The Fabled Dragon Land of the Pacific Ocean.
Take a different look at Australia, picture it being a "Dragons Head". Then go to New Zealand, and picture it being the curled legs and claws of the "Dragon Talons". Shoot across to Easter Island and you will be at the "Dragons Tail". Follow the under water mountain caps passing by the Hawaiian Islands on ward to the beginning of the Kuril Trench, you are now at the "Dragons Wing Tips". Follow the Japanese Trench back down to the Dragons Head.
Mu (pronounced Moo) the Polynesian word for Dragon. The mother land of the immortal serpents.
Full Version: Mu the Dragon Lands.
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Ancient Mysteries & Alternative History
QUOTE(Codebreaker @ May 28 2005, 09:06 PM)
The Fabled Dragon Land of the Pacific Ocean.
Take a different look at Australia, picture it being a "Dragons Head". Then go to New Zealand, and picture it being the curled legs and claws of the "Dragon Talons". Shoot across to Easter Island and you will be at the "Dragons Tail". Follow the under water mountain caps passing by the Hawaiian Islands on ward to the beginning of the Kuril Trench, you are now at the "Dragons Wing Tips". Follow the Japanese Trench back down to the Dragons Head.
Mu (pronounced Moo) the Polynesian word for Dragon. The mother land of the immortal serpents.
[right][snapback]645423[/snapback][/right]
Take a different look at Australia, picture it being a "Dragons Head". Then go to New Zealand, and picture it being the curled legs and claws of the "Dragon Talons". Shoot across to Easter Island and you will be at the "Dragons Tail". Follow the under water mountain caps passing by the Hawaiian Islands on ward to the beginning of the Kuril Trench, you are now at the "Dragons Wing Tips". Follow the Japanese Trench back down to the Dragons Head.
Mu (pronounced Moo) the Polynesian word for Dragon. The mother land of the immortal serpents.
[right][snapback]645423[/snapback][/right]
The idea of this continent first appeared in the works of the antiquarian Augustus Le Plongeon (1826–1908), a 19th century traveler and writer who conducted his own investigations of the Maya ruins in Yucatán. He announced that he had translated the ancient Mayan writings, which supposedly showed that the Maya of Yucatán were older than the later civilizations of Atlantis and Egypt, and additionally told the story of an even older continent of Mu, which had foundered in a similar fashion to Atlantis, with the survivors founding the Maya civilisation. (Later students of the Ancient Maya writings argue that Le Plongeon's "translations" were based on little more than his vivid imagination.)
Get it
IT NEVER EXISTED OUTSIDE OF Augustus Le Plongeon IMAGINATION
give it up
its dead
Your theory is too much of a stretch, but there was an antediluvian continent in that area called the Sundhi Continent that included Australia and also contained several (now underwater) megalithic civilizations. So anyway, Mu did exist and, like Atlantis, we just don't know where.
I wonder just how technologically advanced they were and what exactly happened. I also wonder if the reason for their preference for megalithic structures was because of their size (nephilii??)
I wonder just how technologically advanced they were and what exactly happened. I also wonder if the reason for their preference for megalithic structures was because of their size (nephilii??)
QUOTE(jjtss @ May 29 2005, 04:27 AM)
Your theory is too much of a stretch, but there was an antediluvian continent in that area called the Sundhi Continent that included Australia and also contained several (now underwater) megalithic civilizations. So anyway, Mu did exist and, like Atlantis, we just don't know where.
I wonder just how technologically advanced they were and what exactly happened. I also wonder if the reason for their preference for megalithic structures was because of their size (nephilii??)
[right][snapback]645927[/snapback][/right]
I wonder just how technologically advanced they were and what exactly happened. I also wonder if the reason for their preference for megalithic structures was because of their size (nephilii??)
[right][snapback]645927[/snapback][/right]
No the name Mu was invented by a westerner, In a story he wrote. a fictional story. That is a matter of public record
when are you guys gonna get this
the sundaland shelf was near india
not australia
atlantis was a Story invented by plato. He even said so himself.
really. Fantasy figures highly in your imagination.
Why ?
Life too hard for ya
QUOTE(jjtss @ May 29 2005, 03:27 AM)
Your theory is too much of a stretch, but there was an antediluvian continent in that area called the Sundhi Continent that included Australia and also contained several (now underwater) megalithic civilizations. So anyway, Mu did exist and, like Atlantis, we just don't know where.
I wonder just how technologically advanced they were and what exactly happened. I also wonder if the reason for their preference for megalithic structures was because of their size (nephilii??)
[right][snapback]645927[/snapback][/right]
I wonder just how technologically advanced they were and what exactly happened. I also wonder if the reason for their preference for megalithic structures was because of their size (nephilii??)
[right][snapback]645927[/snapback][/right]
You mean Sundaland - the geological name given to SE Asia during the ice age when the Sunda shelf was above sea level. Technically it wasn't a continent (it was, and is, part of Asia), it didn't include Australasia (which was sperated from it by a narrow strait) and whilst some have speculated that there could have been humans living there, maybe even a proto-civilisation, there is no actual hard evidence of this.
