1. Occam's razor goes against you here. either it is a fabrication, concious or not, or there are creatures which break all laws of physics, biology, psychology, geology, with no proof whatsoever. The theories are not equal, so you can't even begin to use this.
2. Conspiracy? what you are proposing sounds like conspiracy. the idea that something can break all natural laws and leave no trace, that sounds like nothing was ever there to conspire about.
3. If you can prove it is false, yes, this statement is true. but to "prove" something, it has to be testable. the tests have to be repeatable. that's how science works.
4. n/a
5. Have you considered maybe that person is humoring you? sociopsychology can easily explain a verification of things like this, it's not even abnormal psych.
6. It is possible to feel very strongly about something that is later disproven. Most people felt from the bottom of their hearts that they saw women consorting with demons in the witch trials (pick any set you like). That didn't make it any more true, and lots of innocent people died as a result.
7. whoa. we know a lot about science. i think it is metaphysics you are talking about here, not true science. we don't know a lot about that because it is not testable, there is no evidence, etc.
8. n/a
9. anger is a problem here. it often interferes with rational problem solving. i am neither confirming or denying the existence of your creatures, but relax. experiment a little. try recreating your mindset at the time of contact. see what happens.
10. Quantum physics is not as misunderstood as you believe. it has a lot to do with provable things, it is just more difficult to understand without a strong mathematical background. but we have used quantum physics for a lot of really cool things, like teleportation of photons.
11. Paradigm shift is a change in assumptions. Wikipedia has a more definitive answer about this.
12. If you're not sure about whether this applies to you, think about it. have you approached this matter in a detached and scientific manner? have you examined the evidence, not just your emotions of the experience? did you use the scientific method? do you take any person who says you are wrong and denounce them imediately, without considering their arguement?
13. good. a foggy head can happen for a lot of reasons, but drinking is one of the mose easily avoidable. not saying it does not have its place, but certainly never when you are trying to approach an arguement from a logical perspective.
14. I agree. but always look for the rational before the irrational.
15. It is quite a fun word though, isn't it?
16. lawsuits about things like this are just plain funny.
17. lol!
18. i haven't seen any other names that might be yours--that i know of! OMG! IT'S A CONSPIRACY! They've taken over your aliases!
19. Hmm... why didn't i think of that?
20. huh? oh well, not by business.
21. I would, however, love for the Mounties to show up on my doorstep to haul me away for stalking strangers who live thousands of miles away...
22. At the same time though, don't discount their arguements. the burden of proof lies on you.
23. Unless you are really Christopher Pike or an Undead Jane Austen (which would be awesome)
24. I have a masters in supercool-ish-ness-ism or something. whatever.
25. but you do! you have tried to place the burden of proof on the nonbeliever!
26. i don't like spam!
27. what makes a valid arguement is not how strongly you believe in something, but how strong the positive evidence is for your case. they laughed at galileo, but not einstein, whose theories were far more unconventional.
28. i know. i know all about it.
29. you want a scientist, but what kind? just like you wouldn't want someone with a doctorate in history removing your appendix, you need to first list the evidence, then find what kind of scientist would be most knowledgeable in that area. after that, a trip to the local college might help. there's usually a professor or ta with a moment to spare.
30. Because you posted it on the forum generally reserved for scientific discussion of this stuff, you opened it up for debate. if it is just contact info, i would try a forum on a different website that doesn't draw so many skeptics to frighten away that kind of conversation.
31. you haven't posted the ideas of other people as facts, but you need to look much harder at the research that opposes your view than you have been doing thus far.
32. i agree. spam is bad. again.
33. It is not a theory, because it has never been tested. it is an idea. it is not even a hypothesis, because you have not compiled data to form a testable question. to get feedback on the idea, speak with a physicist. He can tell you more about what exactly a dimension is, and whether your idea is testable.
34. without verification by evidence, it is not provable, and therefore not a fact. personal or otherwise.
35. Mine has buttons for eyes and his name is frankie... but don't create a false persona which you would feel would better further your point.
36. thank you for not quoting him. he did despise quantum physics though, and sought to disprove it often. this led to many advances in the field, oddly enough. but most of his work dealt with what is closer to conventional physics.
37. no weird conspiracy theories for you! you may not have seen that a&e special about how the aliens invaded hitler's body and created a holocaust that never happened... oh, wait, that program was silenced by the government.
38. you have's done this in the way they are implying. good for you.
39. maybe i'm just in the dark here, but huh?
40. you haven't done this, but don't denounce skeptics! by asking the hard questions, they can help you solidify your arguement . just like einstein did with quantum theory.
41. *frothydog laughs*
please do not take this as a personal attack, an attack on your idea, or anything like that. you saw what you saw, but consider the arguements. it can eather lead to grim realizations about your ideas, or a stronger, more valid point. like i said, if you want to sincerely get in contact, examine the event and try to recreate it. that's the best solution i can offer
if she did hit you should have pulled off the matrix and like,did a flip over and then kick her in the bum and run away,thats what i would do 
