angrycrustacean
Oct 14 2005, 07:59 PM
I was just curious about which cryptid is the most believed in. Pick which one you
most think is real and/or believe in. I think I listed most of the major cryptids, if not you'll just have to use the Other choice.
Shivel
Oct 14 2005, 08:04 PM
It's definitely between Bigfoot and Nessie.
I chose Bigfoot, on the count that there is much more evidence.
indeed
Oct 14 2005, 08:13 PM

Exactly the same as JayMan for me.
FrothyDog
Oct 14 2005, 11:57 PM
there's a book called "a fish caught in time" about the coelocanth. within this book, where they are talking about bathyscapes, they mention going deep in the ocean. they saw a creature that was about 20 feet wide, and much longer.
that's the area we really haven't explored.
that's the area i'm sure our next true cryptid will come from.
by the way, the book is a pretty good one.
Piney
Oct 15 2005, 12:07 AM
Gotta go with the hairy hominid.... Bigfoot
Lapi'che
Feenix Fire
Oct 15 2005, 12:23 AM
I said sea monsters.
Question! What's a Bunyip and how do you pronounce it?
fawkes2
Oct 15 2005, 12:25 AM
l agree with jayman,indeed,piney
l belive more in bigfoot.
indeed
Oct 15 2005, 12:55 AM
QUOTE(Feenix Fire @ Oct 15 2005, 10:23 AM) [snapback]888277[/snapback]
Question! What's a Bunyip and how do you pronounce it?
You pronounce it as Bun-yip.
QUOTE
This is an Australian monster. It exists in Aboriginal stories and art, as well as in modern reports. Descriptions vary widely- the Aborigines describe it as having tusks, flippers, and a tail like a horse. The Aboriginal Bunyip lived in or near water such as creeks and pools from dried up river beds (billabongs.)
The Bunyip is supposed to emerge at night to prey on animals, and women and children. It gives a loud bellowing cry if approached. When the Aborigines hear the cry, they stay away from the water.
More recent accounts vary widely in their descriptions, ranging from hairy, scaled, feathered, fur, long tail, long neck, horse head, bird head etc...
http://www.eaudrey.com/myth/bunyip.htm
Feenix Fire
Oct 15 2005, 01:05 AM
Thank ye very much
XNavyGunner
Oct 15 2005, 01:25 AM
I believe more in "sea monsters". We're constantly learning what's under the surface, and also look at all the possible hiding spots. Trying to find one creature in the Pacific alone would be a futile effort.
draconic chronicler
Oct 15 2005, 01:04 PM
Dragons, of course, more people believe in them alone, than every other cryptid put together, and not only now, but for 5,000 years of recorded history, and untold thousands of more years as effigies and petroglyphs prove. They are part of virtually every human faith as well so we are talking about billions of people, just today, and virtually everyone in the world believed in them prior to 300 years ago.
Thunderbirds, sea serpents, lake monsters, etc virtually always stem from original dragon legends as well.
A common link in virtually all of these stories it that this cryptid is as intelligent or more so than humans themselves, and possess inexplicable, supernatural abilitilies, which, (if there is any truth to 5000 years of recorded sightings), might explain why they can remain so elusive.
frogfish
Oct 15 2005, 03:17 PM
to add to Indeed said, Bunyips come in different forms...
i would have to say sea monsters...so much of our oceans are unexplored
343 Guilty Spark
Oct 15 2005, 03:26 PM
Bigfoot was my choice. Then it would be sea monsters. Nessie, loch ness is to small, has been searched countless times and it doesn't have enough food supply. How can it exist.
draconic chronicler
Oct 16 2005, 12:38 AM
It could exist if it were a dragon and leaves the loch when there are too many searchers bothering it. This would explain all of the sightings despite no sonor detections. Below the often-view head, obscured by the water, could be a pair of folded wings!
The Skeptic Eric Raven
Oct 16 2005, 08:53 PM
QUOTE(draconic chronicler @ Oct 15 2005, 08:04 AM) [snapback]888802[/snapback]
Dragons, of course, more people believe in them alone, than every other cryptid put together, and not only now, but for 5,000 years of recorded history, and untold thousands of more years as effigies and petroglyphs prove. They are part of virtually every human faith as well so we are talking about billions of people, just today, and virtually everyone in the world believed in them prior to 300 years ago.
Thunderbirds, sea serpents, lake monsters, etc virtually always stem from original dragon legends as well.
A common link in virtually all of these stories it that this cryptid is as intelligent or more so than humans themselves, and possess inexplicable, supernatural abilitilies, which, (if there is any truth to 5000 years of recorded sightings), might explain why they can remain so elusive.
Just because it is a part of a culture does not mean the actual people believe that they are living beings. I never met anyone in my whole life that would consider the dragon a real creature.
draconic chronicler
Oct 16 2005, 08:59 PM
How about most of the population of Asia, and most people who believe in the Bible, since dragons are mentioned there. Loads of "new age'/pagan types as well. I think 2 billion would be a very conservative estimate.
The Skeptic Eric Raven
Oct 16 2005, 09:02 PM
Primitive cultures will believe in anything. It would be fun to see how many people in the US and Europe believe in your dragon nonsense.
DemonWatcher
Oct 16 2005, 10:13 PM
QUOTE(ericraven2003 @ Oct 16 2005, 04:02 PM) [snapback]890242[/snapback]
Primitive cultures will believe in anything. It would be fun to see how many people in the US and Europe believe in your dragon nonsense.
all cultures can be considered "primitive" even ours, besides there are people who still believe dragons are either real or were real. to say "primitive" cultures will believe anything, tell that to the aborigines or the american indians, what you said is the most victorian statement made to date. get real and wake up to reality, research before you speak like that first.
The Skeptic Eric Raven
Oct 16 2005, 10:16 PM
QUOTE(DemonWatcher @ Oct 16 2005, 05:13 PM) [snapback]890321[/snapback]
all cultures can be considered "primitive" even ours, besides there are people who still believe dragons are either real or were real. to say "primitive" cultures will believe anything, tell that to the aborigines or the american indians, what you said is the most victorian statement made to date. get real and wake up to reality, research before you speak like that first.
You are the one believing in fantastical creatures with no proof. Its a bird, its a plane, no its super dragon.
DemonWatcher
Oct 16 2005, 10:18 PM
QUOTE(ericraven2003 @ Oct 16 2005, 05:16 PM) [snapback]890325[/snapback]
You are the one believing in fantastical creatures with no proof. Its a bird, its a plane, no its super dragon.

