QUOTE(Rainbow Rowan @ Oct 3 2005, 05:36 PM) [snapback]872355[/snapback]
Pallidin, if you hadn't read the original tech manual, you would be lost with the other resources, right?
I know what your saying, RR, but some manuals may well be clear to the author and some readers, but not so to others. This is especially true with tech manuals, and I would suspect also true with writings involving phylosophy, spirituality, extra-terrestials, etc...
In these day's, RR, its just not enough to tell someone "here is the TRUTH" in such and such manual, because that "truth" to one reader is mere opinion to another reader or not even really "grasped" if is the truth. Therfore, I ask specific questions, regardless of whether or not is already been addressed in a "manual"
Speculative writings(those which involve religion, paranormal phenomenon and so-on) are even more prone to critical analysis, as often such writings include numerous "assumptions" presented as statements of fact without evidence. This is not to suggest that such writings contain no facts, rather that it is often the case that speculative assumptions are wrapped in-between these facts to make the "whole" appear as wholly factual.
The Raelian Movement bases its original premise on the writings from Rael.
This is very dangerous.
Those writings, though certainly containing some facts(general scientific facts I might add), contain a tremendous amount of assumptions which have absolutely no evidenciary value. He met an alien? Ok, where's the proof or any subtle hint of evidence. There is none. He met with "Jesus" etc, on a distant planet? Not only is that contention intellectually absurd, there is also no proof there either, just Rael's word that it is true.