QUOTE(RagePatriot @ Oct 31 2005, 11:23 AM) [snapback]910633[/snapback]
Seems like a waste to spend money developing it as a weapon. If you wanna screw over a country, we have nuclear torpedos that are meant to me shot at the seabed in a major harbor and forever change the landscape so ships can't go there anymore. Also, I'm sure that would have the desired consequences of the weather manipulation too. I would assume a nuclear explosion under water would heat the water, making a hurricane more likely. Might even make a tsunami, and plus, the water won't be very safe to drink either.
I disagree, I mean the potential for this being a weapon is phenomenal. I mean you could send a hurricane or create a hurricane on a country & they'd never even know. They could just think it was an act of nature. It not only has the potential to kill but it certainly has potential to cause economic chaos. The recent hurricane in the US is costing not only a few billion to clean up but a few more billion to help ensure the problem won't happen again.