QUOTE(iaapac @ Aug 14 2005, 03:47 AM) [snapback]788321[/snapback]
Of course there can be freewill. Knowing an outcome and being the cause of the outcome are completely different things. For example, imagine I tape the footy this weekend. Someone tells me the score before I get to watch it. So I know the score, I know the vital plays, I know who does what, but I'm not in control of that, right?
It's not a great example, but in a similar way, God who lives outside of time knows all: past, present, future. He is not responsible for things we do anymore tahn I am responsible for a footy game.
Regards,
Does that make sense
[snapback]787743[/snapback]
But if you know the score, then all the players can do is conform and play to achieve that score. They have no other options and thus have no free will.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a common argument used against the claim that there can't be free will if God knows everything. You are correct when you say that, "...knowing an outcome and being the cause of the outcome are completely different things." However, the basic idea of free will is that it occurs without any connection to anything preceding it, so the whole, "If I go back in time and know what you're gonna do, it doesn't mean you don't have free will" is missing the point entirely. Besides, as I am about to mention, the 'taping the footy' analogy is misleading because it assumes that time is linear.
It seems like everything in the universe functions as the result of a set of natural laws, which can be expressed as mathematical equations. This is what physics is all about. Of course, the equations to describe particular phenomena we investigate are only accurate if;
1) we know all the factors (variables) that influence the phenomena we are investigating
2) we can measure all the variables accurately
3) we are intelligent enought to fit all the variables together in the correct combination
Now keep in mind that monotheitic religions assume that;
A: God is all poweful and all knowing, and
B: We have free will and if we make the right choices we will go to heaven after we die
Now, it would make sense that if God is
all knowing then He would be aware of every last variable in the entire universe and know precisely how everything influences and affects everything else.
Unfortunately, free will states that since there is no cause, there is no way to predict the outcome, so God cannot know everything if we have free will! And one can't even use the argument about time-travel from before because it assumes that time is linear, (when in fact it is not) and it means that any choice we make will affect the universe in a different way to if we made a different choice. Time isn't like a railroad, more like a branching tree. Anyway, all this is good news for us and bad news for God.
On the other hand, if we
dont have free will, and our thoughts and behaviour are really no more than the result of everything that precedes us, then that means we are bound by the natural laws of the universe just like everything else we can predict, and it means that God can then predict our behaviour. Which means He knows before we are even born what we will choose in our lives. This is bad news for us and good news for God.
In other words, it can be proven that any religion that is fundamentally based on the assumption that both 'A' and 'B' are true, are in fact wrong, because 'A' and 'B' are in fact mutually exclusive!