"The 1971 flowchart makes it perfectly clear, the design, intent and purpose of the U.S. Special Virus program. As Dr. Peter Piot, Executive Director of UNAIDS says, the HIV/AIDS virus is the result of many steps in the laboratory, it was no accident.  The 1971 flowchart provides absolute evidence of the United States' intent to kill its own citizens and others." 

Dr. Boyd E. Graves - September 28, 2002

After beginning his research on the AIDS pandemic in 1992, Dr. Boyd Graves discovered in February 1999 the greatest evidence, to date, of records and reports of the experiments that led to the development of what the world now knows as the AIDS virus. That document is the “1971 Flow Chart of the Special Virus Program of the United States.” Dr. Graves submitted this flowchart as evidence to the Sixth Circuit Federal Court in a case which named the President of the United States as a defendant to answer a petition acknowledging the authenticity of the Flow Chart. On January 12, 2001, the case was dismissed as “frivolous,” and then referred to the District’s Appellate Court, which ruled in favor of the lower court. Eventually, it went to the Supreme Court, which refused to hear it without giving comment as to why. Dr. Graves spoke with Final Call contributor Sultan Muhammad to explain the significance and consequences of his research. - (FinalCall.com)

According to Boyd Graves: The 1971 Flow Chart is the blueprint for the development of AIDS. It is the quintessential missing link document which provides absolute proof of the U.S. origin of HIV/AIDS. It is located in one of the 15 progress reports of the federal program entitled “The U.S. Special Virus Cancer Program.” I believe the term “cancer” was a misnomer to misdirect the actuality of the HIV development. It provides, again, absolute, absolute evidence of the U.S. origin of HIV as a synthetic biological agent.

We are currently bringing the lawsuit again with respect to the origin of AIDS/U.S. manufacture of AIDS, vis-à-vis through a federal complaint which we now have pending in the San Diego Federal Court.

(In 1932, Mr. Prescott Bush, the grandfather of the current president, convened the first international eugenics)

Many of us are aware that the Tuskegee experiment, where Black sharecroppers were injected intentionally with syphilis for the purposes of infiltrating syphilis into the Black genome. Some 60 years later, we could then say that Black people are scurrilous; syphilis runs rampant throughout Black people and, therefore, they are someone to be placed in a secondary capacity. That is particularly in line with the eugenics program where White births are encouraged and Black births are discouraged.

In 1932, the infectious agent of HIV was first tested on sheep in Iceland. That agent is called Visna. In 1932, in conjunction with the Tuskegee syphilis program, they were testing the infectious agent of HIV on an island nation. We have Visna as 30 percent of the sequences of the HIV here today. So, 1932 not only is significant for the start of a push for eugenics, i.e. a White birth order, but also the start of the testing of the infectious agent of HIV in AIDS.

http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_1597.shtml

HIV an effective virus?  It is so weak that brief exposure to temperature changes kills it.  Brief exposure to alkalinity changes kill it (when I was in high school, it was widely assumed that sperm was a hotbed of HIV.  Today, we know that the minute scarring involved in sexplay is generally responsible for the transmission of the virus, and ejaculate only carries a minor amount of the virus.  I still recall the angry response to the doctor who first brought up this theory).  It takes a significant amount of time to cause AIDS, more than enough time for the person infected to procreate, and in a significant amount of cases does not ever cause AIDS.  Even on causing AIDS, the person with the syndrome is not incapacitated until the later stages of the diseas, which, again, are not guaranteed, althoug probable.

As an effective virus, it misses the mark by a wide margin.  If the government commissioned its creation, I would demand my money back.
[right][snapback]775186[/snapback][/right]

If we didn't have any sex outside of marrige, if we only had sex for procreation, if we only had sex after a through medical examination and in sterile conditions, sure, the rate of infection would not be as high, but then, trying to rely on social conditioning that goes against the inherent instinct of humans as animals always tends to fail. Look at how well telling priests to remain celibate worked.

It is one thing to overcome our instincts and not club the secretary over the head and drag her off to the cave for some procreation, another entirely to completely deny and entire aspect of species sexuality.
[right][snapback]775314[/snapback][/right]

If you want to eat like a dog, you can live and sleep outside like a dog. If you want to live and sleep like a human, pick up those sticks!

