Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The Goddess of the Israelites
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > Unexplained Mysteries > Spirituality vs Skepticism
mako
Note: William G. Dever is a Professor of Near Eastern Archaeology, University of Arizona a well known Maximalist (one who thinks that the bible has some historical truth in it), that with the book mentioned in this article, seems to be slowly coming over to the Minimalist (one who sees little to no historical truth in the bible) camp.


This article is from the Mail & Guardian Online

The Goddess of the Israelites

Colin Bower

The discovery that the deities of ancient Palestine were female ought to be good news for all of humanity, not just women. Even the increasingly beleaguered monotheistic religions might find reason to be pleased, for it gives them opportunity to reinvent a deity that will represent the yin and the yang, the yoni as well as the lingam, the mother as well as the father, the wife as well as the husband.

In his newly published book, “Did God Have a Wife?”, archaeologist William G Dever brings the record of matriarchy worship up to date. His findings will not be new to the world of scholarship, but they will be to the general public -- and their significance should reverberate in church councils and congregations for they thoroughly subvert conventional Christian and Judaic beliefs.

Dever finds that 90% of the people of ancient Palestine -- of the second millennium and the early centuries of the first millennium BCE -- lived in scattered and isolated rural communities, even after Jerusalem had emerged as the capital of a united monarchy. These communities practiced a folk religion quite different from the monotheistic, patriarchal, literary and theoretical religion we find in the Old Testament and the Hebrew scriptures. It was characterized by what people did, rather than what they thought; polytheistic, not bound by written rules and egalitarian. But, most importantly, it was matriarchal.

Their principal goddess was Asherah, consort of the most senior of the ancient deities of the area. Also in the pantheon of goddesses was Shapsh (Sun), Yarih (Moon), Astarte (androgynous) and Anat (warrior), some of whom were also sometimes identified with Asherah.

The cult of Asherah is confirmed by the archaeological record, which allows us to reinterpret previously incomprehensible passages in ancient texts. These include the Bible itself, which provides ample evidence of attempts to suppress information of the widespread worship of Asherah and other polytheistic practices.

She was a central deity to whom women and men both gave allegiance. Jewish Kabalistic writings also confirm an early goddess called Shekinah, and testify to the holy act of sexual union between her and Yahweh, sometimes graphically described. Under the matriarchy, sex is not just holy, it is also very sexy; under the patriarchy it is regulated, controlled and, finally, under Paul, barely tolerated.

Of course, the existence of the matriarchy as predating patriarchal deities in many ancient civilisations is commonly accepted, and some argue for the one Great Mother as the original deity of all. But what is new and controversial is the discovery that the matriarchy was so firmly entrenched in the heartland of the world’s three great monotheistic religions.

Dever finds evidence of folk religion in cultic shrines all over Palestine, and of goddess worship in unmistakable terracotta figurines, in graphic art depicting stylized emblems of female worship and in the many disguised biblical references to Asherah.

The figurines invariably depict a nude female figure with large breasts and an often graphically displayed pubic triangle. The Bible refers to the shrines as “high places” characterized by Asherah -- typically translated as “groves” or wooden poles, but now believed to have been symbols of the goddess. Asherah was fully identified with trees -- the embodiment of wisdom in ancient Canaanite religion -- and many depictions show her growing from a tree trunk.

What will most challenge Christian and Judaic belief is Dever’s assertion that their holy scripts are the product of a tiny, but increasingly powerful, Jerusalem-based male literary and theological elite.

Monotheism was a late development, possibly as late as the Persian or Hellenistic periods, well after the Babylonian exile, and, therefore, a back-projection of the writers and redactors of the Bible.

This contradicts the conventional understanding of biblical texts as describing the universal story of the founding of mankind by a male god, Yahweh, of his exclusive guidance of a promised people to nationhood, and of the common destiny of the people who became known as Israelites.

Post-modern critical theory has long taught us that texts are never quite what they seem to be. As a result of Dever’s work, we can now see more clearly that the religion of the Old Testament and the Hebrew scriptures is a humanly contrived narrative written to serve the interests of a particular group with a vested interest to propound and defend. That interest was monotheistic, elitist, priestly, literary and male. It conferred prestige and power upon those who served it.

Monotheistic, patriarchal narratives have largely enslaved the human consciousness for 3 000 years or more.

Dever’s work helps us understand that the Old Testament is one of these, and that it rightfully belongs in the mythical realm of the Gilgamesh epic and the Odyssey.

Did God Have a Wife? Archeology and Folk Religion in Ancient Israel by William G Dever is published by William B Eerdman Publishing Company

Okay, what do y’all think?
yes.gif
SilverCougar
Well as a goddess worshiper...
mako
LOL, need you say more? no.gif
zandore
So does this mean that "Professor William G. Dever" is starting to shun religion(Christianity)?
SilverCougar
Say more? You want MORE??

XD

Even Allah had three daughters who were at one time goddesses until women became second class... and I believe there is even evidence that Allah was consort, and vice versa, to Ma'at... (Egyptian goddess)

Then again, Allah is also supposed to be the same god as the one the Judaic and Christians worship... and there's evidence that Mary became just "Mother to Jesus" from being one of the Goddesses in the fertile crescent, that were Yawhe's consort (and vice versa).