I suppose by megalithic structures you;re referring to the natural rock formation at Yonaguni between Taiwan and Japan which was also above sea level at the time and which may have been altered by human activity - though again there is no hard evidence for this.
btw anyone who states that Mu or Lemuria did exist must, by the same logic, believe that Narnia exists........
QUOTE(Essan @ May 29 2005, 01:14 PM)
QUOTE(jjtss @ May 29 2005, 03:27 AM)
Your theory is too much of a stretch, but there was an antediluvian continent in that area called the Sundhi Continent that included Australia and also contained several (now underwater) megalithic civilizations. So anyway, Mu did exist and, like Atlantis, we just don't know where.
I wonder just how technologically advanced they were and what exactly happened. I also wonder if the reason for their preference for megalithic structures was because of their size (nephilii??)
[right][snapback]645927[/snapback][/right]
I wonder just how technologically advanced they were and what exactly happened. I also wonder if the reason for their preference for megalithic structures was because of their size (nephilii??)
[right][snapback]645927[/snapback][/right]
You mean Sundaland - the geological name given to SE Asia during the ice age when the Sunda shelf was above sea level. Technically it wasn't a continent (it was, and is, part of Asia), it didn't include Australasia (which was sperated from it by a narrow strait) and whilst some have speculated that there could have been humans living there, maybe even a proto-civilisation, there is no actual hard evidence of this.
I suppose by megalithic structures you;re referring to the natural rock formation at Yonaguni between Taiwan and Japan which was also above sea level at the time and which may have been altered by human activity - though again there is no hard evidence for this.
btw anyone who states that Mu or Lemuria did exist must, by the same logic, believe that Narnia exists........
[right][snapback]646227[/snapback][/right]
Narnia is real Essan,
the entrance is behind my wardrobe.
i go on safari there quite often,
got some great lion pelts
and a kitchen cupboard full of turkish delight
muhuahahaha
Am i correct in assuming that Lemuria is real, but was actually just a stretch of land bridging Madagascar and West Africa?
It was called Lemuria, because it was supposed to have inhabited Lemurs.
Like Atlantis, it existed i suspect, but only on a grand scale as a figment of a person's imagination... i.e Plato.
It was called Lemuria, because it was supposed to have inhabited Lemurs.
Like Atlantis, it existed i suspect, but only on a grand scale as a figment of a person's imagination... i.e Plato.
quote from Narnia: 'the inside is bigger than the outside.'
In the infinite universe inside my head, Narnia is much more real than Lemuria or Mu or even Atlantis.
Why is it so offensive for people to speculate on the existence of 'before' and why is it so necessary to ridicule them?
I intend, when the Great Shift comes, to follow a path into a World where the works of Charles de Lint are biographies of living people, where Harry Potter is based on a an existing public school, and where the Olmec heads reveal the history of our alien forefathers. It will be so much more amusing than this world where the most important things seem to be ego and oil.
In the infinite universe inside my head, Narnia is much more real than Lemuria or Mu or even Atlantis.
Why is it so offensive for people to speculate on the existence of 'before' and why is it so necessary to ridicule them?
I intend, when the Great Shift comes, to follow a path into a World where the works of Charles de Lint are biographies of living people, where Harry Potter is based on a an existing public school, and where the Olmec heads reveal the history of our alien forefathers. It will be so much more amusing than this world where the most important things seem to be ego and oil.
QUOTE(cerberus @ May 29 2005, 04:18 PM)
Am i correct in assuming that Lemuria is real, but was actually just a stretch of land bridging Madagascar and West Africa?
It was called Lemuria, because it was supposed to have inhabited Lemurs.
Like Atlantis, it existed i suspect, but only on a grand scale as a figment of a person's imagination... i.e Plato.
[right][snapback]646311[/snapback][/right]
It was called Lemuria, because it was supposed to have inhabited Lemurs.
Like Atlantis, it existed i suspect, but only on a grand scale as a figment of a person's imagination... i.e Plato.
[right][snapback]646311[/snapback][/right]
nope
you're not correct.
lemuria was a hypothetical continent proposed by an englishman in the 19th century to explain the similarities between lemurs in south america and africa
this was before continental drift was discovered.
if you look at the two coastlines you can see where millions of years ago they fitted together. there was never a continent ion between. there would have been no room for it
This has also been proved with certain plant species appearing on both continents.
Marduk.. this unrelated.. but can you shed any light on the 'Book of Thoth'?
Marduk.. this unrelated.. but can you shed any light on the 'Book of Thoth'?
QUOTE(cerberus @ May 29 2005, 05:42 PM)
This has also been proved with certain plant species appearing on both continents.
Marduk.. this unrelated.. but can you shed any light on the 'Book of Thoth'?
[right][snapback]646366[/snapback][/right]
Marduk.. this unrelated.. but can you shed any light on the 'Book of Thoth'?
[right][snapback]646366[/snapback][/right]
it was allegedly written by Hermes Trismegistus who was either a greek citizen or a greek god depending on wether you're looking at him from a greek or roman perspective
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?method...8&curtab=2222_1
However it is possible that when he wrote the book of thoth he had simply translated it from an earlier egyptian work.
if it was ever written on an emerald tablet then the source for the emeralds could only have been south america.
so either it's
1. a work of literature
2. the work of an egyptian god who travelled to south america and then founded egyptian culture.
you can use occhams razor at this point if you like
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.