Full Version: Giant Anaconda...Sucuriju Gigante
these two Anacondas look very big to me, especially the black and white photo... it's hard to tell in photos, but its tail end looks very far away; that looks way over 30ft to me.
QUOTE(Mal X @ Oct 25 2005, 10:40 PM) [snapback]902689[/snapback]
these two Anacondas look very big to me, especially the black and white photo... it's hard to tell in photos, but its tail end looks very far away; that looks way over 30ft to me.
its hard to tell with the black and white photo as theres nothing in the foreground or background to give the snake any scale, so it could be any size
hi Mal X 
welcome to um 
more like 20 footer, cant say from photos
welcome to um more like 20 footer, cant say from photos
hate to spoil the fun, but u can't tell the length in the black and white, but i guess the camera was low to the ground to amke the snake appear big.
The second photo is a picture of 3 guys holding a sewage hose. It DOES look like a snake, though.
The second photo is a picture of 3 guys holding a sewage hose. It DOES look like a snake, though.
1st one is a fake picture, the second is a pipe
QUOTE(The Chupacabra King @ Oct 25 2005, 03:23 PM) [snapback]902764[/snapback]
The second photo is a picture of 3 guys holding a sewage hose. It DOES look like a snake, though.
Hey, Hey Chuppi K,
How can you tell it's a sewage hose? What about the faintly visible striations running perpendicular to the snakes length? And the dorsal curvatures? Sorry, but I do believe it is an anaconda of fairly usual size. Anacondas don't usually break length records...They are heavily built snakes that usually take the cake for their girth and weight. It very well could BE an anaconda, a very well fed one, at that!
SF78
Sewage pipe?? 
Nah! that LOOKS like a real one, not one of the biggest Anaconda pics that I've seen though. The first pic is clearly a fake one.
Nah! that LOOKS like a real one, not one of the biggest Anaconda pics that I've seen though. The first pic is clearly a fake one.
I find it curious that people insist the first picture is "fake" when there is nothing in the photo to suggest the size of the animal. In a "fake" photo, wouldn't the forger include something like another animal or human to make the snake look extraordiarilyy large? Otherwise, what is the point? The photo looks a little odd, probably because it may be a very old photo.
the first picture is BIGFOOT and the 2nd one is the Loch Ness Monster.
QUOTE(xstortionist @ Oct 26 2005, 01:26 PM) [snapback]903517[/snapback]
the first picture is BIGFOOT and the 2nd one is the Loch Ness Monster.
lol
great findings xstortionist
Looks like a couple of bog-standard anacondas to me.
erm..er why is the first one fake?, its a photo of a anaconda, its just probably not very big, still an actual anaconda though, not fake
the second one is definitely an anaconda... download it and play around with the contrast and you'll see its skin pattern.... that tail end is pointed, the last 7ft or so is also very thick for a 20 footer..it's almost a third too thick..but i cant see if it's attached to the tractor though
the black and white one could be a fake...i.e they've moved the tail end comming out of the water further away from you, if not, that is one huge snake..because the end of its tail is about 35ft away and at least 8ft of it is in the water.
the problem with this photo is, if the snake was that massive (46ft long); its head end would be much larger, the head looks too small compared to the grass...........most odd
uuum. is that head as wide as ours?..... if so it's a 46 footer... very hard to tell
the black and white one could be a fake...i.e they've moved the tail end comming out of the water further away from you, if not, that is one huge snake..because the end of its tail is about 35ft away and at least 8ft of it is in the water.
the problem with this photo is, if the snake was that massive (46ft long); its head end would be much larger, the head looks too small compared to the grass...........most odd
uuum. is that head as wide as ours?..... if so it's a 46 footer... very hard to tell
The second photo is definitely a snake! Whether it’s a bigger than 20ft, I couldn’t tell you? You can tell it’s not a pipe because of the way it bends and because of the coloration.
QUOTE(Mal X @ Oct 26 2005, 04:42 PM) [snapback]903796[/snapback]
the second one is definitely an anaconda... download it and play around with the contrast and you'll see its skin pattern.... that tail end is pointed, the last 7ft or so is also very thick for a 20 footer..it's almost a third too thick..but i cant see if it's attached to the tractor though
the black and white one could be a fake...i.e they've moved the tail end comming out of the water further away from you, if not, that is one huge snake..because the end of its tail is about 35ft away and at least 8ft of it is in the water.
the problem with this photo is, if the snake was that massive (46ft long); its head end would be much larger, the head looks too small compared to the grass...........most odd
uuum. is that head as wide as ours?..... if so it's a 46 footer... very hard to tell
40 footers..anaconda grow upto 30(9 meters) now a real 40 footer would have created news around the world.
facts at http://www.sandiegozoo.org/animalbytes/t-boa.html
ITS JUS A GIANT SNAKE
Hmmm... Anybody ever hear of the Manaus anaconda?TeraLink Was Here!
no, please tell more
love giant snakes
dude the first pic isnt a picture its a piece of art work not a photograph and the other one idk what it is
QUOTE(Mal X @ Oct 25 2005, 05:40 PM) [snapback]902689[/snapback]
these two Anacondas look very big to me, especially the black and white photo... it's hard to tell in photos, but its tail end looks very far away; that looks way over 30ft to me.
Hey All,
I don't think the first picture of the ananconda is fake. It's suggested size though is definitely in question. Take a look at the grass that the snake is on... It's the biggest blades of grass i've ever seen in my life... or the camera man played some pretty good visual tricks.
dude it's fake, in fact they both look fake, you can't see the head in the second, and there is no background to see how big the snake was.
Very bad pictures u have there. Dont say too much
QUOTE(Mal X @ Oct 25 2005, 04:40 PM) [snapback]902689[/snapback]
these two Anacondas look very big to me, especially the black and white photo... it's hard to tell in photos, but its tail end looks very far away; that looks way over 30ft to me.
The first phot is a very old phot of a sanke, but there is no way to accurately judge its size because of the lack of anything to compare it too. the second is definitely a large snake of some kind. Sewer hose doesn't bend that way and you can barely make out the markings of the snake.
Off my viewing photo 1 looks like a hand drawn picture and the second is fake as well.
But i see were backonto the topic of giant snakes again
But i see were backonto the topic of giant snakes again
The pics might not be fake, but the snakes are definitely not GIANT. Looks to me like a 20 foot snake.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.