not offer links to Bearden sites or to sites that claim success while crying "conspiracy, conspiracy".
Navy? I thought it was Army. Different Tom Bearden? [Interesting side note is that he claims a Ph.D. on one page and then his vitae says that he has completed the course work but has not turned in his thesis...er...dissertation. So he is ABD on his vitae. Heh...just like me! I'm ABD and was considering have my students call me Dr. Moody. Maybe I'll consider that.]

Sincerely, thank you for responding to my post. I'm simply looking for more evidence directly related to the video link I posted. For all I know the video could be from an explosion that happened just out of sight but strong enough to create that effect shown in the video. I do not know. The person who put the video up suggested scalar weapons and claimed the guy was killed. Again, I have no idea. looking at the video, it looks like the blast might have missed the guy (very directional blast and he appeared to be standing just outside the area of the blast).

I simply would like to know if anyone had any more evidence that the video is what the person claims it is: a video of a blast effect created from a scalar weapon based on Tesla's theories.

Thanks.

Robert

Sorry for not responding sooner. I sort of float through the forums and forget where and when I posted, so bear with me, please.

I've got some of Bearden's papers. One of the first ones, he claimed to be Navy, if I remember correctly. The paper dealt with a method to obtain free energy using an incredibly long wire with sputter coating. In reading that paper, I came to the conclusion it was a waste of money (someone else's, it was given to me as a birthday gift). The idea was valid, sort of, if you could stretch a wire out 50 miles and were satisfied with a couple milliamps of current supply. Practicality = 0.
He also did a paper in which he claimed the Navy was working on scalar weapons taken directly from Tesla's experiments. While this can't be verified, you can build one yourself, if you want. As stated previously, a Caduceus wound coil is presumed to produce scalar magnetics. See this subject at JLN Labs website: http://jnaudin.free.fr/ . Naudin has some material there regarding scalar magnetics. Note that JLN does not get into the conspiracy stuff much, if at all. Mostly, it's a website dealing with alternatives, from free energy to alternative methods of flight, quite interesting, and most of the stuff there can either be built or proved.
Also on the JLN site is a section regarding Bearden's MEG. Not that the MEG follows the standards for mag amps, where small fields control large fields. A surface examination of this subject will easily make one wonder if perhaps mag amps are capable of production of more energy than energy used. In my early days in electronics, I used mag amps and wondered the same thing, but during those years, I was convinced that you can't get something for nothing; however, in the years since, I've changed my viewpoint 180, and I'm quite certain that you can get something for nothing. Let me qualify that: you can get something that we can't find the source for, or more explicitly, zero point, or Dirac sea. Magnets can do some wonderful things, and electromagnetism can do some more wonderful things. I say this whether I like it or not, by the way.

I'll say one more thing here. If there is anyone who is seriously interested in developing alternate sources of energy, you'll need to pm me, and the exchange will be via email. Too many jerks that make the claim "you can't" try to argue, and I haven't yet found any of them that actually know anything at all beyond schoolroom about electronics and electrical phenomena. So if you're going to try to argue that stuff, let's not; if you're seriously interested, give me a shot.
offamychain

Tesla was a crack-pot scientist, albeit a very intelligent one. He gave alot of good discoveries & inventions to mankind, but a great many of the things he was playing with have been over-interpreted to the point that they have become completely uncredible. The so-called "Death Ray" is one of them. The same thing can be seen with the modern day John Hutchison. His so-called "Hutchison Effect" has a cult following....but he can't even recreate it & has admitted that he has faked results in order to sell more videos of the "H-Effect" in action. Hard core believers simply refuse to listen to the last point however.
RabidCat
QUOTE(offamychain @ Aug 16 2007, 02:40 PM) *
Tesla was a crack-pot scientist, albeit a very intelligent one. He gave alot of good discoveries & inventions to mankind, but a great many of the things he was playing with have been over-interpreted to the point that they have become completely uncredible. The so-called "Death Ray" is one of them. The same thing can be seen with the modern day John Hutchison. His so-called "Hutchison Effect" has a cult following....but he can't even recreate it & has admitted that he has faked results in order to sell more videos of the "H-Effect" in action. Hard core believers simply refuse to listen to the last point however.