I know sex is the #one reason for aid's, but it's more then just that..I seen where men in some country's would not use condom's.There wife's had no choice but to have unproteted sex with them..these are the same country's where it is ok..to have more then one female..It's no wonder aides is such a problem.. We must change how people think.. But to get back on thread..it's funny they don't know where this really come's from.
[right][snapback]775432[/snapback][/right]

If we didn't have any sex outside of marrige, if we only had sex for procreation, if we only had sex after a through medical examination and in sterile conditions, sure, the rate of infection would not be as high, but then, trying to rely on social conditioning that goes against the inherent instinct of humans as animals always tends to fail.  Look at how well telling priests to remain celibate worked.
[right][snapback]775195[/snapback][/right]

I'm sorry but sex may be great, but it's not worth dying for.

It's like what my Bible teacher said:

"If we didn't have any sex outside of marriage, AIDs wouldn't exist today like it does."
[right][snapback]775180[/snapback][/right]

I believe that it probably was a virus designed by the government, intended to elimate hosexuals, IV drug users, and adulteres.  I also believe they have the cure...
But, yeah...I think it was...and still is, a very effective virus.
[right][snapback]775105[/snapback][/right]

Same concept, different examples of overcoming instinct.
[right][snapback]775377[/snapback][/right]

Same here; if you want to have sex like dogs, why not do everything else like a dog? If you want to be human, at least learn to control yourself original.gif If this has nothing to do with the topic, then oops.

Using the world's fastest supercomputer, the scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory calculated the date by analyzing the rate at which the AIDS virus mutates. Assuming the rate is constant, the scientists calculated back to a common ancestor, dubbed the "Eve virus."

~~~~~~~~~~


From all the present evidence, it appears that around 1930, the chimp and monkey variants of HIV were introduced into the human population in Africa at least seven times, according to Beatrice Hahn of the University of Alabama and her colleagues. Hahn's analysis is reported in this week's issue of the journal Science.

The leap from chimps and monkeys to humans could have been due to bites, to consumption of the contaminated animals' meat, or even to wounds incurred by men or women while butchering the animals, Hahn says.

Scientists looking for evidence that strains of the AIDS virus are continually being transmitted from chimps and monkeys have now found the animal AIDS virus in no fewer than 23 separate species of chimpanzees, monkeys, baboons and mandrills, Hahn and her colleagues report.

The part about sex between a man and a monkey is just someone's sick bestial erotic fantasy.

I believe that it probably was a virus designed by the government, intended to elimate hosexuals, IV drug users, and adulteres.  I also believe they have the cure...
But, yeah...I think it was...and still is, a very effective virus.
[right][snapback]775105[/snapback][/right]

Not as much as you might think.

When Kinsey released his infamous study, one of the discoveries that he made was that acts of bestiality were in the 15% range among city dwelling youths, but 30% in the farmlands (and that is only among the reports he actually got). Current studies indicate it may be even higher. The implication here is that beastiality is low more due to the inaccessability of animals, rather than to a moral compuction against having sex with them.

If you are a jungle dweller, and it is easier to find a monkey than it is to find a date, this might well apply.
[right][snapback]776037[/snapback][/right]

Thinking of a guy engaging in bestiality is sick, but thinking that the government created a virus to eradicate an entire population of people isn't?  That's a more reasonable explanation?
[right][snapback]775949[/snapback][/right]

Humans I think are the only species who uses sex for recreation instead of solely procreation

This is why I believe man will drop nukes on each other again Ashley-Star*Child. Statements like “A condom doesn't always protect you from AIDs. It's better than nothing I suppose, but it's not foolproof. People still get pregant using condoms that break, etc, what makes you think AIDS is any different”, prove how absolutely ignorant people like yourself are willing to accept pain, suffering and early death.

Your god made Earth and math is a language that works very well in describing this world. One of these fields of mathematics is called statistics – you should take this math course at you local college, it is usually only two credits for an into course and it will show you, prove to you, tell you for a statistical fact, that you will “MOST LIKLEY NOT” CATCH AIDS IF YOU USE A CONDOM CORECTLY.

Wow, it’s a miracle; we can help ourselves if we want to! Wouldn’t you know? Thank God for statistics.

If you do not believe in facts like these Ashley-Star*Child then congratulations, you are UM’s most famous nincompoop.   

Thank you – and happy bell curves!
[right][snapback]775583[/snapback][/right]

First off, you don't know that because you are not a dog or hourse or goat etc...

Wow, talk about being ignorant, I don't suppose you know that the only species of animal having been documented for have recreational sexual activity with the opposite sex, is the dolphin. […]

[…]This excludes cases of apparent homosexuality, which, like in humanity does occur.

EXCUSE ME. The percentage of risk in still contracting AIDs and other STDs through a condom is still there. […]

[…]I did not say a condom doesn't help reduce the risk, but it most definantly is not, and I quote the word again, foolproof.