please don't be a smart-@$$, do you believe in bigfoot, if so you are believing in a creature that many say doesn't exist, so right back at ya.
The Skeptic Eric Raven
Oct 16 2005, 10:24 PM
QUOTE(DemonWatcher @ Oct 16 2005, 05:18 PM) [snapback]890328[/snapback]
please don't be a smart-@$$, do you believe in bigfoot, if so you are believing in a creature that many say doesn't exist, so right back at ya.
Once again from the other post. No, I do not believe in bigfoot. No proof. Sorry Charlie. No dragons for you.
DemonWatcher
Oct 16 2005, 10:26 PM
QUOTE(ericraven2003 @ Oct 16 2005, 05:24 PM) [snapback]890334[/snapback]
Once again from the other post. No, I do not believe in bigfoot. No proof. Sorry Charlie. No dragons for you.

believe what you will, i will believe what i do.
The Skeptic Eric Raven
Oct 16 2005, 10:28 PM
QUOTE(DemonWatcher @ Oct 16 2005, 05:26 PM) [snapback]890339[/snapback]
believe what you will, i will believe what i do.
Good for you. The force is strong in this one.
DemonWatcher
Oct 16 2005, 10:29 PM
QUOTE(ericraven2003 @ Oct 16 2005, 05:28 PM) [snapback]890340[/snapback]
Good for you. The force is strong in this one.

are we settled then?
draconic chronicler
Oct 17 2005, 01:55 AM
I think he is just mad DW, that my resarch has revealed that the Biblical "Satan" is a Seraphim dragon, and not the stereotypical horned human "devil" with pitchfork that he portrays as his avatar. He's obviously suffering from a traumatic identity crisis.
DemonWatcher
Oct 17 2005, 09:41 PM
QUOTE(draconic chronicler @ Oct 16 2005, 08:55 PM) [snapback]890541[/snapback]
I think he is just mad DW, that my resarch has revealed that the Biblical "Satan" is a Seraphim dragon, and not the stereotypical horned human "devil" with pitchfork that he portrays as his avatar. He's obviously suffering from a traumatic identity crisis.
lmao, maybe, but his "primitive" statement was so victorian in origin and thought, thanks DC, smart you are. I knew the dif between Satan and Lucifer when i was a mere kid, glad i am no christian
Althalus
Oct 17 2005, 09:48 PM
I chose bigfoot as they aremore prevalent that ony other cryptid, wih the possible exception of lake monsters.
It is quite possible hat they do exist and are in fact the altered descendants of neandethal man.
angrycrustacean
Oct 17 2005, 10:00 PM
I really thought Nessie would win this one. Guess I was wrong, eh?
Original
Oct 17 2005, 11:07 PM
I picked Bigfoot, because I would imagine that by now we would of found a Lake Monster. The way I see it is that Bigfoot has a much larger hiding place then Nessie.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.