Please, can you give some examples of over-interpretation of Tesla's inventions, other than death ray stuff. And let's exclude this H-effect from the conversation.
Mainly curious about this, as I've studied the man's stuff for a long time.
offamychain
QUOTE(RabidCat @ Aug 16 2007, 11:05 PM) *
Please, can you give some examples of over-interpretation of Tesla's inventions, other than death ray stuff. And let's exclude this H-effect from the conversation.
Mainly curious about this, as I've studied the man's stuff for a long time.


His claim that he could split the Earth in two was one...by harmonic resonation. He DID experiment with this & was able to cause slight vibrations in surrounding buildings, more like sound vibrations than physical movement. This might be compared to the "boom boxes" in a vehicle parked beside you at a stop-light. The bass noise hurts your ears & can even be felt, but it really does no damage to anything. Over the years, this incident has been expanded so that many sources make claims that he caused an earthquake covering several cty blocks of New York, damaging several buildings. The latter part just didn't happen.

Tesla was also involved in the planning of the Philadelphia Experiment, or more accurately, the larger scope of it that was called Project Rainbow. (He DIDN'T directly participate in the actual Eldridge experiment, because he was dead....although some Tesla fan have forgotten that fact) The myth part of the Eldridge story has been debunked so many time that it isn't funny. It was almost certainly a project, similar to de-gauzzing, which was intended to warp light around the ship by the use of high levels of electricity & magnetism. This part is where Tesla came in & his knowledge was used. But the story has been expanded on to include tales about teleportation & time travel. Interestingly, the Eldridge still survives. It's now the Leon, with, I believe, the Greek navy.

He also experimented with sending wireless power hrough the atmosphere, & even through the Earth itself. (The last one simply won't work, as any licensed electrician like myself knows.) Tesla found this out also. But his wireless transmission theory has some fact to it. Electricity CAN be transmitted through the air....but it takes certain situations to make it happen & is HUGELY inefficient. I'm not real sure how much Tesla believed he could make this happen, but it's been expanded through the years to the point that many think he really thought that he could generate power at Niagra Falls, then beam it by antennae to San Francisco, to power someone's light bulb. It just doesn't work that way.

There are reports that Tesla claimed to have built an electrical power generator that would not consume fuel. I'm not entirely sure how deep he got into this, but I do know that a great many Tesla fans believe whole-heartedly he knew how to do this. Surely Tesla, as smart as he was, realized this was a form of perpetual motion....energy output with no energu input. This also has been tried for centuries & it just can't happen. It violates both the first & second law of thermodynamics. I'm tempted to believe that Tesla knew this, and that the hype about his no-fuel machine was added later, to increase his reputation as a genius.

There are dozens of other theories of his that have been warped by history into something that he wasn't even trying to do....judging by his notes & memoirs.

As stated in my first post, the man was undoubtably intelligent. But many of his experiments almost obviously have been given greater depth than what ever actually resulted from them.
Robert Moody
I appreciate the responses some have given to my question. I wanted to ask again and ask that the response be about the content of my question specifically.

The video I linked to in an earlier post claims to record the effects of a Scalar-type weapon based on theories pushed forward by Tesla. Does anyone have any other information about that specific video or any solid evidence that the military actually has a working weapon based on these theories.

Thanks.

RabidCat
QUOTE(offamychain @ Aug 17 2007, 12:19 AM) *
His claim that he could split the Earth in two was one...by harmonic resonation. He DID experiment with this & was able to cause slight vibrations in surrounding buildings, more like sound vibrations than physical movement. This might be compared to the "boom boxes" in a vehicle parked beside you at a stop-light. The bass noise hurts your ears & can even be felt, but it really does no damage to anything. Over the years, this incident has been expanded so that many sources make claims that he caused an earthquake covering several cty blocks of New York, damaging several buildings. The latter part just didn't happen.

