QUOTE(isis-999 @ Aug 14 2005, 08:40 PM)
Your right Larry, Not to long ago the Cherokee tribes where going to us some land they owned to open a casion, The government did not care this would give the tribe money for schools, heath care, and other important needs. All they cared about was how much money they could make off our land, Please they where not helping fill the tribe's needs but they wanted a cut of their business! Go figure.
[right][snapback]790691[/snapback][/right]
Of course they wanted a cut . . . they are politicians, and their strongest suit is taking money away from people. As I said, I don't think that the reservations should be subject to federal or state law in the first place. Treaties between the various tribes were signed by both parties. Keep in mind that a treaty, in the Constitution, is perforce between the United States and another nation. Technically speaking, reservations, while within the land area of the United States, aren't really a part of the United States . . . they are akin to the land embassies of foreign countries are situated on being the same as the native soil of those foreign countries . . . US laws don't apply. I think the Native Americans had no more to say regarding the terms of those treaties than the Hebrews did regarding "God's covenant" with them, but darn, having signed the treaties, the US should adhere to those treaties . . . and treat the tribes on reservations as separate nations . . . and not part of the US. I can't see that gambling casinos are any different than Las Vegas and Atlantic City, or for that matter, the card casinos in Gardena, CA. I.e., they do no worse harm, and certainly are good for the tribe's finances, and the fates know that the tribes need income, and it is best if it is income they earn for themselves. The Bureau of Indian Affairs has already stolen the tribes blind, so much for "help" for Native Americans by the federal government. Their "help" has been only a license for those bureaucrats to steal. They just want to go on stealing.