Everyone here can attest

you are SO being petty

Who me? At least I am not the one who believes the vampire wannabe.

he is not a wannabe, just ask him

Well, that is definitely not biased

fine, prove he isn't

Ok...Vampires don't exist

THAT IS YOUR OPINION GET FACTS OKAY!

But that is fact

it is not

Do you have proof they exist? And don't turn the question on me, because that says you don't

let me ask you something, what is so hard to believe about a race of people who have fangs and physical (or mental) need for blood?

because they are not a race, they are just a messed-up person. They don't fear garlic, and all that stupid BS. People do drink blood. They are just not vampires. They are people in need of a mental institution.

I wasn't talking about fear of gralic, all I said was is so hard to belive about people who have real fangs, and a need for blood?

Because humans don't have fangs. We have omnivorous canines. Short and blunt. Look at human evolution. You can claerly see the trend.

what about a mutant breed of humans

^Is that your answer to everything you can't explain? Mutants?

no, just it fits the bill with somethings today

Mutants are sterlie


It annoys the heck outta me...plus, he is always wrong with that answer.


WTF, fits the bill! You are completely wrong with you statements.
Like I said, get a background on genetics.

not all the time, just like hybrids

99% of hybrids are also sterile. GET a background on genetics.

we had these debate before remeber? and I am in 10th grade how do I get a background in genetics?!?

Take college courses If not, just do some research on your own. Take the initiative to learn!

I have been doing research

On what? It does not look like it to me.

oh, really, well you claim to know a LOT on genetics, biology,phyics etc, thats an awful lot of advanced things to know about , I have trouble believing you

PM me and I will tell you more.

Well, back on topic.

vampires are real

You are one desperate believer.

I think he's disagreeing for the sake or arguement...

Anyone who claims to be a vampire is a fool, anyone who believes them is far too gullible for their own good.

More cowbell?

Heh heh... I is so screwed up! I have a much greater inclination to believe traditional and ancient vampyre legends than I would any of the more modern crap.
Oh, but Bram Stoker didn't invent fangs, there were some vampyres with fangs, although usually it was a single puncture, or a tearing wound. However Lilith hardly counts as a Vampire, and its widely understood that the "woman before Eve" was created as a means of degrading women. The story is less Biblical than the tale of the Golem, which was essentially an early cabalist tale.
However vampyres are extremely widespread, from the classic vampire. (living dead who feeds on the living) to the Varguile. (head with wings for ears that attacks the living)

But from what i have gathered from early sources, Vampires are supposed to be the an anamoly in the paranormal. While ghosts are soul only, not having a physical form. The living have a body and soul. And Demons and angels are completely spiritual, but can become corporeal. According to the theory I read, vampires are supposed to be something completely abnormal, a body without a soul.

But wheh, all I can say is all the people claiming to be vampires are quite insane. Albert Fish claimed to be a servant of God after all, doesn't mean we believe him.

I think you should go do a little scientific research on the subject, vampires do not, can not, never did, and never will exist on this Earth in this dimension.

again, your opinion

May I ask what you believe a Vampyre to be exactly? just curious.

I believe a vampire to be a non-extant figment of the imagination, beginning as a terrifying mythical beast in eastern Europe, later romanticized by books and movies until it became some sort of humanoid figure rather than an evil beast to be destroyed on sight. Goth kids soon pick up on this and think it is "cool", so they start calling themselves vampires because they want to be different and unusual and want people to pay attention to them. Thats all a vampire is, nothing.

No, its science

No, that's not exactly the "broad spectrum" description that I was looking for. I'm refering to what the defining characteristics of a Vampyre are...not so much the apperance as the physical characteristics.

no, its just your peoples opinion, some people think the earth is flat that does not make science

Using science we know they are not real. You on the other hand sound like a kid at a playground. Find something to back up your point.

so saying that something odd and parnormal might exist is playground talk, is that what your saying?

You are right, that does not make science. But proof and evidence does Using science, vampires don't exist

Yes. When you make a blanket statement that vampires do exist, but do not have one bit of evidence. That sounds playground to me.

look a 100 years ago gorillas were consider a myth, 600 years ago saying the a meteorite fell from space would have been laughed at, 1000 years ago the earth was thought to be flat.
you see were I am going with this?

Gorillas were known to science since 1847

The meteorite named Elbogen one of the oldest recorded falls. It fell in 1400. Many other depictions of meteorites have been found much older.

1000 years ago, science was in its infancy.

okay 150 years ago, and in 1400 it was not widly belived to be from outer space, and the point I am trying to make is that what is know to science is always changing

Do you know what a recorded fall means? As in it fell from the sky?

And my point is that there are some things that are just impossible

todays impossible, is tomorrows fact.

Such ignorance. So you think Pigs can fly? The world will explode? Mermaids are real (wait, don't answer that )?