Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Titanic Wreckage Under Threat
Unexplained Mysteries Discussion Forums > News, Media & World Events > Main Front Page News
UM-Bot
user posted imageThe reputation of the Titanic was destroyed long ago, not least on that very night in the spring of 1912 when the supposedly "unsinkable" luxury liner hit an iceberg and slipped beneath the waters of the North Atlantic in less than three hours. Since then, the memory of the Titanic and the 1,500 crew and passengers who died have been assailed by films, books and Hollywood blockbusters, each bearing a varying degree of accuracy in what happened. But now the substance of the vessel itself - on the ocean floor, two miles down - is threatened in an unprecedented manner. Ironically, the problem is partly caused by those people trying to preserve the Titanic and gauge its destruction. Experts who have been visiting the wreck of the liner over the past decade have reported that its decay is accelerating year by year, largely as a result of scientists and wealthy tourists who visit the site by mini-submarines.

In the past 10 years, the ship's crow's nest where a lookout warned in vain, "Iceberg right ahead!" has vanished and the foremast has crumbled. The captain's cabin, where he was resting when the ship struck the iceberg at 11.40pm on the night of 12 April, has all but disappeared. "I was shocked," Alfred McLaren, an ocean scientist and retired submariner who dived on the wreck in 1999 and revisited it last month, told The New York Times. "It's much more heavily deteriorated. I expected her to be in about the same shape as 1999. But, God almighty, there's more [rust] everywhere."

user posted image View: Full Article | Source: The Independent
snuffypuffer
Perhaps it's time to close the site off for awhile.
Starlyte
QUOTE
Mr Kamuda says they should all leave well alone. In addition to the 1,500 people who drowned when the ship sank, at least three Titanic survivors have had their ashes scattered there. "It's a grave site," he said. "I think they would be better to leave it alone, put a [web] camera down there and then if anyone wants to look at it they can just go to their local library and have a look."


Yes, I think it is time to leave the ship alone. I also think the web camera is a great idea. original.gif
Benjo Koolzooie
I think it is so hard to imagine the Titanic under the waves, even now, as I type this.

I think it is sad, also, that the Titanic is starting to crumble and break away. sad.gif

All that metal deep under the water, it would be a really, whats the word....,maybe a "haunting" thing to see. I think they should leave the Titanic in peace now.
Inspekta_X
Cant stop decay, it cant be moved or it would just fall into millions of peices, i think they should just leave it alone, i mean get over it, it happened like over 90 years ago, sure it was tragic but time heals all wounds. The movie has been forgotten and that was only a few years ago, I think everyone should move onto looking at more exiting things underwater, volcanos, great barrier reef ect. If all the money that has been spent on the titanic was spent on the Great Barrier reef it would almost be saved, its sad to see such a natural wonder as the reef decay and die, instead of a peice of man made ignorance...
Kismit
It's not decaying . It's moving on to it's next incarnation . Ship wrecks tend to gather sea life and become ocean reefs . I don't know about you but I'm over the loss my self ... huh.gif
connecian
I think that they have done enought research and gathered enough artifacts. Leave the Titanic alone. There are enough pictures and web sights if anyone wants to see information .. let them look it up.
Really, people getting married on the deck, how creepy. Just another factor of when money comes into play.
snuffypuffer
Yeah, what's next, setting up a McDonald's down there?
forst
On the one hand, I agree that having so many people visit the site really doesn't make sense, research is one thing, and putting ashes of survivors at least makes sense, but going down just to see it or to get married! that not necessary.

On the other hand, the wreck is going to decay totally eventually, there's little to no chance it could ever be moved and saved. So while it may happen sooner, it's going to happen eventually. Not something to get horribly worked up over.
Aslan
QUOTE
I expected her to be in about the same shape as 1999. But, God almighty, there's more [rust] everywhere."


Serious question. Can anybody explain to me why the amount of visitors to a shipwreck at the bottom of the North Atlantic hastens the rusting of the shipwreck ?

Surely you'd expect the odd patch of rust, just here and there, in a 91 year old metal boat at the bottom of the sea.
connecian
QUOTE (Aslan @ Aug 13 2003, 09:22 PM)
Serious question. Can anybody explain to me why the amount of visitors to a shipwreck at the bottom of the North Atlantic hastens the rusting of the shipwreck ?

Surely you'd expect the odd patch of rust, just here and there, in a 91 year old metal boat at the bottom of the sea.

aslan, you are right that rust should be expected here and there. From reading on this, because of the increased activity around the Titanic, the water has been churned up around it more than around other ship wrecks, therefore bringing more oxygen down from the surface , causing the increase in the decay.

If it had been just explored and archived a bit and then left alone, it would be slower process of decay since it is down further than some ships and the oxgen levels are lower in the depth of the ocean where it is at.

Hope this helps some
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.