The bible could have historical facts in it.. we know that people write about what they know. Areas and such. But we also know back then that people also write about extravigent things. How do you think we have myths and legends? We find many places in Greece that are in various greek myths... why is it that we write them off as just a fantastic imagination... yet if something that was mentioned in the bible was found, it "proves" that the bible was right? *shrugs*

Personally... I feel that it's very likely, way way back before the torah and bible were finally hand written... the tribal peoples believed in a Goddess, with a God.
theoric
QUOTE
Monotheistic, patriarchal narratives have largely enslaved the human consciousness for 3 000 years or more.


this is very true and very important that people start to recognize this. For too long now mankind has willingly been enslaved by such devices
Heru
QUOTE(hyperactive @ Sep 22 2005, 05:24 PM) [snapback]857564[/snapback]

this is very true and very important that people start to recognize this. For too long now mankind has willingly been enslaved by such devices



Um sorry that would be money.
theoric
money is a by-product, a tool, of the enslaving social methodologies in question.
SilverCougar
QUOTE(Heru @ Sep 23 2005, 12:33 AM) [snapback]857783[/snapback]

Um sorry that would be money.


Heh... there are more then one way to "enslave" minds of the populous. Money is one way... organized reliogion is another.. government is yet another... (though sometimes government is needed...)

Paranoid Android
Well there we have it folks. Conclusive proof that the BIble is indeed a crock and we should go on a bon-fire spree and burn every last copy of the Bible for the heresy which it is

w00t.gif

I'm sure the book makes for an interesting read Mako, and it's an interesting hypothesis. But I'm just not buying it.

You won't find anything to support that theory within the Bible itself. The Israelites were condemned by God for their worship of the Asherah poles, you know.................... OH! I forgot. The bible was edited later to support a monotheistic religion - of course it would condemn Asherah worship tongue.gif

Regards, PA
mako
QUOTE
OH! I forgot. The bible was edited later to support a monotheistic religion - of course it would condemn Asherah worship

By Jove, I believe he has it finally! There is more support for that than for the validity of the bible. Go figger as CD says. yes.gif
GIDEON MAGE
there was already a definitive book on this over 25 years agp "the hebrew goddess". i don't remember the author. actually, asherah is mentioned many many timesin hebrew, read a jewish translation and find out something.
Kismit
Doesn't it stand to reason that Woman would have been worshipped. They were after all, the providers of life.

They were not ony capable of producing life but of sustaining it, wether through gestation or just being able to produce the food source, milk. We live in a society that can not survive without both men and woman, how on earth could we have been started or created by only one figure of either sex.

And more importantly, why would the God of the bible go on to later state that worshipping women for being able to produce and sustain life is wrong and an act of evil. For you msut only worship me. But then again I am probably just jumping the gun a bit here.

Many religions have a Yin and a Yang an Isis to their Zeus an Eve to their Adam or a Mary to their Joseph. It is always about balance. The natural belief structures which collectively group themselves Pagan, know this, if only because it is inescapably true.
SilverCougar
Pssst Isis was with Amon... and er.. Osirus. Zues was with Hera... and every other woman out there.. XD *snickers* *teases Kis*
Paranoid Android
QUOTE(Kismit @ Sep 26 2005, 09:08 AM) [snapback]861541[/snapback]

We live in a society that can not survive without both men and woman, how on earth could we have been started or created by only one figure of either sex.

And more importantly, why would the God of the bible go on to later state that worshipping women for being able to produce and sustain life is wrong and an act of evil. For you msut only worship me. But then again I am probably just jumping the gun a bit here.


The Bible refers to God as "He", but God is not human, who's to say God is a he anymore than a boat is a she.

God outlawed worship of ALL gods and all things except for Him. He didn't single out the worship of female's, or of female gods.

Just a thought.

Regards, PA

Kismit

Nope, it didn't single out woman. It (or more accurately, someone) decided that worshipping anything other than it was wrong. And with quite a few of the earlier pre-christian religions and cultures honouring woman, because of the simple fact that they produced and sustained life, some could say that decision made by God or whoever wrote that bit of the Bible, was the first step on the road to the Witch trials.

Why did God let these people live for so long happy in their own beliefs, and then tell them what they had been doing was wrong? Why didn't somebody tell them before they worshipped false idols that it was wrong to do so?

There are actualy no faults with these other religions, they honoured that which God is perceived to be as well as celebrating all of the everyday miracles that happen by giving them names and identities. They celebrated God as much as any Christian or Catholic or Baptist or other Bible oriented religion would today.


*pokes tounge out at the cat, you want I should take away your
scratching post. huh.gif

quickly goes and checks her book shelf.

SilverCougar
Noooo not my scratching post!!!
mako
QUOTE
God outlawed worship of ALL gods and all things except for Him. He didn't single out the worship of female's, or of female gods.

Well, that was the story put forth by those 6th century BCE YHWHist scribes as they codifed and wrote the OT! After all, Asherah was a much more popular deity as was several other Canaanite deities and was pulling a lot of the money that would have gone to the YHWHist heirarchy! Good enough reason to have their god "outlaw" worship of other gods and goddesses! grin2.gif And with the backing of the Persian Emperor who had given the YHWHist permission to set up a temple state to govern for him, who could resist? yes.gif
Kit Walker
My question would be, "Did Dr. Dever become a Minimalist?"
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.