There seems to be growing support for "alternate theories" in recent years. I began to wonder about all the opposition to the solid theories we already hold as true and tested. Where does all this opposition come from?
First of all, I believe that many people don't know what the word theory means. They take it to mean, "this is our current belief of the way things work, but we're not sure."
But a theory is more than a hunch. It's a sturdy scientific model that's been tested by repeated observations and backed up by empirical evidence.
But still, people use theory so loosely that it weakens the meaning. It's not a theory to point out flaws or gaps in evolution. It's not a theory to state that the earth formed in 6,000 years and not over 4.5 bil because we've seen canyons form in a matter of days. Those are limited points with little to no evidence to stand on.
But anyway, could this surge in Woo-woo ideas come from a huge willingness to believe that what we see in science fiction is possible? That because they do it on Star Trek that the current rules of physics limiting velocity to c are wrong?
In short, where do they get all these ideas? Do they just want some notoriety for pointing out phantom flaws in scientific theories?