Tesla was also involved in the planning of the Philadelphia Experiment, or more accurately, the larger scope of it that was called Project Rainbow. (He DIDN'T directly participate in the actual Eldridge experiment, because he was dead....although some Tesla fan have forgotten that fact) The myth part of the Eldridge story has been debunked so many time that it isn't funny. It was almost certainly a project, similar to de-gauzzing, which was intended to warp light around the ship by the use of high levels of electricity & magnetism. This part is where Tesla came in & his knowledge was used. But the story has been expanded on to include tales about teleportation & time travel. Interestingly, the Eldridge still survives. It's now the Leon, with, I believe, the Greek navy.

He also experimented with sending wireless power hrough the atmosphere, & even through the Earth itself. (The last one simply won't work, as any licensed electrician like myself knows.) Tesla found this out also. But his wireless transmission theory has some fact to it. Electricity CAN be transmitted through the air....but it takes certain situations to make it happen & is HUGELY inefficient. I'm not real sure how much Tesla believed he could make this happen, but it's been expanded through the years to the point that many think he really thought that he could generate power at Niagra Falls, then beam it by antennae to San Francisco, to power someone's light bulb. It just doesn't work that way.

There are reports that Tesla claimed to have built an electrical power generator that would not consume fuel. I'm not entirely sure how deep he got into this, but I do know that a great many Tesla fans believe whole-heartedly he knew how to do this. Surely Tesla, as smart as he was, realized this was a form of perpetual motion....energy output with no energu input. This also has been tried for centuries & it just can't happen. It violates both the first & second law of thermodynamics. I'm tempted to believe that Tesla knew this, and that the hype about his no-fuel machine was added later, to increase his reputation as a genius.

There are dozens of other theories of his that have been warped by history into something that he wasn't even trying to do....judging by his notes & memoirs.

As stated in my first post, the man was undoubtably intelligent. But many of his experiments almost obviously have been given greater depth than what ever actually resulted from them.

Um hum.
I'd rather not get into deep discussions about what you've written here. But I would suggest you do a little more research before you make such statements with such authority.
Before you go back to work, however, I suggest you review your NEC guidelines, especially about grounding.
Because my UPS machines will detect whether you've properly wired your place, and they won't like it if you don't have that ground as a power dump, even though you claim it is non-conductive.
Legatus Legionis
QUOTE
War clouds were again darkening Europe. On 11 July 1934 the headline on the front page of the New York Times read, "TESLA, AT 78, BARES NEW 'DEATH BEAM.'" The article reported that the new invention "will send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 250 miles..." Tesla stated that the death beam would make war impossible by offering every country an "invisible Chinese wall."

LINK TO DEATH RAY
a thread worth browsing through. even though i already made a thread similar to this.
i like Tesla than Einstein .

QUOTE(offamychain @ Aug 17 2007, 03:19 PM) *
His claim that he could split the Earth in two was one...by harmonic resonation. He DID experiment with this & was able to cause slight vibrations in surrounding buildings, more like sound vibrations than physical movement. This might be compared to the "boom boxes" in a vehicle parked beside you at a stop-light. The bass noise hurts your ears & can even be felt, but it really does no damage to anything. Over the years, this incident has been expanded so that many sources make claims that he caused an earthquake covering several cty blocks of New York, damaging several buildings. The latter part just didn't happen.


it was known as the Earthquake Machine.
ton's of stuff about Tesla could be found here through the links our co-members produced.
Teslasparkgap
Books and web sites talk about an electrostatic beam.

Man, Tesla was all about A/C.

That beam concept is so CIA-IllumiNazi control of Tesla dis information.

A/C is the way.

Beam away, it can make a column of A/C

This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.