(Warning, author was tired and in a bad mood.
Please be gracious to the author, and mentally filter out his blatant and totally uncalled for @$$holeness, trying to glean the facts, wich are academically sound. I freely admit that this is an exampel of a bad post.
- The @$$hole author, Mike)
QUOTE(Deaths_Requiem @ Aug 21 2005, 06:29 PM)
I've tried looking some of these up, but they are different from anything I have seen. They remind me of Ancient Japanese form of writing but I'm not sure. If you know what they are let me know, I'd be much oblidged.
[right][snapback]802714[/snapback][/right]
Ummm... no offense, but "Ancient Japanese"?
Sorry, but I'll have to step in here. I have been studying linguistics (structural linguistics, historical linguistics, philology, and the history of writing) for fun for over five years. I recently took an undergraduate and graduate level linguistics class for fun (and got an A in both), and four semesters of Japanese. I also read a book on the history of writing in Japan as part of my Japanese 4 final paper. I also learned quite a bit about typography when I started designing True Type fonts for fun.
So....
There is no "Ancient Japanese". Not at all. Sorry.
The first "writing" in Japan was Greater Seal and Lesser Seal characters on Chinese imports, in particular Chinese mirrors, in late 6th through early 8th centuries. The first writing in Japan was brought in Korean scholars fleeing a war between three kingdoms in North Korea in the 8th century. (Surprisingly, Japan and part of North Korea were originally allies.) The writing was all "Court Mandarin", and was translated into Mandarin Chinese when written, and back to Japanese by the scribe when read. The phonological spellings and margin notes in most writings in the 8th through 10th century are period Korean, not period Japanese. It wasn't until the 12th century that the notion of writing Japanese in Japanese started to take hold. (The idea was on par with heresy; the same was true in Vietnam [Ang Am], the Korean kingdoms, and other countries.) In the 14th century, the first pure-Japanese-language written in purely phonetic characters in "Woman's Hand" (what would later become Hiragana) became a cultural transformation point. Before that, the only "Japanese" writing in Japan were phonetic and gloss notes on religious, government, and business text (a different simplification set that would become Katakana). Women were the first to use writing for true, native Japanese culture. Anyway, the character sets of the time were fairly close to the modern Kanas. There were two extra characters (the Iroha poem makes more sense with these), it is believed the ha-gyo and a-gyo were reversed phonetically (and at times the ha-gyo and wa-gyo seemed interchangeable, hence the ha-pronounced-wa subject marker, he-pronounced-e object of preposition marker, and wo-pronounced-o direct object marker), and the list of Hengana (acceptable alternate Kana forms) was a bit larger and more commonly used.
("A History of Japanese Writing", Christopher Seeley, University of Hawaii Press.)
The "Kana Hifumi", or "God Age Characters", are largely believed to be legend, and the "rediscovery" a hoax.
http://base.kb.dk/manus_pub/cv/manus/Manus...=365&p_Lang=alt You may be thinking of the Shang dynasty characters, which are ancient *Chinese* (and were never used outside a limited area of China). However, these tend to be stylized pictographs, and only encompassed a small set of concrete ideas. They were used almost exclusively on scapulae (shoulder bones) and turtle shells. They do not look like the picture you provide. Further, the early "Court" writing (Greater Seal and Lesser Seal), and the alternate writing systems that evolved before in China before the War of the Three Kingdoms (such as Jurchen and Hsi-Hsia) look more like modern Chinese than this.
("A History of Japanese Writing". Also, "The Writing Systems of the World", Florian Coulmas, Blackwell Oxford & Cambridge Press.)
The picture you give has some vague characteristics of Phoenician and Punic scripts of the early Mediterranean, and Mangyan of the Philippines, but I would say that it's no where near close enough to be even possibly related.
("Writing Systems of the World: Alphabets, Syllabaries, Pictograms", Akira Nakanishi, Tuttle Publishing.)
Furthermore....
As someone who has studies Santeria, and live in the middle of Hatian Voodoo, New Orleans Voodoo, Paolo, Shango, Macumba, and Candomble (large Brazilian population for the latter two), I can also say that these don't look like any veve of the Loas or Orisha. Further, they don't look anything like early runes (I can quote books for that, too), or anything used in European magical traditions such as Hermetics or modern Wicca (practicing Wiccan for about 15 years, long before Buffy, Charmed, and such made it fashionable).
Honestly, given what I know about writing, which I can honestly say is fairly extensive, I'd say the characters in the picture are gibberish. I'd pose three situations as to their "meaning".
[1] Your friend was sleepwalking and drew on himself. People have done much weirder. I knew one guy who went through his house, gathered all his flashlights, even asking his wife where more were, and stacked them all neatly on top of his dryer (while sleepwalking). Another guy I knew as a kid peed in the refrigerator *twice*. His mother backed him up on that one. (... yeah, I didn't know what to say to that either.....) So, drawing on oneself is not that unusual.
[2] Your friend wants attention, and made sh*t up to get it. Kids do that.
[3] You want attention, and made sh*t up to get it. Kids do that.
Sorry, but I just can't bring myself to buy it.
Mike