Kismit and Cebrakon - I found several sites on synchronicity. If anyone's interested, here's one that describes it without going into too much detail:
SynchronicityQUOTE
Synchronicity is a word created by the Swiss psychologist Carl Jung to describe the alignment of "universal forces" with the life experiences of an individual. Jung believed that many experiences perceived as coincidences were not merely due to chance, but instead reflected the creation of an event or circumstance by the "co-inciding" or alignment of such forces. The process of becoming intuitively aware and acting in harmony with these forces is what Jung labeled "indaviduation." Jung said that an individuated person would actually shape events around them through the communication of their consciousness with the collective unconscious.
~~~~~~~~~~
Although not scientifically provable in the classical sense, a scientific basis for the phenomenon of synchronicity may be found in the principle of correlation, in so far as a more precise scientific term for Jung's expression 'acausal connecting principle' is 'correlation'.
It is a well-known scientific principle that 'correlation does not imply causation'. Yet, correlation may in fact be a physical property shared by events without there being a classical cause-effect relationship, as shown in quantum physics, where widely separated events can be correlated without being linked by a direct physical cause-effect.
I can understand the idea of correlation. An event occurring in one place may have an effect on something miles, or even hundreds of miles away. Where I run into a snag trying to understand this, however, is when Jung writes of "universal forces." They are often referenced to, but are never described in great detail.
Could quantum theory be used to explain this?
What is synchronicityQUOTE
Some scientists see a theoretical grounding for synchronicity in quantum physics, fractal geometry, and chaos theory. They are finding that the isolation and separation of objects from each other is more apparent than real; at deeper levels, everything -- atoms, cells, molecules, plants, animals, people -- participates in a sensitive, flowing web of information. Physicists have shown, for example, that if two photons are separated, no matter by how far, a change in
one creates a simultanious change in the other.
Now my next problem. Quantum physics may explain the physical side of synchronicity, but what about the connection between a thought and an event? I found this next example amusing, btw:
QUOTE
The more pragmatic a person, the greater a surprise a synchronistic incident is -- even mild ones of the sort that happen to most people sooner or later. For example, Bruce, a corporate lawyer, was stunned the day that, just as he was getting ready to dial his father, he picked up the phone and heard his father’s voice on the other end -- calling him. "I said, `Holy smokes!’ We were both dumbfounded!" he recalls. For a moment in time, synchronicity shattered their assumptions of cause-and-effect reality.
It seems (to me, at least) that to accept this side of synchronicity one also has to accept the possibility of being clairvoyant. I find this frustrating because it's using one unknown to explain another unknown.
Now, I'm not trying to debunk synchronicity, I'm simply trying to understand it better.
stellarx3 - You brought up an interesting question about there being a possible connection between the man's mental condition and psychic phenomena. I couldn't find anything that supports that, but I did find this:
Dr. Martina Belz-MerkQUOTE
There is currently a controversial debate concerning whether unusual experiences are symptoms of a mental disorder, if mental disorders are a consequence of such experiences, or if people with mental disorders are especially susceptible to or even looking for these experiences.
The site goes on to explain that a person need not have a psychological disorder in order for that person to believe they have had a paranormal experience.
Also, it suggests that stress may be a factor for an increased susceptibility towards unusual experiences. Interestingly enough, I have been going through a particularly stressful period lately. Unfortunately, it also states that this occurs to people who have a strong belief in the paranormal, which I don't have.
And just to be fair, on the skeptical side there's a term for finding a link between unconnected occurrences.
Apophenia.QUOTE
In statistics, apophenia is called a Type I error, seeing patterns where none, in fact, exist. It is highly probable that the apparent significance of many unusual experiences and phenomena are due to apophenia, e.g., ghosts and hauntings, EVP, numerology, the Bible code, anomalous cognition, ganzfelt "hits", most forms of divination, the prophecies of Nostradamus, remote viewing, and a host of other paranormal and supernatural experiences and phenomena.
These are examples of both extremes. I have to say that I'm still on the fence about synchronicity. I can't claim that I have psychic abilities, but OTOH, I have experienced strange events that I have no explanation for (events far more interesting that the lighter incident

).